Skip to main content
Log in

An Exploratory Investigation on the Effectiveness of a Novel Vibration-Enhanced Flooded-Bed Dust Scrubber

  • Published:
Mining, Metallurgy & Exploration Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Airborne coal mine dust is an unintended and unavoidable result of coal extraction operations that raises notable health and safety concerns. Modern mining techniques utilize several dust mitigation strategies, and the flooded-bed dust scrubber (FBS) is one such technology used extensively on continuous miners. The conventional static panel filter, instrumental in most scrubber designs, is fundamentally limited in collection efficiencies due to a high clogging rate and a tradeoff between mesh density and airflow rate. To overcome these deficiencies, a novel vibrating mesh panel is proposed. In this study, a laboratory-scale dust scrubber unit was used to investigate the efficacy of concept as compared to that of a static mesh. A statistical design of experiments study was first used to determine the effective vibrational parameters and scrubber operational parameters on dust collection and clogging mitigation. Optimized results from this study were then evaluated against those of a static mesh to determine performance improvement while investigating the mechanisms controlling dust collection and particle department through the scrubber system. Results show that the vibrating mesh conditions and higher water flow rates led to an improvement in the collection efficiency of the scrubber system. Compares to a static-mesh, the vibrating mesh FBS showed a significant reduction in pressure drop across the mesh screen indicating lower air loss through the test duration. Overall, the findings confirm that vibrating filter mesh reduces filter clogging while maintaining high collection efficiencies. This research supports further technological advancement in mine dust mitigation technologies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. U.S. Department of Labor (2014) Lowering miners’ exposure to respirable coal mine dust, including continuous personal dust monitors. Fed Regist 79(84) http://arlweb.msha.gov/regs/fedreg/final/2014finl/2014-09084.asp. Accessed June 5, 2022

  2. Sinclair J (1958) Environmental conditions in coal mines [including fires, explosions, rescue and recovery work]. Pitman, [S.l.] VIII, 341 p. OCLC Number: 1069120555

  3. CDC (2019) Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health. In: Occupational Respiratory Disease Surveillance, National Occupational Respiratory Mortality System (NORMS). National Database

    Google Scholar 

  4. Suarthana E, Laney AS, Storey E, Attfield MD (2011) Coal workers’ pneumoconiosis in the United States: regional differences 40 years after implementation of the 1969 Federal Coal Mine Health and Safety Act. Occup Environ Med 68(12):908–913. https://doi.org/10.1136/oem.2010.063594

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Gamble JF, Reger RB, Glenn RE (2011) Rapidly progressing coal workers pneumoconiosis as a confounding risk factor in assessing coal mine dust safe exposure levels. J ClinToxicol S1:003. https://doi.org/10.4172/2161-0495.S1-003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. dos S Antao VC, Petsonk EL, Sokolow LZ, Wolfe AL, Pinheiro GA, Hale JM, Attfield MD (2005) Rapidly progressive coal workers’ pneumoconiosis in the United States: geographic clustering and other factors. Occup Environ Med 62(10):670–674. https://doi.org/10.1136/oem.2004.019679

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Attfield M, Seixas N (1995) Prevalence of pneumoconiosis and its relationship to dust exposure in a cohort of U.S. Bituminous coal miners and ex-miners. Am J Ind Med 27(1):137–151

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Cashdollar KL, Sapko MJ (2006) Explosion hazards of coal dust in the presence of methane. In: Department of Health and Human Services. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Handbook for Methane Control in Mining, Chapter 12, pp 147–150. DHHS (NIOSH) Publication No. 2006–127, IC 9486 Information Circular/2006, Pittsburgh Research Laboratory, Pittsburgh, PA, June 2006

  9. U.S. Department of Labor (2014) Final rule. http://arlweb.msha.gov/regs/fedreg/final/2014finl/2014-09084.asp. Accessed June 5, 2022.

  10. Reed W, Taylor C (2007) Factors affecting the developing of mine face ventilation systems in the 20th century. SME Annual Conference and Expo, Denver, CO

    Google Scholar 

  11. Wang W, Peng FF (1991) Analysis of respirable distributions with multiple dust sources on longwall faces, 375, West Virginia University, p 367. OCLC Number / Unique Identifier: 1139501100

  12. Colinet JF, Spencer ER, Jankowski RA (1997) Status of dust control technology on U.S. longwalls. Proceedings of 6th International Mine Ventilation Congress, pp 345–351

    Google Scholar 

  13. Arya S, Sottile J, Novak T (2018) Development of a flooded-bed scrubber for removing coal dust at a longwall mining section. Saf Sci 110:204–213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2018.08.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Arya S, Sottile J, Rider JP, Colinet JF, Novak T, Wedding C (2018) Design and experimental evaluation of a flooded-bed dust scrubber integrated into a longwall shearer. Powder Technol 339:487–496. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.powtec.2018.07.072

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Arya S, Novak T, Saito K et al (2019) Empirical formulae for determining pressure drop across a 20-layer flooded-bed scrubber screen. Mining Metall Explor 36(6):1169–1177. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42461-019-0091-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Arya S (2018) Investigation of the effectiveness of an integrated flooded-bed dust scrubber on a longwall shearer through laboratory testing and CFD simulation. Doctoral Dissertation,. Mining Engineering, University of Kentucky. https://doi.org/10.13023/ETD.2018.074

    Book  Google Scholar 

  17. Cowley SR, McCoy BS (1993) Wet scrubber apparatus. U. S. Patent 5(178):654

    Google Scholar 

  18. Campbell JA, Moynihan DJ, Roper WD, Willis EC (1983) U.S. Patent No. 4,380,353. Patent and Trademark Office, Washington, DC: U.S

    Google Scholar 

  19. Colinet JF, Jankowski RA (2000) Silica collection concerns when using flooded-bed scrubbers. Min Eng 52(4):49–54

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Colinet J, Halldin CN, Schall J (2021) Best practices for dust control in coal mining, Second edn. National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health, Pittsburgh, PA; Spokane, WA. https://doi.org/10.26616/NIOSHPUB2021119

    Book  Google Scholar 

  21. Colinet, J., Potts, J. D., & Reed, W. R. (2011). Evaluation of face dust concentrations at mines using deep-cutting practices.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Colinet J, Reed WR, Potts JD (2013) Impact on respirable dust levels when operating a flooded-bed scrubber in 20-foot cuts, Pittsburgh. In: Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, DHHS (NIOSH) publication no. 2014–105, RI 9693

  23. National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (2002) Exposure to silica dust on continuous mining operations using flooded-bed scrubbers. Appl Occup Environ Hyg 17(5):322–323. https://doi.org/10.1080/10473220252864888

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Salazar AJ, Saito K, Alloo RP, Tanaka N (2000) U.S. Patent No. 6,093,250. U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  25. Taylor A, Schafrik S, Kumar AR (2019) The Vortecone: a new maintenance-free wet scrubber device. Conference Proceedings: 4th International Future Mining Conference 2019. The Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy, Melbourne, pp 216–228

    Google Scholar 

  26. Kumar AR, Levy A, Kumar A, Schafrik S, Novak T (2020) Computational fluid dynamics modeling and laboratory analysis of aerosol particles’ capture on thin swirling water film in a Vortecone. Powder Technol 361:499–506. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.powtec.2019.11.093

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Kumar AR, Schafrik S (2020) Multiphase CFD modeling and laboratory testing of a Vortecone for mining and industrial dust scrubbing applications. Process Saf Environ Prot 144:330–336. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2020.07.046

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Kumar AR, Schafrik S, Novak T (2020) Multi-phase computer modeling and laboratory study of dust capture by an inertial Vortecone scrubber. Int J Min Sci Technol 30(3):287–291. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmst.2020.03.014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Kumar AR, Schafrik S, Velasquez O (2020) Designing, modeling, and laboratory testing of a non-clogging impingement type filter for mining dust scrubbers. Mining Metall Explor 37(6):1911–1918. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42461-020-00311-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. King RP (2001) Classification based on sieving–vibrating screens. Modeling and simulation of mineral processing systems. Elsevier, pp 81–86

    Google Scholar 

  31. Chen Z, Zhou Z, Peng J (2022) Dust removal mechanism of the vibrating string filter with charged water mist. Int J Rotating Mach 2022. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/5713983

  32. Mishin IF, El'bert EI, Belikov VI, Tumanov AN, Kachaev VK (1975) Cleaning coal tar by vibrating-screen filtration, surfactant treatment, and short-term clarification. Coke Chem., USSR (Engl. Transl.);(United Kingdom), p 4

    Google Scholar 

  33. Yang X, Wang H, Chase GG (2015) Performance of hydrophilic glass fiber media to separate dispersed water drops from ultra low sulfur diesel supplemented by vibrations. Sep Purif Technol 156:665–672. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2015.10.062

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Kim SC, Wang H, Imagawa M, Chen DR, Pui DY (2006) Experimental and modeling studies of the stream-wise filter vibration effect on the filtration efficiency. Aerosol Sci Technol 40(6):389–395. https://doi.org/10.1080/02786820600640541

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Genkin G, Waite TD, Fane AG, Chang S (2006) The effect of vibration and coagulant addition on the filtration performance of submerged hollow fibre membranes. J Membrane Sci 281(1-2):726–734. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2006.04.048

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Niţoi D, Amza G, Amza Z, Radu C, Teodorescu M (2018) Practical realisation and finite element modeling of ultrasonic filters design for air filtration. Int Multidiscip Sci GeoConference: SGEM 18(4.2):555–562. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/400/2/022003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Amza CG, Nitoi DF, Chivu O, Radu C, Teodorescu MC (2015) Contributions of the possibility of use of ultrasound in the air filter and purification. In 15th International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference SGEM 2015, pp 897–904. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/95/1/012010

    Book  Google Scholar 

  38. Nakamura K (2012) Ultrasonic transducers. Material and design for sensors, actuators and medical applications. Woodhead Publishing USA. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-1-84569-989-5.50022-X

    Book  Google Scholar 

  39. Niţoi D, Amza G (2019) Industrial air purification system using ultrasonic vibration. Curr Trends Nat Sci 8(15):17–22

    Google Scholar 

  40. Lu Z, Rath A, Amini SH, Noble A, Shahab S (2022) A computational fluid dynamics investigation of a novel flooded-bed dust scrubber with vibrating mesh. Int J Mining Sci Technol 32(3):525–537. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmst.2022.03.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Fuchs EP (1979) Coal mining equipment vibration data report. Donaldson Company, Inc

    Google Scholar 

  42. Smith AK, Peterson JS, Kovalchik PG (2008) Continuous mining machine conveyor system sound power levels. Pittsburgh Research Laboratory (National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health). National Conference on Noise Control Engineering, pp 28–31. Dearborn. https://stacks.cdc.gov/view/cdc/9689

  43. Mężyk A, Klein W, Pawlak M, Kania J (2015) Numerical simulation of the vibration control system designed for continuous miner machines. Dynamical systems mathematical and numerical approaches. Department of Automation, Biomechanics and Mechatronics-Poland, pp 363–370

    Google Scholar 

  44. Mężyk A, Klein W, Pawlak M, Kania J (2017) The identification of the vibration control system parameters designed for continuous miner machines. Int J Non-Linear Mech 91:181–188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnonlinmec.2017.02.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Yantek DS (2003) Estimated sound power radiated by surfaces on a continuous miner tail section using vibration measurements. National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Pittsburgh, PA

    Google Scholar 

  46. Stander CJ, Heyns PS (2005) Instantaneous angular speed monitoring of gearboxes under non-cyclic stationary load conditions. Mech Syst Signal Process 19(4):817–835. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2004.10.006

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  47. Wang J, Zhang Y, Dong L (2016) Analysis of vibration characteristics and dynamic load identification in continuous miner cutting arm. Int J Simul Syst Sci Technol 17(13):20–21. https://doi.org/10.5013/IJSSST.a.17.13.20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Mężyk A, Pawlak M, Klein W et al (2015) Modeling and optimization of resonance characteristics of complex machinery system under dynamic load. Arch Appl Mech 85:1383–1398. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00419-014-0955-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Zhang XK (2011) Optimal placement ot vibration sensor about heavy mining equipment. Meikuang Jixie (Coal Mine Machinery) 32(3):173–175. https://doi.org/10.3390/s19020340

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Shahab S (2015) Vibration energy harvesting, biomimetic actuation, and contactless acoustic energy transfer in a quiescent fluid domain (Doctoral dissertation,. Georgia Institute of Technology)

    Google Scholar 

  51. Janjua AN, Shaefer M, Amini SH, Noble A, Shahab S (2024) Vibrational energy transmission in underground continuous mining: Dynamic characteristics and experimental research of field data. Appl Energy 354(Part A):122220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2023.122220

  52. Schwarz BJ, Richardson MH (1999) Experimental modal analysis. Vibrant Technology Inc., CSI Reliability Week, Orlando, FL

    Google Scholar 

  53. Coster HGL, Farahani TD, Chilcott TC (2011) Production and characterization of piezo-electric membranes. Desalination 283:52–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2011.04.071

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Bilad MR, Discart V, Vandamme D, Foubert I, Muylaert K, Vankelecom IF (2013) Harvesting microalgal biomass using a magnetically induced membrane vibration (MMV) system: filtration performance and energy consumption. Bioresour Technol 138:329–338. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2013.03.175

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Kuscer D, Rojac T, Belavič D, Santo Zarnik M, Bradeško A, Kos T, Faccini M (2017) Integrated piezoelectric vibration system for fouling mitigation in ceramic filtration membranes. J Membrane Sci 540:277–284. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2017.06.054

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  56. Khairuddin NFM, Idris A, Irfan M (2019) Towards efficient membrane filtration for microalgae harvesting: a review. J Kejuruteraan 2:103–112. https://doi.org/10.17576/jkukm-2019-si2(1)-13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Nurra C, Clavero E, Salvadó J, Torras C (2014) Vibrating membrane filtration as improved technology for microalgae dewatering. Bioresour Technol 157:247–253. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2014.01.115

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This study was sponsored by the Alpha Foundation for the Improvement of Mine Safety and Health, Inc. (Alpha Foundation). The views, opinions, and recommendations expressed herein are solely those of the authors and do not imply any endorsement by the Alpha Foundation, its directors, and staff.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mahmud Esad Uluer.

Ethics declarations

Competing Interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Highlights

• A novel dust scrubber filter design is proposed to increase dust collection efficiency.

• The bench-scale scrubber unit was subjected to initial system sensitivity analysis.

• An experimental design was used to see how different vibrational parameters affect response variables.

• Coal dust is dislodged from the filter surface by a vibrating mesh screen.

• The vibration enhances the screen’s wettability, creating more dust and water mixtures.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Uluer, M.E., Shigo, M., Amini, S.H. et al. An Exploratory Investigation on the Effectiveness of a Novel Vibration-Enhanced Flooded-Bed Dust Scrubber. Mining, Metallurgy & Exploration 41, 73–90 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42461-023-00889-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42461-023-00889-w

Keywords

Navigation