Skip to main content
Log in

Assessing Effectiveness of Various Wear-Resistant Materials Used as Hard Facings in Mining Applications

  • Published:
Mining, Metallurgy & Exploration Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Characterizing the abrasiveness of soil/rock and the allowable wear of hard-facing products in various conditions is a critical factor in selection of the best material for certain applications related to drilling and excavation in mining and construction industries. The Soil Abrasion Index test machine at Colorado School of Mines (CSM) is one of the recently developed unique systems capable of testing soil/crushed rock abrasion under various conditions, such as dry, wet, and saturated settings. It is also capable of testing the performance of various types of hard-facing materials in a given geo-material. This paper studies the wear properties of different hard-facing materials in various crushed rocks from a surface mining operation in the iron range region of the USA. The hard-facing materials include regular and hardened steels and six different specialized hard facings, based on chromium carbide. The soil/rock include a standard sand and two rock samples from the surface mine. Fourteen abrasion tests were conducted, where the weight loss of each hard-facing material was measured over timespans up to 1 h of testing. The results show the distinct performance differences between the steels with 17 HRC and 43 HRC hardness and the hard-facing products for this application. The results show the possibility to evaluate the abrasiveness of different rocks at a mine or construction site and the performance of various hard facings in similar working conditions. This is a practical solution for selection of the cutting tool or reinforcement of bucket lips and truck beds for comparison of relative wear life between different wear-resistant materials.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12

References

  1. Dossett JL & Totten GE (2013) Steel heat treating fundamentals and processes. https://doi.org/10.31399/asm.hb.v04a.9781627081658

    Google Scholar 

  2. Rostami J, Alavi Gharahbagh E, Palomino AM, Mosleh M (2012) Development of soil abrasivity testing for soft ground tunneling using shield machines. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 28:245–256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. ASTM International (2014) Standard test method for laboratory determination of abrasiveness of rock using the CERCHAR method. Annual book of ASTM standards. https://doi.org/10.1520/D7625

  4. Dahl F, Bruland A, Jakobsen PD, Nilsen B, Grøv E (2012) Classifications of properties influencing the drillability of rocks, based on the NTNU/SINTEF test method. Tunn Undergr Space Technol (Elsevier Ltd) 28:150–158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Alavi Gharahbagh E, Rostami J, Palomino AM (2011) New soil abrasion testing method for soft ground tunneling applications. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 26:604–613 (Elsevier Ltd)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Jakobsen PD, Bruland A, Dahl F (2013) Review and assessment of the NTNU/SINTEF soil abrasion test (SAT™) for determination of abrasiveness of soil and soft ground. Tunn Undergr Space Technol (Elsevier ltd) 37:107–114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Thuro K, Singer J (2007) Determining Abrasivity with the LCPC Test. In 1st Canada - U.S. Rock Mechanics Symposium, 27–31 May, Vancouver, Canada 1973–1980. https://doi.org/10.1201/NOE0415444019-c103

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Mosleh M, Gharahbagh EA, Rostami J (2013) Effects of relative hardness and moisture on tool wear in soil excavation operations. Wear (Elsevier) 302:1555–1559

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Alavi Gharahbagh E, Rostami J, Talebi K (2013) Introducing the Penn State soil abrasion index (PSAI) for application in soft ground mechanized tunneling. In: Anagnostou G, Ehrbar H (eds) World Tunnel Congress 2013 Geneva underground – the way to the future! pp 1201–1208

    Google Scholar 

  10. Hedayatzadeh M, Rostami J, Peila D, Forough O, Salazar C (2017) Development of a soil abrasion test and analysis of impact of soil properties on tool wear for soft-ground mechanized tunneling using EPB machines. In Proceedings of the World Tunnel Congress 2017 1–6

  11. Alavi Gharahbagh E (2013) Development of a soil abrasion test and analysis of impact of soil properties on tool wear for soft-ground mechanized tunneling. Pennsylvania State University

  12. Barzegari G, Uromeihy a, Zhao J (2013) A newly developed soil abrasion testing method for tunnelling using shield machines. Q J Eng Geol Hydrogeol 46:63–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Jakobsen PD, Langmaack L, Dahl F, Breivik T (2013) Development of the soft ground abrasion tester (SGAT) to predict TBM tool wear, torque and thrust. Tunn Undergr Space Technol (Elsevier Ltd) 38:398–408

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Alavi Gharahbagh E, Rostami J & Talebi K (2014) Relationship between cutterhead torque and tool wear: a laboratory-scale study. In North American Tunneling - 2014 Proceedings, NAT 2014

  15. Alavi Gharahbagh E, Qiu T, Rostami J (2013) Evaluation of granular soil Abrasivity for Wear on cutting tools in excavation and tunneling equipment. J Geotech Geoenviron 139:1718–1726

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Alavi Gharahbagh E, Rostami J, Talebi K (2014) Experimental study of the effect of conditioning on abrasive wear and torque requirement of full face tunneling machines. Tunn Undergr Space Technol (Elsevier Ltd) 41:127–136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. ASTM International (2017) Standard test method for determination of the point load strength index of rock and application to rock strength classifications 1. 22

  18. Deere DU & Miller RP (1966) Engineering classification and index properties for intact rock

  19. Lu N, Kim T-H, Sture S, Likos WJ (2009) Tensile strength of unsaturated sand. J Eng Mech 135:1410–1419

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Thuro K (1997) Drillability prediction: geological influences in hard rock drill and blast tunnelling. Geol Rundsch 86:426–438

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Several individuals helped design the testing and prepare the equipment and materials, particularly Brent Duncan, Bruce Yoshioka, and Ray Johnson from Colorado School of Mines, as well as Sam Anderson and Scott Rife from JADCO Manufacturing, Inc. Professor Richard Wendlandt has performed XRD testing and analyzing and the authors appreciate his support and feedback. Thanks also go to Travis Garska and David Leustek of Komatsu/JOY Global field office in Minnesota, USA.

Funding

This project was supported by Earth Mechanics Institute at Colorado School of Mines and JADCO Manufacturing, Inc.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wei Hu.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hu, W., Rostami, J. & Frough, O. Assessing Effectiveness of Various Wear-Resistant Materials Used as Hard Facings in Mining Applications. Mining, Metallurgy & Exploration 37, 117–128 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42461-019-00110-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42461-019-00110-x

Keywords

Navigation