Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Proposing a “lean and green” framework for equipment cost analysis in construction

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Frontiers of Engineering Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

One limitation of previous productivity-driven research on equipment selection and operation simulation lies in the fact that the green aspects of construction activities have been largely neglected in analysis of cost-efficiency of construction operations. On the other hand, studies attempting to measure greenhouse gas emission due to construction activities have yet to develop a methodology that correlates their findings and implications with construction productivity. In order to address the immediate need for improving the sustainability performance of construction projects, it is imperative for the construction industry to evaluate greenhouse gas emission as a cost factor in construction planning, equipment selection, and cost estimating. In this context, this paper formalizes an integrative framework for equipment cost analysis based on the concepts of lean construction and green construction, aimed to guide the selection of appropriate construction equipment considering exhaust emission and productivity performance at the same time. The framework is elaborated in earthwork construction in order to evaluate the impact of greenhouse gas emission in estimating equipment hourly rates and assessing greenness and sustainability for alternative equipment options.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • AbouRizk S, Hajjar D (1998). A framework for applying simulation in the construction industry. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, 25 (3): 604–617

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ahn C, Peña-Mora F, Lee S, Arboleda C A (2013). Consideration of the environmental cost in construction contracting for public works: A + C and A + B + C bidding methods. Journal of Management Engineering, 29(1): 86–94

    Google Scholar 

  • Al-Sudairi A A (2007). Evaluating the effect of construction process characteristics to the applicability Dd of lean principles. Construction Innovation: Information, Process. Management, 7(1): 99–121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Al-Sudairi A, Diekmann J E, Songer A D, Brown H M (1999) Simulation of construction processes: Traditional practices versus lean principles. In: Proceedings of 7th Annual Conference of International Group of Lean Construction, 39–50

  • Aziz R F, Hafez S M (2013). Applying lean thinking in construction and performance improvement. Alexandria Engineering Journal, 52(4): 679–695

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ballard G, Howell G (1994). Implementing lean construction: Stabilizing work flow. In: Proceedings of 2nd Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction, Santiago, Chile, 101–110

  • Barati K, Shen X (2016). Operational level emissions modelling of on-road construction equipment through field data analysis. Automation in Construction, 72: 338–346

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carmichael D G, Shen X, Peansupap V (2019). The relationship between heavy equipment cost efficiency and cleaner production in construction. Journal of Cleaner Production, 211: 521–529

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caterpillar (2017). Caterpillar Performance Handbook. Version No. 47. Peoria, IL: Caterpillar

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheng T, Feng C, Chen Y (2005). A hybrid mechanism for optimizing construction simulation models. Automation in Construction, 14(1): 85–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conte A S I (2002). Lean construction: From theory to practice. In: Proceedings of 10th Annual Conference of International Group for Lean Construction, Gramado, Brazil, 1–9

  • Dunlop P, Smith S D (2004). Planning, estimation and productivity in the lean concrete pour. Engineering, Construction, and Architectural Management, 11(1): 55–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farrar J M, AbouRizk S M, Mao X (2004). Generic implementation of lean concepts in simulation models. Lean Construction Journal, 1(1): 1–23

    Google Scholar 

  • Fernandez-Solis J L, Porwal V, Lavy S, Shafaat A, Rybkowski Z K, Son K, Lagoo N (2013). Survey of motivations, benefits, and implementation challenges of last planner system users. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 139(4): 354–360

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Golzarpoor H, Gonzalez V (2013). A green-lean simulation model for assessing environmental and production waste in construction. In: Proceedings of 21th Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction, Fortaleza, Brazil, 885–894

  • Golzarpoor H, González V, Shahbazpour M, O’Sullivan M (2017). An input-output simulation model for assessing production and environmental waste in construction. Journal of Cleaner Production, 143: 1094–1104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • González V, Echaveguren T (2012). Exploring the environmental modeling of road construction operations using discrete-event simulation. Automation in Construction, 24: 100–110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gransberg D D, O’Connor E P (2015). Major equipment life-cycle cost analysis. St. Paul, MN: Minnesota Department of Transportation Research Services & Library

    Google Scholar 

  • Green S D (1999). The missing arguments of lean construction. Construction Management and Economics, 17(2): 133–137

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Hasan M, Lu M (2017). Error quantification and visualization in using sensors to position backhoe excavator. In: ASCE International Workshop on Computing in Civil Engineering, Seattle, Washington, USA, 150–157

  • Heidari B, Marr L C (2015). Real-time emissions from construction equipment compared with model predictions. Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association, 65(2): 115–125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howell G, Ballard G (1998). Implementing lean construction: Understanding and action. In: Proceedings of 6th Annual Conference of International Group for Lean Construction, Guaruja, Brazil

  • Hummer J E, Arocho I, Rasdori W (2017). Approach to assessing tradeoffs between construction equipment fleet emissions and cost. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 143(5): 1–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim J, Koo C, Kim C J, Hong T, Park H S (2015). Integrated CO2, cost, and schedule management system for building construction projects using the earned value management theory. Journal of Cleaner Production, 103: 275–285

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ko C H, Chung N F (2014). Lean design process. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 140(6): 04014011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koskela L, Howell G, Ballard G, Tommelein I (2002). Foundations of lean construction. In: Best R, de Valence G, eds. Design and Construction: Building in Value. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann, Elsevier

    Google Scholar 

  • Koskela L (1992). Application of the New Production Philosophy to Construction. Technical Report No. 72. Center for Integrated Facility Engineering, Stanford University, CA, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Law A M (2015). Simulation Modeling and Analysis. Boston: McGraw-Hill

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis P, Rasdorf W (2017). Fuel use and pollutant emissions taxonomy for heavy duty diesel construction equipment. Journal of Management Engineering, 33(2): 04016038

    Google Scholar 

  • Li W, Wang X G (2016). Innovations on management of sustainable construction in a large earthwork project: An Australian case research. Procedia Engineering, 145: 677–684

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lu M (2003). Simplified discrete-event simulation approach for construction simulation. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 129(5): 537–546

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lu M, Hasan M (2018). Productivity improvement in operating autonomous plants subject to random breakdowns in construction. In: Proceedings of 2018 Winter Simulation Conference (WSC), IEEE, Gothenburg, Sweden, 3885–3896

    Google Scholar 

  • Lu M, Wong L C (2005). Comparing PROMODEL and SDESA in modeling construction operations. In: Proceedings of the 37th Winter Simulation Conference, Orlando, FL, USA, 1524–1532

    Google Scholar 

  • Lu M, Lam H C, Dai F (2008). Resource-constrained critical path analysis based on discrete event simulation and particle swarm optimization. Automation in Construction, 17(6): 670–681

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mao X, Zhang X (2008). Construction process reengineering by integrating lean principles and computer simulation techniques. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 134(5): 371–381

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marzouk M, Moselhi O (2003). Object-oriented simulation model for earthmoving operations. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 129(2): 173–181

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller C J M, Packham G A, Thomas B C (2002). Harmonization between main contractors and subcontractors: A prerequisite for lean construction? Journal of Construction Research, 03(01): 67–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morley D, Lu M, Joseph T (2013). In search of the ideal truck-excavator combination. In: Proceedings of 30th International Symposium on Automation and Robotics in Construction, Montreal, Quebec, Canada

  • Moselhi O, Alshibani A (2009). Optimization of earthmoving operations in heavy civil engineering projects. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 135(10): 948–954

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peurifoy R L, Oberlender G D (2013). Estimating Construction Costs (6th Edition). New York: McGraw-Hill Higher Education

    Google Scholar 

  • Rasdorf W, Frey C, Lewis P, Kim K, Pang S H, Abolhassani S (2010). Field procedures for real-world measurements of emissions from diesel construction vehicles. Journal of Infrastructure Systems, 16(3): 216–225

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenbaum S, Toledo M, Gonzalez V (2012). Green-lean approach for assessing environmental and production waste in construction. In: Proceedings of 20th Annual Conference of International Group for Lean Construction, San Diego, USA

  • Sacks R, Radosavljevic M, Barak R (2010). Requirements for building information modeling based lean production management systems for construction. Automation in Construction, 19(5): 641–655

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salem O, Solomon J, Genaidy A, Minkarah I (2006). Lean construction: From theory to implementation. Journal of Management Engineering, 22(4): 168–175

    Google Scholar 

  • Shang G, Sui P L (2014). Lean Construction Management: The Toyota Way. Singapore: Springer

    Google Scholar 

  • Shi J J (1999). A neural network based system for predicting earthmoving production. Construction Management and Economics, 17(4): 463–471

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas H R, Horman M J, de Souza U E L, Zavřski I (2002). Reducing variability to improve performance as a lean construction principle. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 128(2): 144–154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tommelein D I (1998). Pull-driven scheduling for pipe-spool installation: Simulation of lean construction technique. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 124(4): 279–288

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tommelein I D, Li A E Y (1999). Just-in-time concrete delivery: Mapping alternatives for vertical supply chain integration. In: Proceedings of 7th Annual Conference of International Group for Lean Construction, Berkeley, California, USA, 97–108

  • Uriarte A G, Ng A H C, Moris M U, Oscarson J (2015). Lean, simulation and optimization: A win-win combination. In: Proceedings of the 2015 Winter Simulation Conference, IEEE, Huntington Beach, CA, USA, 2227–2238

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) (2009). Potential for reducing greenhouse gas emissions in the construction sector. Washington D.C.: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

    Google Scholar 

  • Vision (2017). Winter-wise solution to cold weather construction challenges. Visions, Publication of Graham Construction

  • Wang T, Wang J, Wu P, Wang J, He Q, Wang X (2017). Estimating the environmental costs and benefits of demolition waste using life cycle assessment and willingness-to-pay: A case study in Shenzhen. Journal of Cleaner Production, 172: 14–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • World Commission on Environment, and Development (1986). Our Common Future, a Report of World Commission on Environment and Development. Oxford: Oxford University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Yates J K (2014). Design and construction for sustainable industrial construction. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 140(4): B4014005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yi C, Lu M (2018). A Simulation-based Earthmoving Fleet Optimization Platform (SEFOP) for truck/excavator selection in rough grading project. In: Proceedings of 35th International Symposium on Automation and Robotics in Construction (ISARC 2018), Berlin, Germany, 956–962

  • Yoon J, Kim J, Suh S, Suh S (2014). Spatial factors affecting the loading efficiency of excavators. Automation in Construction, 48: 97–106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang H, Tam C M, Li H, Shi J J (2006). Particle swarm optimization-supported simulation for construction operations. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 132(12): 1267–1274

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang M, Cao T, Zhao X (2017). Applying sensor-based technology to improve construction safety management. Sensors (Switzerland), 17 (8): 1841

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, T6G 1H9, Canada

    Ming Lu, Nicolas Diaz & Monjurul Hasan

Authors
  1. Ming Lu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Nicolas Diaz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Monjurul Hasan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ming Lu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lu, M., Diaz, N. & Hasan, M. Proposing a “lean and green” framework for equipment cost analysis in construction. Front. Eng. Manag. 6, 384–394 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42524-019-0033-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42524-019-0033-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation