Abstract
This essay is a contribution to a symposium on Madhav Khosla’s important book, India’s Founding Moment. It uses the book to reflect on the relevance of the story of the Indian founding to constitution making around the world in the twenty-first century. It explores this question through three themes that run through the book: people and process; the substance of constitutions; and global influences. In conclusion, I suggest that the principal value of the Indian example lies in its emphasis on the development of a democratic people through the principles and processes for which a democratic constitution provides. The direct applicability of the Indian example should not be overstated, however. In matters of important detail, it was necessarily anchored in the particularities of the Indian case, including the nature of the societal divisions as they had evolved under colonial rule, attracting substantive constitutional solutions that would not necessarily be applicable elsewhere. The world of constitution making has moved in in 70 years, moreover, as might be expected. Many of the challenges for constitution making now reflect both the possibilities and the pathologies of post-modernity, to which the Indian founding provides at best a general guide.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Notes
Khosla 2020.
Khosla 2020, 24.
Khosla 2020, 20, 21.
Khosla 2020, 153–4.
Khosla 2020, 6.
Khosla 2020, 6.
In relation to constitutional development in Thailand, see Uwanno and Burns 2021.
Mirow 2015, 6–7.
Constitution of the Union of Burma 1947.
Coffey 2021, describing the activities of Chan Htoon, legal adviser to the Constituent Assembly of Burma, in India in 1947.
Myint-U T 2019, 30–31.
Rothermund 2006, 10.
Yeh and Chang 2011.
Saunders 2021, 238.
Timor Leste and South Sudan are examples.
Dann, Riegner and Bönnemann 2020.
Daly 2019.
Bell and Zulueta-Fulscher 2016,
Khosla 2020, 4, 21.
Khosla 2020, 25.
This part of the story is told, somewhat briefly, in Khosla 2020, 13–14.
Khosla quotes Gandhi in 1940 on this point: Khosla 2020, 13.
A breakdown of these categories is available at Lok Sabha 2021.
Khosla 2020, 13.
Khosla 2020, 157–158.
A similar approach has been taken, with varying measures of success, in other constitution-making contexts where there is no extant legislature with adequate legitimacy. South Africa and Nepal are good, contrasting, examples.
South African History Online 2019.
Commonwealth Human Rights Initiative 1999.
Hart 2003.
See now, UN Secretary-General 2020.
UN Development Programme 2016.
UN Development Programme 2016, 33.
UN Secretary-General 2020, 4.
Hart 2003, 4.
Saati 2017, 13, 19.
Prempeh 2017, 296, 300.
South Africa also exemplified the significance of this form of leadership: Haysom 2004.
Khosla 2020, 110, 138.
Khosla 2020, 142.
Khosla 2020, 36.
Constitution of Nepal 2015.
Bulmer 2019.
Khosla 2020, 65, 46.
Khosla 2020, 65–69.
See Rao 1967, 147–150.
Coffey 2021.
Khosla 2020, 16.
Dam 2013.
Dam 2013, 154.
It was elevated to become the second principle in UN Secretary-General 2020, 3.
References
Bell C, Zulueta-Fulscher K (2016) Sequencing Peace Agreements and Constitutions in the Political Settlement Process. International IDEA.
Bulmer E (2019) Independent Regulatory and Oversight (Fourth-Branch) Institutions. International IDEA.
Coffey D (2021) The Drafting of the Constitution of the Union of Burma 1947. Unpublished paper.
Commonwealth Human Rights Initiative (1999) Consultation on Participatory Constitution-Making: Recommendations to CHOGM, ’99. https://www.humanrightsinitiative.org/publications/const/constitutionalism_booklet_1999.pdf. Accessed 11 Nov 2021.
Daly T (2019) Democratic Decay: Conceptualising an Emerging Research Field. Hague J Rule Law 11:9–36
Dam S (2013) Presidential Legislation in India: The Law and Practice of Ordinances. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Dann P, Riegner M, Bönnemann M (2020) The Global South and Comparative Constitutional Law. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Hart V (2013) Democratic Constitution Making: USIP Special Report 107. https://www.usip.org/sites/default/files/resources/sr107.pdf. Accessed 11 Nov 2021.
Haysom N (2004) Negotiating A Sustainable Political Settlement. https://1library.net/document/y91108dq-negotiating-sustainable-political-settlement-legitimation-transition-presented-nicholas.html. Accessed 11 Nov 2021.
Khosla M (2020) India’s Founding Moment. Harvard University Press, Harvard.
Lok Sabha (2021) Constituent Assembly of India. http://164.100.47.194/loksabha/constituent/facts.html. Accessed 11 Nov 2021.
Mirow MC (2015) Latin American Constitutions: The Constitution of Cadiz and its Legacy in Spanish America. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Myint-U T (2019) The Hidden History of Burma. Atlantic Books, London.
Prempeh HK (2017) Conclusion: Does Participation Help to Foster Constitutionalism in Africa? In: Abbiate T, Böckenförde M, Veronica F (eds) Public Participation in African Constitutionalism. Routledge, London, pp 296–307
Rothermund D (2006) Constitution Making and Decolonization. Diogenes 53:9–17
Saati A (2017) Participation – To Unveil a Myth. In: Abbiate T, Böckenförde M, Veronica F (eds) Public Participation in African Constitutionalism. Routledge, London, pp 13–25
Saunders C (2019a) International Involvement in Constitution-Making. In: Landau D, Lerner H (eds) Comparative Constitution Making. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, pp 69–89
Saunders C (2019) Constitution Making in Asia. Chinese J Comp Law 7:251–265
Saunders C (2021) Constitution Transformation. Global Constitutionalism 10:237–255
Shiva Rao B (ed) (1967) The Framing of India’s Constitution: Select Documents Volume II. Indian Institute of Public Administration, New Delhi.
South African History Online (2019). The Public Participation Process. https://www.sahistory.org.za/archive/chapter-13-public-participation-process. Accessed 11 Nov 2021.
UN Development Programme (2016) Guidance Note on Constitution-Making Support. https://www.undp.org/publications/undp-guidance-note-constitution-making-support. Accessed 11 Nov 2021.
UN Secretary-General (2020) United Nations Assistance to Constitution-Making Processes. https://peacemaker.un.org/sites/peacemaker.un.org/files/SG%20Guidance%20Note%20on%20Constitutional%20Assistance_2.pdf. Accessed 11 Nov 2021.
Uwanno B, Burns WD (2021) The Thai Constitution of 1997 Sources and Process. http://www.members.tripod.com/asialaw/articles/constburns1.html. Accessed 11 Nov 2021.
Yeh J-R, Chang W-C (2011) The Emergence of East Asian Constitutionalism: Features in Comparison. Am J Comp Law 59:805–839
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
The author states that there is no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Saunders, C. Democracy, Constitutionalism, Modernity, Globalisation. Jus Cogens 4, 11–23 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42439-021-00048-z
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42439-021-00048-z
Keywords
- Constitution making
- Democracy
- India
- Comparative constitutional law