Abstract
Turkey’s militarized involvement rendered it a critical actor for the diplomacy involving the Libyan crisis. The quick dividends from Ankara’s application of hard-power assets had a dramatic impact on the course of the conflict in 2020, which surprised many observers. Despite the resolute rhetoric about further military action, an emboldened Turkey has refrained from further escalation, and appears to have settled for a de facto ceasefire regime since August 2020. This paper seeks to analyze the drivers of Turkey’s initial involvement in Libya, in a way that departs from its traditional foreign policy, a key component of which was non-interference in regional disputes. Moreover, it analyzes the reasons behind Turkey’s de-escalation and declining military involvement in the Libya crisis. This paper makes two interrelated arguments: first, Turkey’s Libya policy showcases the recent coercive turn in its Middle East policy, which has been an outcome of overlapping developments at the leadership, domestic, and regional levels. Second, the key concept for understanding different phases of Turkey’s Libya policy is escalation dominance. Changing patterns of escalation dominance shape the boundaries of Turkey’s military involvement in militarized regional crises in general and the Libyan crisis in particular.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Al Jazeera. 2020. UN urges Libyan rivals to prioritise “national interest” in talks. https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2020/10/13/un-urges-libya-to-prioritise-national-interest-in-november-talks. Accessed 7 Nov 2020.
Aras, Bulent. 2019. The crisis and change in Turkish foreign policy after July 15. Alternatives 44 (1): 6–18.
Coşkun, Orhan, and Dominic Evans. 2020. Turkey says any Libya ceasefire deal requires Haftar withdrawal. Reuters. https://uk.reuters.com/article/us-libya-security-turkey/turkey-says-any-libya-ceasefire-deal-requires-haftar-withdrawal-idUSKCN24N29D. Accessed 7 Nov 2020.
Davis Biddle, Tami. 2020. Coercion theory: a basic introduction for practitioners. Texas National Security Review 3 (2): 94–109.
International Crisis Group. 2020. Turkey wades into Libya’s troubled waters. International Crisis Group Report No. 257. https://www.crisisgroup.org/europe-central-asia/western-europemediterranean/turkey/257-turkey-wades-libyas-troubled-waters. Accessed 7 Nov 2020.
Kamouni-Janssen, Floor El, and Iba Abdo. 2015. Addressing Libya’s multiple crises: when violent politics, extremism and crime meet. Clingendael Institute, CRU Policy Brief. https://www.clingendael.org/sites/default/files/pdfs/Policy_Brief_Addressing_Libyas_multiple%20crises_Clingendael)_CRU_July2015.pdf. Accessed 7 Nov 2020.
Kardaş, Şaban. 2013. Turkey on NATO’s role in the MENA: perspectives from a “central country”. ADAM Academy: Journal of Social Sciences 3 (1): 65–74.
Kardaş, Şaban. 2020. Understanding Turkey’s coercive diplomacy. GMF On Turkey. https://www.gmfus.org/publications/understanding-turkeys-coercive-diplomacy. Accessed 7 Nov 2020.
Kekilli, Emrah, and Bilgehan Öztürk. 2020. Turkey’s position in the Libyan crisis. Insight Turkey 22 (2): 53–62.
Tocci, Nathalie. 2020. Europe needs boots on the ground in Libya. Politico. https://www.politico.eu/article/europe-libya-strategy-boots-on-the-ground/. Accessed 7 Nov 2020.
US Department of State. 2020. Special briefing via telephone with Richard Norland, U.S. Ambassador to Libya. https://www.state.gov/special-briefing-via-telephone-with-richard-norland-u-s-ambassador-to-libya/. Accessed 7 Nov 2020.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The author declares that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this article.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kardaş, Ş. Turkey’s Libya policy: militarization of regional policies and escalation dominance. China Int Strategy Rev. 2, 325–336 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42533-020-00060-w
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42533-020-00060-w