Skip to main content
Log in

Pedagogy of the “Not”: Negation, Exodus, and Postdigital Temporal Regimes

  • Original Articles
  • Published:
Postdigital Science and Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Postdigital capitalist time is an incessant acceleration that acts to homogenize time and wed us to the present, to which we have to constantly catch up. While the impulse of this is no doubt economic (the realization of value), it is crucially undergirded by a pedagogical logic wherein we have to perpetually learn and re-learn the latest apps, social media configurations, operating systems, and so on. Political strategies of resistance thus need to be bolstered by an alternative mode of educational life, and I propose a pedagogy of the “not” as one possibility. Such a pedagogy is an act of suspension that sustains a detachment from the present, clearing out oppositions and thereby exposing us to a radical indeterminacy and potentiality that is always untimely. Suspension is the praxis of negation, which means that negation operates by keeping sense indeterminate to meaning and signification. Rather than suppressing, disavowing, or annihilating the stated content, negation retains even that which is negated. While this would appear as a form of exopedagogy, which withdraws from the dialectic of the private/public, I instead argue that it redefines the terms of any dialectic, redefining the very categories exopedagogy withdraws from. Before concluding, I spend some time with Sandy Grande’s important critiques of Eurocentrism and progress in Western critical education, demonstrating how negation as suspension circumvents these errors through its accommodation of—or, better, insistence on—variegated temporalities and forms of life.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. For the first example, think of Twitter’s banning of promoted ads by Russia Today and Sputnik (two sources highly critical of the US government), or Facebook’s censoring of Safa, a Gaza-based news site. For the second example, think of when the Egyptian regime of Hosni Mubarak blocked social media. In the case of Iran in 2009, the USA intervened and got Twitter to delay scheduled maintenance so that the US-friendly and backed Green Movement could continue coordinating protests and attacks. For more on this, see the introduction in Ford (2018a).

  2. This is not unique to Libya at all. The same thing happened (and is happening) with Syria, and it’s only a matter of time until it happens (again) with Iran, the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela, the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea (DPRK, or North Korea), and so on. For more on Libya, see Ford (2015a, b)

  3. Some contest the claim that we sleep less today than previously (e.g., Horne 2011). This research identifies that our “sleep deficit” has less to do with a lack of sleep and more to do with the stress and pace of our live (Horne 2011, p. 3). Horne importantly critiques a romancization of past sleep times. In fact, when one reads testimony about working conditions in English factories in the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries, it’s clear that sleep duration was far from ideal. What this research does not challenge is that there is an inherent antagonism between sleep and capital.

  4. I mean “betray” in both senses of the word: both to break from and to reveal.

  5. For more on education and the common, see De Lissovoy (2011), Ford (2015a, b), Gautreaux (2017), and Slater (2015).

  6. Malott (2016) provides a careful consideration of Indigenous critiques of marxism in his book’s first chapter.

  7. This is not to imply that settler-colonialism is not considered in education. For examples of this, see the work of Troy Richardson (e.g., 2007; 2012) and the work of the Latin American Philosophy of Education Society. Noroozi (2016) uses Derrida to address the relationship between pedagogy, time, and the decolonial.

  8. See chapter 2 in Grande (2004), especially pages 80–88.

  9. See in particular chapter 2.6 of Empire (Hardt and Negri 2000).

  10. It’s important to note here that Harootunian acknowledges that Lukács’ theories were more complex, and he deals with them elsewhere in his book.

References

  • Bennett, A., & Burke, P. J. (2017). Re/conceptualising time and temporality: an exploration of time in higher education. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/01596306.2017.1312285.

  • Biesta, G. J. J. (2017). The rediscovery of teaching. New York: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bourassa, G. N. (2018). Postschool imaginaries: educational life after neoliberalism. Policy Futures in Education, online first, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1177/1478210318765544

  • Crary, J. (2013). 24/7: late capitalism and the ends of sleep. New York: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Lissovoy, N. (2011). Pedagogy in common: democratic education in the global era. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 43(10), 1119–1134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dean, J. (2009). Democracy and other neoliberal fantasies: communicative capitalism and left politics. Durham: Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ford, D. R. (2015a). From standardized testing to the war on Libya: the privatization of U.S. education in international context. In B. Porfilio & M. Abendroth (Eds.), Understanding neoliberal rule in K-12 schools: educational fronts for local and global justice (pp. 95–109). Charlotte: Information Age Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ford, D. R. (2015b). The pneumatic common: learning in, with and from the air. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 47(13–14), 1405–1418.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ford, D. R. (2018a). Politics and pedagogy in the “post-truth” era: insurgent philosophy and praxis. New York: Bloomsbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ford, D. R. (2018b). Queer communist study: the sinthomostudier against the capital-learning-debt regime. Journal of Curriculum and Pedagogy, 15(1), 8–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forte, M. (2012). Slouching towards Sirte: NATO’s war on Libya and Africa. Montreal: Baraka Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gautreaux, M. (2017). Revitalizing the common(s) in New Mexico: a pedagogical consideration of socially engaged art. In A. J. Means, D. R. Ford, & G. B. Slater (Eds.), Educational commons in theory and practice: global pedagogy and politics (pp. 249–269). New York: Palgrave Macmillon.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Grande, S. (2004). Red pedagogy: Native American social and political thought. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haider, A. (2018). Mistaken identity: race and class in the age of Trump. New York: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardt, M., & Negri, A. (2000). Empire. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harootunian, H. (2015). Marx after Marx: History and time in the expansion of capitalism. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, D. (2010). A companion to Marx’s capital. New York: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horne, J. (2011). The end of sleep: “sleep debt” versus biological adaptation of human sleep to waking needs. Biological Psychology, 87, 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jandrić, P. (2017). Learning in the age of digital reason. Rotterdam: Sense.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Jandrić, P., Knox, J., Besley, T., Ryberg, T., Suoranta, J., & Hayes, S. (2018). Postdigital science and education. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 50(10), 893–899.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, T. E. (2012). Exopedagogy: on pirates, shorelines, and the educational commonwealth. Educational Philosphy and Theory, 44(8), 845–861.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, T. E. (2017). Inoperative learning: a radical rewriting of educational potentialities. New York: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Malott, C. S. (2016). History and education: engaging the global class war. New York: Peter Lang.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Marx, K. (1867/1967). Capital: a critique of political economy (trans: Moore S. & Aveling E., vol. 1). New York: International Publishers.

  • Marx, K. (1973). Grundrisse: foundations of the critique of political economy (rough draft) (trans: Nicolaus M.). New York: Penguin Books.

  • Meyerhoff, E., & Noterman, E. (2017). Revolutionary scholarship by any speed necessary: slow or fast but for the end of this world. ACME: an international journal for critical geographies. Retrieved from: https://www.acme-journal.org/index.php/acme/article/view/1429. Accessed 25 Sept 2018

  • Noroozi, N. (2016). Pedagogy of time and a decolonial “present”. In N. Levinson (Ed.), Philosophy of education society yearbook 2016 (pp. 420–430). Illinois: University of Urbana-Champaign.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, T. A. (2007). Vine Deloria Jr. as a philosopher of education: an essay of rememberance. Anthropology and Education Quarterly, 38(3), 221–230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, T. A. (2012). Disrupting the coloniality of being: toward de-colonial ontologies in philosophy of education. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 31(6), 539–551.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slater, G. B. (2015). Constituting common subjects: toward an education against enclosure. Educational Studies, 50(6), 537–553.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stanley, N. (2018). How to sleep well: the science of sleeping smarter, living better and being productive. Cornwall, UK: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, C. (2011). Reds at the blackboard: communism, civil rights, and the New York City Teachers Union. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Virno, P. (2004). A grammar of the multitude: for an analysis of contemporary forms of life (trans: Bertoletti I., Cascaito J., & Casson A.) Los Angeles: Semiotext(e).

  • Virno, P. (2008). Multitude: between innovation and negation (trans: Bertoletti I., Cascaito J., & Casson A.) Los Angeles: Semiotext(e).

  • Virno, P. (2018). An essay on negation: towards a linguistic anthropology (trans: Chiesa L.) York: Seagull books.

  • Wozniak, J. (2016). The rhythm and blues of indebted life: notes on schools and the formation of the indebted man. In E. Duarte (Ed.), Philosophy of Education 2015 (pp. 71–80). Urbana: Philosophy of Education Society.

  • Wozniak, J. (2017). Towards a rhythmanalysis of debt dressage: education as rhythmic resistance in everyday indebted life. Policy Futures in Education, 15(4), 495–508.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Derek R. Ford.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ford, D.R. Pedagogy of the “Not”: Negation, Exodus, and Postdigital Temporal Regimes. Postdigit Sci Educ 1, 104–118 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-018-0009-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-018-0009-4

Keywords

Navigation