Skip to main content

Development and optimization of a receive-only surface array with purely geometrical decoupling for rat brain MRI at 2 T



Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) experiments on small animals, as well as in humans, require specific radiofrequency (RF) coil designs in order to maximize field homogeneity during excitation and signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) during reception. Therefore, the use of dedicated transmit-only and receive-only coil geometries has been preferred as standard technology configuration. Among the receive coil geometries, the surface coil has been widely used to increase the SNR in localized regions of interest. With the advent of MRI-phased arrays, the high sensitivity of surface coils can be achieved in extended regions, further allowing parallel imaging acquisition methodologies to accelerate acquisition time.


This work describes the development and characterization of a two-channel receive-only RF coil set specifically designed for MRI acquisition of rat brain in a 2 T system for neuroscience studies.


We have developed and compared the performance of one common surface coil with a two-channel phased array with purely geometric decoupling between coil elements (i.e., without using low input impedance preamplifiers), both actively detuned during reception and having exactly the same dimensions.


The results have shown that the single-channel surface coil achieved up to 5 times higher SNR at 5 mm depth compared to a volume coil commonly used for rat brain MRI in our laboratory, while the two-channel array achieved 4 times higher SNR at the same depth, with the additional advantage of producing an extended area with higher sensitivity.


In vivo brain images of anesthetized rats confirmed the SNR gain for both receive-only single-channel surface coil and two-channel array in comparison with a volume coil. We have verified that only using the partial overlapping technique does not provide sufficient isolation to eliminate mutual coupling interaction between elements, since residual coupling can still affect the coil performance.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6


  1. Ackerman JJH, Grove TH, Wong GG, Gadian DG, and Radda GK, Mapping of metabolites in whole animals by 31P NMR using surface coils. Nature 1980, doi:

  2. Giovannetti G, Sensitivity estimation in circular and square loops, Concepts Magn Reson Part A Bridg Educ Res, 2018, doi:

  3. Griswold MA, Characterization of multichannel coil arrays on the benchtop, in Encyclopedia of magnetic resonance, 2012.

  4. Griswold MA et al., Generalized autocalibrating partially parallel acquisitions (GRAPPA). Magn Reson Med, 2002, doi:

  5. Haase A et al., NMR probeheads for in vivo applications, Concepts Magn. Reson., 2000, doi:<361::AID-CMR1>3.0.CO;2-L.

  6. Jin J, Electromagnetic analysis and design in magnetic resonance imaging. 2018.

  7. Keil B and Wald LL, Massively parallel MRI detector arrays. J Magn Reson, 2013, doi:

  8. Kellman P and McVeigh ER, Image reconstruction in SNR units: a general method for SNR measurement, Magn Reson Med., 2005, doi:

  9. Mispelter J, Lupu M, and Briguet A, NMR probeheads for biophysical and biomedical experiments. 2015.

  10. Papoti D, Vidoto ELG, Martins MJ, and Tannús A, Effects of crossing saddle coil conductors: electric length × mutual inductance. Concepts Magn Reson Part B Magn Reson Eng, 2010, doi:

  11. Peterson DM, Beck BL, Duensing GR, and Fitzsimmons JR, Common mode signal rejection methods for MRI: reduction of cable shield currents for high static magnetic field systems, Concepts Magn Reson Part B Magn Reson Eng, 2003, doi:

  12. Pruessmann KP, Weiger M, Scheidegger MB, and Boesiger P, SENSE: sensitivity encoding for fast MRI. Magn Reson Med 1999<952::AID-MRM16>3.0.CO;2-S.

  13. Reykowski A, Wright SM, and Porter JR, Design of matching networks for low noise preamplifiers. Magn Reson Med, 1995, doi:

  14. Roemer PB, Edelstein WA, Hayes CE, Souza SP, and Mueller OM, The NMR phased array. Magn Reson Med, 1990, doi:

  15. Snyder JN and Grover FC, Inductance calculations working formulas and tables. Math. Comput, 1964, doi:

  16. Wang J, Reykowski A, and Dickas J, Calculation of the signal-to-noise ratio for simple surface coils and arrays of coils, IEEE Trans Biomed Eng, 1995, doi:

  17. Wright SM, Magin RL, and Kelton JR, Arrays of mutually coupled receiver coils: theory and application. Magn Reson Med, 1991, doi:

Download references


The authors are grateful to Jaqueline Moraes Malheiros for her excellent skills and help with animal handling. The authors thank the Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel (CAPES) for support on the scholarship for D. Papoti.

Author information



Corresponding author

Correspondence to Daniel Papoti.

Ethics declarations

This research was supported by Sao Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP) grant # 2005/56663-1. All applicable national and institutional guidelines set by the Animal Care and Use of the University of Sao Paulo were followed.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Papoti, D., Vidoto, E.L.G., Matins, M.J. et al. Development and optimization of a receive-only surface array with purely geometrical decoupling for rat brain MRI at 2 T. Res. Biomed. Eng. 36, 341–348 (2020).

Download citation


  • Small animal MRI
  • RF coils
  • Surface coils
  • MRI-phased arrays