Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Competencies for the Competent Person: Defining Workplace Examiner Competencies from the Health and Safety Leader’s Perspective

  • Published:
Mining, Metallurgy & Exploration Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The ability to identify hazards during a workplace examination is a critical skill for mineworkers to have in order to maintain a safe workplace. While research suggests that being able to successfully recognize hazards requires a complex set of competencies, it is unclear which competencies are most critical to adequately perform a workplace examination. This paper presents a hazard recognition competencies framework as an explanation of the competencies that affect mineworker hazard recognition. To better understand how the industry is selecting and preparing workplace examiners, researchers from the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) interviewed nine health and safety (H&S) professionals at surface stone, sand, and gravel mine sites throughout the USA. A primary purpose of these interviews was to verify the competencies included in the hazard recognition competencies framework and to understand why these competencies are critical. Finally, the results of this study are presented within the context of current NIOSH research findings related to hazard recognition.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Enhancing Mineworkers’ Abilities to Identify Hazards at Sand, Stone, and Gravel Mines: Training and Assessment Strategy Recommendations Contract # 212-2015-M-87769.

References

  1. MSHA (2015b) Program policy letter P15-V-01 examination of working places. Retrieved October 15, 2019, from https://www.msha.gov/p15-v-01

  2. Examinations of Working Places in Metal and Nonmetal Mines, 81 FR 36818 (2016) Federal Register: The Daily Journal of the United States

  3. Examination of working places ((2019)) 30 CFR §§ 56/57.18002

  4. Definitions (2015) 30 CFR §§ 56/57.2

  5. Willmer DR (2017) Exploring the use of situation awareness in behaviors and practices of health and safety leaders. Trans Soc Min Metall Explor Inc 342(1):36–42

    Google Scholar 

  6. Rost K, Willmer D, Haas E (2015) An operant analysis of leadership practices in mining. J Saf Health Environ Res 11(2):234–241

    Google Scholar 

  7. The Group for Organizational Effectiveness, Inc (2016) Enhancing mineworkers’ abilities to identify hazards at sand, stone, and gravel mines: training and assessment strategy recommendations. Unpublished contract report

  8. Ajzen I (2005) Attitudes, personality, and behavior. McGraw-Hill Education, New York

    Google Scholar 

  9. Wang L, Song M, Jiang T, Zhang Y, Yu C (2011) Regional homogeneity of the resting-state brain activity correlates with individual intelligence. Neurosci Lett 488(3):275–278

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Hunter, D. R. (2002). Risk perception and risk tolerance in aircraft pilots. Federal Aviation Administration report no. PB2003100818. Washington, DC: Federal Aviation Administration

  11. Kowalski-Trakofler KM, Barrett EA (2003) The concept of degraded images applied to hazard recognition training in mining for reduction of lost-time injuries. J Saf Res 34(5):515–525

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Lehmann CC, Haight JM, Michael JH (2009) Effect of safety training on risk tolerance: an examination of male workers in the surface mining industry. J Saf Health Environ Res 6:1–22

    Google Scholar 

  13. Albert A, Hallowell MR, Kleiner B, Chen A, Golparvar-Fard M (2014) Enhancing construction hazard recognition with high-fidelity augmented virtuality. J Constr Eng Manag 140(7):04014024

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Gramopadhye AK, Drury CG, Sharit J (1997) Feedback strategies for visual search in airframe structural inspection. Int J Ind Ergon 19(5):333–344

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Endlsey M (2000) Theoretical underpinning of situation awareness: a critical review. In: Endsley M, Garland DJ (eds) Situation awareness analysis and measurement. Lawrence Earlbaum Associates, Mahwah

    Google Scholar 

  16. Barrett E, Kowalski K (1995) Effective hazard recognition training using a latent-image, three-dimensional slide simulation exercise. Report of Investigations, Bureau of Mines

  17. Morse JM (2010) Sampling in grounded theory. In: Bryant A, Charmaz K (eds) The sage handbook of grounded theory. Sage, Thousand Oaks, pp 229–244

    Google Scholar 

  18. Eiter B, Hrica J, Willmer D (2018) Imminent danger: characterizing uncertainty in critically hazardous mining situations. Min Eng 70(9):47–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Hsieh H-F, Shannon SE (2005) Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qual Health Res 15(9):1277–1288

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Hickey G, Kipping C (1996) A multi-stage approach to the coding of data from open-ended questions. Nurse Res 4(1):81–91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Potter WJ, Levine-Donnerstein D (1999) Rethinking reliability and validity in content analysis. J Appl Commun Res 27:258–284

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Boyatzis RE (1998) Transforming qualitative information: thematic analysis and code development. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks

    Google Scholar 

  23. Lindlof TR, Taylor BC (2011) Qualitative communication research methods. Sage, Thousand Oaks

    Google Scholar 

  24. Creswell JW (2014) Research design qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods approaches, 4th edn. Sage, Thousand Oaks

    Google Scholar 

  25. Creswell JW (1997) Qualitative inquiry and research design: choosing among five traditions. Sage, Thousand Oaks

    Google Scholar 

  26. Eiter BM, Helfrich W, Hrica J, Bellanca JL (2018). From the laboratory to the field: developing a portable workplace examination simulation tool. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing Advances in Human Factors in Simulation and Modeling, 361–372

  27. Neal A, Griffin MA (2006) A study of the lagged relationships among safety climate, safety motivation, safety behavior, and accidents at the individual and group levels. J Appl Psychol 91(4):946–953

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Montgomery JF (2002) Safety and health training. In: Plog B, Quinlan PJ (eds) Fundamentals of industrial hygiene. National Safety Council, Itasca, pp 680–681

    Google Scholar 

  29. Scharf T, Vaught C, Kidd P, Steiner L, Kowalski K, Wiehagen B, Rethi L, Cole H (2001) Toward a typology of dynamic and hazardous work environments. Hum Ecol Risk Assess 7(7):1827–1841

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. McLeod RW (2015) Designing for human reliability: human factors engineering in the oil, gas, and process industries. Gulf Professional Publishing, Houston

    Google Scholar 

  31. Willmer DR, Haas EJ (2016) Managing health and safety risks: Implications for tailoring health and safety management system practices. Trans Soc Min Metall Explor Inc 340(1):100–103

    Google Scholar 

  32. Eiter BM, Bellanca JL, Helfrich W, Orr TJ, Hrica J, Macdonald B, Navoyski J (2017) Recognizing mine site hazards: identifying differences in hazard recognition ability for experienced and new mineworkers. Advances in intelligent systems and computing advances in human factors in simulation and modeling, 104–115

  33. Perlman A, Sacks R, Barak R (2014) Hazard recognition and risk perception in construction. Saf Sci 64:22–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Eiter BM, Hrica J (2019) EXAMiner: a case study of the implementation of a hazard recognition safety intervention. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing Advances in Human Factors and Simulation, 274–286

  35. Clay-Williams R, Colligan L (2015) Back to basics: checklists in aviation and healthcare. BMJ Qual Saf 24(7):428–431

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Simons DJ, Chabris CF (1999) Gorillas in our midst: sustained inattentional blindness for dynamic events. Perception 28(9):1059–1074

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Orr TJ, Bellanca JL, Eiter BM, Helfrich W, Rubinstein EN (2018) The effect of hazard clustering and risk perception on hazard recognition. In: International Conference on Applied Human Factors and Ergonomics. Springer, Cham, pp 349–360

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH), 626 Cochrans Mill Road, Pittsburgh, PA, 15236, USA

    Jonathan K. Hrica & Brianna M. Eiter

Authors
  1. Jonathan K. Hrica
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Brianna M. Eiter
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jonathan K. Hrica.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Disclaimer

The findings and conclusions in this paper are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position of the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Mention of any company name or product does not constitute endorsement by NIOSH.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hrica, J.K., Eiter, B.M. Competencies for the Competent Person: Defining Workplace Examiner Competencies from the Health and Safety Leader’s Perspective. Mining, Metallurgy & Exploration 37, 1951–1959 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42461-020-00275-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42461-020-00275-w

Keywords

Search

Navigation