Advertisement

Vegetos

, Volume 32, Issue 1, pp 58–63 | Cite as

Studies on phytochemical analysis, antioxidant and antibacterial activity of Ficus racemosa L. leaf and fruit extracts against wound pathogens

  • Balasubramanian BagyalakshmiEmail author
  • Periyasamy Nivedhitha
  • Angusamy Balamurugan
Research Articles
  • 18 Downloads

Abstract

The present study deals with antibacterial activity of leaf and fruit parts of Ficus racemosa plant. Phytochemical analysis revealed alkaloids, flavonoids, phenols that contributed for higher antioxidant and antibacterial activity. The fruit exhibited significant inhibition when compared with leaf. Bacteria from wounds of diabetic patients were isolated and identified as Staphylococcus spp., Pseudomonas spp., Klebsiella spp. and Escherichia coli. MIC for all the three (Ethanol, toluene and ethyl acetate) extracts was performed against wound isolates. Among all wound bacteria tested Staphylococcus spp. showed lowest MIC (0.07 mg/ml) with toluene extract of fruit. The MIC for E. coli and Pseudomonas spp. was found to be 0.15 mg/ml and for Klebsiella spp. (0.31 mg/ml).The MIC 0.625 mg/ml was obtained for toluene extracts of leaf against Staphylococcus spp. and Klebsiella spp. Antibacterial study revealed that the extracts of leaf and fruit exhibited good inhibition activity against wound isolates. Study of well diffusion assay of Ficus racemosa extract revealed that 75 and 100 µg/ml concentration was found to have significant control over wound pathogens. Highest inhibition was obtained for Staphylococcus spp. and Klebsiella spp. with fruit extract with a zone of inhibition of 26 ± 0.10 and 24 ± 0.13 mm, respectively at 100 µg/ml. Toluene extract of fruit had higher antioxidant activity with IC50 of 0.75 µg/ml followed by ethanol extract 1.42 µg/ml and correlated with antibacterial activity. Thus, this study proved that leaf and fruit extract have significant antibacterial activity and hence it can be used for a therapeutic purpose.

Keywords

Ficus racemosa Wound pathogen MIC Antibacterial activity 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The researchers are thankful to the Head of the Department, Principal and Management of K.S.R. College of Educational Trust, Tiruchengode, Tamil Nadu, India. We also acknowledge DST-FIST Grant no. 368 for infrastructural support.

References

  1. Beckert S, Witte M, Wicke C, Königsrainer A, Coerper S (2006) A new wound-based severity score for diabetic foot ulcers: a prospective analysis of 1,000 patients. Diabetes Care 29:988–992CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Chowdhary N, Kaur M, Amarjeet S, Kumar B (2014) Wound healing activity of aqueous extracts of Ficus religiosa and Ficus benghalensis leaves in rats. Indian J Res Pharm Biotechnol 12:1071–1081Google Scholar
  3. Cui JL, Guo TT, Ren ZX, Zhang NS, Wang ML (2015) Diversity and antioxidant activity of culturable endophytic fungi from alpine plants of Rhodiola crenulata, R. sangusta, and R. sachalinensis. PLos One J 4(2):423–465Google Scholar
  4. Dimple SM, Bhaven C, Kataria B, Sunita BC (2012) Wound healing and anti-inflammatory activity of extract of Ficus racemosa Linn. bark in albino rats. Int J Basic Clin Pharmacol 1(2):111–115Google Scholar
  5. Dorman HJ, Bachmayer O, Kosar M, Hiltunen R (2004) Antioxidant properties of aqueous extracts from selected Lamiaceae species grown in Turkey. J Agric Food Chem 52:762–770CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Farrag HA, Rehim AH, Hazaa MM, Sayed AS (2016) Prevalence of pathogenic bacterialisolates infecting wounds and their antibiotic sensitivity. J Infect Dis Ther 4:5Google Scholar
  7. Galal A, Askari L (2013) In vitro antimicrobial activity of aqueous and ethanolic extracts of leaves of Ficus carica collected from five different regions of Morocco. J Mater Environ Sci 4:33–38Google Scholar
  8. Hisanori A, Kazuyasu F, Osamu Y, Takashi O, Keiji I (2001) Antibacterial action of several tannins against Staphylococcus aureus. J Antimicrob Chemother 48:487–491CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Holt JG, Krieg NR, Sneath PHA, Staley JT, Williams ST (1994) Bergey's manual of determinative bacteriology, 9th edn. William and Wikin Company, BaltimoreGoogle Scholar
  10. Hossain S, Sayeed A, Uddin N (2014) In-vitro antimicrobial activity of methanolic extract of Ficus racemosa Linn. fruits. J Sci Innov Res 3(4):446–449Google Scholar
  11. Kaur S, Mondal P (2014) Study of total phenolic and flavonoid content, antioxidant activity and antimicrobial properties of medicinal plants. J Microbiol Ex 1(1):5Google Scholar
  12. Khaleel AI, Sijam K, Rashid TS, Ahmad KB (2016) Phytochemical determination and antibacterial activity of Punica granatum peel extracts against plant pathogenic bacteria. Am J Plant Sci 7:159–166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kirankumar S, Umesh MK, Ramesh L (2013) Phytochemical screening and antimicrobial activities of Ficus glomerata Roxb fruit extracts. Int J Pharm Pharmaceut Sci 5:372–375Google Scholar
  14. Kumari I (2018) A study of the antimicrobial effect of Euphorbia hirta L. against Escherichia coli. Vegetos 31(3):123–125Google Scholar
  15. Mehta K, Patel BN, Jain BK (2013) Phytochemical analysis of leaf extract of Phyllanthus fraternus. Res J Recent Sci 2:12–15Google Scholar
  16. Nair R, Chanda SV (2007) Antibacterial activities of some medicinal plants of the western region of India. Turk J Biol 31(4):231–236Google Scholar
  17. Pandit R, Phadke A, Jagtap A (2010) Antidiabetic effect of Ficus religiosa extract in streptozotocin-induced diabetic rats. J Ethnopharmacol 128(2):462–466CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Pinzur MS, Slovenkai MP (2005) Guidelines for diabetic foot care: recommendations endorsed by the Diabetes Committee of the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle. Soc Foot Ankle Int 26:113–119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Shaik G, Sujatha N, Mehar SK (2014) Medicinal plants as source of antibacterial agents to counter Klebsiella pneumonia. J Appl Pharm Sci 4(1):135Google Scholar
  20. Soni N, Mehta S, Satpathy G, Gupta RK (2014) Estimation of nutritional, phytochemical, antioxidant and antibacterial activity of dried fig (Ficus carica). J Pharma Phyto 6(2):158–165Google Scholar
  21. Tariq AL, Reyaz AL (2012) Phytochemical analysis of Camellia sinensis leaves. Int J Drug Dev Res 4:311–316Google Scholar
  22. Tepe B, Daferera D, Sökmen M, Polissiou M, Sökmen A (2004) In vitro antimicrobial and antioxidant activities of the essential oils and various extracts of Thymus eigii M. Zohary et P. H. Davis. J Agric Food Chem 52:1132–1137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Vazir J, Inamdar P, Desai S, Patel D, Meshram D (2014) Phytochemical screening and in vitro antibacterial activity of Camellia sinensus. Indo Am J Pharm Res 4:1158–1162Google Scholar
  24. Vedavathy S, Mrudula V, Sudhakar A (1997) A tribal medicine in Chittoor district. Andhra Pradesh, India, Vedams E Books (P) Ltd., New DelhiGoogle Scholar
  25. Verma P (2012) Antibiotic sensitivity treatment for Gram positive bacteria isolated from pus sample. Bull Environ Pharmacol Life Sci 1:3–6Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Society for Plant Research 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Balasubramanian Bagyalakshmi
    • 1
    Email author
  • Periyasamy Nivedhitha
    • 1
  • Angusamy Balamurugan
    • 2
  1. 1.PG & Research Department of BiotechnologyK. S. Rangasamy College of TechnologyTiruchengodeIndia
  2. 2.R&DTStanes Company and Ltd.CoimbatoreIndia

Personalised recommendations