Abstract
Shock loss occurs when there is a change in the area of a drift or airflow direction. These shock losses accumulate throughout the ventilation system and will increase the mine resistance as underground development deepens or becomes more complex. Hence, shock losses should be carefully considered when establishing the resistance through a series of branches as they can be a significant contributor to the estimated mine resistance. Using computer software to simulate a ventilation system is common but applying reasonable shock loss factors in the software is not a simple or direct process. Determining shock loss values includes the consideration of historical measurements, application of factors and formulas from literature based on the geometry and complexity of junctions, and the geometry variation at different locations. For example, the shock loss at the bottom of a ventilation raise can be comprised of a 90° bend and a sudden area change. This paper presents an approach for estimating shock loss factors near raise junctions using computational fluid dynamics. Current and future work will also be compared with field measurements. Results from this approach are compared with software defaults as well as classical techniques in published literature and standards.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Levin LY, Semin MA (2019) Influence of shock losses on air distribution in underground mines. J Min Sci 55:287–296. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1062739119025576
Hartman HL, Mutmansky TM, Ramani RV, Wang WJ (1997) Mine ventilation and air conditioning, 3rd edn. John Wiley & Sons Publishing Company
McElroy GE (1935) Engineering factors in the ventilation of metal mines (No. 385). US Government Printing Office
McPherson MJ (2009) Subsurface ventilation and environmental engineering. Mine Ventilation Services Inc, Fresno, CA, USA
White FM (2015) Fluid mechanics, 8th ed. McGraw-Hill Education, New York, NY, USA
DJ Brake 2015 Quality assurance standards for mine ventilation models and ventilation planning AUSTRALIAN MINE VENTILATION CONFERENCE NSW, Australia Sydney 221 228
Selwana J, Kunene TJ, Tartibu LK (2020) A numerical analysis of airflow efficiency of a mine ventilation aircrossing. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management. Harare, Zimbabwe
Srivatsan JS, Sastry BS (2015) Validation of empirical models for shock loss due to regular obstructions in mine airways using CFD. In: Application of Computers and Operations Research in the Mineral Industry - Proceedings of the 37th International Symposium, APCOM 2015. Fairbanks, AK, USA
Hurtado JP, Díaz N, Acuña EI, Fernández J (2014) Shock losses characterization of ventilation circuits for block caving production levels. Tunn Undergr Sp Technol 41:88–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2013.11.010
Jade RK, Sastry BS (2008) An experimental and numerical study of two-way splits and junctions in mine airways. In: 12th US/North American mine ventilation symposium. Reno, Nevada, USA
Purushotham T, Sastry BS, Samanta B (2010) Estimation of shock loss factors at shaft bottom junction using computational fluid dynamics and scale model studies. CIM J 1:130–139
Tien JC (1987) Shock losses around underground overcasts. In: Mutmansky J (ed) 3rd Mine Ventilation Symposium. State College, PA, USA
ANSYS Inc. (2022) Workbench user’s guide. Canonsburg, PA, USA
Ansys Inc 2021 Discovery SpaceClaim Canonsburg PA, USA
ANSYS Inc. (2010) ANSYS meshing user’s guide. Canonsburg, PA, USA
ANSYS Inc. (2022) Ansys CFD-post user’s guide. Canonsburg, PA, USA
Howden (2022) Ventsim Visual TM User Guide. South Brisbane, QLD, Australia
TSI Incorporated (2022) DP-CALC MicroManometer Model 5825 Operation and Service Manual. Shoreview, Minnesota, USA
Nielsen-Kellerman Co. (2020) User guide Kestrel 5000 Environmental, 5100 Racing, 5200 Professional Environmental Meters. Boothwyn, PA, USA
Atkinson JJ (1854) On the theory of the ventilation of mines. North Engl Inst Min Eng 3:118
Testo SE & Co. KGaA (2023) Instruction manual Testo 417 vane anemometer. West Chester, PA, USA
ANSYS Inc 2009 ANSYS CFX-solver theory guide Canonsburg PA, USA
Acharya R (2016) Investigation of differences in Ansys solvers CFX and fluent. Royal Institute of Technology, KTH, Stockholm, Sweden
Acknowledgements
The authors want to thank Vale Base Metals for the support of this work. The authors are also grateful to their colleagues Fletcher Friesen, Paul Aho, Daniel Caton, Allen Jonas, Hugo Ferrari, Stefano Girardo, Scott MacMillan, Peter McGirr, Brandan Randell, Deon Jenkins, and Matthew Cheeseman for helping set up the field experiments and take measurements.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Zhang, H., Falk, L. & Allen, C. An Application of Computational Fluid Dynamics to Predict Shock Loss Factors at Raise Junctions in Underground Mine Ventilation Systems. Mining, Metallurgy & Exploration (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42461-024-00984-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42461-024-00984-6