Skip to main content

Presenting a dataset for collaborator recommending systems in academic social network

A case study on ReseachGate

Abstract

Collaborator finding systems are a special type of expert finding models. There is a long-lasting challenge for research in the collaborator recommending research area, which is the lack of the structured dataset to be used by the researchers. We introduce two datasets to fill this gap. The first dataset is prepared for designing a consistent, collaborator finding system. The next one, called a co-author finding model, models an academic social network as a table that contains different relations between the pair of users. Both of them provide an opportunity for introducing potential collaborators to each other. These two models have been extracted from ResearchGate (RG) data set and are available publicly. RG dataset has been collected from Jan. 2019 to April 2019 and includes raw data of 3980 RG users. The dataset consists of almost complete information about users. In the preprocessing phase, the well-known Elmo was used for analyzing textual data. We call this as ResearchGate dataset for Recommending Systems (RGRS). For assessing the validity of data, we analyze each layer of data separately, and the results are reported. After preparing data and evaluating the collaborator finding models, we have done some assessments on RGRS. Some of these assessments are co-author, following-follower, and question answering relations. The outcomes indicate that it is the best relation in propagating knowledge in the network. To the best of our knowledge, there is no processed and analyzed dataset of this size.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Notes

  1. https://www.mendeley.com/

  2. https://www.academia.edu/

  3. https://aminer.org/

  4. https://www.linkedin.com/

  5. https://www.researchgate.net/

  6. https://github.com/zroozbahani/RGData

  7. http://uvt-expert-collection/

  8. http://www.informatik.uni-trier.de/ley/db

  9. http://academic.research.microsoft.com/

  10. http://dblp.uni-trier.de/

  11. https://archive.org/details/stackexchange

References

  • Anongnart S (2012) Building fexpert: system for searching experts in research university using k-means algorithms. In: 2012 IEEE symposium on computers & informatics (ISCI). IEEE, pp 176–179

  • Cai D, Shao Z, He X, Yan X, Han J (2005) Mining hidden community in heterogeneous social networks. In: Proceedings of the 3rd international workshop on Link discovery, pp 58–65

  • Davoodi E, Afsharchi M, Kianmehr K (2012) A social network-based approach to expert recommendation system. In: International conference on hybrid artificial intelligence systems. Springer, pp 91–102

  • Gollapalli SD, Mitra P, Giles CL (2012) Similar researcher search in academic environments. In: Proceedings of the 12th ACM/IEEE-CS joint conference on digital libraries, pp 167–170

  • Hoang DT, Tran VC, Nguyen TT, Nguyen NT, Hwang D (2017) A consensus-based method to enhance a recommendation system for research collaboration. In: Asian conference on intelligent information and database systems. Springer, pp 170–180

  • Huynh T, Takasu A, Masada T, Hoang K (2014) Collaborator recommendation for isolated researchers. In: 2014 28th international conference on advanced information networking and applications workshops. IEEE, pp 639–644

  • Jutla IS, Jeub LG, Mucha PJ (2011) A generalized louvain method for community detection implemented in matlab. http://netwiki.amath.unc.edu/GenLouvain

  • Kong X, Jiang H, Yang Z, Xu Z, Xia F, Tolba A (2016) Exploiting publication contents and collaboration networks for collaborator recommendation. PloS one 11(2):e0148492

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li N, Gillet D (2013) Identifying influential scholars in academic social media platforms, pp 608–614

  • Liang W, Zhou X, Huang S, Hu C, Xu X, Jin Q (2018) Modeling of cross-disciplinary collaboration for potential field discovery and recommendation based on scholarly big data. Future generation computer systems 87:591–600

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peters ME, Neumann M, Iyyer M, Gardner M, Clark C, Lee K, Zettlemoyer L (2018) Deep contextualized word representations. arXiv:1802.05365

  • Rani SK, Raju K, Kumari VV (2015) Expert finding system using latent effort ranking in academic social networks. Int J Inf Technol Comput Sci 7(2):21–27

    Google Scholar 

  • Roozbahani Z, Rezaeenour J, Emamgholizadeh H, Belkin M (2018) Identifying and comparing features and facilities of scientific social networks for recommending collaborators. In: International conference on distributed computing and high performance computing (DCHPC 2018), Qom, Iran, pp 1–16

  • Roozbahani Z, Rezaeenour J, Emamgholizadeh H, Bidgoly AJ (2020) A systematic survey on collaborator finding systems in scientific social networks. Knowl Inf Syst 63:183–194

    Google Scholar 

  • Shani G, Gunawardana A (2011) Evaluating recommendation systems. In: Recommender systems handbook. Springer, pp 257–297

  • Sohangir S, Wang D (2018) Finding expert authors in financial forum using deep learning methods. In: 2018 second IEEE international conference on robotic computing (IRC). IEEE, pp 399–402

  • Sonnenwald DH (2007) Scientific collaboration. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology 41(1):643–681

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sujatha Das G, Mitra P, Giles CL (2012) ’Similar researcher search’ in academic environments

  • Sun N, Lu Y, Cao Y (2019) Career age-aware scientific collaborator recommendation in scholarly big data. IEEE Access 7:136036–136045

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tang L, Liu H (2009) Uncovering cross-dimension group structures in multi-dimensional networks. In: SDM workshop on analysis of dynamic networks, pp 568–575

  • Torkzadeh Mahani N, Dehghani M, Mirian MS, Shakery A, Taheri K (2018) Expert finding by the dempster-shafer theory for evidence combination. Expert Syst 35(1):e12231

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu Y, Guo X, Hao J, Ma J, Lau RY, Xu W (2012) Combining social network and semantic concept analysis for personalized academic researcher recommendation. Decis Support Syst 54(1):564– 573

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang B, Di J, Liu J, Liu D (2013) Hierarchical community detection with applications to real-world network analysis. Data & Knowledge Engineering 83:20–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou H, Zhang Y, Li J (2018) An overlapping community detection algorithm in complex networks based on information theory. Data & Knowledge Engineering 117:183–194

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jalal Rezaeenour.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Roozbahani, Z., Rezaeenour, J., Shahrooei, R. et al. Presenting a dataset for collaborator recommending systems in academic social network. J. of Data, Inf. and Manag. 3, 29–40 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42488-021-00041-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42488-021-00041-7

Keywords

  • Collaborator finding
  • Academic social network
  • ResearchGate
  • Recommender systems