Amoroso, C. (2014). Hybrid by Choice. Increasing Engagement in a High Enrollment Course. Hybrid Pedagogy, 20 May. https://hybridpedagogy.org/hybrid-choice-increasing-engagement-high-enrollment-course/. Accessed 14 November 2021.
Barab, S., & Squire, K. (2004). Design-based research: Putting a stake in the ground. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327809jls1301_1.
Barfield, W., & Weghorst, S. (1993). The sense of presence within virtual environments: A conceptual framework. In G. Salvendy & M. Smith (Eds). Human-computer interaction: Applications and case studies (pp. 699-704). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Beatty, B. J. (2007). Hybrid classes with flexible participation options – If you build it , how will they come? Paper presented at the 2007 Association for Educational Communications and Technology Annual Convention (October). Anaheim, CA: Association for Educational Communications and Technology. http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.457.495&rep=rep1&type=pdf. Accessed 14 November 2021.
Beatty, B. J. (2019). Hybrid-Flexible Course Design: Implementing student-directed hybrid classes. EdTech Books.
Bell, J., Sawaya, S., & Cain, W. (2014). Synchromodal classes: Designing for shared learning experiences between face-to- face and online students. International Journal of Designs for Learning, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.14434/ijdl.v5i1.12657.
Bond, M., & Bedenlier, S. (2019). Facilitating student engagement through educational technology: Towards a conceptual framework. Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 1, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.5334/jime.528.
Bower, M., Dalgarno, B., Kennedy, G. E., Lee, M. J. W., & Kenney, J. (2015). Design and implementation factors in blended synchronous learning environments: Outcomes from a cross-case analysis. Computers & Education, 86, 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.03.006.
Butz, N. T., & Stupnisky, R. H. (2017). Improving student relatedness through an online discussion intervention: The application of self-determination theory in synchronous hybrid programs. Computers and Education, 114, 117–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.06.006.
Butz, N. T., Stupnisky, R. H., Pekrun, R., Jensen, J. L., & Harsell, D. M. (2016). The Impact of Emotions on Student Achievement in Synchronous Hybrid Business and Public Administration Programs: A Longitudinal Test of Control-Value Theory*. Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education, 14(4), 441–474. https://doi.org/10.1111/dsji.12110.
Cain, W., Bell, J., & Cheng, C. (2016). Implementing robotic telepresence in a synchronous hybrid course. In Proceedings of IEEE 16th International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies, ICALT 2016. (pp. 171–175). New York: The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICALT.2016.79.
Carvalho, L., & Goodyear, P. (2014). The architecture of productive learning networks. New York: Routledge.
Carvalho, L., Nicholson, T., Yeoman, P., & Thibaut, P. (2020). Space matters: framing the New Zealand learning landscape. Learning Environments Research, 23(3), 307–329. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-020-09311-4.
Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2011). Research Methods in Education. 7th Ed. London: Routledge.
Cunningham, U. (2014). Teaching the Disembodied: Othering and Activity Systems in a Blended Synchronous Learning Situation. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 15(6). https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v15i6.1793.
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). The general causality orientations scale - self-determination in personality. Journal of Research in Personality, 19(2), 109–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/0092-6566(85)90023-6.
Dinh, H. Q., Walker, N., Song, C., Kobayashi, A., & Hodges L.F. (1999). Evaluating the importance of multi-sensory input on memory and the sense of presence in virtual environments. In L. Rosenblum, P. Astheimer, & D. Teichmann (Eds.), Proceedings of the IEEE Virtual Reality 1999 (pp. 222-228). Los Alamitos, CA: The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. https://doi.org/10.1109/VR.1999.756955.
Dobbins, C., & Denton, P. (2017). MyWallMate: An Investigation into the use of Mobile Technology in Enhancing Student Engagement. TechTrends, 61(6), 541–549. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-017-0188-y.
European University Association. (2021). Universities without walls. A vision for 2030. Brussels: European University Association. https://eua.eu/downloads/publications/universities without walls a vision for 2030.pdf. Accessed 14 November 2021.
Feenberg, A. (2019). Postdigital or Predigital? Postdigital Science and Education, 1(1), 8–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-018-0027-2.
Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School Engagement: Potential of the Concept, State of the Evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59–109. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543074001059.
Furlong, M. J., & Christenson, S. L. (2008). Engaging students at school and with learning: A relevant construct for all students. Psychology in the Schools, 45(5), 365–368. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.20302.
Gobert, J. D., Baker, R. S., & Wixon, M. B. (2015). Operationalizing and Detecting Disengagement Within Online Science Microworlds. Educational Psychologist, 50(1), 43–57. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004.
Goodyear, P., Carvalho, L., & Yeoman, P. (2021). Activity-Centred Analysis and Design (ACAD): Core purposes, distinctive qualities and current developments. Educational Technology Research and Development, 0123456789. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-020-09926-7.
Heilporn, G., Lakhal, S., & Bélisle, M. (2021). An examination of teachers’ strategies to foster student engagement in blended learning in higher education. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 18(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-021-00260-3.
Heutte, J., Fenouillet, F., Martin-Krumm, C., Boniwell, I., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2016). Proposal for a conceptual evolution of the flow in education (EduFlow) model. Presented at 8th European Conference on Positive Psychology (ECPP2016), Angers, France. https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01470857. Accessed 14 November 2021.
Huang, Y., Shu, F., Zhao, C., & Huang, J. (2017). Investigating and analyzing teaching effect of blended synchronous classroom. In Proceedings of 6th International Conference of Educational Innovation Through Technology (EITT) (pp. 134–135). New York: The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. https://doi.org/10.1109/EITT.2017.40.
Irvine, V. (2020). The Landscape of Merging Modalities. Educause Review, 4, 40–58. https://er.educause.edu/articles/2020/10/the-landscape-of-merging-modalities. Accessed 9 May 2021.
Irvine, V., Code, J., & Richards, L. (2013). Realigning Higher Education for the 21st-Century Learner through Multi-Access Learning. Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 9(2).
JISC. (2006). Designing Spaces for Effective Learning A guide to 21st century learning space design. http://www.online-conference.net/jisc/content/designspaces.pdf. Accessed 14 November 2021.
Joy, M., Foss, J., King, E., Sinclair, J., Sitthiworachart, J., & Davis, R. (2013). Incorporating technologies into a flexible teaching space. British Journal of Educational Technology, 45(2), 272-284. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12040.
Kapur, M. (2016). Examining Productive Failure, Productive Success, Unproductive Failure, and Unproductive Success in Learning. Educational Psychologist, 51(2), 289–299. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2016.1155457.
Ladd, T. (2020). Optimizing concurrent classrooms: Teaching students in the room and online simultaneously. Forbes, 19 June. https://www.forbes.com/sites/tedladd/2020/06/19/optimizing-concurrent-classrooms-teaching-students-in-the-room-and-online-simultaneously/#50645ba93451. Accessed 14 November 2021.
Lakhal, S., Bateman, D., & Bédard, J. (2017). Blended Synchronous Delivery Mode in Graduate Programs: A Literature Review and Its Implementation in the Master Teacher Program. Collected Essays on Learning and Teaching, 10. http://dx.doi.org/10.22329/celt.v10i0.4747.
Miller, A. N., Sellnow, D. D., & Strawser, M. G. (2021). Pandemic pedagogy challenges and opportunities: instruction communication in remote, HyFlex, and BlendFlex courses. Communication Education, 70(2), 202–204. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634523.2020.1857418.
McGovern, N., & Barnes, K. (2009). Lectures from My Living Room: A Pilot Study of Hybrid Learning from the Students’ Perspective. In F. L. Wang, J. Fong, L. Zhang, & V. S. K. Lee (Eds.), Hybrid Learning and Education (pp. 284–298). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-03697-2_27.
McKenney, S., & Reeves, T. C. (2019). Conducting Educational Design Research. New York: Routledge.
Nørgård, R. T. (2021). Theorising hybrid lifelong learning. British Journal of Educational Technology. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13121.
O’Byrne, W. I., & Pytash, K. E. (2015). Hybrid and Blended Learning: Modifying Pedagogy Across Path, Pace, Time, and Place. Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy, 59(2), 137-140. https://doi.org/10.1002/jaal.463.
Olt, P. A. (2018). Virtually There: Distant Freshmen Blended in Classes through Synchronous Online Education. Innovative Higher Education, 43(5), 381–395. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10755-018-9437-z.
Raes, A., Detienne, L., Windey, I., & Depaepe, F. (2019). A systematic literature review on synchronous hybrid learning: gaps identified. Learning Environments Research, 23(3), 269–290. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10984-019-09303-Z.
Raes, A., Vanneste, P., Pieters, M., Windey, I., Van Den Noortgate, W., & Depaepe, F. (2020). Learning and instruction in the hybrid virtual classroom: An investigation of students’ engagement and the effect of quizzes. Computers and Education, 143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103682.
Ramsey, D., Evans, J., & Levy, M. (2016). Preserving the seminar experience. Journal of Political Science Education, 12(3), 256–267. https://doi.org/10.1080/15512169.2015.1077713.
Shi, Y., Tong, M., & Long, T. (2021). Investigating relationships among blended synchronous learning environments, students’ motivation, and cognitive engagement: A mixed methods study. Computers and Education, 168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104193.
Stahl, G., Koschmann, T., & Suthers, D. (2014). Computer-supported collaborative learning: An historical perspective. In R. K. Sawyer (Ed.), Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences, revised version (pp. 479–500). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Szeto, E. (2014). A Comparison of Online/Face-to-face Students’ and Instructor’s Experiences: Examining Blended Synchronous Learning Effects. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116, 4250–4254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.926.
Wang, Q., Huang, C., & Quek, C. L. (2018). Students’ perspectives on the design and implementation of a blended synchronous learning environment. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 34(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.3404.
Weitze, C. L., Ørngreen, R., & Levinsen, K. (2013). The Global Classroom Video Conferencing Model and First Evaluations. I M. Ciussi & M. Augier (Eds.), Proceedings of the 12th European Conference on E-Learning: SKEMA Business School, Sophia Antipolis France, 30-31 October 2013 (pp. 503-510). Reading, UK: Academic Conferences and Publishing International.
Yorke, M. (2016). The development and initial use of a survey of student ‘belongingness,’ engagement and self-confidence in UK higher education. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 41(1), 154-166. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2014.990415.
Zydney, J. M., McKimm, P., Lindberg, R., & Schmidt, M. (2019). Here or There Instruction: Lessons Learned in Implementing Innovative Approaches to Blended Synchronous Learning. TECHTRENDS, 63(2), 123–132. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-018-0344-z.
Zydney, J. M., Warner, Z., & Angelone, L. (2020). Learning through experience: Using design based research to redesign protocols for blended synchronous learning environments. Computers and Education, 143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103678.