Skip to main content
Log in

Effect of Michelia macclurei intercropping on soil properties and microbial population in young rubber plantation

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Rubber Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The rubber tree is an economically important tree planted in many tropical countries. While rubber planting has improved the livelihoods of growers, it has also resulted in soil degradation. However, systematic studies on assessment of soil health and its management in rubber plantations are limited. The present study explored whether intercropping of Michelia macclurei (an ornamental evergreen tree) in rubber plantation could help conserve soil health compared to traditional monoculture practice with randomised complete block design. The rubber tree density was the same in monoculture and intercropping, with the addition of Michelia macclurei in intercropping. The effects of soil properties and microbial communities was used to analyse two different planting patterns of rubber monoculture and rubber intercropping using soil sampling from field plots. The study investigated variation in soil physical structure, soil moisture, soil nutrients, soil microbes, and enzyme activities in two types of rubber plantations viz. a monoclonal plantation without intercrop (RM) and a plantation with Michelia macclurei as an intercrop (RAS). The results from above study showed an increase in soil organic carbon (SOC), total nitrogen (TN), ammonium nitrogen (AN), available phosphorus (AP), nitrate nitrogen (NN) and total potassium (TK) in plantation with intercrop as compared to monoclonal plantation without intercrop. When comparing the corresponding values of RM to RAS, bacteria and total microbial abundance of RAS increased on average by 75.51% and 48.42%, respectively. In addition, after the transition from rubber monoculture to rubber agroforestry, the annual average of SOC, TN, AP, TK nutrients and pH in soil increased by 10.94%, 4.25%, 14.53%, 1.34% and 9.74%, respectively. Soil water content, soil bulk density and soil porosity were not significantly different between RM and RAS treatments. Sucrase activity and cellulase activity also increased in the RAS intercropping system. These results show that intercropping promotes soil organic matter and microbial communities and enhances soil enzyme activities. These findings indicate that rubber intercropping creates healthy soil environments conducive to tree growth and improves the ecosystem sustainability of rubber plantations. Healthier and stronger rubber trees may increase rubber production and provide sustainable management of plantations in the future.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Liu SR, Yang YJ, Wan H (2018) Development strategy and management countermeasures of planted forests in China: transforming from timber-centered single objective management towards multi-purpose management for enhancing quality and benefits of ecosystem services. Acta Ecol Sinica 38(1):1–10

    Google Scholar 

  2. Singh AK, Liu W, Zakari S, Wu J, Nath J (2021) A global review of rubber plantations: impacts on ecosystem functions, mitigations, future directions, and policies for sustainable cultivation. Sci Total Environ 796:148948

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Huang JX, Pan J, Zhou LJ, Zheng DH, Yuan SN, Chen JM, Li J, Gui Q, Lin WF (2020) An improved double-row rubber (Hevea brasiliensis) plantation system increases land use efficiency by allowing inter cropping with yam bean, common bean, soybean, peanut, and coffee: a 17-year case study on Hainan Island, China. J Clean Prod 263:121493

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Toriyama J, Imaya A, Hirai K, Lim TK, Hak M, Kiyono Y (2022) Effects of forest conversion to rubber plantation and of replanting rubber trees on soil organic carbon pools in a tropical moist climate zone. Agr Ecosyst Environ 323:107699

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Li XF, Wang ZG, Bao XG, Sun JH, Yang SC, Wang P, Wang CB, Wu JP, Liu XR, Tian XL, Wang Y, Li JP, Wang Y, Xia HY, Mei PP, Wang XF, Zhao JH, Yu RP, Zhang WP, Che ZX, Gui LG, Callaway RM, Tilman D, Li L (2021) Long-term increased grain yield and soil fertility from intercropping. Nat Sustain 4:943–950

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Subramanian B, Zhang Y, Grace J, Sha L, Zhou W (2020) Soil organic matter as affected by the conversion of natural tropical rainforest to monoculture rubber plantations under acric ferralsols. CATENA 195:104753

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Cong WF, Hoffland E, Li L, Six J, Sun JH, Bao XG, Zhang FS, van der Werf W (2015) Intercropping enhances soil carbon and nitrogen. Glob Change Biol 21:1715–1726

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Tang C, Yang M, Fang Y et al (2016) The rubber tree genome reveals new insights into rubber production and species adaptation. Nat Plants 2:16073

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Davis W (1997) The rubber industry’s biological nightmare. Fortune 136(3):86

    Google Scholar 

  10. Li HM, Ma YX, Aide TM, Liu WJ (2008) Past, present and future land-use in Xishuangbanna, China and the implications for carbon dynamics. For Ecol Manag 255(1):16–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Xu J, Grumbine RE, Beckschaefer P (2014) Landscape transformation through the use of ecological and socioeconomic indicators in Xishuangbanna, Southwest China, Mekong region. Ecol Indic 36:749–756

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Sever H, Makineci E (2009) Soil organic carbon and nitrogen accumulation on coal mine spoils reclaimed with maritime pine (PinuspinasterAiton) in Agacli-Istanbul. Environ Monit Assess 155(1/4):273–280

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Liu WJ, Luo QP, Li JT, Wang PY, Lu HJ, Liu WY, Li HM (2015) The effects of conversion of tropical rainforest to rubber plantation on splash erosion in Xishuangbanna, SW China. Hydrol Res 46:168–174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Mann CC (2009) Addicted to rubber. Science 325(5940):564–566

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Liu W, Luo Q, Lu H, Wu J, Duan W (2017) The effect of litter layer on controlling surface runoff and erosion in rubber plantations on tropical mountain slopes. SW China Catena 149:167–175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Liu ZW (2014) Soil nutrient status and rational fertilization in Hainan reclamation area. Hainan Agr Reclam Technol (5): 12–18

  17. Sun HD, Liu B, Wu BS, Wei JS, He P, Gao L, Wu M (2016) Characteristics and causes of soil acidification in the rubber plantation. J Northwest for Univ 31(2):49–54

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Jiang XJ, Liu WJ, Wu JE, Wang PY, Liu CG, Yuan ZQ (2017) Land degradation controlled and mitigated by rubber-based agroforestry systems through optimizing soil physical conditions and water supply mechanisms: a Case Study in Xishuangbanna, China. Land Degrad Dev 28(7):2277–2289

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Priyadarshan PM, Hoa TTT, Huasun H, Gonçalves PS (2005) Yielding potential of rubber (Hevea brasiliensis) in sub-optimal environments. J Crop Improv 14:221–247

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Romyen A, Sausue P, Charenjiratragul S (2017) Investigation of rubber-based intercropping system in southern Thailand. Kasetsart J Soc Sci 39:135e142

    Google Scholar 

  21. Sankalpa JKS, Wijesuriya W, Wimalaratana W et al (2021) Utilizing a farm typology for the development of rubber-based farming: a case from Moneragala district, Sri Lanka. J Rubber Res 24:719–734

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Liu ZF, Liu PP, An F, Chen LL, Yun T, Ma XW (2020) Effects of cassava allelochemicals on rubber tree pathogens, soil microorganisms, and soil fertility in a rubber tree–cassava intercropping system. J Rubber Res 23:257–271

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Qi D, Yang C, Yun T, Wu ZX (2023) The main service functions and driving forces of rubber (Hevea brasiliensis) plantation ecosystem in China. J Rubber Res 26:155–164

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Pradeep B, Sylas VP, Jessy MD (2022) A framework for assessing the vulnerability of rubber plantations to the impacts of climate change with special reference to Kerala, India. J Rubber Res 25:387–399

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Huang YY, Chen YX, Castro IN, Baruffol M, Brezzi M, Lang A, Li Y, Ma K, Niklaus P, Schmid B (2018) Impacts of species richness on productivity in a largescale subtropical forest experiment. Science 362(6410):80–83

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Wu J, Liu W, Chen C (2016) Can intercropping with the world’s three major beverage plants help improve the water use of rubber trees? J Appl Ecol 53(6):1787–1799

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Luedeling E, Smethurst PJ, Baudron F, Bayala J, Huth NI, Noordwijk MV, Ong CK, Mulia R, Lusiana B, Muthuri C, Sinclair F (2016) Field-scale modeling of tree-crop interactions: challenges and development needs. Agr Syst 142:51–69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Bierman PM, Rosen CJ (2005) Nutrient management for fruit and vegetable crop production: Nutrient cycling and maintaining soil fertility, https://conservancy.umn.edu/handle/11299/197962 2021-03-02

  29. Zhang NN, Sun YM, Wang ET, Yang JS, Yuan HL, Scow KM (2015) Effects of intercropping and rhizobial inoculation on the ammonia-oxidizing microorganisms in rhizospheres of maize and faba bean plants. Appl Soil Ecol 85:76–85

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Li XA, Liao LG, Yang HP, Huang YZ, He JA, Ye SM (2020) Spatial pattern of artificial mixed plantation of Cunninghamia lanceolata and Michelia macclurei. J Southwest for Univ 40(5):1–9

    Google Scholar 

  31. Li J, Zhou LJ, Lin WF (2019) Calla lily intercropping in rubber tree plantations changes the nutrient content, microbial abundance, and enzyme activity of both rhizosphere and non-rhizosphere soil and calla lily growth. Ind Crop Prod 132:344–351

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Li PY, Li L (1998) Study on mechanical and physical properties of 10-year-old Michelia macclurei wood. J for Environ 18(2):178–182

    Google Scholar 

  33. Wang JY, Mo YF, Fang XR, Shen LF, Li G, Yang M, Wei GY (2019) Growth performance of 18 broad-leaved Tree species at 9-year-old in Southern Guangxi. For Environ Sci 35(5):33–38

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Bao TD (2000) Soil Agrochemical Analysis. Third Edition. Beijing: China Agricultural Press

  35. Long J, Huang CY, Teng Yi, Yao HY (2003) Preliminary study on soil microbes and soil biochemical activities in mining wasteland. Acta Ecol Sin 23(3):496–503

    Google Scholar 

  36. Schinner F, Von Mersi W, Xylanase CM (1990) Cellulase and invertase activity in soil: an improved method. Soil Biol Biochem 22:511–515

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Xu GH, Zheng HY (1986) Manual of Soil Microbial Analysis methods. China Agricultural, Beijing

    Google Scholar 

  38. Qian CR, Huang YX (1999) Microbiology Experiment Course. Peking University, Beijing, pp 53–71

    Google Scholar 

  39. Wu JS, Lin QM, Huang QY, Xiao HA (2006) Determination method of soil microbial biomass and its application. Meterologicla Publishing House.pp4– 17, Beijing

    Google Scholar 

  40. Bao SD (2000) Soil agrochemical analysis. China Agriculture, Beijing

    Google Scholar 

  41. Hume A, Chen HYH, Taylor AR, Kayahara GJ, Man RZ (2016) Soil C:N:P dynamics during secondary succession following fire in the boreal forest of central Canada. For Ecol Manag 369:1–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Qiu JM, Wu HN, Huang ZP et al (2023) Effects of sugarcane/peanut intercropping on root physiology and rhizosphere soil nutrients. Chin J Oil Crop Sciences, https://link.cnki.net/urlid/42.1429.S.20230807.1330.002

  43. Fu XP, Wu FZ, Wu F, Liu D (2016) Advances in the mechanism of improving crop mineral nutrients in intercropping and relay intercropping systems. J Plant Nutrition and Fertilizer 2016,22(2):525–535

  44. Ma ZS, Wu ZX, Qi DL (2022) Plant allelopathy and its application in the complex rubber tree ecosystem. J Trop Biol 13(1):95–99

    Google Scholar 

  45. Zhou ZZ, Zheng HH, Yang Z, Yin GT, Chen KT (1997) Research on biological cycle of nutrient elements in plantation of rubber intercropped with Amomum Longiligulare. For Res 10(5):464–471

    Google Scholar 

  46. Lyu M, Xie J, Giardina CP, Vadeboncoeur MA, Feng X, Wang M, Ukonmaanaho L, Lin TC, Kuzyakov Y, Yang YS (2019) Understory ferns alter soil carbon chemistry and increase carbon storage during reforestation with native pine on previously degraded sites. Soil Biol Biochem 132:80–92

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Chen CF, Liu WJ, Jiang XJ, Wu JN (2017) Effects of rubber-based agroforestry systems on soil aggregation and associated soil organic carbon: implications for land use. Geoderma 299:13–24

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Chen CF, Liu WJ, Wu JE, Jiang XJ, Zhu XA (2019) Can intercropping with the cash crop help improve the soil physico-chemical properties of rubber plantations? Geoderma 335: 149– 160

  49. Wen Z, Wu JE, Yang YZ, Li RN, Ouyang ZY, Zheng H (2022) Implementing intercropping maintains soil water balance while enhancing multiple ecosystem services. CATENA 217:106426

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Liu JQ, Liu WJ, Li WX, Jiang XJ, Wu JE (2018) Effects of rainfall on the spatial distribution of the throughfall kinetic energy on a small scale in a rubber plantation. Hydrol Sci J 63(7):1078–1090

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Wang Y, Liu S, Guo JL, Liu BB (2018) Influence of different vegetation types on soil nutrients, enzyme activities and microbial diversities in Loess Plateau. Bull Soil Water Conserv 38(1):62–68

    Google Scholar 

  52. Li J, Lin WF, Zhou LJ (2016) Effects of long-term intercropping coffee on rubber soil nutrients and soil enzymes. Southwest China J Agric Sci 29(6):1371–1374

    Google Scholar 

  53. Yuan ZQ, Yu KL, Epstein H, Fang C, Li JT, Liu QQ, Liu XW, Gao WJ, Li FM (2016) Effects of legume species introduction on vegetation and soil nutrient development on abandoned croplands in a semi-arid environment on the Loess Plateau, China. Sci Total Environ 541:692–700

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are thankful to Dr. Wang DF for providing relevant standard soil profile resource in Hainan Island.

Funding

This project is supported by this research was funded by Hainan Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China (320RC736; 319MS090), China Agriculture Research System (CARS-33-ZP3). The authors are grateful to above grants that financially supported this work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Dongling Qi, Zhixiang Wu or Xiaobo Yang.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship and/or publication of this article.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Qi, D., Zhang, F., Wu, Z. et al. Effect of Michelia macclurei intercropping on soil properties and microbial population in young rubber plantation. J Rubber Res (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42464-024-00256-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42464-024-00256-4

Keywords

Navigation