Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Incorporating Segmentive & Augmentive Tools in Cosine KNN for Bearing Intelligent Fault Diagnosis

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Vibration Engineering & Technologies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To address challenges in Intelligent Fault Diagnosis (IFD) of bearings in rotating machinery, this study aims to propose a model that reduces computational resources and expert dependence while enhancing performance under diverse operating conditions.

Method

The study introduces the Segmentation-based Augmented Cosine K—nearest neighbors (SACK) model, integrating raw vibration signal segmentation and data augmentation techniques. Unlike traditional approaches, SACK eliminates frequency or time-frequency signal processing, simplifying augmentation using existing tools.

Result

Evaluation of the SACK model reveals satisfactory performance and improvements compared to other Machine Learning (ML) models. Enhanced robustness across various operating conditions suggests potential efficiency gains in computational resources and reduced reliance on human experts. The proposed model presents a promising solution for cost-effective IFD implementation in resource-constrained environments.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Anwarsha A, Babu TN (2022) Recent advancements of signal processing and artificial intelligence in the fault detection of rolling element bearings: a review. J Vibroengineering 24(6):1027–1055. https://doi.org/10.21595/jve.2022.22366

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Zhang S, Zhang S, Wang B, Habetler TG (2019) Machine learning and deep learning algorithms for bearing fault diagnostics—a comprehensive review. IEEE Access. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2972859

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Iqbal M, Madan AK (2023) Machine learning based faulty bearing diagnosis in CNC machine. Available: http://www.ijeast.com. Accessed 1 Feb 2024

  4. Mohiuddin M, Islam MS (2022) Rolling element bearing faults detection and classification technique using vibration signals †. Eng Proc. https://doi.org/10.3390/ecsa-9-13339

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Saufi SR, Bin Ahmad ZA, Leong MS, Lim MH (2019) Challenges and opportunities of deep learning models for machinery fault detection and diagnosis: a review. IEEE Access Inst Electr Electron Eng Inc. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2938227

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Zhang S, Zhang S, Wang B, Habetler TG (2020) Deep learning algorithms for bearing fault diagnosticsx—a comprehensive review. IEEE Access Inst Electr Electron Eng Inc 8:29857–29881

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hakim M, Omran AAB, Ahmed AN, Al-Waily M, Abdellatif A (2023) A systematic review of rolling bearing fault diagnoses based on deep learning and transfer learning: taxonomy, overview, application, open challenges, weaknesses and recommendations. Ain Shams Eng J. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asej.2022.101945

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Saufi SR, Isham MF, Ahmad ZA, Hasan MDA (2023) Machinery fault diagnosis based on a modified hybrid deep sparse autoencoder using a raw vibration time-series signal. J Ambient Intell Humaniz Comput 14(4):3827–3838. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12652-022-04436-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Iqbal M, Madan AK (2022) CNC Machine-bearing fault detection based on convolutional neural network using vibration and acoustic signal. J Vib Eng Technol 10(5):1613–1621. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42417-022-00468-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Sahu PK, Rai RN (2023) Effect of time-frequency representations for fault classification of rolling bearing in noisy conditions using deep learning. In: 2023 25th International Conference on Digital Signal Processing and its Applications, DSPA 2023, Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc. https://doi.org/10.1109/DSPA57594.2023.10113425.

  11. Iqbal M, Madan AK (2023) Bearing fault diagnosis in CNC machine using hybrid signal decomposition and gentle AdaBoost learning. J Vib Eng Technol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42417-023-00930-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Lu Q, Shen X, Wang X, Li M, Li J, Zhang M (2021) Fault diagnosis of rolling bearing based on improved VMD and KNN. Math Probl Eng. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/2530315

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Wang Z, Xia H, Zhang J, Yang B, Yin W (2023) Imbalanced sample fault diagnosis method for rotating machinery in nuclear power plants based on deep convolutional conditional generative adversarial network. Nucl Eng Technol 55(6):2096–2106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.net.2023.02.036

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Lyu P, Zhang H, Yu W, Liu C (2022) A novel model-independent data augmentation method for fault diagnosis in smart manufacturing. Procedia CIRP. Elsevier B.V., pp 949–954

    Google Scholar 

  15. Zhang T, He S, Chen J, Pan T, Zhou Z (2022) Toward small sample challenge in intelligent fault diagnosis: attention-weighted multidepth feature fusion net with signals augmentation. IEEE Trans Instrum Meas. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIM.2021.3134999

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Tnani MA, Subarnaduti P, Diepold K (2022) Efficient feature learning approach for raw industrial vibration data using two-stage learning framework. Sensors. https://doi.org/10.3390/s22134813

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Gawde S, Patil S, Kumar S, Kotecha K (2023) A scoping review on multi-fault diagnosis of industrial rotating machines using multi-sensor data fusion. Artif Intell Rev 56(5):4711–4764. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-022-10243-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Singh V, Gangsar P, Porwal R, Atulkar A (2023) Artificial intelligence application in fault diagnostics of rotating industrial machines: a state-of-the-art review. J Intelligent Manufacturing Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-021-01861-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Liang YL, Chien W, Yuan SF (2023) Overview of bearing fault diagnosis based on vibration signal. In: 2023 IEEE 3rd International Conference on Electronic Communications, Internet of Things and Big Data, ICEIB 2023, Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc, pp 547–549

  20. Hakim M et al (2022) Bearing fault diagnosis using lightweight and robust one-dimensional convolution neural network in the frequency domain. Sensors. https://doi.org/10.3390/s22155793

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Dan Y, Hongbing J, Yongchan G (2019) A robust D-S fusion algorithm for multi-target multi-sensor with higher reliability. Information Fusion 47:32–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inffus.2018.06.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Zhang A, Li S, Cui Y, Yang W, Dong R, Hu J (2019) Limited data rolling bearing fault diagnosis with few-shot learning. IEEE Access 7:110895–110904. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2934233

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Kang Y, Chen G, Pan W, Wei X, Wang H, He Z (2023) A dual-experience pool deep reinforcement learning method and its application in fault diagnosis of rolling bearing with unbalanced data. J Mech Sci Technol 37(6):2715–2726. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12206-023-0501-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Weng C, Lu B, Gu Q, Zhao X (2023) A novel hierarchical transferable network for rolling bearing fault diagnosis under variable working conditions. Nonlinear Dyn 111(12):11315–11334. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11071-023-08405-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Liu X, Zhao X, He K (2022) Feasibility study of the GST-SVD in extracting the fault feature of rolling bearing under variable conditions. Chin J Mech Eng (English Edition). https://doi.org/10.1186/s10033-022-00806-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Yang B, Sun H (2023) A zero-shot learning fault diagnosis method of rolling bearing based on extended semantic information under unknown conditions. J Braz Soc Mech Sci Eng. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40430-022-03965-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Zhang R, Gu Y (2022) A transfer learning framework with a one-dimensional deep subdomain adaptation network for bearing fault diagnosis under different working conditions. Sensors. https://doi.org/10.3390/s22041624

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Yang J, Liu J, Xie J, Wang C, Ding T (2021) Conditional GAN and 2-D CNN for bearing fault diagnosis with small samples. IEEE Trans Instrum Meas. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIM.2021.3119135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Maguolo G, Paci M, Nanni L, Bonan L (2021) Audiogmenter: a MATLAB toolbox for audio data augmentation. Appl Comput Informatics. https://doi.org/10.1108/ACI-03-2021-0064

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Saghi T, Bustan D, Aphale SS (2023) Bearing fault diagnosis based on multi-scale CNN and Bidirectional GRU. Vibration 6(1):11–28. https://doi.org/10.3390/vibration6010002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Han S, Oh S, Jeong J (2021) Bearing fault diagnosis based on multiscale convolutional neural network using data augmentation. J Sens. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/6699637

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Oh JW, Jeong J (2020) Data augmentation for bearing fault detection with a light weight CNN. Procedia computer science. Elsevier BV, pp 72–79

    Google Scholar 

  33. Lopez-Bernal D, Balderas D, Ponce P, Molina A (2021) Education 40: Teaching the basics of knn, lda and simple perceptron algorithms for binary classification problems. Future Internet. https://doi.org/10.3390/fi13080193

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Neupane D, Seok J (2020) Bearing fault detection and diagnosis using case western reserve university dataset with deep learning approaches: a review. IEEE Access Inst Electr Electron Eng Inc 8:93155–93178. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2990528

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Saufi SR, Bin Ahmad ZA, Leong MS, Lim MH (2019) Low-speed bearing fault diagnosis based on ArSSAE model using acoustic emission and vibration signals. IEEE Access 7:46885–46897. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2909756

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Smith WA, Randall RB (2015) Rolling element bearing diagnostics using the Case Western Reserve University data: a benchmark study. Mech Syst Signal Process 6465:100–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2015.04.021

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Fu L, Cheng L, Chen W, Cai X (2023) Bearing fault diagnosis with small sample based on data-driven. In: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE), Nanjing, China, pp 369–373

  38. Liu B, Yan C, Wang Z, Liu Y, Wu L (2023) Fault diagnosis of rolling bearing under limited samples using joint learning network based on local-global feature perception. J Mech Sci Technol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12206-023-0607-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Senthamil Selvi M, Jansi Rani S (2021) Classification of admission data using classification learner toolbox. J Phys Conf Ser. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1979/1/012043

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to extend their greatest gratitude to the Institute of Noise and vibration UTM for funding the current study under the Higher Institution Centre of Excellence (HICoE) Grant Scheme of Advanced Health Monitoring for Turbomachinery (R.K130000.7843.4J227) and Health Monitoring and Integrity Assessment of Ageing Assets (R.K130000.7843.4J228).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute of Noise and Vibration, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 54100, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia

    J. S. Yap, M. H. Lim & M. Salman Leong

Authors
  1. J. S. Yap
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. M. H. Lim
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. M. Salman Leong
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. S. Yap.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yap, J.S., Lim, M.H. & Leong, M.S. Incorporating Segmentive & Augmentive Tools in Cosine KNN for Bearing Intelligent Fault Diagnosis. J. Vib. Eng. Technol. (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42417-024-01377-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42417-024-01377-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation