Skip to main content
Log in

Reliability Assessment Technology for Spacial Complex Mechanical System

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Advances in Astronautics Science and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Ground tests of spacial mechanical products have the characteristics of few test subsamples and expensive test cost, which often appear the cases of zero-failure samples. The classic reliability evaluation methods cannot adapt to the reliability assessment needs of small subsamples and zero-failure samples for high-reliability, long-life spacial complex mechanical products. The characteristics of failure rate functions of typical mechanical products such as mechanical structure, motors, bearings, gears, valves, and so on have been analyzed. Then the reliability evaluation methods of spacial complex mechanical system have been deduced, which has been combined the prior data of Bayesian method. Bayesian posterior distribution function of exponential distribution has been established by the method, which makes use of uniform distribution as a prior distribution, and combines with the convex characteristics of exponential distribution’s failure rate. Bayesian posterior distribution function of exponential distribution has been utilized in products, such as motors, valves, etc., which have characteristics of presenting exponential distribution. The evaluation range of accumulative failure-rate has been reduced by making use of accumulative failure-rate and predicted failure rate of exponential distribution And the weighted least-squares method has been used in parametric fitting based on accumulative failure-rate Then high-precision estimated failure rate of exponential distribution has been obtained. In this paper, the calculation example of compressor filled with spacial propellant has verified the feasibility of the calculation method. The problems of the reliability tests’ few subsamples and evaluating efficiency for expensive, complex spacial mechanical products have been solved effectively by the above proposed method.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Zhou ZF (2007) Space reliability engineering. China Astronautic Publishing House, Beijing

    Google Scholar 

  2. Guo WC, Liao JS, Xiao MX (2007) Q/W 8B–2007 Assessment methods for spacecraft reliability. China Academy of Space Technology, Beijing

    Google Scholar 

  3. Martz HF, Waller RA (1979) A Bayesian zero-failure (BAZE) reliability demonstration testing procedure. J Qual Technol 11(3):128–138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Mao SS, Wang LL (1996) Reliability analysis for Weibull zero failure data. Chin J Appl Probab Stat 12:95–107

    Google Scholar 

  5. Hai M (2000) The synthesize estimation of reliability parameter of zero-failure data. Math Theory Appl 20(3):36–44

    Google Scholar 

  6. Mao SS, Luo CB (1989) Reliability analysis of zero-failure data. Math Stat Appl Probab 4(4):489–506

    Google Scholar 

  7. Zhang ZH, Jiang LP (2005) Statistical analysis of zero-failure data based on the normal distribution. Chin J Eng Math 22(4):741–744

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Liu HT, Zhang ZH (2008) Bayesian reliability analysis of Weibull zero failure data. Syst Eng Theory Pract 28(11):643–648

    Google Scholar 

  9. Wu B, Li MF (2003) Mechanical parts and system reliability model. Chemical Industry Press, Beijing

    Google Scholar 

  10. Zhao Y (2011) Data analysis of reliability. National Defence Industry Press, Beijing

    Google Scholar 

  11. Zhang ZL, Song TL (2006) GJB/Z 299C–2006 reliability prediction handbook for electronic equipment. China Standardization Press, Beijing

    Google Scholar 

  12. Jones TL (2011) Handbook of reliability prediction procedures for mechanical for mechanical equipment. USA Maryland Naval Surface Warefare Center

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

Not applicable.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Not applicable.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shuli Yang.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Not applicable.

Ethical approval

Not applicable.

Informed consent

Not applicable.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Shao, L., Yang, S. & Wang, Y. Reliability Assessment Technology for Spacial Complex Mechanical System. Adv. Astronaut. Sci. Technol. 5, 335–339 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42423-022-00119-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42423-022-00119-3

Keywords

Navigation