Abstract
In Our Moral Fate, Allen Buchanan defends an account of moral change that is grounded in evolutionary biology. His account offers resources for explaining the possibility of both moral progress and moral regression, where progress and regression are a function of moral inclusion and moral exclusion, respectively. In my commentary, I first offer a brief summary of Buchanan’s argument. I then examine Buchanan’s account from the perspective of transitional justice. Transitional justice provides confirming evidence for some of Buchanan’s substantive claims and challenges the validity of others. I end with a discussion of power and time. Power plays a central role in Buchanan’s account of niche construction, but the locus of power is unspecified. Time scales for moral change are profoundly different for the timeline of transitional justice versus the timeline of evolutionary biology. My discussion of power and time raises questions the nature of the normative guidance Buchanan’s account offers in the short term.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Arriaza L, Roht-Arriaza N (2008) Social reconstruction as a local process. Int J Transit Justice 2:152–172
Bates G, Cinar I, Nalepa M (2019) Accountability by numbers: a new global transitional justice database. Perspect Polit. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537592719000756:1-24
Buchanan A (2020) Our moral fate: evolution and the escape from tribalism. Cambridge: MIT Press
Christiano C (2011) An instrumental argument for a human right to democracy. Philos Public Aff 39:142–176
Fuller L (1969) rev. ed. The morality of law. New Haven: Yale University Press
International Center for Transitional Justice (2016) “We want to be heard”: obstacles to women taking part in participatory mechanisms for dealing with victims of the internal armed conflict. https://www.ictj.org/sites/default/files/ICTJ_Report_Colombia_Gender_Reparations_2016.pdf. Accessed 16 Mar 2021
International Center for Transitional Justice (ICTJ). https://www.ictj.org/about (accessed 10 Feb 2021)
Kennard M (2017) Chiquita made a killing from colombia’s civil war. Pulitzer Center January 28, 2017. https://pulitzercenter.org/stories/chiquita-made-killing-colombias-civil-war. Accessed 16 Mar 2021
Menszer F and Hills T (2020) Information overload helps fake news spread, and social media knows it. Scientific American. https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/information-overload-helps-fake-news-spread-and-social-media-knows-it/. Accessed 16 Mar 2021
Morrow P (2020) Unconscionable crimes: how norms explain and constrain genocide and mass atrocity. Cambridge: MIT Press
Murphy C (2004) Lon Fuller and the moral value of the rule of law. Law Philos 24:239–262
Murphy C (2010) A moral theory of political reconciliation. New York: Cambridge University Press
Murphy C (2017) The conceptual foundations of transitional justice. New York: Cambridge University Press
Murphy C (2018) The ethics of diversity in transitional justice 16:821–836
Murphy C (forthcoming 2021) The movement for black lives and transitional justice. Brandon Hogan, Michael Cholbi, Alex Nadva, and Benjamin Yost (eds.), Philosophers on the Movement for Black Lives. New York: Oxford University Press
Ndahiro K (2019) In Rwanda, we know all about dehumanizing language. The Atlantic. April 13, 2019. https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2019/04/rwanda-shows-how-hateful-speech-leads-violence/587041/. Accessed 16 Mar 2021
Olsen T, Payne L, Reiter A (2010) the justice balance: when transitional justice improves human rights and democracy. Hum Rights Q 32:980–1007
Rundle K (2015) The impossibility of an exterminatory legality: law and the holocaust. Univ Toronto Law J 59:65–125
Sharp D (2014) Addressing dilemmas of the global and the local in transitional justice. Emory Int Law Rev 29:71–117
Teitel R (2003) Transitional justice geneology. Harvard Hum Rights J 16:69–94
Tsai J and Robins S (2018) Strengthening participation in local-level and national transitional justice processes. Global Initiative for Justice, Truth, and Reconciliation (GIJTR) https://www.sitesofconscience.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/Strengthening-Participation-Toolkit-online.pdf. Accessed 16 Mar 2021
United Nations Secretary General (2010) Guidance note of the secretary general: United Nations Approach to Transitional Justice. https://www.un.org/ruleoflaw/files/TJ_Guidance_Note_March_2010FINAL.pdf. Accessed 16 Mar 2021
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Murphy, C. Transitional Justice and Our Moral Fate. Jus Cogens 3, 73–84 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42439-021-00037-2
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42439-021-00037-2