Skip to main content
Log in

Enabling Technologies for Space Exploration Missions: The CIRA-TEDS Program Roadmap Perspectives

  • Original article
  • Published:
Aerotecnica Missili & Spazio Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The technologies and demonstrators for space exploration (TEDS) Program is an essential part of the Italian Aerospace Research Program (PRORA), for which execution was assigned to the Italian Aerospace Research Centre (CIRA) by the Italian Minister of Research. It was conceived in 2020 as a technology program aimed to mature several technologies, demonstrators, and engineering tools considered enabling for future space exploration and colonization missions. Indeed, Martian colonization and lunar colonization are foreseen to be the next steps in human space exploration, and long-term manned spaceflight and extra-terrestrial planet settlement are the inevitable trends of space technologies and will enhance human knowledge in several scientific fields, leading to better understanding of the wider universe and our place within it. But the robotic and manned exploration, for both short- and long-term missions and, above all, the possible habitation and the future colonization of the Moon, require to overcome numerous critical challenges e.g., protection from radiation and micro-meteorites, energy supply, extraction and recycling of water, food production, and much more. Moreover, the environmental issues that could negatively impact lunar surface missions include temperature fluctuations, triboelectrification, airless conditions, energetic particle exposure, and the lunar regolith dust particles. The present paper gives an overview of the (CIRA) development plan related to the (TEDS) program, focusing on the development of enabling technologies, both actual achievements and future perspectives.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Activities are part of phase 2 program, they will start in 2024, and are not included in this paper.

Abbreviations

BEM:

Boundary element method

CIRA:

Italian aerospace research centre

ESA:

European space agency

GER:

Global exploration roadmap

ISECG :

International space exploration coordination group

ISO:

International organization for standardization

ISRU:

In-situ resource utilization

ISS:

International space station

LPT:

Laser power transmission

MUR:

Italian ministry of research

NASA:

National aeronautics and space administration

PRORA:

National aerospace research program

PSR:

Permanent shadowed regions

PTM:

Particle transport model

Re:

Reynolds number

TEDS:

Technologies and demonstrators for space exploration

TRL:

Technology readiness level

References

  1. Favaloro, N., Smoraldi, A., Elia, G., Invigorito, M., Salvatore, V.: CIRA preliminary roadmap for the development of mars research project. Aerotecnica Missili Spazio. Aerosp Sci Technol, 98, 119–130 (2019) (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42496-019-00008-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. PRORA – Pubblicazione decreto in gazzetta ufficiale. https://www.gazzettaufficiale.it/atto/vediMenuHTML?atto.dataPubblicazioneGazzetta=2021-01-23&atto.codiceRedazionale=21A00259&tipoSerie=serie_generale&tipoVigenza=originario. Accessed 23 Jan 2021

  3. NASA Space Technologies Roadmap and Taxonomy https://www.nasa.gov/offices/oct/taxonomy/index.html. Accessed 11 Mar 2021

  4. Saccoccia G. et al.: ESA Coordination Activities on Space Exploration Technology Roadmaps. IAA-SEC 2014-WA1493, International Space Exploration Forum, Washington (USA) (2014)

  5. European Space Technology Harmonisation. https://www.esa.int/Enabling_Support/Space_Engineering_Technology/Technology_Harmonisation. Accessed Nov 2022

  6. Woerner, J., Evans, L.: European space technology master plan. ESA-ESTEC (2017)

  7. ISECG (International Space Exploration Coordination Group) Global Exploration Roadmap https://www.globalspaceexploration.org/wordpress/wp-content/isecg/GER_2018_small_mobile.pdf. Accessed Nov 2022

  8. The International Space Exploration Coordination Group. https://www.globalspaceexploration.org/. Accessed Jan 2018

  9. Cresto, A.S., Viola, N., Fusaro, R., Saccoccia, G.: Approach to technology prioritization in support of moon initiatives in the framework of ESA exploration technology roadmap. Acta Astronaut. 139, 42–53 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Global Exploration Roadmap (GER)-addendum 2022. https://www.nasa.gov/sites/default/files/atoms/files/ger-supplement-update-2022-final-10-6-22_tagged.pdf. Accessed Oct 2022

  11. Afshar-Mohajer, N., Wu, C.-Y., Curtis, J., Gaier, J.R.: Review of dust transport and mitigation technologies in lunar and Martian atmospheres. Adv. Space Res. 56, 1222–1241 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Stubbs, T.J., Farrell, V.M., Halekas, J.S., Burchill, J.K., Collier, M.R., Zimmerman, M.I., Vondrak, R.R., Delory, G.T., Pfaff, R.F.: Dependence of lunar surface charging on solar wind plasma conditions and solar irradiation. Planet. Space Sci. 90, 10–27 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pss.2013.07.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Zhang, et al.: First measurements of the radiation dose on the lunar surface. Sci. Adv, 6, 39 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aaz1334. Accessed 25 Sep 2020

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Simpson, J.A.: Elemental and isotopic composition of the galactic cosmic rays. Annu. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 33, 323–382 (1983)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Jäkel, O.: Radiation hazard during a manned mission to Mars. Z. Med. Phys. 14, 267 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1078/0939-3889-00229

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Durante, M., Cucinotta, F.A.: Physical basis of radiation protection space travel. Rev. Mod. Phys. 83, 1245–1281 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Wilson, P.G., Fuller, M.T., Borisy, G.G.: Monastral bipolar spindles: implications for dynamic centrosome organization. J. Cell Sci. 110(4), 451–464 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Guetersloh, S., et al.: Polyethylene as a radiation shielding standard in simulated cosmic-ray environments. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. Sect. B 252(2), 319–332 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Zhong, W., Sui, G., Jana, S., Miller, J.: Cosmic radiation shielding tests for UHMWPE fiber/nano-epoxy composites. Compos. Sci. Technol. 69, 2093–2097 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Cha, J.-H., Kim, Y., Kumar, S.K.S., Choi, C., Kim, C.-G.: Ultra-high-molecular-weight polyethylene as a hypervelocity impact shielding material for space structures. Acta Astronaut. 168, 182–190 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Laurenzi, S., de Zanet, G., Santonicola, M.G.: Numerical investigation of radiation shielding properties of polyethylene-based nanocomposite materials in different space environments”. Acta Astronaut. 170, 530–538 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Thibeault, S.A., Fay, C.C., Lowther, S.E., Earle, K.D., Sauti, G., Kang, J.H., Park, C., McMullen, A.M.: Radiation Shielding Materials Containing Hydrogen, Boron, and Nitrogen: Systematic Computational and Experimental Study—Phase I. NIAC Final Report; NASA: Washington, DC, USA (2012)

  23. Harrison, C., Weaver, S., Bertelsen, C., Burgett, E., Hertel, N., Grulke, E.: Polyethylene/boron nitride composites for space radiation shielding. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 109, 2529–2538 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Harrison, C., Burgett, E., Hertel, N., Grulke, E.: Polyethylene/boron composites for radiation shielding applications. AIP Conf. Proc. 969, 484 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Chopra, N.G., Luyken, R.J., Cherrey, K., Crespi, V.H., Cohen, M.L., Louie, S.G., Zettl, A.: Boron nitride nanotubes. Science 269, 966–967 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Koning, W. J. F., Romander, E. A., Johnson, W.: Optimization of Reynolds Number Airfoils for Martian Rotor Applications Using an Evolutionary Algorithm. AIAA 2020 Scitech Forum, Orlando, FL, Jan. 6 –Jan. 20 – 2020, AIAA paper 2020–0084 (2020)

  27. Syal, M., Govindarajan, B., Leishman, J.G.: Mesoscale Sediment Tracking Methodology to Analyze Brownout Cloud Developments, presented at the 66th Annual Forum of the American Helicopter Society, Phoenix, AZ, USA, May 10–13, (2010)

  28. Ghosh, S., Rajagopalan, R.G.: A computational study on rotor and fuselage configuration effect on rotorcraft brownout. J. Am. Helicopter Soc. 67, 012001 (2022)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. D’Andrea, A.: Numerical Analysis of Unsteady Vortical Flows Generated by a Rotorcraft Operating on Ground: A First Assessment. Proceedings of the 65th Annual Forum of the American Helicopter Society International, Grapevine, TX, May 27–29 (2009)

  30. Phillips, C., Brown, R.E.: Eulerian simulation of the fluid dynamics of helicopter brownout. J. Aircr. 46, 1416–1429 (2009). https://doi.org/10.2514/1.4(1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Bagnold, R.A.: The physics of blown sand and desert dunes. Dover Publications Inc, Mineola (1941)

    Google Scholar 

  32. NASA In-Situ Resource Utilization (ISRU) Development & Incorporation Plans, Technology Exchange Conference, Nov. Galveston, TX (2007)

  33. NASA ISRU-Technology-Gap-Assessment-Report-Apr-2021. https://www.globalspaceexploration.org/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2021/04/ISECG-ISRU-Technology-Gap-Assessment-Report-Apr-2021.pdf. Accessed 21 Apr 2021

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was performed within the “CIRA TEDS Program”. It is a program proposal included in the National Aerospace Research Program (PRO.RA), already presented and approved by the Italian Ministry of Research, MUR.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to N. Favaloro.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Favaloro, N., Saccone, G., Piscitelli, F. et al. Enabling Technologies for Space Exploration Missions: The CIRA-TEDS Program Roadmap Perspectives. Aerotec. Missili Spaz. 102, 187–197 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42496-023-00159-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42496-023-00159-4

Keywords

Navigation