Skip to main content
Log in

Error Compensation of a Low-Cost Analogue Sun Sensor for Micro-/Nano-satellites

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Advances in Astronautics Science and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The growth of micro-/nano-satellites requires miniaturized sun sensors which could be applied in the Attitude Determination and Control System easily, conveniently and cheaply. In this work, the error compensation methods of a low-cost Analogue Sun Sensor, COSSA, have been innovatively proposed, which mainly includes two error compensation mathematical models and related testing and calibration methods. From theory and engineering perspectives, Error Source Propagation Model and Linear Surface Fitting Model have been built, respectively; then zero-point calibration method and surface fitting calibration method have been illustrated to compensate the measurement error. After testing and calibration experiment, the accuracy of COSSA prototype is better than \(0.25^\circ \) (1\(\sigma \)), which is 2 \(\sim \) 4 times higher in accuracy compared with most analogue sun sensors. Therefore, the feasibility and effectiveness of error compensation methods could be well-proved.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20
Fig. 21
Fig. 22

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

The data used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. Fortescue P, Swinerd G, Stark J (2011) Spacecraft systems engineering. Wiley, Hoboken, pp 575–605. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119971009

    Book  Google Scholar 

  2. Xie N, Theuwissen AJP (2014) A miniaturized micro-digital sun sensor by means of low-power low-noise CMOS imager. IEEE Sens J 14(1):96–103. https://doi.org/10.1109/JSEN.2013.2280453

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Porras-Hermoso A, Cubas J, Pindado S (2022) Use of spacecraft solar panels and sun sensors for estimation of the sun-pointing direction in the UPMSat-2 mission. Measurement 204:112061. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2022.112061

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Zhou J (2001) Spacecraft control theory. Northwestern Polytechnical University Press, Xi’an, pp 59–70

    Google Scholar 

  5. Li W, Zhang G, You Z, Xing F (2012) Error compensation for area digital sun sensor. Sensors 12(9):11798–11810. https://doi.org/10.3390/s120911798

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Xie R, Wang B, Li S et al (2022) A method and validation of system accuracy improvement for digital sun sensors. Chin Space Sci Technol

  7. Feng M, Yu X, Zhou J, Guo J (2017) A low-cost self-powered wireless attitude sensor for CubeSats. In: 68th International Astronautical Congress, Adelaide, Australia, 25–29 Sept 2017

  8. Springmann JC, Cutler JW (2014) Flight results of a low-cost attitude determination system. Acta Astronaut 99:201–214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actaastro.2014.02.026

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Antonello A, Olivieri L, Francesconi A (2018) Development of a low-cost sun sensor for nanosatellites. Acta Astronaut 144:429–436. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actaastro.2018.01.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Bolshakov K, Diriker FK, Clark R, Lee R et al (2021) Array-based digital sun sensor design for cubesat application. Acta Astronaut 178:81–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actaastro.2020.08.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Porras-Hermoso A, Alfonso-Corcuera D, Piqueras J et al (2021) Design, ground testing and on-orbit performance of a sun sensor based on COTS photodiodes for the UPMSat-2 satellite. Sensors 21(14):4095. https://doi.org/10.3390/s21144905

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Romijn J, Vollebregt S, May A et al (2022) Visible blind quadrant sun position sensor in a silicon carbide technology. In: IEEE 35th International Conference on Micro Electro Mechanical Systems, Tokyo, Japan, 9–13 Jan 2022. https://doi.org/10.1109/MEMS51670.2022.9699533

  13. Wei M, Xing F, You Z (2017) A highly accurate wireless digital sun sensor based on profile detecting and detector multiplexing technologies. Mech Syst Signal Process 82:56–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2016.05.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Walker AR, Kumar M (2017) CubeSat attitude determination using low-cost sensors and magnetic field time derivative. In: 55th AIAA Aerospace Science Meeting, AIAA SciTech Forum, Grapevine, Texas, USA, 9 –13 Jan 2017. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2017-0166

  15. Deng S, Meng T, Wang H et al (2017) Flexible attitude control design and on-orbit performance of the ZDPS-2 satellite. Acta Astronaut 130:147–161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actaastro.2016.10.020

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Yu X, Zhou J, Zhu P, Guo J (2018) Star of AOXiang: an innovative 12U CubeSat to demonstrate polarized light navigation and microgravity measurement. Acta Astronaut 147:97–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actaastro.2018.03.014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Sozen SN, Gokce M, Yavuzyilmaz C et al (2021) Measurement correction of a set of analog sun sensors via neural network. In: IEEE 8th International Workshop on Metrology for AeroSpace, online, 23–25 June, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1109/MetroAeroSpace51421.2021.9511675

  18. Zhang Q, Zhang Y (2022) Design and verification of an integrated panoramic sun sensor atop a small spherical satellite. Sensors 22(21):8130. https://doi.org/10.3390/s22218130

  19. Kopacz JR, Herschitz R, Roney J (2020) Small satellites an overview and assessment. Acta Astronaut 170:93–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actaastro.2020.01.034

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Hamann R, Verhoeven C, Vaartjes A, Bonnema A (2008) Nano-satellite for micro-technology prequalification: the Delfi Program of Delft University of Technology. In: Sandau R, Roser H-P, Valenzuela A (eds) Small satellites for earth observation. Springer, Berlin, pp 319–330. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6943-7_30

  21. Bouwmeester J, Aalbers G, Ubbels W (2008) Preliminary mission results and project evaluation of the Delfi-C3 nano-satellites. In: 4S Symposium Small Satellites, Systems and Services, Noordwijk, Netherland

  22. Feng M, Yu X, Bai B et al (2019) Design and realization of low-cost micro wireless automatic sun sensor. Syst Eng Electron 41(8):1852–1857. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1001-506X.2019.08.24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Lens Research & Development Corporation. Bison64-ET Product. https://www.cubesatshop.com/product/bison64-et/. 19 March 2023

  24. Newspace Systems. NSS CubeSat Sun Sensor Product. https://www.cubesatshop.com/product/nss-cubesat-sun-sensor/. 19 March 2023

  25. Wang C, Liang H, Lv Z et al (2016) Analysis of error sources existing in dual-axial analog sun sensor. Aerosp Control Appl 42(1):43–47. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1674-1579.2016.01.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Wu S, Steyn W (2002) Modeling and in-orbit calibration practice of a miniature 2-axis analogue sun sensor. Aerosp Sci Technol 6(6):423–433. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1270-9638(02)01187-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Wang J, Wang H, Ying P, Jin Z (2012) Design of four-quadrant analog sun sensor. Chin J Sens Actuators 25(12):1659–1663. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1004-1699.2012.12.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Chen C (2013) A large-field and high performance star sensor design. Department of Control Science and Engineering, Harbin Institute of Technology

  29. Nie Y, Wang Z (2011) Concise tutorial on numerical methods. Higher Education Press, Beijing, pp 80–83

    Google Scholar 

  30. Liu S (2005) Numerical methods. Science Press, Beijing, pp 114–116

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

National Key Research and Development Program of China (Project No. 2021YFE0116000), Open Research of State Key Laboratory of Structural Analysis for Industrial Equipment (Project No. GZ20103), and Seed Foundation of Innovation and Creation for Graduate Students in Northwestern Polytechnical University (Project No. ZZ2018055).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Feng, M. and Yu, X. contributed the central idea. Hu, X. and Yu, X. provided the testing facilities, and Hu, X. completed the related experiments. Feng, M. analyzed most of the data and wrote the initial draft of this paper, Yu, X. and Hu, X. contributed to discussing some details and finalizing this paper.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xiaozhou Yu.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

All authors declare that there is no potential conflict of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this paper.

Ethical approval

This paper does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Informed consent

All authors provided informed consent prior to their participation.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Feng, M., Hu, X. & Yu, X. Error Compensation of a Low-Cost Analogue Sun Sensor for Micro-/Nano-satellites. Adv. Astronaut. Sci. Technol. 6, 87–100 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42423-023-00142-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42423-023-00142-y

Keywords

Navigation