Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Blockchain applied to the construction supply chain: A case study with threat model

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Frontiers of Engineering Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The construction industry has long faced the challenge of introducing collaborative systems among multiple stakeholders. This challenge creates a high level of rigidity in terms of processing shared information related to different processes, robust holistic regulations, payment actualizations, and resource utilization across different nodes. The need for a digital platform to crossconnect all stakeholders is necessary. A blockchain-based platform is a prime candidate to improve the industry in general and the construction supply chain (CSC) in particular. In this paper, a literature review is presented to establish the main challenges that CSC faces in terms of its effects on productivity and efficiency. In addition, the effect of applying blockchain platforms on a case study is presented and analyzed from performance and security level. The analysis aims to emphasize that blockchain, as presented in this paper, is a viable solution to the challenges in the CSC regardless of the risks associated with the security and robustness of the flow of information and data protection. Moreover, a threat analysis of applying a blockchain model on the CSC industry is introduced. This model indicates potential attacks and possible countermeasures to prevent the attacks. Future work is needed to expand, quantify, and optimize the threat model and conduct simulations considering proposed countermeasures for the different blockchain attacks outlined in this study.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aloini D, Dulmin R, Mininno V, Ponticelli S (2012). Supply chain management: A review of implementation risks in the construction industry. Business Process Management Journal, 18(5): 735–761

    Google Scholar 

  • Atzei N, Bartoletti M, Cimoli T (2017). A survey of attacks on Ethereum smart contracts (SoK). In: Proceedings of 6th International Conference on Principles of Security and Trust. Uppsala: Springer, 164–186

    Google Scholar 

  • Barbosa F, Woetzel J, Mischke J, Ribeirinho M J, Sridhar M, Parsons M, Bertram N, Brown S (2017). Reinventing construction: A route to higher productivity. McKinsey Global Institute

  • Behera P, Mohanty R, Prakash A (2015). Understanding construction supply chain management. Production Planning and Control, 26(16): 1332–1350

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhargava V, Chander R, Favilla J R, Kaijim W, Lin S (2019). Engineering and construction digital supply chains. IBM Institute for Business Value

  • Cachin C (2016). Architecture of the Hyperledger blockchain fabric. In: Workshop on Distributed Cryptocurrencies and Consensus Ledgers, 310: 4

    Google Scholar 

  • Dasgupta D, Shrein J, Gupta K D (2019). A survey of blockchain from security perspective. Journal of Banking and Financial Technology, 3: 1–17

    Google Scholar 

  • Feng C, Ma Y, Zhou G, Ni T (2018). Stackelberg game optimization for integrated production-distribution-construction system in construction supply chain. Knowledge-Based Systems, 157: 52–67

    Google Scholar 

  • Garay J A, Kiayias A (2020). SoK: A consensus taxonomy in the blockchain era. In: Cryptographers’ Track at the RSA Conference. San Francisco, CA: Springer, 284–318

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Garcia de Soto B, Agusti-Juan I, Hunhevicz J, Joss S, Graser K, Habert G, Adey B T (2018). Productivity of digital fabrication in construction: Cost and time analysis of a robotically built wall. Automation in Construction, 92: 297–311

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerbet P, Castagnino C, Rothballer S, Rothballer C, Renz A, Filitz R (2016). The transformative power of building in formation modelling. Digital in Engineering and Construction, Boston Consulting Group

  • Groce A, Feist J, Grieco G, Colburn M (2019). What are the actual flaws in important smart contracts (and how can we find them)? Cornell University, arXiv: 1911.07567

  • Heiskanen A (2017). The technology of trust: How the Internet of Things and blockchain could usher in a new era of construction productivity. Construction Research and Innovation, 8(2): 66–70

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes D (2020). The impact of blockchain technology on the construction industry. Medium

  • Johnston D A, McCutcheon D M, Stuart F I, Kerwood H (2004). Effects of supplier trust on performance of cooperative supplier relationships. Journal of Operations Management, 22(1): 23–38

    Google Scholar 

  • Kadefors A (2004). Trust in project relationships—inside the black box. International Journal of Project Management, 22(3): 175–182

    Google Scholar 

  • Karame G O, Androulaki E, Capkun S (2012). Double-spending fast payments in bitcoin. In: Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Computer and Communications Security. Raleigh, NC, 906–917

  • Kinnaird C, Geipel M (2017). Blockchain Technology: How the inventions behind bitcoin are enabling a network of trust for the built environment. London: Arup

    Google Scholar 

  • Konashevych O, Poblet M (2018). Is blockchain hashing an effective method for electronic governance? In: 31st International Conference on Legal Knowledge and Information Systems. Groningen: IOS Press, 195–199

    Google Scholar 

  • Kopczak L R, Johnson M E (2003). The supply-chain management effect. MIT Sloan Management Review, 44(3): 27–34

    Google Scholar 

  • Kshetri N (2017). Will blockchain emerge as a tool to break the poverty chain in the global south? Third World Quarterly, 38(8): 1710–1732

    Google Scholar 

  • Li J, Greenwood D, Kassem M (2018). Blockchain in the built environment: Analysing current applications and developing an emergent framework. In: Proceedings of the 6th Creative Construction Conference. Ljubljana: Diamond Congress Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li J, Greenwood D, Kassem M (2019). Blockchain in the built environment and construction industry: A systematic review, conceptual models and practical use cases. Automation in Construction, 102: 288–307

    Google Scholar 

  • Maciel A (2020). Use of blockchain for enabling Construction 4.0. In: Sawhney A, Riley M, Irizarry J, eds. Construction 4.0: An Innovation Platform for the Built Environment. London: Routledge

    Google Scholar 

  • Mantha B R K, Garcia de Soto B (2019). Cyber security challenges and vulnerability assessment in the construction industry. In: Proceedings of the 7th Creative Construction Conference. Budapest: Diamond Congress Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mantha B R K, Jung Y, Garcia de Soto B (2020). Implementation of the common vulnerability scoring system to assess the cyber vulnerability in construction projects. In: Proceedings of the 8th Creative Construction Conference. Budapest: Diamond Congress Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marks M (2017). Construction: The next great tech transformation. McKinsey & Company

  • Mason J (2017). Intelligent contracts and the construction industry. Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction, 9(3): 04517012

    Google Scholar 

  • Mason J, Escott H (2018). Smart contracts in construction: Views and perceptions of stakeholders. In: Proceedings of FIG Conference. Istanbul

  • Mathews M, Robles D, Bowe B (2017). BIM + blockchain: A solution to the trust problem in collaboration? In: CITA BIM Gathering. Dublin

  • Mendling J, Weber I, van der Aalst W, vom Brocke J, Cabanillas C, Daniel F, Debois S, Di Ciccio C, Dumas M, Dustdar S, Gal A, Garcia-Banuelos L, Governatori G, Hull R, La Rosa M, Leopold H, Leymann F, Recker J, Reichert M, Reijers H A, Rinderle-Ma S, Solti A, Rosemann M, Schulte S, Singh M P, Slaats T, Staples M, Weber B, Weidlich M, Weske M, Xu X, Zhu L (2018). Blockchains for business process management—challenges and opportunities. ACM Transactions on Management Information Systems, 9(1): 4

    Google Scholar 

  • Mosakheil J H (2018). Security threats classification in blockchains. Culminating Projects in Information Assurance, 48. St. Cloud, MN: Department of Information Systems, St. Cloud State University

    Google Scholar 

  • Nguyen B, Buscher V, Cavendish W, Gerber D, Leung S, Krzyzaniak A, Robinson R, Burgess J, Proctor M, O’Grady K, Flapper T (2019). Blockchain and the built environment. London: Arup

    Google Scholar 

  • Nowiński W, Kozma M (2017). How can blockchain technology disrupt the existing business models? Entrepreneurial Business and Economics Review, 5(3): 173–188

    Google Scholar 

  • Nomura Research Institute (2015). Survey on blockchain technologies and related services. FY2015 Report

  • O’Brien W J, Fischer M A (1993). Construction supply-chain management: A research framework. In: Proceedings of Civil-COMP, Information Technology for Civil & Structural Engineers. Edinburgh, 61–64

  • Omohundro S (2014). Cryptocurrencies, smart contracts, and artificial intelligence. AI Matters, 1(2): 19–21

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Papadopoulos A G, Zamer N, Gayialis P S, Tatsiopoulos P I (2016). Supply chain improvement in construction industry. Universal Journal of Management, 4(10): 528–534

    Google Scholar 

  • Pärn E A, Garcia de Soto B (2020). Cyber threats and actors confronting the Construction 4.0. In: Sawhney A, Riley M, Irizarry J, eds. Construction 4.0: An Innovation Platform for the Built Environment. London: Routledge

    Google Scholar 

  • Penzes B (2018). Blockchain technology in the construction industry: Digital transformation for high productivity. London: Institution of Civil Engineers (ICE)

    Google Scholar 

  • Project Provenance Ltd. (2015). Blockchain: The solution for transparency in product supply chains. London

  • Queiroz M, Telles R, Bonilla S (2019). Blockchain and supply chain management integration: A systematic review of the literature. Supply Chain Management, 25(2): 241–254

    Google Scholar 

  • Saad M, Spaulding J, Njilla L, Kamhoua C, Shetty S, Nyang D, Mohaisen A (2019). Exploring the attack surface of blockchain: A systematic overview. Cornell University, arXiv: 1904.03487

  • Saberi S, Kouhizadeh M, Sarkis J, Shen L (2019). Blockchain technology and its relationships to sustainable supply chain management. International Journal of Production Research, 57(7): 2117–2135

    Google Scholar 

  • Schrauf S, Berttram P (2016). Industry 4.0: How digitization makes the supply chain more efficient, agile, and customer-focused. Strategy&, PWC

  • Sepasgozar S M, Razkenari M A, Barati K (2015). The importance of new technology for delay mitigation in construction projects. American Journal of Civil Engineering and Architecture, 3(1): 15–20

    Google Scholar 

  • Shen C, Pena-Mora F (2018). Blockchain for cities—A systematic literature review. IEEE Access, 6: 76787–76819

    Google Scholar 

  • Streule T, Miserini N, Bartlomé O, Klippel M, García de Soto B (2016). Implementation of Scrum in the construction industry. Procedia Engineering, 164: 269–276

    Google Scholar 

  • Swan M (2016). Blockchain temporality: Smart contract time specifiability with blocktime. In: International Symposium on Rules and Rule Markup Languages for the Semantic Web. Rule Technologies. Research, Tools, and Applications. Stony Brook, NY: Springer, 184–196

    Google Scholar 

  • Tezel A, Papadonikolaki E, Yitmen I, Hilletofth P (2020). Preparing construction supply chains for blockchain technology: An investigation of its potential and future directions. Frontiers of Engineering Management, in press, doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42524-020-0110-8

  • Turk Ž, Klinc R (2017). Potentials of blockchain technology for construction management. Procedia Engineering, 196: 638–645

    Google Scholar 

  • Viriyasitavat W, Xu L, Bi Z, Sapsomboon A (2018). Blockchain-based business process management (BPM) framework for service composition in Industry 4.0. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-018-1422-y

  • Vrijhoef R, Koskela L (2000). The four roles of supply chain management in construction. European Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 6(3–4): 169–178

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang J, Wu P, Wang X, Shou W (2017). The outlook of blockchain technology for construction engineering management. Frontiers of Engineering Management, 4(1): 67–75

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang Y, Han J, Beynon-Davies P (2019). Understanding blockchain technology for future supply chains: A systematic literature review and research agenda. Supply Chain Management, 24(1): 62–84

    Google Scholar 

  • Wong P, Cheung S (2005). Structural equation model of trust and partnering success. Journal of Management Engineering, 21(2): 70–80

    Google Scholar 

  • Xue X, Wang Y, Shen Q, Yu X (2007). Coordination mechanisms for construction supply chain management in the Internet environment. International Journal of Project Management, 25(2): 150–157

    Google Scholar 

  • Ye Z, Yin M, Tang L, Jiang H (2018). Cup-of-Water theory: A review on the interaction of BIM, IoT and blockchain during the whole building lifecycle. In: Proceedings of the 35th International Symposium on Automation and Robotics in Construction (ISARC). Berlin: IAARC Publications, 1–9

    Google Scholar 

  • Zheng Z, Xie S, Dai H, Chen X, Wang H (2018). Blockchain challenges and opportunities: A survey. International Journal of Web and Grid Services, 14(4): 352–375

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful for the support from the Center for Cyber Security (CCS) at New York University Abu Dhabi (NYUAD).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Division of Engineering, New York University Abu Dhabi (NYUAD), Saadiyat Island, Abu Dhabi, 129188, United Arab Emirates

    Gjorgji Shemov, Borja Garcia de Soto & Hoda Alkhzaimi

Authors
  1. Gjorgji Shemov
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Borja Garcia de Soto
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Hoda Alkhzaimi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Borja Garcia de Soto.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Shemov, G., Garcia de Soto, B. & Alkhzaimi, H. Blockchain applied to the construction supply chain: A case study with threat model. Front. Eng. Manag. 7, 564–577 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42524-020-0129-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42524-020-0129-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation