Skip to main content
Log in

A bibliometric assessment of the science and practice of blue–green space (BGS): hot spots, lacunae, and opportunities

  • Review Article
  • Published:
Socio-Ecological Practice Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Blue–green space (BGS) is an important component of the Earth's environment, and BGS research and practice have become an increasingly important part of climate change adaptation and mitigation. In this review article, we conducted a bibliometric assessment on the science and practice of BGS worldwide. Our results showed that (1) the number of BGS studies has been growing rapidly since 2017, and the intensity of international collaboration has increased markedly; (2) BGS research hot spots were ignited by and focused on environment problems and evolved over time. Examples include, but are not limited to, boosting the composite functions and synergistic effects of BGS in climate change adaptation and mitigation (particularly stormwater management and thermal environment regulation), enhancing ecosystem services (biodiversity and carbon), and promoting human health (physical and mental); (3) the collaborative planning and system construction of BGS will be a major development trend in the future; and (4) research on synergistic mechanisms, collaborative planning, and BGS spatial pattern optimization has largely been theoretical, and there is a shortage of empirical quantitative research and there are few real-world examples of BGS in socio-ecological practice. These set the stage for further advancement of BGS science and practice.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

We sincerely thank Editors and the anonymous reviewers for comments which improved our manuscript.

Funding

This study was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51808198), and the Science and Technology Department of Henan Province (the special project of Key Research and Promotion of Henan Province 222400410323 and the High-level Foreign Expert Import Program of Henan Province HNGD2022042).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

BM was the project and overall research manager and wrote the manuscript; RZ was the data processing analyst and wrote the manuscript; YL was the language editor and wrote the manuscript; EX and YZ was the co-investigator and wrote the manuscript; and HW and GT were the overall research manager and wrote the manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Hong Wei or Guohang Tian.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interests.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mu, B., Zhao, R., Liu, Y. et al. A bibliometric assessment of the science and practice of blue–green space (BGS): hot spots, lacunae, and opportunities. Socio Ecol Pract Res 6, 5–20 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42532-024-00178-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42532-024-00178-w

Keywords

Navigation