Skip to main content
Log in

Numerical Simulation of Laboratory Strength Tests Using a Stochastic Approach

  • Published:
Mining, Metallurgy & Exploration Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Heterogeneity and discontinuity significantly affect rock strength. For accurate stability prediction, intact rock behavior is imperatively included in rock mass behavior. However, past research largely used arbitrary scaling approaches to produce rock strength. This paper considers a stochastic approach in order to determine the strength of a rock. Based on the laboratory data, a MATLAB® with extreme value stochastic model generates a database for each physico-mechanical property. Then FLAC® simulates laboratory-sized rock specimens. The grids developed in the numerical model can in turn develop random material properties in MATLAB®, which researchers then applied to the final FLAC® model. Model runs simulate the approach performed in the laboratory. The results from the model indicate that a stochastic approach produces strengths that are lower than a deterministic approach. Failure modes for each specimen are different, similar to observations in the laboratory. In addition, random density also influences the failure mode, highlighting the importance of stochastic analysis in rocks.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Mark C (1987) Analysis of longwall pillar stability. PhD Thesis. Pennsylvania State University

  2. Bieniawski ZT (1968) The effect of specimen size on compressive strength of coal. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci Geomech Abstr 5(4):325–326

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Recio-Gordo D, Jimenez R (2012) A probabilistic extension to the empirical ALPS and ARMPS systems for coal pillar design. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 52:181–187

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Soltani A (2015) Analysis of the ARMPS Database Using FLAC3D. University of Kentucky, A pillar stability comparison for room and pillar coal mines during development. Master’s Thesis

    Google Scholar 

  5. Jaksa MB, Kaggwa WS, Brooker PI (1999. Sydney) Experimental evaluation of the scale of fluctuation of a stiff clay. Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on the Application of Statistics and Probability 1:415–422

    Google Scholar 

  6. Fang Z, Harrison JP (2002) Development of a local degradation approach to the modelling of brittle fracture in heterogeneous rocks. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 39(4):443–457

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Kim K, Gao H (1995) Probabilistic approaches to estimating variation in the mechanical properties of rock masses. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci Geomech Abstr 32(2):111–120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Mingli H, Chunan T, Wancheng Z (2000) Numerical simulation on failure process of rock [J]. Chin J Rock Mech Eng 19(4):468–471

    Google Scholar 

  9. Deng J et al (2003) Pillar design by combining finite element methods, neural networks and reliability: a case study of the Feng Huangshan copper mine, China. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 40(4):585–599

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Jade S, Sitharam TG (2003) Characterization of strength and deformation of jointed rock mass based on statistical analysis. Int J Geomech 3(1):43–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Itasca (2017) FLAC. https://www.itascacg.com/software/flac. Itasca Consulting Group, Inc. Minnesota, USA

  12. Weibull W (1939) A statistical theory of the strength of materials. Ingeniors Vetenskaps Akademien

  13. Einstein HH (1983) Probabilistic and statistical methods in engineering geology. Rock Mech Rock Eng 16(1):39–72

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. Potvin Y, Dight PM, Wesseloo J (2012) Some pitfalls and misuses of rock mass classification systems for mine design. J South Afr Inst Min Metall 112(8):697–702

    Google Scholar 

  15. Yegulalp TM, Kim K (1992) Statistical assessment of scale effect on rock properties using the theory of extremes. Transactions AIME 294:1834–1834

    Google Scholar 

  16. Gumbel EJ (2013) Statistics of extremes. Echo Point Books & Media, Brattleboro, VT

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Hoek E, Brown ET (1980) Underground excavations in rock. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL

    Google Scholar 

  18. MathWorks (2017) MATLAB®. https://www.mathworks.com/products/matlab.html. The Mathworks, Inc. Massachusetts, USA

Download references

Funding

This work was supported by the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health [grant numbers 200-2011-40676, 200-2016-92214].

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Danqing Gao.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gao, D., Mishra, B. & Xue, Y. Numerical Simulation of Laboratory Strength Tests Using a Stochastic Approach. Mining, Metallurgy & Exploration 37, 709–716 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42461-020-00189-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42461-020-00189-7

Keywords

Navigation