Abstract
Due to uncertainties in water supply, there is growing demand for water resource management in enterprises. In this study, we evaluated the effects of companies’ water-saving reconstruction projects. We used Hina Advanced Materials Company as a case to construct an investment decision model to (1) calculate the internal and external costs of water resources based on circular economic value analysis theory, and (2) locate the level of water resources circulation. We adopted gray situation decision analysis to identify the typical problems that occur in water resource utilization. Moreover, we demonstrated optimization plans for different potential improvements, thereby providing guidance and references for water resource cost management and the comprehensive optimization of environmental benefits. We concluded that the circulation economic value analysis model can effectively display the flow and amount of value derived from water resource flows, thereby providing guidance and suggestions for optimizing water resource flows.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Bouzon M, Govindan K, Rodriguez C M T (2018). Evaluating barriers for reverse logistics implementation under a multiple stakeholders’ perspective analysis using grey decision-making approach. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 128: 315–335
Burritt R L, Christ K L, Omori A (2016). Drivers of corporate water- related disclosure: Evidence from Japan. Journal of Cleaner Production, 129: 65–74
Burritt R L, Schaltegger S, Zvezdov D (2011). Carbon management accounting: Explaining practice in leading German companies. Australian Accounting Review, 21(1): 80–98
Busch T, Liedtke C, Beucker S (2005). The concept of corporate resource efficiency accounting—A case study in the electronic industry. In: Schaltegger S, Bennett M, Burritt R, eds. Sustainability Accounting and Reporting. Berlin: Springer, 109–128
Cassimon D, Engelen P, van Liedekerke L (2016). When do firms invest in corporate social responsibility? A real option framework. Journal of Business Ethics, 137(1): 15–29
Çelikbilek Y, Tüysüz F (2016). An integrated grey based multi-criteria decision-making approach for the evaluation of renewable energy sources. Energy, 115: 1246–1258
Chapagain A K, Tickner D (2012). Water footprint: Help or hindrance? Water Alternatives, 5(3): 563–581
Christ K L, Burritt R L (2017). Water management accounting: A framework for corporate practice. Journal of Cleaner Production, 152:379–386
Collet L, Ruelland D, Estupina V B, Dezetter A, Servat E (2015). Water supply sustainability and adaptation strategies under anthropogenic and climatic changes of a meso-scale Mediterranean catchment. Science of the Total Environment, 536: 589–602
Ding X H, He J H, Wang L Y (2018). Inter-provincial water resource utilization efficiency and its driving factors considering undesirable outputs: Based on SE-SBM and Tobit model. China Population, Resources and Environment, 28(1): 157–164 (in Chinese)
Gao C K, Zhang M H, Wei Y X, Na H M, Fang K J (2016). Construction and analysis of “water carrier” and “water value” in the iron and steel production. Journal of Cleaner Production, 139: 540–547
Giuliani E (2016). Human rights and corporate social responsibility in developing countries’ industrial clusters. Journal of Business Ethics, 133(1): 39–54
Hazelton J (2014). Corporate water accountability—The role of water labels given non-fungible extractions. Pacific Accounting Review, 26 (1/2): 8–27
Herzig C, Viere T, Schaltegger S, Burritt R L (2013). Environmental Management Accounting: Case Studies of South-East Asian Companies. London: Routledge
Hu W, Long Q H, Qian M, Liu G B (2014). Determination of evaluation index system weight for enterprises wastewater treatment based on AHP. Environmental Pollution & Control, 36(2): 88–91, 95 (in Chinese)
Jasch C M (2008). Environmental and Material Flow Cost Accounting: Principles and Procedures. Springer
Jones P, Hillier D, Comfort D (2015). Water stewardship and corporate sustainability: A case study of reputation management in the food and drinks industry. Journal of Public Affairs, 15(1): 116–126
Khalil N, Kamaruzzaman S N, Baharum M R (2016). Ranking the indicators of building performance and the users’ risk via Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP): Case of Malaysia. Ecological Indicators, 71: 567–576
Li D Y, Huang M, Ren S G, Chen X H, Ning L T (2016). Environmental legitimacy, green innovation, and corporate carbon disclosure: Evidence from CDP China 100. Journal of Business Ethics, 150: 1089–1104
Martinez F (2015). A three-dimensional conceptual framework of corporate water responsibility. Organization & Environment, 28(2): 137–159
Nakajima M, Kimura A, Wagner B (2015). Introduction of Material Flow Cost Accounting (MFCA) to the supply chain: A questionnaire study on the challenges of constructing a low-carbon supply chain to promote resource efficiency. Journal of Cleaner Production, 108:1302–1309
Park Y W, Hong P, Roh J J (2013). Supply chain lessons from the catastrophic natural disaster in Japan. Business Horizons, 56(1): 75–85
Pitchipoo P, Venkumar P, Rajakarunakaran S (2013). Modeling and development of a decision support system for supplier selection in the process industry. Journal of Industrial Engineering International, 9 (1): 23
Prox M (2015). Material flow cost accounting extended to the supply chain—Challenges, benefits and links to life cycle engineering. Procedia CIRP, 29: 486–491
Qiu Y, Shaukat A, Tharyan R (2016). Environmental and social disclosures: Link with corporate financial performance. British Accounting Review, 48(1): 102–116
Signori S, Bodino G A (2013). Water management and accounting: Remarks and new insights from an accountability perspective. In: Songini L, Pistoni A, Herzig C, eds. Accounting and Control for Sustainability (Studies in Managerial and Financial Accounting, vol. 26). Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing Ltd., 115–161
Sindhu S, Nehra V, Luthra S (2017). Investigation of feasibility study of solar farms deployment using hybrid AHP-TOPSIS analysis: Case study of India. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 73: 496–511
Song X, Li Z (2012). Modified index system for eco-efficiency evaluation of circular economy in economy in coal mining area based on network flow analysis. Journal of Convergence Information Technology, 7(13): 1–9
Sulong F, Sulaiman M, Norhayati M A (2015). Material Flow Cost Accounting (MFCA) enablers and barriers: The case of a Malaysian small- and medium-sized enterprise (SME). Journal of Cleaner Production, 108: 1365–1374
Wan Y K, Ng R T L, Ng D K S, Tan R R (2015). Material Flow Cost Accounting (MFCA)-based approach for prioritisation of waste recovery. Journal of Cleaner Production, 107: 602–614
Wei Y H (2017). Method research of construction engineering project investment project preference based on grey situation decision-making theory. Journal of Jilin Jianzhu University, 34(5): 104–108 (in Chinese)
Xiao X, Jin Y L (2008). Discussion on construction of resource value flow accounting—By way of recycling economy in process-based manufacturing enterprises. Journal of Finance and Economics, (10): 122–132 (in Chinese)
Xiao X, Liu S H (2014). Environmental management accounting research based on “elements flow-value flow” analysis. Accounting Research, (3): 79–87, 96 (in Chinese)
Xiao X, Xiong F (2010). Theory and methodology system of resource value flow based on recycling economy. Systems Engineering, 28 (12): 64–68 (in Chinese)
Xiao X, Zeng H X, Li S H (2017). Study on “material flow-value flow- organization” three-dimensional model of environmental management accounting. Accounting Research, (1): 15–22, 95 (in Chinese)
Xiong F, Xiao X (2014). Performance measurement of circular economy of iron and steel enterprises based on value flow. Environmental Pollution & Control, 36(5): 13–18, 23 (in Chinese)
Xiong F, Xiao X, Chen X H, Zhou Z F (2015). Path optimization of Chinese aluminum corporation for a circular economy strategy based on a resource value flow model: A case study of China LCO. Environmental Engineering and Management Journal, 14(8): 1923–1932
Yang H F (2006). Evaluation index system of enterprises competitiveness based on circular economy. Systems Engineering, 24(11): 79–84 (in Chinese)
Zheng L, Xiao X (2010). Study on control decision model of resource flow cost accounting. The Theory and Practice of Finance and Economics, 31(1): 57–61 (in Chinese)
Zhou Z F, Liu L M (2017). Research on the environmental protection investment decision of thermal power enterprises based on the transfer of resource value. Science & Technology Progress and Policy, 34(9): 114–120 (in Chinese)
Zhou Z F, Zhang L Y, Ou J (2018). Research on the optimization of the circular economy value flow in process manufacturing enterprises—Taking papermaking companies as an example. Accounting and Finance, 175(5): 67–73 (in Chinese)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This research was supported by the projects of the National Social Funds of China (Grant No. 18BJY085).
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made.
The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Jiang, R., Chen, X., Zhao, L. et al. An evaluation model of water-saving reconstruction projects based on resource value flows. Front. Eng. Manag. 9, 257–267 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42524-020-0144-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42524-020-0144-y