California Essentials for Childhood Case Study: Collective Impact Through Strategic Opportunities

Abstract

This case study describes the formation, process, and implementation of the California Essentials for Childhood (EfC) Initiative. Major successes and challenges of the EfC Initiative are highlighted, as well as lessons learned and future directions. Grounded in a collective impact organizing model, the EfC Initiative brought a public health lens to addressing child maltreatment in California with an emphasis on primary prevention and social determinants of health. The public health perspective allows for broader policy and systems change approaches that can have population-level impacts. This perspective was embraced by partner organizations in ways that will have lasting influence and help to align cross-sector efforts to promote safe, stable, nurturing relationships and environments. The EfC Initiative was also successful in developing new Childhood Adversity and Resilience metrics for Kidsdata.org and local dashboards that provide actionable data for local partners. However, it was challenging to operate under a collective impact structure in a state as geographically and demographically diverse as California. The lessons learned will inform the next steps for the EfC Initiative.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1

References

  1. Anda, R. F., Brown, D. W., Dube, S. R., Bremner, J. D., Felitti, V. J., & Giles, W. H. (2008). Adverse childhood experiences and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in adults. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 34(5), 396–403.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bohn, S., Danielson, C., Fisher, J., Kimberlin, S., Mattingly, M., & Wimer, C. (2017). The California poverty measure: 2014. Retrieved from https://inequality.stanford.edu/sites/default/files/CPM-2014_technical-appendix.pdf. Accessed 7 Dec 2018.

  3. Brown, D. W., Young, K. E., Anda, R. F., Felitti, V. J., & Giles, W. H. (2006). Re: asthma and the risk of lung cancer. Findings from the adverse childhood experiences (ACE). Cancer Causes & Control, 17(3), 349–350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. California Department of Finance (2015). Enacted budget detail. Retrieved from http://www.ebudget.ca.gov/2015-16/Enacted/BudgetSummary/BSS/BSS.html. Accessed 7 Dec 2018.

  5. California Department of Public Health (2016). Adverse Childhood Experiences (ACEs): California update, 2011–2013 data. Retrieve by contacting CDPH at https://www.cdph.ca.gov/Programs/CCDPHP/DCDIC/SACB/Pages/ChildMaltreatmentandChildAbusePrevention.aspx#.

  6. California Department of Public Health (2018). EpiCenter - California Injury Data Online. Retrieved from http://epicenter.cdph.ca.gov/, August 2018. Based on California Department of Finance, Report P-3: State and County Population Projections by Race/Ethnicity, Detailed Age, and Gender, 2010–2060.

  7. Center for the Study of Social Policies (2018). Strengthening families: a protective factors framework. Retrieved from https://cssp.org/our-work/projects/protective-factors-framework/. Accessed 7 Dec 2018.

  8. Center on the Developing Child at Harvard University (2018). Retrieved from https://developingchild.harvard.edu/science/. Accessed 7 Dec 2018.

  9. Coleman-Jensen, A., Gregory, C., & Singh, A. (2014). Household food security in the United States in 2013 (Economic Research Report No. 173). Retrieved from https://www.ers.usda.gov/webdocs/publications/45265/48787_err173.pdf?v=0. Accessed 7 Dec 2018.

  10. Felitti, V. J., Anda, R. F., Nordenberg, D., Williamson, D. F., Spitz, A. M., Edwards, V., & Marks, J. S. (1998). Relationship of childhood abuse and household dysfunction to many of the leading causes of death in adults: the adverse childhood experiences (ACE) study. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 14(4), 245–258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. KPJR (2015). Paper tigers. Retrieved from https://kpjrfilms.co/paper-tigers/. Accessed 7 Dec 2018.

  12. KPJR (2016). Resilience. Retrieved from https://kpjrfilms.co/resilience/. Accessed 7 Dec 2018.

  13. Let’s Get Healthy California Task Force (2012). Let’s get healthy California task force final report. Retrieved from Let’s Get Healthy California website https://letsgethealthy.ca.gov/. Accessed 7 Dec 2018.

  14. Putnam-Hornstein, E., Needell, B., King, B., & Johnson-Motoyama, M. (2013). Racial and ethnic disparities: a population-based examination of risk factors for involvement with child protective services. Child Abuse & Neglect, 37(1), 33–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Administration for Children and Families, Children’s Bureau (2015). Child Maltreatment 2013. Retrieved from https://www.acf.hhs.gov/cb/research-datatechnology/statistics-research/child-maltreatment. Accessed 7 Dec 2018.

Download references

Funding

This work was funded by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention CE002363–01.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Steve Wirtz.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors have no relevant conflicts of interest to disclose.

Financial Disclosures

The authors have no relevant financial relationships interest to disclose.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Abbott, M., Wirtz, S. California Essentials for Childhood Case Study: Collective Impact Through Strategic Opportunities. Int. Journal on Child Malt. 1, 133–152 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42448-018-0012-0

Download citation

Keywords

  • Child abuse
  • Child neglect
  • Child maltreatment
  • Prevention
  • Collective impact
  • Policy
  • Systems change
  • Social norms