Skip to main content

Magnetic properties of graphene oxide via a simple mixing with waste engine oil-based carbon nanotubes

Abstract

Graphene oxide (GO) was synthesized via a simple electrochemical exfoliation of graphite in a surfactant-containing aqueous solution. A novel custom-made surfactant, 1,4-bis (neopentyloxy)-3-(neopentyloxycarbonyl)-1,4-dioxobutane-2-sulfonate (TC14) was used to assist the exfoliation process. The structural and magnetic properties of prepared GO were examined using electron microscopies, micro-Raman, and Fourier transform infrared spectroscopies, and vibrating sample magnetometer (VSM). Room temperature VSM measurement showed a diamagnetic response of pristine GO under a high magnetic field. This indicated the low defect and the absence of any impurities in the synthesized GO. Simple mixing of GO and carbon nanotubes (CNTs) was also done to study their magnetic properties. CNTs were initially synthesized from waste engine oil using thermal chemical vapour deposition. It was found that the addition of magnetic CNTs has successfully induced the ferromagnetism in the GO sample. The saturation magnetization and average coercivity of GO/CNTs were observed to be 6.13 memu and 345.12 G, respectively. This study offers a low cost and simple method to induced magnetism in GO as compared to the common chemical modifications of GO.

Introduction

Graphene has been known with its outstanding properties and wide range applications. A derivative of graphene namely graphene oxide (GO) also has received enormous attention because it is easily synthesized, modified or chemically reduced for mass production of graphene and offers many practical applications. Graphene and its derivatives also show potential in spintronic applications due to their excellent carrier mobility and long spin diffusion length arise from the weak spin–orbit coupling of carbon atom [1, 2]. However, it is known that perfect graphene is intrinsically diamagnetic [1, 3]. The presence of defects such as vacancies, impurity, dislocations and grain boundaries in graphene can induce the spin polarization and increase its magnetism [4, 5]. Hence, several studies have been done to enhance the magnetic properties of GO such as nanocomposite with metallic or magnetic materials [6, 7] and chemical activation [4]. Meanwhile, GO produced from the Hummers method and chemically reduced GO (RGO) was reported [8, 9] to show ferromagnetism response without any further treatments. It was believed that nature uses of acids during the synthesis process using Hummers method has contributed to the magnetic properties of GO.

Modification of another carbon material namely carbon nanotubes (CNTs) is also seen can improve their properties and expand their applications. Pistone et al. [10] reported the synthesis of CNTs from isobutene using Fe/Al2O3 based catalyst decorated with Fe3O4 magnetite nanoparticle. They use of metal-based catalyst and the addition of magnetite nanoparticle has successfully induced the magnetization in CNTs sample. Magnetic carbon materials offer many potential applications such as magnetic data storage, nanoprobe in magnetic force microscopy [10], adsorbent [11] and biosensor [12].

Moreover, the use of surfactant in stabilizing the carbon nanostructures also gained much attention due to its natural role of surfactant [13, 14]. Previous works have implemented the triple-tails surfactant, TC14 in various nanocomposites applications including CNTs/natural rubber latex and graphene-based rubber [15,16,17]. However, so far, there is no work reported on the use of triple-tails surfactant, TC14 in the magnetic properties study of GO incorporated with CNTs.

Therefore, in this study, GO synthesized via an electrochemical exfoliation process was directly mixed with magnetic CNTs synthesized from waste engine oil (WEO) in the presence of ferrocene (C10H10Fe). A novel custom-made surfactant, 1,4-bis (neopentyloxy)-3-(neopentyloxycarbonyl)-1,4-dioxobutane-2-sulfonate (TC14) [18] was used to assist the exfoliation process during the synthesis of GO. The use of ferrocene catalyst did contribute to the magnetic properties of CNTs. As compared to the conventional routes to induce the magnetic properties of GO, we offered a simpler, greener and cheaper process by avoiding the use of hazardous chemicals such as acid treatment. Moreover, the mixing of GO and CNTs which were both carbon-based materials did not give additional contaminations or impurities to the nanocomposite sample.

Materials and methods

GO was initially synthesized via an electrochemical exfoliation method as similarly reported in [19, 20]. A custom-made surfactant, 1,4-bis (neopentyloxy)-3-(neopentyloxycarbonyl)-1,4-dioxobutane-2-sulfonate (TC14) with concentration of 0.1 M was used to assist the GO dispersion in deionized (DI) water. The graphite electrodes were connected to the voltage source of 7.0 V for 24 h synthesis process. CNTs were separately synthesized using thermal CVD method from waste engine oil as carbon source with a ferrocene catalyst of 17.99 wt% [21]. For the preparation of GO/CNTs sample, 0.05 g CNTs and 0.5 wt% TC14 was dispersed in 10 ml deionized water and stirred for 30 min. GO solution was then simultaneously mixed into CNTs dispersion with volume ratio of 1:1 and sonicated for 30 min in an ultrasonic bath. The mixture was further stirred in a water bath system at 85 °C for 1 h. The prepared dispersion was then repeatedly centrifuged at 5000 rpm and the precipitation was further dried in an oven to form a fine GO/CNTs powder. The samples were characterized using field emission scanning electron microscopy (FESEM-Hitachi SU 8020), high-resolution transmission electron microscopy (HRTEM- FEI Tecnai F30 200 kV), micro-Raman spectroscopy (Renishaw InVia Raman Microscope), Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR-Thermo scientific Nicolet 6700 FTIR spectrometer), and vibrating sample magnetometer (VSM-LakeShore 7404).

Result and discussion

FESEM analysis was performed to observe the morphology of pristine GO, pure CNTs and GO/CNTs nanocomposites as seen in Fig. 1. Pristine GO (Fig. 1a) presented a lateral surface area, crumple, and typical wrinkle structure. The edges part exhibited a highly roll-up structure due to the intra-planar interaction between the layers of GO sheets [22]. Meanwhile, a dense quasi aligned CNTs from WEO precursor with a diameter at around 31–33 nm was presented in Fig. 1b. Hollow tube CNTs were observed to be covered between the crumple GO sheets in the GO/CNTs nanocomposite sample (Fig. 1c–d). The diameter of the CNTs in the GO/CNTs sample was consistent with pristine CNTs. The formed nanocomposites between GO and CNTs shows a thick flake-like shape with wrinkles and hollow tube structure similar to the reported of GO/CNTs composites [23]. However, both GO and CNTs structures were slightly deformed after the mixing process due to the stirring and sonication processes to produce a uniform GO/CNTs dispersion. This might be due to the π–π bonding in-between CNTs and GO, thus altered the size of the nanostructures [22, 23].

Fig. 1
figure1

FESEM images of a pristine GO, b WEO-based quasi aligned CNTs, c–d GO/CNTs nanocomposite sample

The morphology of pristine GO and GO/CNTs nanocomposites was further investigated by high-resolution transmission electron microscopy (HRTEM) as shown in Fig. 2. Figure 2a shows a pristine GO consisted of multi-layers of graphene sheets (< 10 layers) due to its natural wavy and stacked characteristics. Meanwhile, GO/CNTs nanocomposites image in Fig. 2b revealed the CNTs structure was distributed over the GO surfaces. It is clearly shown in all regions that the end-tubes of CNTs were pulled out from the GO structures, thus confirmed the nanocomposites are well-attached due to the higher compatibility of GO led by the stabilization of triple-tails surfactant within the nanocomposite.

Fig. 2
figure2

HRTEM images of a pristine GO and b GO/CNTs

Micro-Raman spectroscopy was used to investigate the carbon structure ordering of the sample (Fig. 3a). A typical micro-Raman spectrum of GO was observed with strong D (disorder) and G (graphitic) peaks at ~ 1359 and 1597 cm−1, respectively and ID/IG ratio of 0.91. A slightly broad and intense peak at 1361 cm−1 was due to the defects contributed by the oxygenesis group at GO edges, indicating a successful oxidation and intercalation process [24]. Meanwhile, for CNTs synthesized from WEO, the ID/IG ratio showed a slightly lower (0.90) than the GO sheets, which is consistent with the typical crystallinity of CNTs in previous work [21]. After the incorporation of GO and CNTs, the ratio was slightly increased up to 1.09. The distortion at G peak indicates the successful interactions between the GO and CNTs [24]. Higher disorder as also observed in FESEM analysis showed that the mixing process did affect the structure of the nanocomposite sample.

Fig. 3
figure3

a Micro-Raman and b FTIR spectra of pristine GO, pure CNTs and GO/CNTs samples

In order to affirm the attachment between CNTs and GO structures, the FTIR measurement was carried. From the FTIR analysis, the noticeable changes were observed at several points (Fig. 3b). As the previous report, there is no obvious peak presence in the CNTs spectrum [25]. Meanwhile, the characteristics peaks around 3352, 2977, 1381, 1087, 1044 and 884 cm−1 were seen in the GO sample. The existence of the vibrational bands in the range of 1000–1400 cm−1 was due to the various oxygen functional groups attached at edges GO sheets [26, 27]. Meanwhile, the peak appeared at around 800 cm−1 was confirmed the stabilized GO sheets assisted surfactant [28]. The presence of the intense and broad peaks at 2977 and 3352 cm−1, respectively, further supported that the GO solution is highly water- soluble [29]. After the addition of CNTs in the GO solution, the FTIR spectrum of GO/CNTs exhibits all characteristics peaks for GO along with several peaks of CNTs. The peaks at below 1000 cm−1 (epoxy group) for GO and CNTs sample were disappeared in GO/CNTs nanocomposites meanwhile a broad and intense peak at 3440 cm−1 (hydroxyl group) was observed. This confirmed that the GO and CNTs are well-mixed during the mixing process. Meanwhile, the graphitic skeleton peak at 1582 and 1651 cm−1 further confirmed the functionalization between GO and CNTs [30, 31].

The magnetizations of the samples as the function of a magnetic field at room temperature are presented in Fig. 4. As reported in previous studies [4, 9], without any chemical modification and treatments, pristine GO was naturally diamagnetic. This is also consistent with our result (Fig. 4a) where the GO presented a diamagnetic response even under a high magnetic field up to 12,000 G. The addition of CNTs has successfully induced the magnetic properties of GO as seen in Fig. 4b. The ferromagnetic response was observed with the measured saturation magnetization and average coercivity of 6.13 memu and 345.12 G, respectively. Even though the results obtained is slightly lower but the magnetization value of GO composites is still comparable with other previous works [32, 33]. As previously reported, the CNTs exhibit ferromagnetic hysteresis with a saturation magnetization of ~ 30 \(\mu emu\) [34]. The enhancement observed for the GO/CNTs nanocomposite sample was probably due to the presence of metallocene catalyst (ferrocene) in CNTs. On the other hand, as presented through micro-Raman analysis, the increase of GO/CNTs defect also led to the enhancement of their magnetic properties. It was known that the presence of defects in carbonaceous materials such as graphene can induce spin polarization which can enhance the magnetic properties of the materials [4, 35, 36].

Fig. 4
figure4

Magnetic properties of a GO and b GO/CNTs nanocomposites sample

Conclusions

Simple mixing of CNTs with GO has increased the magnetic properties of the GO-based nanocomposites. It was found that the addition of magnetic CNTs synthesized from wastes engine oil has successfully induced the ferromagnetism in the GO-assisted TC14 surfactant sample which suitably offers the nanocomposites in many sensors and photo-catalyst applications.

References

  1. 1.

    Tang T, Liu F, Liu Y, Li X, Xu Q, Feng Q (2014) Identifying the magnetic properties of graphene oxide. Appl Phys Lett 104:123104. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4869827

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Zhang P, Wu MW (2011) Electron spin diffusion and transport in graphene. Phys Rev B 84:045304. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.84.045304

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Sepioni M, Nair RR, Rablen S, Narayanan J, Tuna F, Winpenny R, Geim AK, Grigorieva I (2010) Limits on intrinsic magnetism in graphene. Phys Rev Lett 105:207205. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.105.207205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Govind Raj K, Joy PA (2014) Ferromagnetism at room temperature in activated graphene oxide. Chem Phys Lett 605:89–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cplett.2014.05.027

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Raji AT, Lombardi EB (2015) Stability, magnetic and electronic properties of cobalt-vacancy defect pairs in graphene: a first-principles study. Phys Rev 464:28–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physb.2015.02.017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Sahoo PK, Panigraphy B, Li D, Bahadur D (2013) Magnetic behavior of reduced graphene oxide/metal nanocomposites. J Appl Phys 113:17B525. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4799150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Sun J, Liang Q, Han Q, Zhang X, Ding M (2015) One-step synthesis of magnetic graphene oxide nanocomposite and its application in magnetic solid phase extraction of heavy metal ions from biological samples. Talanta 132:557–563. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.talanta.2014.09.043

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Sarkar SK, Raul KK, Pradhan SS, Basu S, Nayak A (2014) Magnetic properties of graphite oxide and reduced graphene oxide. Phys E 64:78–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physe.2014.07.014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Qin S, Guo X, Cao Y, Ni Z, Xu Q (2014) Strong ferromagnetism of reduced graphene oxide. Carbon 78:559–565. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2014.07.039

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Pistone A, Lannazzo D, Fazio M, Celegato F, Barrera G, Tiberto P, Giordano A, Azzerboni B, Galvagno S (2014) Synthesis and magnetic properties of multiwalled carbon nanotubes decorated with magnetite nanoparticles. Phys Rev B 435:88–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physb.2013.11.015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Luo YB, Li X, Jiang XY, Cai BD, Zhu FP, Zhang HF, Chen ZG, Pang YQ, Feng YQ (2015) Magnetic graphene as modified quick, easy, cheap, effective, rugged and safe adsorbent for the determination of organochlorine pesticide residues in tobacco. J Chromatogr A 1406:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chroma.2015.05.066

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Chen HC, Chen YT, Tsai RY, Chen MC, Chen SL, Xiao MC, Chen CL, Hua MY (2015) A sensitive and selective magnetic graphene composite-modified polycrystalline-silicon nanowire field-effect transistor for bladder cancer diagnosis. Biosens Bioelectron 66:198–207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bios.2014.11.019

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Mohamed A, Sagisaka M, Hollamby M, Rogers SE, Heenan RK, Dyer R, Eastoe J (2012) Hybrid CO2-philic surfactants with low fluorine content. Langmuir 28(15):6299–6306. https://doi.org/10.1021/la3005322

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Mohamed A, Sagisaka M, Guittard F, Cummings S, Paul A, Rogers SE (2011) Low fluorine content CO2-philic surfactants. Langmuir 27(17):10562–10569. https://doi.org/10.1021/la2021885

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Nurhafizah MD, Aziz AA, Suriani AB, Mohamed A, Soga T (2020) Low-temperature exfoliated graphene oxide incorporated with different types of natural rubber latex: electrical and morphological properties and its capacitance performance. Ceram Int 46(5):5610–5622. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2019.11.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Nurhafizah MD, Suriani AB, Mohamed A, Soga T (2020) Effect of voltage applied for graphene oxide/latex nanocomposite produced via electrochemical exfoliation and its application as conductive electrodes. Diam Relat Mater 101:107624. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diamond.2019.107624

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Mohamed A, Anas AK, Suriani AB, Azira AA, Sagisaka M, Brown P, Eastoe J, Kamari A, Hashim NH, Isa IM (2014) Preparation of multiwall carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs) stabilised by highly branched hydrocarbon surfactants and dispersed in natural rubber latex nanocomposites. Coll Polym Sci 292(11):3013–3023. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00396-014-3354-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Mohamed A, Ardyani T, Suriani AB, Brown P, Hollamby M, Sagisaka M (2016) Graphene-philic surfactants for nanocomposites in latex technology. Adv Colloid Interface 230:54–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cis.2016.01.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Nurhafizah MD, Suriani AB, Alfarisa S, Mohamed A, Isa IM, Kamari A, Hashim N, Aziz AA, Mahmood MR (2015) The synthesis of graphene oxide via electrochemical exfoliation method. Adv Mater Res Trans Tech Publ 1109:55–59. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.1109.55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Nurhafizah MD, Khor SY, Tan KL, Soga T (2019) The synthesized reduced graphene oxide enhanced the capacitive behavior of activated carbon/PVA as potential electrode materials. J Nanostruct. https://doi.org/10.22052/jns.2019.196289.1919

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Suriani AB, Alfarisa S, Mohamed A, Isa IM, Kamari A, Hashim N, Mamat MH, Mohamed AR, Rusop M (2015) Quasi-aligned carbon nanotubes synthesised from waste engine oil. Mater Lett 139:220–223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matlet.2014.10.046

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Lee SP, Ali GAM, Algarni H, Chong KF (2019) Flake size-dependent adsorption of graphene oxide aerogel. J Mol Liq 277:175–180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molliq.2018.12.097

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Song G, Sun L, Li S, Sun Y, Fu Q, Pan C (2020) Synergistic effect of Gr and CNTs on preparing ultrathin Cu-(CNTs + Gr) composite foil via electrodeposition. Compos B Eng 187:107841. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2020.107841

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Abu Bakar NH, Gam A, Ismail J, Algarni H, Chong KF (2019) Size-dependent corrosion behavior of graphene oxide coating. Prog Org 134:272–280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.porgcoat.2019.05.011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Ali SD, Hussain ST, Gilani SR (2013) Synthesis, characterization and magnetic properties of carbon nanotubes decorated with magnetic MIIFe2O4 nanoparticles. Appl Surf Sci 271:118–124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2013.01.140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Wang X, Dou W (2012) Preparation of graphite oxide (GO) and the thermal stability of silicone rubber/GO nanocomposites. Thermochim Acta 529:25–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tca.2011.11.016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Gupta VK, Agarwal S, Sadegh H, Ali GAM, Bharti AK, Makhlouf ASH (2017) Facile route synthesis of novel graphene oxide-β-cyclodextrin nanocomposite and its application as adsorbent for removal of toxic bisphenol A from the aqueous phase. Mol Liq 237:466–472. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molliq.2017.04.113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Mohamed A, Trickett SYC, Cummings S, Sagisaka M, Hudson L, Sandrine N, Dyer R, Rogers SE, Heenan RK, Eastoe J (2010) Universal surfactant for water, oils, and CO2. Langmuir 26(17):13861–13866. https://doi.org/10.1021/la102303q

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Ali GAM, Makhlouf SA, Yusoff MM, Chong KF (2015) Structural and electrochemical characteristics of graphene nanosheets as supercapacitor electrodes. Rev Adv Mater Sci 41:35–43

    Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Shah S, Pandey OP, Mohammed J, Srivastava AK, Gupta A, Basandrai D (2020) Reduced graphene oxide (RGO) induced modification of optical and magnetic properties of M-type nickel doped barium hexaferrite. J Sol–Gel Sci Technol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10971-019-05210-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Layek RK, Uddin ME, Kim NH, Tak Lau AK, Lee JH (2017) Noncovalent functionalization of reduced graphene oxide with pluronic F127 and its nanocomposites with gum Arabic. Compos B Eng 128:155–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2017.07.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Yuan L, Nujiang T, Xiangang W, Qian F, Ming L, Qinghua X, Fuchi L, Youwei D (2013) Realization of ferromagnetic graphene oxide with high magnetization by doping graphene oxide with nitrogen. Sci Rep 3:25566. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep02566

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Try T, Fuchi L, Liu Y (2014) Identifying the magnetic properties of graphene oxide. Appl Phys Lett 104(12):123104–123109. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4869827

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Friedman AL, Chun H, Jung YJ, Heiman D, Glaser ER, Menon L (2010) Possible room-temperature ferromagnetism in hydrogenated carbon nanotubes. Phys Rev 81:115461. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.81.115461

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    El-Khawas EH, Azab AA, Mansour AM (2020) Structural, magnetic and dielectric properties of reduced graphene oxide/La0.9Bi0.1FeO3 nanocomposites. Mater Chem Phys 241:122335. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchemphys.2019.122335

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Sun Y, Pan H, Zheng Y, Zhang K, Fu L, Chen J, Zhang W, Tang N (2020) The effect of thermal annealing on the magnetic properties of graphene oxide quantum dots. Appl Surf Sci 501:144234. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2019.144234

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to acknowledge Short Term Grant, Universiti Sains Malaysia (USM) (304/PFIZIK/6315241) for financial support. The authors want to thank Nano-Optoelectronics Research and Technology Laboratory (USM), Nanotechnology Research Centre (UPSI) for their facilities support, and Department of Frontier Material, Nagoya Institute of Technology, Japan for the technical supports.

Funding

This study was funded by Short Term Grant, Universiti Sains Malaysia (USM) (Grant code: 304/PFIZIK/6315241).

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. D. Nurhafizah.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nurhafizah, M.D. Magnetic properties of graphene oxide via a simple mixing with waste engine oil-based carbon nanotubes. SN Appl. Sci. 2, 534 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42452-020-2361-8

Download citation

Keywords

  • Graphene oxide
  • Exfoliation
  • Electron microscopy
  • Carbon nanotubes
  • Magnetism