Skip to main content
Log in

Multiportfolio optimization with CVaR risk measure

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Data, Information and Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In the financial industry, the trading of multiple portfolios is usually aggregated and optimized simultaneously. When multiple portfolios are managed together, unique issues such as market impact costs must be dealt with properly. Conditional Value-at-Risk (CVaR) is a coherent risk measure with the computationally friendly feature of convexity. In this study, we propose the new combination of CVaR with the multiportfolio optimization (MPO) problem and develop optimization models with using CVaR to measure risks in MPO problems. A five-step scheme is presented for practical operations with considering the impact costs caused by aggregating the trading of multiple portfolios. The impact of CVaR on returns and utility in MPO environment is studied, and the comparisons with existing methods and sensitivity analysis are reported.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Almgren R, Thum C, Hauptmann E, Li H (2005) Direct estimation of equity market impact. Risk 18(7):58–62

    Google Scholar 

  • Artzner P, Delbaen F, Eber J-M, Heath D (1999) Coherent measures of risk. Math Financ 9(3):203–228

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Coase R (1937) The nature of the firm. Economica 4(16):386–405

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coase R (1960) The problem of social cost. J Law Econ 3:1–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fabian C (2008) Handling CVaR objectives and constraints in two-stage stochastic models. Eur J Oper Res 191:888–911

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Fabozzi J, Pachamanova D (2010) Simulation and optimization in finance: modelling with MATLAB,@risk, or VBA. Business & Economics

  • Iancu DA, Trichakis N (2014) Fairness and efficiency in multiportfolio optimization. Oper Res 62(6):1285–1301

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Ji R, Lejeune MA (2018) Risk-budgeting multi-portfolio optimization with portfolio and marginal risk constraints. Ann Oper Res 262(2):547–578

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Lejeune MA, Shen S (2016) Multi-objective probabilistically constrained programs with variable risk: models for multi-portfolio financial optimization. Eur J Oper Res 252(2):522–539

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Meng Z, Jiang M, Hu Q (2011) Dynamic CVaR with multi-period risk problems. J Syst Sci Complex 24:907–918

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Najafi AA, Mushakhian S (2015) Multi-stage stochastic mean-semivariance-CVaR optimization under transaction costs. Appl Math Comput 256:445–458

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Numtech, (2012). Basel Committee Proposes Using Expected Shortfall Instead of VaR in Market Risk Management: http://www.numtech.com/news/basel-committee-proposes-expected-shortfall/. Accessed 26 Feb 2016

  • O’Cinneide C, Scherer B, Xu X (2006) Pooling trades in a quantitative investment process. J Portf Manag 32(4):33–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rockafellar RT, Uryasev S (2000a) Optimization of conditional value-at-risk. J Risk 2:21–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rockafellar RT, Uryasev S (2000b) Optimization of conditional value-at-risk: optimization algorithms and applications. Computational Intelligence for Financial Engineering:49–57

  • Rockafellar RT, Uryasev S (2002) Conditional value-at-risk for general loss distributions. J Bank Financ 26:1443–1471

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sarykalin S, Serraino G, Uryasev S (2008) Value-at-risk vs. conditional value-at-risk in risk management and optimization. Conference Paper, INFORMS. https://doi.org/10.1287/educ.1080.0052

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Savelsbergh, M.W.P., Stubbs, R.A., Vandenbussche, D., (2010), Multiportfolio optimization: A natural next step. Guerard JB, ed. Handbook of Portfolio Construction (Springer, New York), 565–581

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Securities and Exchange Commission, (2011), General information on the regulation of investment advisers. http://www.sec.gov/divisions/investment/iaregulation/memoia.htm. Accessed 26 Feb 2016

  • Stubbs, R., Vandenbussche, D., (2009) Multiportfolio Optimization and Fairness in Allocation of Trades, White paper, Axioma Inc. Research Paper, No. 013

  • Takano Y, Gotoh J (2011) Constant rebalanced portfolio optimization under nonlinear transaction costs. Asia-Pacific Finan Markets 18:191–211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang MH, Li C, Xue HG, Xu FM (2014) A new portfolio rebalancing model with transaction costs. J Appl Math

  • Yang Y, Rubio F, Scutari G (2013) Multiportfolio optimization: a potential game approach. IEEE Transactions on Signal Professing 61(22):5590–5602

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang X, Zhang K (2009) Using genetic algorithm to solve a new multi-period stochastic optimization model. J Comput Appl Math 231:114–123

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research supported by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada discovery grant (RGPIN-2014-03594, RGPIN-2019-07115).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Guoqing Zhang.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhang, G., Zhang, Q. Multiportfolio optimization with CVaR risk measure. J. of Data, Inf. and Manag. 1, 91–106 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42488-019-00007-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42488-019-00007-w

Keywords

Navigation