Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Effects of different factors on leaf litter decomposition in rubber plantations in Danzhou, South China

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Rubber Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Litter decomposition influences the nutrient cycle and the availability of soil nutrient resources in rubber plantation ecosystem. This study aimed to analyze effects of different factors such as soil layer depths, root accessibility and soil fertility levels on dynamic decomposition of leaf litter in rubber plantations, as well as physico-chemical properties and microbiological parameters of the soil. We performed decomposition experiments to analyze the effect of these factors on leaf litter decomposition in a rubber plantation in Danzhou, South China. The results showed that the rubber leaf litter decomposition activity increased with the depth of the soil layer. The fertility level of soil affected the decomposition process, with higher soil fertility level restraining litter decomposition. The litter decomposition was affected by the root accessibility, but the roots turned out to not be decisive factors in the decomposition process. The microorganism abundance differed seasonally in the above-ground and underground soil layers during the rubber leaf litter decomposition. The number of actinomycetes, bacteria and fungi changed most dramatically between March and May. The fastest rate of rubber leaf litter decomposition also occurred during this period. The microorganisms played a key role in the rubber litter decomposition underground. Enzymes sucrase, urease, polyphenol oxidase and cellulase contributed in regulating the decomposition of rubber leaf litter. These results may provide further insight into the potential of using leaf litter resources in tropical plantations. This study also provides valuable information about the decomposition mechanism of leaf litter as part of the nutrient cycle.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Liu C, Sun X (2013) A review of ecological stoichiometry: basic knowledge and advances. Ref Modul Earth Syst Environ Sci. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-409548-9.05519-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Waring RH, Schlesinger WH (1985) Forest ecosystems, concepts and management. Clin Exp Allergy 75(75):284

    Google Scholar 

  3. Krishna MP, Mohan M (2017) Litter decomposition in forest ecosystems: a review. Energy Ecol Environ 2(4):236–249

    Google Scholar 

  4. Schlesinger WH (1997) Biogeochemistry: an analysis of global change. Q Rev Biol 54(4):353–423

    Google Scholar 

  5. Wen HY, Fu H, Guo D (2017) Influence of nitrogen addition on Stipa bungeana and Heteropappus altaicus litter decomposition and nutrient release in a steppe located on the Loess Plateau. Acta Ecol Sinica 37(6):2014–2022

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Wang J, Liu LL, Wang X, Chen YW (2015) The interaction between abiotic photodegradation and microbial decomposition under ultraviolet radiation. Global Change Biol 21(5):2095–2104

    Google Scholar 

  7. Piscart C, Navel S, Maazouzi C, Montuelle B, Cornut J, Mermillod-Blondin F, Chatelliers MC, Simon L, Marmonier P (2011) Leaf litter recycling in benthic and hyporheic layers in agricultural streams with different types of land use. Sci Total Environ 409(20):4373–4380

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Tang C, Yang M, Fang Y, Luo Y, Gao S, Xaio X, An Z, Zhou B, Zhang B, Tan X, Yeang H, Qin Y, Yang J, Lin Q, Mei H, Montoro P, Long X, Qi J, Hua Y, He Z, Sun M, Li W, Zeng X, Cheng H, Liu Y, Yang J, Tian W, Zhuang N, Zeng R, Li D, He P, Li Z, Zou Z, Li S, Li C, Wang J, Wei D, Lai C, Luo W, Yu J, Hu S, Huang H (2016) The rubber tree genome reveals new insights into rubber production and species adaptation. Nat Plants 2:16073

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Podong C, Poolsiri R (2013) Above ground biomass and litter productivity in relation with carbon and nitrogen content in various landuse small watershed, Lower Northern Thailand. J Biodivers Environ Sci 3(8):121–132

    Google Scholar 

  10. N’Dri Julien K, Guéi Arnauth M, Edoukou EF, Yéo JG, N’Guessan KK, Lagerlöf J (2018) Can litter production and litter decomposition improve soil properties in the rubber plantations of different ages in Côted Ivoire? Nutr Cycl Agroecosys 111:203–215

    Google Scholar 

  11. Cao JH, Jiang JS, Zhao CM, Chen JM (2007) Advances on nutrient circulation under rubber plantations ecosystem. Trop Agr Sci 27(3):48–56

    Google Scholar 

  12. Cao JH, Tao ZL, Zha CM, Jiang JS, Xie GS (2011) Nutrient return in fall litter of Hevea brasiliensis at different age. Chin J Trop Crops 32(1):1–6

    Google Scholar 

  13. Lu TP, Zhang WX, Niu J, Lin YM, Wu MJ (2016) Changes of withered leaves and soil carbon and nitrogen in different forest types in Xishuangbanna. Chin J Trop Crops 37(8):1526–1533

    Google Scholar 

  14. Zhou HP, Wei LP, Xie J, Chen GY, Xu R (2017) Litter dynamics of rubber plantation and macadamia plantation in Xishuangbanna. J Anhui Agr Univ 44(3):422–42833

    Google Scholar 

  15. Prescott CE (2010) Litter decomposition: what controls it and how can we alter it to sequester more carbon in forest soils? Biogeochemistry 101(1–3):133–149

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Kaspari M, Garcia MN, Harms KE, Santana M, Yavitt JB (2008) Multiple nutrients limit litterfall and decomposition in a tropical forest. Ecol Lett 11(1):35–43

    Google Scholar 

  17. Abraham J, Philip A, Punnoose KI (2001) Soil nutrient status during the immature phase of growth in a Hevea plantation. Indian J Nat Rubber Res 14(2):170–172

    Google Scholar 

  18. Sun HD, Liu B, Wu BS, Wei JS, He P, Gao L, Wu M (2016) Characteristics and causes of soil acidification in the rubber plantation. J Northwest Forest Univ 31(2):49–54

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Jiang XJ, Liu WJ, Wu JE, Wang PY, Liu CG, Yuan ZQ (2017) Land degradation controlled and mitigated by rubber-based agroforestry systems through optimizing soil physical conditions and water supply mechanisms: a case study in Xishuangbanna, China. Land Degrad Dev 28(7):2277–2289

    Google Scholar 

  20. Warren-Thomas E, Dolman PM, Edwards DP (2015) Increasing demand for natural rubber necessitates a robust sustainability initiative to mitigate impacts on tropical biodiversity. Conserv Lett 8(4):230–241

    Google Scholar 

  21. Statista Research Department. (2017) Price for Malaysian rubber from 2013 to 2030. https://www.statista.com/statistics/469630/rubber-price-forecast/

  22. Kennedy SF, Leimona B, Yi ZF (2017) Making a green rubber stamp: emerging dynamics of natural rubber eco-certification. Int J Biodivers Sci Ecosyst Serv Manage 13(1):100–115

    Google Scholar 

  23. Liu WJ, Luo QP, Lu HJ, Wu JE, Duan WP (2017) The effect of litter layer on controlling surface runoff and erosion in rubber plantations on tropical mountain slopes, SW China. CATENA 149:167–175

    Google Scholar 

  24. Jobi MC (2006) “Studies on the biology of Luprops curticollis (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae) and rubber litter insect dynamics in relation to rubber litter fall patterns” Thesis. Department of Zoology, St. Joseph’s College Devagiri, University of Calicut, https//hdl.handle.net/10603/42038

  25. Li YN, Zhou XM, Zhang NL, Ma KP (2016) The research of mixed litter effects on litter decomposition in terrestrial ecosystems. Acta Ecol Sin 36(16):4977–4987

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. People’s Republic of China Forestry Industry Standard (2011) Observation methodology for long-term forest ecosystem research. China Standard Press, Beijing

    Google Scholar 

  27. Qian CR, Huang YX (1999) Microbiology experiment course. Peking University Press, Beijing

    Google Scholar 

  28. Xu GH, Zheng HY (1986) Handbook of soil microbial analysis methods. China Agricultural Press, Beijing

    Google Scholar 

  29. Zhao CM, Cao JH, Li XB, Lan GY, Peng ZB, Jang JS (2012) Decomposition of litter and nitrogen release in rubber forest. Chin J Trop Crops 33(9):1535–1539

    Google Scholar 

  30. Moazzam NS, Yiping Z, Liqing S (2018) Dynamics of root and leaf decomposition in chronosequence of rubber plantation (Hevea brasiliensis) in SW China. Pak J Bot 50(2):791–799

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Miao XL, Jiang JS, Wang CY, Peng ZB, Li JH, Cui ZF (2012) Comparison of annual returned carbon content of litters and annual carbon emission of the rubber trees of different ages. Ecol Sci 31(6):625–630

    Google Scholar 

  32. Qu XJ, Zhao GY, Geng R, Dai SY, Yuan J (2019) Decomposition and nutrient releasing pattern in Camellia oleifera seed meal. Nonwood For Res 37(4):104–111

    Google Scholar 

  33. Zhang ZQ, Lin KM, Zou SQ, Cao GQ (2006) Decomposition of Cunninghamia lanceolata litter with different control measures. J Zhejiang A F Univ 23(1):65–69

    Google Scholar 

  34. Gréggio TC, Assis LC, Nahas E (2008) Decomposition of the rubber tree Hevea brasiliensis litter at two depths. Chil J Agr Res 68(2):128–135

    Google Scholar 

  35. Xue XX, Wu XP, Wang WB, Luo XH, Zhang YF, Wang DP, Zhao CM (2019) Effects of varying slopes and depths on decomposition and infrared spectrum characteristics of leaf litter in a rubber forest. Acta Ecol Sinica 39(3):874–883

    Google Scholar 

  36. Carvalho GH, Batalha MA, Silva IA, Cianciaruso MV, Petchey OL (2014) Are fire, soil fertility and toxicity, water availability, plant functional diversity, and litter decomposition related in a neotropical savanna? Oecologia 175(3):923–935

    Google Scholar 

  37. Ma XQ, Liu AQ, He ZY (1997) The litter and its decomposition in young Chinese fir plantation ecosystem. Chin J Plant Ecol 21(6):564–570

    Google Scholar 

  38. Wang RP, Liu Q, Peng SL, Lin KH, Wen Y, Xue N (2006) Dynamics of microorganisms in litters of different tree species at Jianfengling. J Zhejiang For Coll 23(3):255–258

    Google Scholar 

  39. Song Y, Gu XR, Yan HY, Mao WT, Wu XL, Wan YX (2014) Dynamics of microbes and enzyme activities during litter decomposition of Pinus massoniana forest in mid-subtropical area. Environ Sci 3:1151–1158

    Google Scholar 

  40. Kaiser C, Franklin O, Dieckmann U, Richter A, Johnson N (2014) Microbial community dynamics alleviate stoichiometric constraints during litter decay. Ecol Lett 17(6):680–690

    Google Scholar 

  41. Sun BJ, Zhang XP, Jia SX (2013) The effect of soil physical and chemical properties on soil microbial community in agroecosystem. Soil Crop 2(3):138–144

    Google Scholar 

  42. Huang JY, Song CC, Zhang JB, Guo YD, Liao YJ (2008) Influence of litter importation on basal respiration and labile carbon in restored farmland in Sanjiang Plain. Acta Ecol Sinica 28(7):3417–3424

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Li TY, Kang FF, Han HR, Gao J, Song XS, Yu S (2015) Responses of soil microbial carbolic metabolism characteristics to home-field advantage of leaf litter decomposition in Liaoheyuan Nature Reserve of northern Hebei Province, China. Chin J Appl Ecol 26(7):2159–2166

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Kare F (2008) The effect of added nitrogen on the rate of decomposition of organic matter. Biol Rev 63(3):433–462

    Google Scholar 

  45. Carreiro MM, Sinsabaugh RL, Repert DA, Parkhurst DF (2000) Microbial enzyme shifts explain litter decay responses to simulated nitrogen deposition. Ecology 81(9):2359–2365

    Google Scholar 

  46. Deforest JL, Zak DR, Pregitzere KS, Burton AJ (2004) Atmospheric nitrate deposition and the microbial degradation of cellobiose and vanillin in a northern hardwood forest. Soil Biol Biochem 36(6):965–971

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Hobbie SE (2000) Interactions between litter lignin and soil nitrogen availability during leaf litter decomposition in a Hawaiian montane forest. Ecosystems 3:494–494

    Google Scholar 

  48. Waldrop MP, Zak DR, Sinsabaugh RL, Gallo M, Lauber C (2004) Nitrogen deposition modifies soil carbon storage through changes in microbial enzymatic activity. Ecol Appl 14(4):1172–1177

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The authors disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: this project is supported by China Agriculture Research System (CARS-33-ZP3).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Rubber Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Tropical Agricultural Sciences/Danzhou Investigation & Experiment Station of Tropical Crops, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Baodao Xincun, Danzhou, Hainan, 571737, People’s Republic of China

    Zhixiang Wu, Chuan Yang, Liming Guan, Huaying Lai & Dongling Qi

  2. Key Laboratory of Biology and Genetic Resources of Rubber Tree, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Danzhou, Hainan, China

    Zhixiang Wu, Chuan Yang, Liming Guan, Huaying Lai & Dongling Qi

  3. Hubei Xinyangfeng Fertilizer Co., Ltd, Danzhou, 448001, Hainan, China

    Long Jin

Authors
  1. Zhixiang Wu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Long Jin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Chuan Yang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Liming Guan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Huaying Lai
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Dongling Qi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dongling Qi.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wu, Z., Jin, L., Yang, C. et al. Effects of different factors on leaf litter decomposition in rubber plantations in Danzhou, South China. J Rubber Res 24, 771–782 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42464-021-00134-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42464-021-00134-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation