Abstract
In this paper, a kind of micro–nanosatellite electromagnetic docking device is designed and a configuration of electromagnet with iron-core is proposed. Compared with the coreless coil, the electromagnetic force within the docking range can be significantly increased. To resolve the problem of limited capacity of electromagnet attitude correction, a type of taper hole–taper rod matching mechanism is designed to limit non-docking axial motion for docking in electromechanical coordination. Through the ground experiment, the function of electromagnetic docking device is verified.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Wang B, Zhuang Y, Liu P, Wang N, Han RQ, Zhu JL (2018) Review of spacecraft electromagnetic docking technology development. Spacecr Eng 27(6):92–101
KongEM, Otero AS, Nolet S, Berkovitz DS, Miller DW (2004) SPHERES as a formation flight algorithm development and validation testbed: current progress and beyond. In: 2004 Proc int. symp. on formation flying missions & techn., pp 1–13
Fredrickson SE, Duran S, Howard N, et al (2004) Application of the mini AERCam free flyer for orbital inspection. In: Proc. of SPIE, Bellingham, WA, USA, pp 26–35
Bloom J (2004) On-orbit Autonomous Servicing Satellite (OASIS) systems requirements document. Univ. of Washington, WA
Ocampo C, Williams J (2005) Electromagnetically guided autonomous docking and separation in micro-gravity. Univ. of Texas, Austin
Underwood C, Pellegrino S, Lappas VJ, Bridges CP, Baker J (2015) Using CubeSat_micro-satellite technology to demonstrate the Autonomous Assembly of a Reconfigurable Space Telescope (AAReST). Acta Astronaut 114:112–122
Bridges CP, Taylor B, Horri N, Underwood CI (2013) Strand-2: visual inspection, proximity operations & nanosatellite docking. In: 2013 IEEE aeros. conf., pp 1–8
Smail S, Underwood C (2009) Electromagnetic flat docking system for in-orbit self-assembly of small spacecraft. Adv Astronaut Sci 134:173–183
Boesso A, Francesconi A (2013) ARCADE small-scale docking mechanism for micro-satellites. Acta Astronaut 86:77–87
Bandyopadhyay S, Chung S-J, Foust R, Subramanian G (2016) Review of formation flying and constellation missions using nanosatellites. J Spacecr Rockets 53(3):567
Hallaj MA, Assadian N (2015) Tethered satellite system control using electromagnetic forces and reaction wheels. Acta Astronaut 117:390–401
Foust RC, Lupu ES, Nakka YK, Chung SJ, Hadaegh FY (2018) Ultra-soft electromagnetic docking with applications to in-orbit assembly. In: Proc. 69th int. astron. congr., Bremen, Germany, pp 1–14
Yung KW, Landecker PB, Villani DD (1998) An analytic solution for the force between two magnetic dipoles. J Mag Electr 9:39–52
Landecker PB, Villani DD, Yung KW (1999) An analytic solution for the torque between two magnetic dipoles. J Mag Electr 10:29–33
Zhang YW (2021) Piece-wise control of constant electromagnetic moments for spacecraft self- and soft-docking exploiting dynamics conservation. Asian J Control 23:2459–2473
Wu LJ, Ruan GZ, Han RQ, Wang B Micro-nano satellite sensorless electromagnetic docking control based on the high frequency injection method (unpublished)
Acknowledgements
The authors acknowledge the Beijing Institute of Spacecraft System Engineering for providing topics, putting forward requirements and granting project funding.
Funding
No funding received.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
L.J. Wu and G.Z Ruan designed the research. R.Q. Han and B. Wang helped optimize the project scheme and provided the test site. G.Z Ruan conducted the research and analyzed the data. G.Z Ruan wrote the article.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
We declare that we have no conflict of interest.
Ethical approval
It is a pre-research project oriented by interest and hence Ethical approval not required.
Informed consent
For this type of study, formal consent is not required.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ruan, G., Wu, L., Han, R. et al. Design of Electromagnetic Docking Device for Micro–Nanosatellite. Adv. Astronaut. Sci. Technol. 5, 341–350 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42423-022-00121-9
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42423-022-00121-9