Skip to main content
Log in

Mineral Resources Evaluation with Mining Selectivity and Information Effect

  • Review
  • Published:
Mining, Metallurgy & Exploration Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The most common approach used in the mining industry for mineral resources modeling is to estimate the grades using ordinary kriging and report the recoverable resources based on this deterministic estimated model. Mineral resources calculated with kriging are a smooth representation of the actual distribution of grades and do not provide an assessment of uncertainty. Unlike kriging, simulation reproduces the variability of the grades in the mineral deposit and provides an assessment of uncertainty. Reporting mineral resources directly on high-resolution simulation results would assume perfect knowledge of the grade at the time of mining and selectivity at the scale of the data. There will always be uncertainty left at the time of mining, so assuming perfect knowledge of the grade in the future is incorrect. There are two concerns when geostatistical simulation is used for resources modeling: the information and the mining selectivity effects. A new framework for resource estimation is proposed with two separate modules to address those concerns. The information effect is accounted for by anticipating the additional production data that will be available at the time mining to guide the destination for the mined material. The mining selectivity effect is addressed by mimicking the grade control procedure to get mineable dig limits at a chosen selectivity, represented by a minimum mineable unit size. In addition to a prediction of recoverable resources that will be closer to the material mined in the future, the framework proposed provides an assessment of local and global uncertainty for risk management.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

References

  1. Benndorf J, Dimitrakopoulos R (2007) New efficient methods for conditional simulation of large orebodies. Orebody Modelling and Strategic Mine Planning Spectrum Series 14:103–110

    Google Scholar 

  2. Cuba MA, Boisvert J, Deutsch CV (2012) Simulated learning model for mineable reserves evaluation Centre for Computational Geostatistics Annual Report:14

  3. Deraisme J, Roth C (2000) The information effect and estimating recoverable reserves. Geovariances. https://www.geovariances.com/en/ressources/information-effect-estimating-recoverable-reserves/. Accessed 15 May 2018

  4. Deutsch CV, Journel AG (1998) GSLIB: geostatistical software library and user’s guide, 2nd edn. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  5. Deutsch CV (2015) All realizations all the time. Centre for Computational Geostatistics Annual Report 17

  6. Deutsch CV (2017) IGC-DL: Intelligent grade control - dig limits (Version 0.1). Centre for Computational Geostatistics Annual Report 19

  7. Emery X (2009) Change-of-support models and computer programs for direct block-support simulation. Comput Geosci 35(10):2047–2056. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2008.12.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Emery X, Ortiz JM (2011) Two approaches to direct block-support conditional co-simulation. Comput Geosci 37(8):1015–1025. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2010.07.012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Geovariances (2018) What’s new in ISATIS 2018? Geovariances. https://www.geovariances.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/isatis-v2018-new-features.pdf. Accessed 3 May 2018

  10. Goovaerts P (1997) Geostatistics for natural resources evaluation. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  11. Isaaks EH, Srivastava RM (1989) Applied geostatistics. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  12. Journel AG, Huijbregts C (1978) Mining geostatistics. Academic Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  13. Journel AG, Kyriakidis PC (2004) Evaluation of mineral reserves: a simulation approach. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  14. Leuangthong O, Neufeld C, Deustch CV (2003) Optimal selection of selective mining unit (SMU) size. Centre for Computational Geostatistics Annual Report 05

  15. Machuca-Mory DF, Babak O, Deutsch CV (2008) Flexible change of support model suitable for a wide range of mineralization styles. Min Eng 60(2):63–72

    Google Scholar 

  16. Neufeld C, Deutsch CV (2005) Calculating recoverable reserves with uniform conditioning. Centre for Computational Geostatistics Annual Report 07

  17. Neufeld C, Leuangthong O, Deustch CV (2007) A simulation approach to account for the information effect. Centre for Computational Geostatistics Annual Report 09

  18. Nowak M, Leuangthong O (2017) Conditional bias in kriging: let’s keep it. Quant Geol Geostat 19:303–318. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-46819-8_20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Rossi ME, Deutsch CV (2014) Mineral resource estimation. Springer, Dordrecht

    Book  Google Scholar 

  20. Sinclair AJ, Blackwell GH (2002) Applied mineral inventory estimation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  21. Vasylchuk YV (2016) Integrated system for improved grade control in open pit mines. University of Alberta, Dissertation

    Google Scholar 

  22. Vasylchuk YV, Deutsch CV (2017) Intelligent grade control – overview. Centre for Computational Geostatistics Annual Report 19

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ana Chiquini.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chiquini, A., Deutsch, C.V. Mineral Resources Evaluation with Mining Selectivity and Information Effect. Mining, Metallurgy & Exploration 37, 965–979 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42461-020-00229-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42461-020-00229-2

Keywords

Navigation