Abstract
A project-oriented organization is a hybrid form of organization where a functional hierarchy is augmented with structures to manage projects strategically across the organization. Six project-oriented organizations from diverse industries that emphasize innovation in their strategies were selected for this study. We use the three pillars of institutional theory — regulative, normative and cultural-cognitive — and institutional entrepreneurship to analyze interview data from executive and project, program and portfolio management personnel in the project-oriented organizations to investigate how innovation is facilitated through external influences and internal responses. Our findings indicate that processes and new structures provide effective ways for innovation and, while individuals are important, processes are more effective than individuals at enabling innovation. We put forward some lessons for practice that emerge directly from the findings, including suggestions on improving allocation of resources, a need to focus on processes, reconceptualization of “failure”, and dedicated investment in market knowledge, customer knowledge, performance metrics and flexible governance structures.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Find the latest articles, discoveries, and news in related topics.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Aldrich H E (2010). Beam me up, Scott(ie)! Institutional theorists’ struggles with the emergent nature of entrepreneurship. Research in the Sociology of Work, 21: 329–364
Aldrich H E (2011). Heroes, villains, and fools: Institutional entrepreneurship, NOT institutional entrepreneurs. Entrepreneurship Research Journal, 1(2): 20122003
Assink M (2006). Inhibitors of disruptive innovation capability: A conceptual model. European Journal of Innovation Management, 9(2): 215–233
Biesenthal C, Clegg S, Mahalingam A, Sankaran S (2018). Applying institutional theories to managing megaprojects. International Journal of Project Management, 36(1): 43–54
Biygautane M, Neesham C, Al-Yahya K O (2019). Institutional entrepreneurship and infrastructure public-private partnership (PPP): Unpacking the role of social actors in implementing PPP projects. International Journal of Project Management, 37(1): 192–219
Bresnen M (2016). Institutional development, divergence and change in the discipline of project management. International Journal of Project Management, 34(2): 328–338
Bresnen M, Marshall N (2010). Partnering in construction: A critical review of issues, problems and dilemmas. Construction Management and Economics, 18(2): 229–237
Cui A S, Wu F (2016). Utilizing customer knowledge in innovation: Antecedents and impact of customer involvement on new product performance. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 44(4): 516–538
Dacin M T, Goodstein J, Scott W R (2002). Institutional theory and institutional change: Introduction to the special research forum. Academy of Management Journal, 45(1): 43–57
Davies A (2014). Innovation and project management. In: Dodgson M, Gann D M, Phillips N, eds. The Oxford Handbook of Innovation Management. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 625–647
Di Muro P, Lecoeuvre L, Turner R (2021). Ambidextrous strategy and execution in entrepreneurial project-oriented organizations: The case of Pagani supercars. International Journal of Project Management, 39(1): 45–58
DiMaggio P J, Powell W W (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2): 147–160
Donada C, Mothe C, Alegre J (2021). Managing skunkworks to achieve ambidexterity: The Robinson Crusoe effect. European Management Journal, 39(2): 214–225
Dougherty D (2006). Organizing for innovation in the 21st century. In: Clegg S R, Hardy C, Lawrence T, Nord W R, eds. The Sage Handbook of Organization Studies. 2nd ed. London: Sage Publications Ltd., 598–617
Dougherty D, Borrelli L, Munir K, O’Sullivan A (2000). Systems of organizational sensemaking for sustained product innovation. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 17(3–4): 321–355
Eisenhardt K M (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14(4): 532–550
Gann D M, Salter A J (2000). Innovation in project-based, service-enhanced firms: The construction of complex products and systems. Research Policy, 29(7–8): 955–972
Gareis R (1991). Management by projects: The management strategy of the new project-oriented company. International Journal of Project Management, 9(2): 71–76
Garud R, Tuertscher P, Van de Ven A H (2013). Perspectives on innovation processes. Academy of Management Annals, 7(1): 775–819
Hall D M, Scott W R (2019). Early stages in the institutionalization of integrated project delivery. Project Management Journal, 50(2): 128–143
Hardy C, Maguire S (2008). Institutional entrepreneurship. In: Greenwood R, Oliver C, Sahlin K, Suddaby R, eds. The Sage Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism. London: Sage Publications Ltd., 198–217
Henisz W J, Levitt R E, Scott W R (2012). Toward a unified theory of project governance: Economic, sociological and psychological supports for relational contracting. Engineering Project Organization Journal, 2(1–2): 37–55
Hobday M (2000). The project-based organisation: An ideal form for managing complex products and systems? Research Policy, 29(7–8): 871–893
Hu Y, Chan A P, Le Y, Jin R (2015). From construction megaproject management to complex project management: Bibliographic analysis. Journal of Management Engineering, 31(4): 04014052
Huemann M (2014). Managing the project-oriented organization. In: Turner R, ed. Gower Handbook of Project Management. 5th ed. London: Routledge, 493–506
Jackson K, Bazeley P (2019). Qualitative Data Analysis with NVivo. 3rd ed. London: Sage Publications Ltd.
Javernick-Will A N, Scott W R (2010). Who needs to know what? Institutional knowledge and global projects. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 136(5): 546–557
Johnson S B (2013). Technical and institutional factors in the emergence of project management. International Journal of Project Management, 31(5): 670–681
Kostis P C, Kafka K I, Petrakis P E (2018). Cultural change and innovation performance. Journal of Business Research, 88: 306–313
Kotter J (2012). How the most innovative companies capitalize on today’s rapid-fire strategic challenges-and still make their numbers. Harvard Business Review, 90(11): 43–58
Lawrence T B, Shadnam M (2008). Institutional theory. In: Donsbach W, ed. The International Encyclopedia of Communication. 2nd ed. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing, 2289–2293
Liu Y, Houwing E J, Hertogh M, Yuan Z, Liu H (2022). Explorative learning in infrastructure development megaprojects: The case of the Hong Kong–Zhuhai–Macao Bridge. Project Management Journal, 53(2): 113–127
Locatelli G, Mariani G, Sainati T, Greco M (2017). Corruption in public projects and megaprojects: There is an elephant in the room! International Journal of Project Management, 35(3): 252–268
Loosemore M, Alkilani S Z, Murphy R (2021). The institutional drivers of social procurement implementation in Australian construction projects. International Journal of Project Management, 39(7): 750–761
Maguire S (2007). Institutional entrepreneurship. In: Clegg S, Bailey J R, eds. International Encyclopedia of Organization Studies. London: Sage Publications Ltd., 674–678
Mahalingam A, Levitt R E (2007). Institutional theory as a framework for analyzing conflicts on global projects. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 133(7): 517–528
Morris P W, Geraldi J (2011). Managing the institutional context for projects. Project Management Journal, 42(6): 20–32
Müller R (2016). Governance and Governmentality for Projects: Enablers, Practices, and Consequences. New York: Routledge
Orr R J, Scott W R, Levitt R E, Artto K, Kujala J (2011). Global projects: Distinguishing features, drivers, and challenges. In: Scott W R, Levitt R E, Orr R J, eds. Global Projects: Institutional and Political Challenges. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 15–51
Pinto J K, Winch G (2016). The unsettling of “settled science”: The past and future of the management of projects. International Journal of Project Management, 34(2): 237–245
Qiu Y, Chen H, Sheng Z, Zhang J, Cheng S (2022). Institutional entrepreneurship and megaproject: A case of the Hong Kong-Zhuhai-Macao Bridge. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 69(6): 3053–3067
Reischauer G (2015). Combining artefact analysis, interview and participant observation to study the organizational sensemaking of knowledge-based innovation. Historical Social Research, 40(3): 279–298
Scott W R (2008). Approaching adulthood: The maturing of institutional theory. Theory and Society, 37(5): 427–442
Scott W R (2014). Institutions and Organizations: Ideas, Interests, and Identities. 4th ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications Ltd.
Sergeeva N, Winch G M (2020). Narrative interactions: How project-based firms respond to government narratives of innovation. International Journal of Project Management, 38(6): 379–387
Storey J (2000). The management of innovation problem. International Journal of Innovation Management, 4(3): 347–369
Sydow J, Söderlund J (2022). Organizing complex projects from neoinstitutional perspectives. In: Winch G, Brunet M, Cao D, eds. Research Handbook on Complex Project Organizing. Camberley: Edward Elgar Publishing, 89–98
Turner J R (2018). The management of the project-based organization: A personal reflection. International Journal of Project Management, 36(1): 231–240
Turner R, Müller R (2003). On the nature of project as a temporary organization. International Journal of Project Management, 21(1): 1–8
Yin R K (2014). Case Study Research: Design and Methods. 5th ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications Ltd.
Zhang Y, Wei H H, Zhao D, Han Y, Chen J (2021). Understanding innovation diffusion and adoption strategies in megaproject networks through a fuzzy system dynamic model. Frontiers of Engineering Management, 8(1): 32–47
Funding
Open Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Additional information
This article is published with open access at link.springer.com and journal.hep.com.cn
This work was supported by the Project Management Institute (PMI) for a PMI Sponsored Program titled “Governance of Innovation in 3P” (Grant No. UTS 1012104).
Rights and permissions
This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made.
The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Sankaran, S., Killen, C.P. & Pitsis, A. How do project-oriented organizations enhance innovation? An institutional theory perspective. Front. Eng. Manag. 10, 427–438 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42524-023-0258-0
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42524-023-0258-0