Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Limitations in Transitioning from Conventional to Modern Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Review

  • Review
  • Published:
Multiscale Science and Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has undergone significant evolution from the initial concept of ivory components to the integration of artificial intelligence. Modern technologies, such as computers and surgical robots, are now employed to precisely place implants and achieve a neutral joint configuration with minimal incisions. Despite these advancements, achieving the desired preoperative outcome remains a challenge. Accurate implant alignment continues to be a prominent limitation in the field. Malalignment results in unbalanced stresses, restricted range of motion, patient discomfort, and ultimately, TKA failure. This study reviews the limitations of commercially available TKA techniques, including navigated TKA, robotic-assisted TKA, and artificial intelligence-based approaches. Compared with the conventional TKA, navigated TKA offers the advantage of smaller incisions, but does not consistently achieve the planned implant position. Conversely, robotic-assisted surgery theoretically provides perfect neutral alignment, but its widespread use is hindered by high operational costs and associated complications. While machine learning can predict the outcomes, its current level of accuracy is not yet clinically acceptable. Although most of the calculations for Patient-specific implants are performed during preoperative session, reducing surgery duration, drawbacks include the added expense of CT scans and MRI images, while the promised results have yet to be consistently achieved.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. P.A. Dieppe, J. Cushnaghan, L. Shepstone, The Bristol ‘oa500’study: progression of osteoarthritis (OA) over 3 years and the relationship between clinical and radiographic changes at the knee joint. Osteoarth. Cartil. 5, 87–97 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. L. Fraenkel, S.T. Bogardus, J. Concato, D.R. Wittink, Treatment options in knee osteoarthritis: the patient’s perspective. Arch. Intern. Med. 164, 1299–1304 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. A.J. Carr, O. Robertsson, S. Graves, A.J. Price, N.K. Arden, A. Judge, D.J. Beard, Knee replacement. Lancet 379, 1331–1340 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60752-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. N. Eynon-Lewis, D. Ferry, M. Pearse, Themistocles gluck: an unrecognised genius. BMJ: Br. Med. J. 305, 1534 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. R.P. Robinson, The early innovators of today’s resurfacing condylar knees. J. Arthroplasty 20, 2–26 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2004.11.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. F. Picard, E. Leitner, O. Raoult, D. Saragaglia, Computer assisted total knee arthroplasty. In:J. Jerosch, K. Nicol, K. Peikenkamp (eds) Steinkopff, Heidelberg, pp. 461–471 (1999)

  7. F. Leitner, F. Picard, R. Minfelde, H.-J. Schulz, P. Cinquin, D. Saragaglia, Computer-assisted knee surgical total replacement. Springer, pp. 629–638 (1997)

  8. M. Sohail, J.Y. Kim, H.S. Kim, Three-step femoral coordinate system for imageless total knee arthroplasty. In: Proceedings of Korean Soc. Mech. Eng (KSME) Annual Meeting, pp. 1681–1682 (2022)

  9. H. Hoffart, E. Langenstein, N. Vasak, A prospective study comparing the functional outcome of computer-assisted and conventional total knee replacement. J. Bone Jt. Surg. Br. 94, 194–199 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. B.P. Chalmers, D.A. Kolin, D.J. Mayman, T.M. Miller, S.A. Jerabek, S.B. Haas, M.P. Ast, Three degrees external to the posterior condylar axis has little relevance in femoral component rotation: a computed tomography-based total knee arthroplasty simulation study. J. Arthroplasty 36, S380–S385 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. D. Saragaglia, B. Rubens-Duval, J. Gaillot, G. Lateur, R. Pailhé, Total knee arthroplasties from the origin to navigation: history, rationale indications. Int. Orthopaed. (SICOT) 43, 597–604 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-018-3913-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. R.S. Nizard, R. Porcher, P. Ravaud, E. Vangaver, D. Hannouche, P. Bizot, L. Sedel, Use of the cusum technique for evaluation of a CT-based navigation system for total knee replacement. Clin. Orthopaed. Relat. Res. 425, 180–188 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. J. Stiehl, W. Konermann, R. Haaker, Navigation and robotics in total joint and spine surgery (Springer, Berlin, 2004)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  14. J. Victor, D. Hoste, Image-based computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty leads to lower variability in coronal alignment. Clin. Orthopaed. Relat. Res.® 428, 131 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1097/01.blo.0000147710.69612.76

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. R.M. Tabatabaee, M.R. Rasouli, M.G. Maltenfort, R. Fuino, C. Restrepo, A. Oliashirazi, Computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty: is there a difference between image-based and imageless techniques? J. Arthroplasty 33, 1076–1081 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2017.11.030

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. L. Perlick, H. Bäthis, M. Tingart, C. Perlick, J. Grifka, Navigation in total-knee arthroplasty CT-based implantation compared with the conventional technique. Acta Orthop. Scand. 75, 464–470 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. T. Heinz, A. Eidmann, P. Anderson, M. Weißenberger, A. Jakuscheit, M. Rudert, I. Stratos, Trends in computer-assisted surgery for total knee arthroplasty in Germany: an analysis based on the operative procedure classification system between 2010 to 2021. J. Clin. Med. 12, 549 (2023)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. I. Bendich, M. Kapadia, K. Alpaugh, A. Diane, J. Vigdorchik, G. Westrich, Trends of utilization and 90-day complication rates for computer-assisted navigation and robotic assistance for total knee arthroplasty in the United States from 2010 to 2018. Arthroplasty Today 11, 134–139 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. W.E. Moschetti, J.F. Konopka, H.E. Rubash, J.W. Genuario, Can Robot-Assisted Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty Be Cost-Effective? A Markov Decision Analysis. J. Arthroplasty 31, 759–765 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2015.10.018

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. E.C. Rodríguez-Merchán, The current role of the virtual elements of artificial intelligence in total knee arthroplasty. EFORT Open Rev. 7, 491–497 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1530/EOR-21-0107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. L. Camarda, A. D’Arienzo, S. Morello, G. Peri, B. Valentino, M. D’Arienzo, Patient-specific instrumentation for total knee arthroplasty: a literature review. Musculoskelet. Surg. 99, 11–18 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. T. Czurda, P. Fennema, M. Baumgartner, P. Ritschl, The association between component malalignment and post-operative pain following navigation-assisted total knee arthroplasty: results of a cohort/nested case-control study. Knee Surg. Sports Traumatol. Arthrosc. 18, 863–869 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. K. Lei, L. Liu, X. Chen, Q. Feng, L. Yang, L. Guo, Navigation and robotics improved alignment compared with psi and conventional instrument, while clinical outcomes were similar in TKA: a network meta-analysis. Knee Surg. Sports Traumatol. Arthrosc. 30, 721–733 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-021-06436-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. D.F. Amanatullah, P.E. Di Cesare, P.A. Meere, G.C. Pereira, Identification of the landmark registration safe zones during total knee arthroplasty using an imageless navigation system. J. Arthroplasty 28, 938–942 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2012.12.013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. R.G. Molli, K.C. Anderson, K.C. Buehler, D.C. Markel, Computer-assisted navigation software advancements improve the accuracy of total knee arthroplasty. J. Arthroplasty 26, 432–438 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2010.01.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. K.P. Iyengar, B.T.V. Gowers, V.K. Jain, R.S. Ahluwalia, R. Botchu, R. Vaishya, Smart sensor implant technology in total knee arthroplasty. J. Clin. Orthopaed. Trauma 22, 101605 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcot.2021.101605

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. M. Sohail, A. Khan, H. S. Kim, Choices of femoral and tibial coordinate systems and their impact on total knee arthroplasty. In: Proceedings of Korean Soc. Mech. Eng (KSME) Annual Meeting, pp. 1056–1057 (2021)

  28. M. Sohail,, J. Y. Kim, H. S. Kim, Choice of transepicondylar axis by projection method during imageless total knee arthroplasty‬. In: Proceedings of Korean Soc. Mech. Eng (KSME) CAE & Applied Mechanics Division Annual Meeting, pp 274–275 (2022)

  29. M. Sohail, J.Y. Kim, J. Park, H.S. Kim, J. Lee, Femoral coordinate system based on articular surfaces: implications for computer-assisted knee arthroplasty. Comput. Biol. Med. 163, 107229 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compbiomed.2023.107229

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. J.-B. Renault, G. Aüllo-Rasser, M. Donnez, S. Parratte, P. Chabrand, Articular-surface-based automatic anatomical coordinate systems for the knee bones. J. Biomech. (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2018.08.028

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. H. Iwaki, V. Pinskerova, M.A.R. Freeman, Tibiofemoral movement 1: the shapes and relative movements of the femur and tibia in the unloaded cadaver knee. J. Bone Jt. Surg. Br. 82-B, 1189–1195 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.82B8.0821189

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Y. Yoshioka, D. Siu, T.D. Cooke, The anatomy and functional axes of the femur. J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 69, 873–880 (1987)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. M. Sohail, J. Park, J.Y. Kim, H.S. Kim, J. Lee, Modified whiteside’s line-based transepicondylar axis for imageless total knee arthroplasty. Mathematics 10, 3670 (2022). https://doi.org/10.3390/math10193670

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. J.Y. Kim, M. Sohail, H.S. Kim, Rapid estimation of contact stresses in imageless total knee arthroplasty. Mathematics 11, 3527 (2023). https://doi.org/10.3390/math11163527

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. P. Yuqi, B. Jiang, Y. Li, Y. Yu, C. Yunsu, Alignment analysis of brainlab knee 3 navigation-guided total knee arthroplasty using the adjusted mechanical method. Front. Surg. 9, 1040025 (2022)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. M.N. Magin, Computernavigierter Gelenkersatz am knie mit dem orthopilot®. Orthop. Traumatol. 22, 63–80 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00064-010-3007-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. M. Mombert, L. Van Den Daelen, P. Gunst, L. Missinne, Navigated total knee arthroplasty: a radiological analysis of 42 randomised cases. Acta Orthop. Belg. 73, 49 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  38. F. Figueroa, E. Wakelin, J. Twiggs, B. Fritsch, Comparison between navigated reported position and postoperative computed tomography to evaluate accuracy in a robotic navigation system in total knee arthroplasty. Knee 26, 869–875 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. J. Bellemans, H. Vandenneucker, J. Vanlauwe, Robot-assisted total knee arthroplasty. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 1976–2007(464), 111–116 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1097/BLO.0b013e318126c0c0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. A.M.I. Di Gioia, B. Jaramaz, B.D. Colgan, Computer assisted orthopaedic surgery: image guided and robotic assistive technologies. Clin Orthopaed Relat Res® 354, 8 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. J.D. Sires, C.J. Wilson, CT validation of intraoperative implant position and knee alignment as determined by the MAKO total knee arthroplasty system. J. Knee Surg. 34, 1133–1137 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  42. M.H.L. Liow, P.L. Chin, H.N. Pang, D.K.-J. Tay, S.-J. Yeo, THINK surgical TSolution-One® (Robodoc) total knee arthroplasty. SICOT J 3, 63 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1051/sicotj/2017052

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. D.Y. Ponzio, J.H. Lonner, Preoperative mapping in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty using computed tomography scans is associated with radiation exposure and carries high cost. J. Arthroplasty 30, 964–967 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2014.10.039

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. B. Kayani, S. Konan, S.S. Huq, J. Tahmassebi, F.S. Haddad, Robotic-arm assisted total knee arthroplasty has a learning curve of seven cases for integration into the surgical workflow but no learning curve effect for accuracy of implant positioning. Knee Surg. Sports Traumatol. Arthrosc. 27, 1132–1141 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-018-5138-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. H. Vermue, T. Luyckx, P. Winnock de Grave, A. Ryckaert, A.-S. Cools, N. Himpe, J. Victor, Robot-assisted total knee arthroplasty is associated with a learning curve for surgical time but not for component alignment, limb alignment and gap balancing. Knee Surg. Sports Traumatol. Arthrosc. 30, 593–602 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-020-06341-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. S. Thiengwittayaporn, P. Uthaitas, C. Senwiruch, N. Hongku, R. Tunyasuwanakul, Imageless robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty accurately restores the radiological alignment with a short learning curve: a randomized controlled trial. Int. Orthopaed. (SICOT) 45, 2851–2858 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-021-05179-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. P. Savov, L.-R. Tuecking, H. Windhagen, J. Ehmig, M. Ettinger, Imageless robotic handpiece-assisted total knee arthroplasty: a learning curve analysis of surgical time and alignment accuracy. Arch. Orthop. Trauma. Surg. 141, 2119–2128 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-021-04036-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. C. Bell, L. Grau, F. Orozco, D. Ponzio, Z. Post, M. Czymek, A. Ong, The successful implementation of the Navio robotic technology required 29 cases. J Robotic Surg 16, 495–499 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-021-01254-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. M. Ali, D. Phillips, A. Kamson, I. Nivar, R. Dahl, R. Hallock, Learning curve of robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty for non-fellowship-trained orthopedic surgeons. Arthroplasty Today 13, 194–198 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artd.2021.10.020

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. T.L. Thomas, G.S. Goh, M.K. Nguyen, J.H. Lonner, Pin-related complications in computer navigated and robotic-assisted knee arthroplasty: a systematic review. J. Arthroplasty 37, 2291-2307.e2 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2022.05.012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. J.Y. Kim, M. Sohail, H.S. Kim, Machine learning based stress estimation after total knee arthroplasty. Proc. Korean Soc. Mech. Eng (KSME) Annu Meet. pp. 2246–2247 (2022)

  52. K.N. Kunze, E.M. Polce, A. Patel, P.M. Courtney, B.R. Levine, Validation and performance of a machine-learning derived prediction guide for total knee arthroplasty component sizing. Arch. Orthop. Trauma. Surg. 141, 2235–2244 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-021-04041-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. S.M. Navarro, E.Y. Wang, H.S. Haeberle, M.A. Mont, V.E. Krebs, B.M. Patterson, P.N. Ramkumar, Machine learning and primary total knee arthroplasty: patient forecasting for a patient-specific payment model. J. Arthroplasty 33, 3617–3623 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2018.08.028

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. C. Jo, S. Ko, W.C. Shin, H.-S. Han, M.C. Lee, T. Ko, D.H. Ro, Transfusion after total knee arthroplasty can be predicted using the machine learning algorithm. Knee Surg. Sports Traumatol. Arthrosc. 28, 1757–1764 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-019-05602-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. K.N. Kunze, E.M. Polce, A.J. Sadauskas, B.R. Levine, Development of machine learning algorithms to predict patient dissatisfaction after primary total knee arthroplasty. J. Arthroplasty 35, 3117–3122 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2020.05.061

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. H. Farooq, E.R. Deckard, N.R. Arnold, R.M. Meneghini, Machine learning algorithms identify optimal sagittal component position in total knee arthroplasty. J. Arthroplasty 36, S242–S249 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2021.02.063

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. A. El-Galaly, C. Grazal, A. Kappel, P.T. Nielsen, S.L. Jensen, J.A. Forsberg, Can machine-learning algorithms predict early revision tka in the danish knee arthroplasty registry? Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 478, 2088–2101 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1097/CORR.0000000000001343

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. J.M. Karnuta, B.C. Luu, A.L. Roth, H.S. Haeberle, A.F. Chen, R. Iorio, J.L. Schaffer, M.A. Mont, B.M. Patterson, V.E. Krebs et al., Artificial intelligence to identify arthroplasty implants from radiographs of the knee. J. Arthroplasty 36, 935–940 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2020.10.021

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. S. Giannotti, F. Sacchetti, C. Citarelli, V. Bottai, N. Bianchi, G. Agostini, R. Capanna, Single-use, patient-specific instrumentation technology in knee arthroplasty: a comparative study between standard instrumentation and psi efficiency system. Musculoskelet. Surg. 104, 195–200 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. L. Wen, Z. Wang, D. Ma, T. Qu, Surgeon dominated design can improve the accuracy of patient-specific instruments in kinematically aligned TKA. J. Person. Med. 12, 1192 (2022)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. A. Mannan, D. Akinyooye, F. Hossain, A Meta-analysis of functional outcomes in patient-specific instrumented knee arthroplasty. J. Knee Surg. 30, 668–674 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. K. Kizaki, A. Shanmugaraj, F. Yamashita, N. Simunovic, A. Duong, V. Khanna, O.R. Ayeni, Total knee arthroplasty using patient-specific instrumentation for osteoarthritis of the knee: a meta-analysis. BMC Musculoskelet. Disord. 20, 1–18 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. M. Meyer, T. Renkawitz, F. Völlner, A. Benditz, J. Grifka, M. Weber, Pros and cons of navigated versus conventional total knee arthroplasty—a retrospective analysis of over 2400 patients. Arch. Orthop. Trauma Surg. (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-021-03834-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Ministry of Trade, Industry, and Energy (MOTIE) and the Korea Institute for Advancement of Technology (KIAT), through the International Cooperative R&D program (Project No. P0016173).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Mechanical, Robotics and Energy Engineering, Dongguk University-Seoul, 30 Pildong-ro 1-gil, Jung-gu, Seoul, 04620, Republic of Korea

    Muhammad Sohail, Jaehyun Park, Jaehun Lee & Heung Soo Kim

Authors
  1. Muhammad Sohail
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jaehyun Park
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Jaehun Lee
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Heung Soo Kim
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Heung Soo Kim.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (XLSX 12 KB)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sohail, M., Park, J., Lee, J. et al. Limitations in Transitioning from Conventional to Modern Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Review. Multiscale Sci. Eng. 5, 77–85 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42493-024-00095-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42493-024-00095-w

Keywords

Search

Navigation