Abstract
The science–practice divide is a stubborn problem in environmental management. Existing research tells us that a range of factors affects the uptake of new science into practice and policy, including socio-organizational, individual, and evaluative variables. Here, we seek to understand the variables influencing the uptake of biotelemetry-derived information in the Laurentian Great Lakes fishery management system. To do so, we used semi-structured telephone interviews (n = 50) to capture the views of managers, researchers, and assessment biologists affiliated with the Great Lakes Fishery Commission (GLFC). Our results suggest that biotelemetry offers epistemological value (generating new and important information), but faces barriers tied to perceptions concerning practicalities of the technology, such as its cost. The practical limitations facing the use of biotelemetry evidence were more specific and potentially more easily resolved than the entrenched individual and socio-organizational challenges of using types of knowledge other than biotelemetry. The persistence of the science–practice divide was evident in our findings. Formal entities and boundary organizations such as the GLFC and inter-sectoral networks that promote interactions, meetings, and connections among researchers and practitioners can help overcome this gap. The Great Lakes Acoustic Telemetry Observation System (GLATOS) network can play a boundary role in facilitating biotelemetry science transfer by focusing on overcoming its evaluative limitations (e.g., costs, technological limitations). Further, the GLFC and GLATOS are well positioned to play a greater role in science transfer by facilitating interactions among scientists and practitioners to help reconcile differences in perceptions.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Availability of data and material
Transcribed interviews are not available due to confidentiality and anonymity agreements
References
Axinn WG, Pearce LD (2006) Mixed method data collection strategies. Cambridge University Press
Bertuol-Garica D, Morsello C, El-Hani CN, Pardini R (2018) A conceptual framework for understanding the perspectives on the causes of thee science-practice gap in ecology and conservation. Biol Rev 93:1032–1055
Brooks JL, Chapman JM, Barkley AN, Kessel ST, Hussey NE, Hinch SG, Patterson DA, Hedges KJ, Cooke SJ, Fisk AT, Gruber SH, Nguyen VM (2019) Biotelemetry informing management: case studies exploring successful integration of biotelemetry data into fisheries and habitat management. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 76:1238–1252
Brownscombe JW, Adams AJ, Young N, Griffin LP, Holder P, Hunt J, Acosta A, Morley D, Boucek R, Cooke SJ, Danylchuk AJ (2019a) Bridging the knowledge-action gap: a case of research rapidly impacting recreational fisheries policy. Mar Policy 104:210–215
Brownscombe JW, Lédée EJI, Raby GD, Struthers DP, Gutowsky LFG, Nguyen VM, Young N, Stokesbury MJW, Holbrook CM, Brenden TO, Vandergoot CS, Murchie KJ, Whoriskey K, Mills FJ, Kessel ST, Krueger CC, Cooke SJ (2019b) Conducting and interpreting fish telemetry studies: considerations for researchers and resource managers. Rev Fish Biol Fisheries 29:369–400
Carr A, Wilkinson R (2005) Beyond participation: boundary organizations as a new space for farmers and scientists to interact. Soc Nat Resour 18:255–265
Cooke SJ, Midwood JD, Thiem JD, Klimley P, Lucas MC, Thorstad EB, Eiler J, Holbrook C, Ebner BC (2013) Tracking animals in freshwater with electronic tags: past, present and future. Animal Biotelemetry 1:1–19
Cooke SJ, Martins EG, Struthers DP, Gutowsky LFG, Power M, Doka SE, Dettmers JM, Crook DA, Lucas MC, Holbrook CM, Krueger CC (2016) A moving target—incorporating knowledge of the spatial ecology of fish into the assessment and management of freshwater fish populations. Environ Monit Assess 188:239
Cooke SJ, Nguyen VM, Kessel ST, Hussey NE, Young N, Ford AT (2017) Troubling issues at the frontier of animal tracking for conservation and management. Conserv Biol 31(5):1205–1207
Crossin GT, Heupel MR, Holbrook CM, Hussey NE, Lowerre-Barbieri SK, Nguyen VM, Raby GD, Cooke SJ (2017) Acoustic telemetry and fisheries management. Ecol Appl 27:1031–1049
Fielder DG, Hayden TA, Vandergoot CS, Krueger CC (2020) Large-scale fish movement affects metrics of management importance as indicated by quantitative stock assessment. J Great Lakes Res 46:633–642
Francis JJ, Johnston M, Robertson C, Glidewell L, Entwistle V, Eccles MP, Grimshaw JM (2010) What is an adequate sample size? Operationalising data saturation for theory-based interview studies. Psychol Health 25:1229–1245
Gaden M, Krueger CC (2018) Multi-jurisdictional governance of the shared Great Lakes fishery: can a non-binding agreement work? In: Brooks S, Olive A (eds) Transboundary environmental governance across the world’s longest border. Chapter 4. Michigan State University Press, Lansing, pp 51–75
Gaden M, Krueger CC, Goddard C, Barnhart G (2008) A joint strategic plan for management of great lakes fisheries: a cooperative regime in a multi-jurisdictional setting. Aquat Ecosyst Health Manage 11(1):50–60
Gaden M, Goddard CI, Read J (2012) A history of multi-jurisdictional management of the share Great Lakes fishery: transcending conflict and diffuse political authority. In: Taylor W, Lynch A, Leonard N (eds) Great Lakes fishery management and policy. Michigan University Press, East Lansing, pp 305–337
Guest G, Bunce A, Johnson L (2006) How many interviews are enough? An experiment with data saturation and variability. Field Methods 18:59–82
Hardin G (2009) The tragedy of the commons. J Nat Resour Policy Res 1(3):243–253
Hayden TA, Holbrook CM, Fielder D, Vandergoot CS, Bergstedt RA, Dettmers JM, Krueger CC, Cooke SJ (2014) Acoustic telemetry reveals large-scale migration patterns of Walleye in Lake Huron. PLoS ONE 9(12):e114833.
Holmlund CM, Hammer M (1999) Ecosystem services generated by fish populations. Ecol Econ 29:253–268
Hussey NE, Kessel ST, Aarestrup K, Cooke SJ, Cowley PD, Fisk AT, Harcourt RG, Holland KN, Iverson SJ, Kocik JF, Mills Flemming JE, Whoriskey FG (2015) Aquatic animal telemetry: a panoramic window into the underwater world. Science 348:6240
Krueger CC, Holbrook CM, Binder TR, Vandergoot CS, Hayden TA, Hondorp DW, Nate N, Paige K, Riley SC, Fisk AT, Cooke SJ (2018) Acoustic telemetry observation systems: challenges encountered and overcome in the laurentian great lakes. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 75(10):1755–1763
Lackey RT (1998) Fisheries management: integrating societal preference, decision analysis, and ecological risk assessment. Environ Sci Policy 1:329–335
Landsman SJ, Nguyen VM, Gutowsky LFG, Gobin J, Cook KV, Binder TR, Lower N, McLaughlin RL, Cooke SJ (2011) Fish movement and migration studies in the Laurentian Great Lakes: research trends and knowledge gaps. J Great Lakes Res 37:365–379
Lennox RJ, Aarestrup K, Cooke SJ, Cowley PD, Deng ZD, Fisk AT, Harcourt RG, Heupel M, Hinch SG, Holland KN, Hussey NE, Iverson SJ, Kessel ST, Kocik JF, Lucas MC, Flemming JM, Nguyen VM, Stokesbury MJW, Vagle S, Vanderzwaag DL, Whoriskey FG, Young N (2017) Envisioning the future of aquatic animal tracking: technology, science, and application. Bioscience 67:10
Leonard NJ, Taylor WW, Goddard CI, Frank KA, Krause AE, Schechter MG (2011) Information flow within the social network structure of a joint strategic plan for management of great lakes fisheries. North Am J Fish Manag 31(4):629–655
Lynch AJ, Cooke SJ, Deines AM, Bower SD, Bunnell DB, Cowx IG, Nguyen VM, Nohner J, Phouthavong K, Riley B, Rogers MW, Taylor WW, Woelmer W, Youn S-J, Beard TD (2016) The social, economic, and environmental importance of inland fish and fisheries. Environ Rev 24:2
Maxwell JA (2004) Using qualitative methods for causal explanation. Field Methods 16:243–264
McGowan J, Beger M, Lewison R, Harcourt R, Campbell H, Priest M, Dwyer RG, Lin H-Y, Lentini P, Dudgeon C, McMahon C, Watts M, Possingham HP (2016) Integrating research using animal-borne telemetry with the needs of conservation management. J Appl Ecol 54:423–429
Mulvaney KK, Foley CJ, Höök TO, Mcnie EC, Prokopy LS (2014) Identifying useful climate change information needs of Great Lakes fishery managers. J Great Lakes Res 40(3):590–598
Nguyen VM, Young N, Hinch SG, Cooke SJ (2016) Getting past the blame game : convergence and divergence in perceived threats to salmon resources among anglers and indigenous fishers in Canada’ s lower Fraser River. Ambio 45(5):591–601
Nguyen VM, Young N, Cooke SJ (2017a) A roadmap for knowledge exchange and mobilization research in conservation and natural resource management. Conserv Biol 31:789–798
Nguyen VM, Brooks JL, Young N, Lennox RJ, Haddaway N, Whoriskey FG, Harcourt R, Cooke SJ (2017b) To share or not to share in the emerging era of big data: perspectives from fish telemetry researchers on data sharing. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 74:8
Nguyen VM, Young N, Cooke SJ (2018a) Applying a knowledge–action framework for navigating barriers to incorporating telemetry science into fisheries management and conservation: a qualitative study. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 75:1733–1743
Nguyen VM, Young N, Corriveau M, Hinch SG, Cooke SJ (2018b) What is “usable” knowledge ? Perceived barriers for integrating new knowledge into management of an iconic Canadian fishery. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 76:463–474
Nguyen VM, Young N, Brownscombe JW, Cooke SJ (2019) Collaboration and engagement produce more actionable science: quantitatively analyzing uptake of fish tracking studies. Ecol Appl 29(6):1316–1330
Olsson P, Folke C, Berkes F (2004) Adaptive comanagement for building resilience in social-ecological systems. Environ Manag 34(1):75–90
O’Mahony S, Bechky BA (2008) Boundary organizations: enabling collaboration among unexpected allies. Adm Sci Q 53:422–459
Pfeffer J, Sutton RI (2006) Evidence-based management. Harvard Bus Rev 84:62–74
Pullin AS, Knight TM (2003) Support for decision-making in conservation practice: an evidence-based approach. J Nat Conserv 11:83–90
Rose DC, Sutherland WJ, Simmons BI, Ivory S, Steiner N, Wu W, Dias MP, Nunes MH, Robertson RJ, Durán AP, Di Fonzo MMI, Nyumba TO, Wauchope HS, Norris L (2018) The major barriers to evidence-informed conservation policy and possible solutions. Conserv Lett 11:e12564
Rose DC, Amano T, González-Varo JP, Mukherjee N, Robertson RJ, Simmons BI, Wauchope HS, Sutherland WJ (2019) Calling for a new agenda for conservation science to create evidence-informed policy. Biol Cons 238:08222
Rousseau DM (2006) Is there such a thing as “evidence-based management”? Acad Manag Rev 31:256–269
Sunderland T, Sunderland-Groves J, Shanley P, Campbell B (2009) Bridging the gap: How can information access and exchange between conservation biologists and field practitioners be improved for better conservation outcomes? Biotropica 41:549–554
Sutherland WJ, Pullin AS, Dolman PM, Knight TM (2004) The need for evidence-based conservation. Trends Ecol Evol 19:305–308
Sutton J, Austin Z (2015) Qualitative research: data collection, analysis, and management. Can J Hosp Pharm 68:226
Thomas DR (2006) A general inductive approach for analyzing qualitative evaluation data. Am J Evalu 27(2):237–246
Thorstad EB, Rikardsen AH, Alp A, Økland F (2013) The use of electronic tags in fish research—an overview of fish telemetry methods. Turkish J Fisher Aquatic Sci 13(5):881–896
Vandergoot CS, Faust MD, Francis JT, Einhouse DW, Drouin R, Murray C, Knight RL (2019) Back from the brink: sustainable management of the Lake Erie Walleye fishery. In: Krueger CC, Taylor WW, Youn S (eds) From catastrophe to recovery: stories of fishery management success. American Fisheries Society, Bethesda, pp 431–466
Yang T, Maxwell TA (2011) Information-sharing in public organizations: a literature review of interpersonal, intra-organizational and inter-organizational success factors. Govern Inf Q 28(2):164–175
Young N, Gingras I, Nguyen VM, Cooke SJ, Hinch SG (2013) Mobilizing new science into management practice: the challenge of biotelemetry for fisheries management, a case study of Canada’s Fraser River. J Int Wildlife Law Policy 16(4):331–351
Young N, Corriveau M, Nguyen VM, Cooke SJ, Hinch SG (2016a) How do potential knowledge users evaluate new claims about a contested resource? Problems of power and politics in knowledge exchange and mobilization. J Environ Manag 184:330–338
Young N, Nguyen VM, Corriveau M, Cooke SJ, Hinch SG (2016b) Knowledge users’ perspectives and advice on how to improve knowledge exchange and mobilization in the case of a co-managed fishery. Environ Sci Policy 66:170–178
Young N, Corriveau M, Nguyen VM, Cooke SJ, Hinch SG (2018) Embracing disruptive new science? Biotelemetry meets co-management in Canada’s Fraser River. Fisheries 43(1):51–60
Acknowledgements
We thank the members of the Great Lakes Fishery Commission community for their participation in our study. We thank the GLFC Science Transfer Program for funding this work (Grant ID#2013 BIN 44024) by way of Great Lakes Restoration Initiative appropriations (Grant ID #GL-00#23010). This paper is contribution 81 of the Great Lakes Acoustic Telemetry Observation System (GLATOS).
Funding
This work was funded by the Great Lakes Fishery Commission (Grant ID #2013_BIN_44024) by way of Great Lakes Restoration Initiative appropriations (Grant ID #GL-00E23010).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Data collection was performed by Delle Palme. Material preparation and data analysis were performed by Pentz and Delle Palme with input from Nguyen, Cooke, and Young. The first draft of the manuscript was written by Delle Palme, Nguyen, and Pentz, and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Nguyen, V.M., Delle Palme, C., Pentz, B. et al. Overcoming barriers to transfer of scientific knowledge: integrating biotelemetry into fisheries management in the Laurentian Great Lakes. Socio Ecol Pract Res 3, 17–36 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42532-020-00069-w
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42532-020-00069-w