Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

An Application of the Functional Resonance Analysis Method (FRAM) to Risk Assessment of Low-Speed Helicopter Operations to Avoid the Aerodynamic Phenomenon Known as Vortex Ring State

  • Original article
  • Published:
Aerotecnica Missili & Spazio Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper presents an application of the functional resonance analysis method (FRAM) to the risk assessment of low-speed legs of a helicopter flight mission. A combination of low forward speed and a specific rate of vertical descent could lead to meet a region of the helicopter’s flight envelope that shall be avoided to prevent the vortex ring state, an aerodynamic phenomenon which could cause uncontrolled high rates of descent. A fully developed vortex ring state (VRS) is characterized by an unstable situation in which the helicopter experiences uncommanded pitch and roll oscillations, with a reduced or no collective authority, and a helicopter descent rate that may approach more than 5000 feet per minute. If the recognition of VRS signs is performed early by the pilot in a condition of sufficient altitude, then the required recovery may be performed. However, some mission legs require to descend close to the ground, as the case of a firefighting mission, in which one of the fundamental task requires to fill a tank with water. This type of mission has been selected as the case study of this paper, and a qualitative risk assessment is performed using FRAM. The model developed using FRAM is systemic, where both accidents and successes are seen to emerge in the system from combinations of normal variability. Moreover, the model is complex and non-linear, providing a complete overview of functions and tasks performed by the whole system and the related couplings. The paper presents the potential events related to the mission selected and provides results in terms of possible safety barriers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Di Giorgio, G.: Theory of helicopter flight. In: Aerodynamics, Flight Mechanics. Aracne, Roma (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Johnson, W.: Model for vortex ring state influence on rotorcraft flight dynamics. In: Presented at the AHS 4th Decennial Specialist's Conference on Aeromechanics, San Francisco, California, January 21–23, (2004)

  3. Taamallah, S.: A qualitative introduction to the vortex-ring-state, autorotation, and optimal autorotation. In: Presented at the 36th European Rotorcraft Forum, Paris, France, September 7–9, 2010. Paper Identification Number 089 (2010)

  4. Padfield, G.D.: Helicopter Flight Dynamics. Blackwell Publishing (2007)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  5. Mullen, P., Bernini, G.: Vortex Ring State prediction and analysis. European Rotorcraft Forum (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Varnes, D.J.; Duren, R.W.; Wood, E.R.: An onboard warning System to prevent hazardous “Vortex Ring State” Enconunters. In: Presented at European Rotorcraft Forum, The Hague, The Netherlands, September 26–29 (2000)

  7. Basset, P., Chang, C., Prasad, J.V.R., Kolb, S.: Prediction of vortex ring state boundary of a helicopter in descending flight by simulation. J. Am. Helicopter Soc. (2007). https://doi.org/10.4050/JAHS.53.139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. AIC: AIC: P 020/2010. Vortex Ring. Aeronautical Information Circular. CAA (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  9. EHEST: European Helicopter Safety Team (EHEST). Safety Considerations. Methods to Improve Helicopter pilots’ capabilities. European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Gao, Z.; Xin, H.: An experimental investigation on vortex-ring state boundary. In: First Russian Helicopter Society Annual Forum Proceedings (1994)

  11. Wolkovitch, J.: Analytical prediction of vortex-ring state boundaries for helicopters in steep descents. J. Am. Helicopter Soc. (1972). https://doi.org/10.4050/JAHS.17.13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Bildgaard, M.; Binet, L.: Active sidestick used for vortex ring state avoidance. In: 35th European Rotorcraft Forum. (2009)

  13. Dang-Vu, B.: Vortex ring state protection flight control law. In: 39th European Rotorcraft Forum, Sep. 2013, Moscou, Russia. ⟨hal-01061133⟩ (2013)

  14. Hollnagel, E.; Hounsgaard, J.; Colligan, L.: FRAM—the Functional Resonance Analysis Method: a handbook for the practical use of the method. In: Centre for Quality, in the Southern Region of Denmark. (2014)

  15. Hollnagel, E.: FRAM: The Functional Resonance Analysis Method. Modeling Complex Socio-technical System. Ashgate, Farnham (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Tian, W., Caponecchia, C.: Using the functional resonance analysis method (FRAM) in aviation safety: a systematic review. J. Adv. Transp. (2020). https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/8898903

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Hollnagel, E.: The Functional Resonance Analysis Method. A Brief GUIDE on How to Use the FRAM. FRAM (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Anvarifar, F., Voorendt, M.Z., Zevenbergen, C., Thissen, W.: An application of the Functional Resonance Analysis Method (FRAM) to risk analysis of multifunction flood defences in the Netherlands. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 158, 130–141 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Lundblad, K.; Speziali, J.; Woltjer, R.; Lundberg, J.: FRAM as a risk assessment method for nuclear fuel transportation. https://researchgate.net/publication/237088893. (2008)

  20. Albery, S., Tepe, S., Borys, D.: An Evaluation of the Functional Resonance Analysis Method (FRAM) as a Practical Risk Assessment Tool Within a Manufacturing Environment. Taylor & Francis, London (2018)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  21. Woltjer, R.; Hollnagel, E.: Functional modeling for risk assessment of automation in a changing air traffic management environment. In: Presented at the 4th International Conference Working on Safety, Crete, Greece (2008)

  22. Sultana, S., Haugen, S.: An extended FRAM method to check the adequacy of safety barriers and to assess the safety of a socio-technical system. Saf Sci 157, 105930 (2022)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Salehi, V., Tran, T.T., Veitch, B., Smith, D.: A reinforcement learning development of the FRAM for functional reward-based assessments of complex systems performance. Int. J. Ind. Ergon. 88, 1071 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ergon.2022.103271

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Kim, Y.C., Yoon, W., C.: Quantitative representation of the functional resonance analysis method for risk assessment. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 214, 107745 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2021.107745;PublishedbyElsevier

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Patriarca, R., Di Gravio, G., Woltjer, R., Costantino, F., Praetorius, G., Ferreira, P., Hollnagel, E.: Framing the FRAM: a literature review on the functional resonance analysis method. Saf. Sci. 129, 104827 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2020.104827

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Salehi, V., Smith, D., Veitch, B., Hanson, N.: A dynamic version of the FRAM for capturing variability in complex operations. Methods X (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mex.2021.101333

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Hirose, T., Sawaragi, T., Horiguchi, Y., Nakanishi, H.: Safety analysis for resilient complex socio- technical systems with an extended functional resonance analysis method. Int. J. Astronaut. Aeronaut. Eng. 2, 1–18 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Tian, J., Wu, J., Yang, O., Zhao, T.: FRAMA: a safety assessment approach based on functional resonance analysis method. Saf. Sci. (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2016.01.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Salihoglu, E., Besikçi, E.B.: The use of functional resonance analysis method (fRAM) in a maritime accident: a case study of prestige. Ocean Eng. (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2020.108223

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Patriarca, R., Di Gravio, G., Costantino, F., Tronci, M.: The functional resonance analysis method for a systemic risk based environmental auditing in a sinter plant: a semi-quantitative approach. Environ. Impact Assess. Rev. (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2016.12.002.ElsevierInc

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Leonardo SpA Helicopter Division Frosinone Plant, Via Giovanni Agusta n.1, 03100, Frosinone, Italy

    Giovanni Di Giorgio

Authors
  1. Giovanni Di Giorgio
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Giovanni Di Giorgio.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The author does not have any financial or non-financial interest directly or indirectly related to this work.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Di Giorgio, G. An Application of the Functional Resonance Analysis Method (FRAM) to Risk Assessment of Low-Speed Helicopter Operations to Avoid the Aerodynamic Phenomenon Known as Vortex Ring State. Aerotec. Missili Spaz. 102, 233–255 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42496-023-00166-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42496-023-00166-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation