Abstract
‘Fake news’ has become an increasingly common refrain in public discourse. The term itself has several uses, at least one of which constitutes Frankfurtian bullshit. After examining what sorts of fake news appeals do and do not count as bullshit, I discuss strategies for overcoming our openness to such bullshit. I do so by drawing a parallel between openness to bullshit and naïve skepticism—one’s willingness to reject the concept of truth on unsupported or ill-considered grounds—and suggest that this parallel indicates three principles for how we ought to combat our openness to fake news and other bullshit. First, the root causes of bullshit openness are not monolithic; we should adopt anti-bullshit strategies in recognition of this fact. Second, our efforts to overcome bullshit openness should be collaborative efforts to create an environment that allows for sustained interrogation of our bullshit openness, rather than a confrontational provision of contrary evidence, despite the fact that such strategies are more time-intensive. Third, social media is unlikely to be a fertile ground on which we will make meaningful progress in the fight against bullshit because of the inherent nature of social media platforms as spaces for short, declarative, confrontational claims.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
As of May 30, 2019, a search of Trump’s Twitter feed for the phrase 'fake news' reveals 394 tweets containing the phrase.
The language in all three cases closely matches language used in the introduction to Volume II of the report, which states that 'if we had confidence after a thorough investigation of the facts that the President clearly did not commit obstruction of justice, we would so state. Based on the facts and the applicable legal standards, however, we are unable to reach that judgment. The evidence we obtained about the President’s actions and intent presents difficult issues that prevent us from conclusively determining that no criminal conduct occurred. Accordingly, while this report does not conclude that the President committed a crime, it also does not exonerate him' (Mueller 2019: 2).
The study of this phenomenon within an essentially academic context has led to some divergence in nomenclature. The most common alternatives to naïve skepticism are 'student relativism' (Erion 2005; Satris 1986), 'reflective relativism' (Momeyer 1995), and 'naïve relativism' (Andre 1983). None, however, seems to capture important features of the phenomenon in that relativism omits the possibility of a total rejection of truth. Further, framing the phenomenon in terms of students obscures the fact that it is the naiveté that is at issue, rather than the skeptic’s status as a student.
The respondents cannot be engaging in intellectually lazy behavior because the evidence is literally right in front of them. Schaffner and Luks argue that respondents are also not engaging in motivated reasoning because the facial unreasonableness of the corresponding belief (e.g., the believe that the Trump inaugural photo really has more people than the Obama inaugural) seems to rule out essentially anyone from genuinely holding the belief.
Search engine optimization, or SEO, is the practice of writing titles or headlines in order to maximize search engine-generated traffic. While academia does not contain the worst offenders (e.g., 'Five stars who are huge jerks: You won’t believe number three!'), the increasing importance of scholarly search engines like Google Scholar, Academia.edu, and so forth prioritizes easily searchable and enticing titles.
For an example of this strategy in response to so-called 'alternative facts,' see (Cooper 2019).
To 'dunk on' a comment is to provide a forceful response that fundamentally undermines or defeats the purpose of the original comment. For example, in response to Denise McAllister’s complaint about the American television show The View being a 'roundtable of delusional mental midgets ricocheting ignorance and lack of emotional regulation' (McAllister 2019), Meghan McCain, one of the show’s cohosts, was widely viewed as dunking on McAllister by simply replying, 'you were at my wedding, Denise…. [sic]' (McCain 2019).
A tweet is 'ratioed' when the number of comments on said tweet drastically outnumbers both retweets and likes, suggesting that the tweet is far more disliked than liked, to the point where the relationship between comments and likes/retweets can be expressed in a ratio. Presumably, if the comments were positive, commenters would also like and/or retweet the original tweet. Some Twitter users will contribute to a Tweet’s ratio by simply commenting to the effect of 'I’m just here for the ratio' (see, e.g., [Gannon 2019]).
As if to prove the point that Twitter is not a medium for sustained, good-faith discourse, Krassenstein (@EdKrassen) and his brother, Brian Krassenstein (@krassenstein), were permanently banned from Twitter for sockpuppeting (i.e., maintaining multiple accounts under the guise that they were operated by different individuals) and purchasing interactions in an effort to publicize their antagonism of Trump (Concha 2019).
Briefly, both bills were called for and championed by Democratic administrations, though both pro- and anti-segregationist voices existed in both parties, largely along geographic lines. The 1960s saw such differences sorted via intra-party debates and ultimately concluded with Democrats generally in favor of civil rights legislation and Republicans generally opposed.
References
Abrams, A. (2018). 'I screwed up': Sean Spicer says he regrets comments on inauguration crowd size and Hitler. Time, 4 January.http://www.time.com/5088900/sean-spicer-screwed-up-inauguration-hitler/. Accessed 8 May 2019.
Ambrose, S., Bridges, M., Lovett, M., DiPietro, M., & Norman, M. (2010). How learning works: Seven research-based principles for smart teaching. San Francisco (CA): Jossey-Bass.
Andre, J. (1983). Dealing with naive relativism in the philosophy classroom. Metaphilosophy, 14(2), 179–182. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9973.1983.tb00129.x.
Barr, N., Pennycook, G., Stolz, J. A., & Fugelsang, J. A. (2015). The brain in your pocket: Evidence that smartphones are used to supplant thinking. Computers in Human Behavior, 48, 473–480. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.02.029.
Barry, D., Barstow, D., Glater, J., Liptak, A., & Steinberg, J. (2003). Correcting the record; times reporter who resigned leaves Long Trail of deception. The New York Times, 11 May.https://www.nytimes.com/2003/05/11/us/correcting-the-record-times-reporter-who-resigned-leaves-long-trail-of-deception.html. Accessed 8 May 2019.
Bastos, M. T., & Mercea, D. (2017). The Brexit botnet and user-generated Hyperpartisan news. Social Science Computer Review, 37(1), 38–54. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439317734157.
BBC. (2016). Nigel Farage outlines three 'easy' outcomes for Brexit. HARDtalk, 20 September. .https://www.bbc.com/news/av/uk-politics-37416831/nigel-farage-outlines-three-easy-outcomes-for-brexit. Accessed 8 May 2019.
BBC (2017). EU trade deal “easiest in human history.” Today, 20 July.https://www.bbc.com/news/av/uk-40667879/eu-trade-deal-easiest-in-human-history. Accessed 8 May 2019.
Beebe, J., & Sackris, D. (2016). Moral objectivism across the lifespan. Philosophical Psychology, 29(6), 912–929. https://doi.org/10.1080/09515089.2016.1174843.
Berinsky, A. J. (2017). Rumors and health care reform: Experiments in political misinformation. British Journal of Political Science, 47(2), 241–262. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123415000186.
Booker, B. (2018). Trump Visits Pittsburgh Despite Objections From Mayor, Jewish Leaders. Morning Edition, 30 October. https://www.npr.org/2018/10/30/662017268/trump-to-visit-pittsburgh-but-not-everyone-will-welcome-him. Accessed 8 May 2019.
Booth, J. (2006). On the mastery of philosophical concepts. In J. Meyer & R. Land (Eds.), Overcoming barriers to student understanding: Threshold concepts and troublesome knowledge (pp. 173–181). New York: Routledge.
Borah, P. (2012). Does it matter where you read the news story? Interaction of incivility and news frames in the political blogosphere. Communication Research, 41(6), 809–827. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650212449353.
Boud, D., & Walker, D. (1990). Making the most of experience. Studies in Continuing Education, 12(2), 61–80. https://doi.org/10.1080/0158037900120201.
Chu, H. (2002). Reeled in by a spoof, Chinese daily shrugs off its capitol error. Los Angeles Times.https://latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-2002-jun-07-fgwhoops7-story.html. Accessed 8 May 2019.
Concha, J. (2018). NYT corrects crowd size estimate at Nashville rally after Trump criticism. The Hill, 30 May.https://thehill.com/homenews/media/389925-nytcorrects-crowd-size-estimate-at-rally-after-trump-criticism. Accessed 8 May 2019.
Concha, J. (2019). Anti-Trump Krassenstein brothers receive permanent twitter ban. The Hill, 24 May.https://thehill.com/homenews/media/445376-anti-trump-krassenstein-brothers-receive-permanent-twitter-ban. Accessed 8 May 2019.
Cooper, T. (2019). Calling out ‘alternative facts’: Curriculum to develop students’ capacity to engage critically with contradictory sources. Teaching in Higher Education, 24(3), 444–459. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2019.1566220.
Louisville Courier Journal (2017). Correction: A hot dog is not a sandwich.https://courier-journal.com/story/news/2017/07/19/correction-hot-dog-notsandwich/489349001/. Accessed 8 May 2019.
Dale, D. [@ddale8]. (2019). Oh man. I was just watching dozens of people walk out of the room as they sensed Trump was a minute or two from concluding...Then Trump said that he’s been watching the doors and not one person has left. [Tweet].https://www.twitter.com/ddale8/status/1101924636281974785. Accessed 8 May 2019.
Delaney, J. (2004). Tolerance and tact: A critical thinking strategy for dealing with relativism. Inquiry: Critical Thinking Across Disciplines, 22(4), 27–31.
Erion, G. (2005). Engaging student relativism. Discourse, 5(1), 120–133.
Feral, W. [@ShawnTrucks]. (2018). *Had the New York Times read to him yesterday. [Tweet].https://www.twitter.com/ShawnTrucks/status/1050013436258734080. Accessed 8 May 2019.
Finster, D. (1989). Developmental instruction part I: Perry’s model of intellectual development. Journal of Chemical Education, 66(8), 659–661.
Frankfurt, H. (1986). On bullshit. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Frankfurt, H. (2016). Donald Trump is BS, says expert in BS. Time, 12 May.http://www.time.com/4321036/donald-trump-bs/. Accessed 8 May 2019.
Gaines, B. J., Kuklinski, J. H., Quirk, P. J., Peyton, B., & Verkuilen, J. (2007). Same facts, different interpretations: Partisan motivation and opinion on Iraq. The Journal of Politics, 69(4), 957–974. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2508.2007.00601.x.
Gannon, K. [@thetattooedprof]. (2019). Just stopped by for the ratio. *looks around* Nice. [Tweet].https://twitter.com/TheTattooedProf/status/1131417165037543424. Accessed 8 May 2019.
Goodwin, G., & Darley, J. (2008). The psychology of meta-ethics: Exploring objectivism. Cognition, 106, 1339–1366. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2007.06.007.
Goodwin, G., & Darley, J. (2010). The perceived objectivity of ethical beliefs: Psychological findings and implications for public policy. Review of Philosophy and Psychology, 1, 161–188. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13164-009-0013-4.
Goodwin, G., & Darley, J. (2012). Why are some moral beliefs perceived to be more objective than others? Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48, 250–256. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2011.08.006.
Grynbaum, M. (2017). 3 CNN journalists resign after retracted story on Trump ally. New York Times, 26 June.https://www.nytimes.com/2017/06/26/business/3-cnn-journalists-resign-after-retracted-story-on-trump-ally.html. Accessed 8 May 2019.
Hartshorne, S. [@sarahhartshorne]. (2018). Fuck you. [Tweet]. https://twitter.com/sarahhartshorne/status/1050724969976659968. Accessed 8 May 2019.
Heiphertz, L., & Young, L. (2017). Can only one person be right? The development of objectivism and social preferences regarding widely shared and controversial moral beliefs. Cognition, 167, 78–90.
Hood, J. (2006). Teaching against the text: The case of qualitative methods. Teaching Sociology, 34(July), 207–223.
Hwang, H., Kim, Y., & Huh, C. (2014). Seeing is believing: Effects of uncivil online debate on political polarization and expectations of deliberation. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 58(4), 621–633. https://doi.org/10.1080/08838151.2014.966365.
Irvine, W. (2000). Confronting relativism. Academic Questions, 14(1), 42–49.
Kelly, M. (2019). The president just called the CEO of apple ‘Tim apple.’ The Verge, 6 May. https://www.theverge.com/2019/3/6/18253785/donald-trump-tim-apple-cook-ceo-name. Accessed 8 May 2019.
Kinnvall, C. (2004). Globalization and religious nationalism: Self, identity, and the search for ontological security. Political Psychology, 25(5), 741–767.
Krassenstein, E. [@EdKrassen]. (2018). 92% of the stories are negative because 100% of the crap you do is negative! [Tweet]. https://twitter.com/EdKrassen/status/1050008542151888896. Accessed 8 May 2019.
Kruse, K. [@KevinMKruse]. (2018a). Democrats were the dominant party, but had become increasingly divided over civil rights, with northern white liberals and African-Americans steadily gaining on the southern conservative segregationists who had long controlled the party. Detailed here: [Tweet]. https://twitter.com/KevinMKruse/status/1022886364386406400. Accessed 8 May 2019.
Kruse, K. [@KevinMKruse]. (2018b). The change was equally clear in the GOP platforms: In 1960, a lengthy, detailed section on civil rights. In 1964, only a few lines. In 1968, not a *single* mention of civil rights Here, read them yourself: [Tweet]. https://www.twitter.com/KevinMKruse/status/1022886384770723840. Accessed 8 May 2019
Kruse, K. [@KevinMKruse]. (2018c). The civil rights act of 1964: Proposed by JFK, passed by democratic-led house (152 Dem votes for, 138 rep votes for) and democratic-led senate (46 Dem votes for, 27 rep votes for). LBJ signed it with MLK at his side. Here’s JFK calling for the bill: [Tweet]. https://twitter.com/KevinMKruse/status/1022886368060628992. Accessed 8 May 2019.
Kruse, K. [@KevinMKruse]. (2018d). The Voting Rights Act of 1965: advanced by LBJ and passed by Democratic-led House (221 Dem votes for, 112 Rep votes for) and Democratic-led Senate (49 Dem votes for, 30 Rep votes for), LBJ signed it. Here’s LBJ calling for the bill after Selma: [Tweet]. https://twitter.com/KevinMKruse/status/1022886369742479365. Accessed 8 May 2019.
Land, R., Cousin, G., Meyer, J., & Davies, P. (2005). Threshold concepts and troublesome knowledge (3): Implications for course design and evaluation. In C. Rust (Ed.), Improving student learning diversity and inclusivity (pp. 53–64). Oxford: Oxford Centre for Staff and Learning Development.
Levine, J. (2019). Donald Trump calls out Washington post reporter, defends inauguration crowd size. The Wrap, 2 March.https://www.thewrap.com/trump-calls-washington-post-reporter-defends-crowd-sizes/ . Accessed 8 May 2019.
Lewis, C. (2015). Engaging student aversions to moral obligations. Teaching Philosophy, 38(3), 273–288. https://doi.org/10.5840/teachphil201581137.
Lochrie, J. (1989). Perry revisited—A fresh look at forms of intellectual and ethical development in the college years. Studies in Higher Education, 14(3), 347–350. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075078912331377723.
MacKenzie, A., & Bhatt, I. (2018). Lies, bullshit and fake news: Some epistemological concerns. Postdigital Science and Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-018-0025-4.
Mance, H. (2017). Farage intervention heaps pressure on Ukip leader Paul Nuttall. Financial Times. https://www.ft.com/content/ff654ace-f517-11e6-8758-6876151821a6. Accessed 8 May 2019.
Marcin, T. (2018). Donald Trump’s approval rating shows he’s a historically unpopular president. Newsweek, 19 September. https://www.newsweek.com/donald-trump-approval-rating-historically-unpopular-president-least-ever-1128666. Accessed 8 May 2019.
Marsh, E. J., & Rajaram, S. (2019). The digital expansion of the mind: Implications of internet usage for memory and cognition. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 8(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jarmac.2018.11.001.
McAllister, D. [@McAllisterDen]. (2019). Can someone explain to me the purpose of the view? It seems to me to be a roundtable of delusional mental midgets ricocheting ignorance and lack of emotional regulation. [Tweet]. https://www.twitter.com/McAllisterDen/status/1110343368280887302. Accessed 8 May 2019.
McCain, M. [@meghanmccain]. (2019). You were at my wedding Denise.... [Tweet]. https://twitter.com/MeghanMcCain/status/1110362826533732353. Accessed 8 May 2019.
Meyer, J., Land, R., & Rust, C. (2003). Threshold concepts and troublesome knowledge: Linkages to ways of thinking and practising within the disciplines. In C. Rust (Ed.), Improving student learning: Improving student learning theory and practice—Ten years on (pp. 1–16). Oxford: Oxford Centre for Staff and Learning Development.
Mitzen, J. (2006). Ontological security in world politics: State identity and the security dilemma. European Journal of International Relations, 12(3), 341–370. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066106067346.
Momeyer, R. (1995). Teaching ethics to student relativists. Teaching Philosophy, 18(4), 305–311.
Mueller, R. (2019). Report On The Investigation Into Russian Interference In The 2016 Presidential Election (Vol. 2). Washington, D.C.
Nyhan, B., & Reifler, J. (2010). When corrections fail: The persistence of political misperceptions. Political Behavior, 32(2), 303–330. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-010-9112-2.
O’Neil, T. (2019). Trump insists “not one person” has left — As people are walking out of his CPAC speech. PJ Media, 2 March. https://pjmedia.com/video/trump-says-not-one-persons-left-as-people-leave-his-cpac-speech/. Accessed 8 May 2019.
Oz, M., Zheng, P., & Chen, G. M. (2017). Twitter versus Facebook: Comparing incivility, impoliteness, and deliberative attributes. New Media & Society, 20(9), 3400–3419. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444817749516.
Paden, R. (1987). The student relativist as philosopher. Teaching Philosophy, 10(2), 97–101.
Paden, R. (1994). The natural history of student relativism. The Journal of Thought, 29(2), 47–58.
Pennycook, G., & Rand, D. G. (2018). Lazy, not biased: Susceptibility to partisan fake news is better explained by lack of reasoning than by motivated reasoning. Cognition., 188, 39–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2018.06.011.
Perry, W. (1970). Forms of intellectual and ethical development in the college years: A scheme. New York: Hold, Rinehart, and Winston.
Prior, M., Sood, G., & Khanna, K. (2015). You cannot be serious: The impact of accuracy incentives on partisan Bias in reports of economic perceptions. Quarterly Journal of Political Science, 10, 489–518. https://doi.org/10.1561/100.00014127.
Quinnipiac University. (2019). U.S. voters still say 2-1 Trump committed a crime, Quinnipiac University national poll finds; but voters oppose impeachment 2-1. Hamden, CT.
Rifkind, H. [@hugorifkind]. (2018). The thing is, the best way to understand Theresa May’s predicament is to imagine that 52 percent of Britain had voted that the government should build a submarine out of cheese. [Tweet]. https://twitter.com/hugorifkind/status/1072222352035987456?lang=en. Accessed 8 May 2019.
Sarkissian, H., Park, J., Tien, D., Cole Wright, J., & Knobe, J. (2011). Folk moral relativism. Mind & Language, 26(4), 482–505. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0017.2011.01428.x.
Satris, S. (1986). Student relativism. Teaching Philosophy, 9(3), 193–205.
Schaffner, B. F., & Luks, S. (2018). Misinformation or expressive responding? What an inauguration crowd can tell us about the source of political misinformation in surveys. Public Opinion Quarterly, 82(1), 135–147. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfx042.
Shapiro, L. (2017). Anatomy of a Russian Facebook ad. The Washington Post, 1 November. https://www.washingtonpost.com/graphics/2017/business/russian-ads-facebook-anatomy/?noredirect=on&utm_term=.5748b0c16ee8. Accessed 8 May 2019.
Summers, M. [@markysumm]. (2018). Let he who has not raw dogged a porn star just after the birth of his 5th child during his 3rd marriage cast the first stone [Tweet]. https://twitter.com/markysumm/status/1050399071389851648. Accessed 8 May 2019.
Tackett, M. (2019). Trump claims his wall is being built. It’s just a replacement of old barriers. The New York Times, 21 February.https://www.nytimes.com/2019/02/21/us/politics/new-mexico-wall-fact-check.html. Accessed 8 May 2019.
Talbot, B. (2012). Student relativism: How I learned to stop worrying and love the bomb. Teaching Philosophy, 35(2), 171–187.
Trump, D. [@realdonaldtrump]. (2017a). Any negative polls are fake news, just like the CNN, ABC, NBC polls in the election. Sorry, people want border security and extreme vetting. [Tweet]. https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/828574430800539648. Accessed 8 May 2019.
Trump, D. [@realdonaldtrump]. (2017b). Wow, CNN had to retract big story on “Russia,” with 3 employees forced to resign. What about all the other phony stories they do? FAKE NEWS! [Tweet]. https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/879648931172556802. Accessed 8 May 2019.
Trump, D. [@realdonaldtrump]. (2017c). After 200 days, rarely has any administration achieved what we have achieved..Not even close! Don’t believe the fake news suppression polls! [Tweet]. https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/894984126582972416. Accessed 8 May 2019.
Trump, D. [@realdonaldtrump]. (2017d). Congratulations to @ABC News for suspending Brian Ross for his horrendously inaccurate and dishonest report on the Russia, Russia, Russia Witch Hunt. More Networks and “papers” should do the same with their Fake News! [Tweet]. https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/937145025359761408. Accessed 8 May 2019.
Trump, D. [@realdonaldtrump]. (2017e). Fake news CNN made a vicious and purposeful mistake yesterday. They were caught red handed, just like lonely Brian Ross at ABC news (who should be immediately fired for his “mistake”). Watch to see if @CNN fires those responsible, or was it just gross incompetence? [Tweet]. https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/939480342779580416. Accessed 8 May 2019.
Trump, D. [@realdonaldtrump]. (2017f). The fake news refuses to talk about how big and how strong our BASE is. They show fake polls just like they report fake news. Despite only negative reporting, we are doing well - nobody is going to beat us. MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN! [Tweet]. https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/944927689638662145. Accessed 8 May 2019.
Trump, D. [@realdonaldtrump]. (2018a). The fake news is working overtime. Just reported that, despite the tremendous success we are having with the economy & all things else, 91% of the network news about me is negative (fake). Why do we work so hard in working with the media when it is corrupt? Take away credentials? [Tweet]. https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/994179864436596736. Accessed 8 May 2019.
Trump, D. [@realdonaldtrump]. (2018b). Melania and I were treated very nicely yesterday in Pittsburgh. The Office of the President was shown great respect on a very sad & solemn day. We were treated so warmly. Small protest was not seen by us, staged far away. The fake news stories were just the opposite-disgraceful! [Tweet]. https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1057620518751428608. Accessed 8 May 2019.
Trump, D. [@realdonaldtrump]. (2018c, November 16). People are not being told that the republican party is on track to pick up two seats in the U.S. senate, and epic victory: 53 to 47. The fake news media only wants to speak of the house, where the midterm results were better than other sitting presidents. [Tweet]. https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1063517548258447361. Accessed 8 May 2019.
Trump, D. [@realdonaldtrump]. (2019a). The wall is being built and is well under construction. Big impact will be made. Many additional contracts are close to being signed. Far ahead of schedule despite all of the democrat obstruction and fake news! [Tweet]. https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1103994805477085186. Accessed 8 May 2019.
Trump, D. [@realdonaldtrump]. (2019b). At a recent round table meeting of business executives, & long after formally introducing Tim Cook of Apple, I quickly referred to Tim + Apple as Tim/Apple as an easy way to save time & words. The Fake News was disparagingly all over this, & it became yet another bad Trump story! [Tweet]. https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1105109329290686464. Accessed 8 May 2019.
Trump, D. [@realdonaldtrump]. (2019c). The New York Times had no legitimate sources, which would be totally illegal, concerning the Mueller Report. In fact, they probably had no sources at all! They are a Fake News paper who have already been forced to apologize for their incorrect and very bad reporting on me! [Tweet]. https://www.twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1113819627212169219. Accessed 8 May 2019.
Trump, D. [@realdonaldtrump]. (2019d, October 10). Despite so many positive events and victories, Media Reseach Center reports that 92% of stories on Donald Trump are negative on ABC, CBS and ABC. It is FAKE NEWS! Don’t worry, the Failing New York Times didn’t even put the Brett Kavanaugh victory on the Front Page yesterday-A17! [Tweet]. https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1050008315286171648 . Accessed 8 May 2019.
Wang, V. (2019). ABC suspends reporter Brian Ross over erroneous report about Trump. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2017/12/02/us/brian-ross-suspended-abc.html. Accessed 8 May 2019.
Ward, A. F., Duke, K., Gneezy, A., & Bos, M. W. (2017). Brain drain: The mere presence of One’s own smartphone reduces available cognitive capacity. Journal of the Association for Consumer Research, 2(2), 140–154. https://doi.org/10.1086/691462.
Wood, T., & Porter, E. (2019). The elusive backfire effect: Mass attitudes’ steadfast factual adherence. Political Behavior, 41(1), 135–163. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-018-9443-y.
Wright, J. (2019). The truth, but not yet: Avoiding naïve skepticism via explicit communication of metadisciplinary aims. Teaching in Higher Education, 24(3), 361–377. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2018.1544552.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wright, J. 'Many People Are Saying…': Applying the Lessons of Naïve Skepticism to the Fight against Fake News and Other 'Total Bullshit'. Postdigit Sci Educ 2, 113–131 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-019-00051-0
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-019-00051-0