Skip to main content
Log in

A Numerical and Closed-Form Analytical Solution of the Global Buckling Critical Load of Tall Buildings Including Soil Flexibility: Timoshenko Beam

  • Review
  • Published:
Journal of Vibration Engineering & Technologies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The global buckling critical load ratio is a paramount parameter dictating the overall performance of tall buildings, yet its exploration has been notably lacking in the existing literature. This study addresses this gap by delivering a comprehensive theoretical investigation, along with presenting both analytical and numerical methods for computing the global buckling critical load ratio.

Methodology

These methods are designed to accommodate uniform and non-uniform tall buildings, taking into account diverse vertical load profiles, including considerations for soil flexibility. In this endeavor, a continuous Timoshenko-type model is employed, characterized by flexural and shear stiffness parameters defined by a dimensionless factor. To enhance the versatility of the analysis, an analytical solution method has been devised for uniform tall buildings. In contrast, a numerical solution method has been formulated to address the intricacies posed by tall structures exhibiting variable properties along their height, including soil flexibility.

Results and Conclusions

Notably, our investigation uncovers that the rotational flexibility of the underlying soil significantly influences the eigenvalues. Furthermore, the parametric analyses carried out in this study underscore the exceptional convergence achieved by the proposed solution methods and highlight the superiority of the continuous model, enabling the execution of parametric studies with minimal computational expenses.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Chitty L (1947) On the cantilever composed of a number of parallel beams interconnected by cross bars. The London, Edinburgh, Dublin Philos Mag J Sci 38:685–699. https://doi.org/10.1080/14786444708521646

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Chitty L, Wan WY (1948) Tall building structures under wind load. 7th International Congress for Applied Mechanics: 254–268

  3. Hegedűs I, Kollár LP (1984) Buckling of sandwich columns with thick faces subjecting to axial loads of arbitrary distribution. Acta Polytech Hungarica 97:123–132

    Google Scholar 

  4. Miranda E (1999) Approximate lateral drift demands in multi-story buildings subjected to earthquakes. J Struct Eng 124(4):417–425. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1999)125:4(417)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Potzta G, Kollár LP (2003) Analysis of building structures by replacement sandwich beams. Int J Solids Struct 40(3):535–553. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0020-7683(02)00622-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Kaviani P, Rahgozar R, Saffari H (2008) Approximate analysis of tall buildings using sandwich beam models with variable cross-section. Struct Des Tall Special Build 17:401–418. https://doi.org/10.1002/tal.360

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Bozdogan KB, Ozturk D (2010) An approximate method for lateral stability analysis of wall-frame buildings including shear deformations of walls. Sadhana 35(3):241–253. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12046-010-0008-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Zalka KA (2002) Buckling analysis of buildings braced by frameworks, shear walls and cores. Struct Des Tall Special Build 11(3):197–219. https://doi.org/10.1002/tal.194

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Zalka KA (2007) A simple method for the deflection analysis of tall wall-frame building structures under horizontal load. Struct Des Tall Special Build 18(3):291–311. https://doi.org/10.1002/tal.410

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Zalka KA (2013) Maximum deflection of symmetric wall-frame buildings. Period Polytech Civil Eng 2(57):173–184. https://doi.org/10.3311/PPci.7172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Laier JE (2021) An improved continuous medium technique for three-dimensional analysis of tall building structures. Struct Eng Mech 80(1):73–81. https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2021.80.1.073

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Franco C, Chesnais C, Semblat JF, Giry C, Desprez C (2022) Finite element formulation of a homogenized beam for reticulated structure dynamics. Comput Struct 261–262:106729. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruc.2021.106729

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Pinto MC (2023) Closed-form and numerical solution of the static and dynamic analysis of coupled shear walls by the continuous method and the modified transfer matrix method. Struct Eng Mech 86(1):49–68. https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2023.86.1.049

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Pinto MC (2023) A general simplified method for static and free vibration analysis of coupled shear walls of a bay. Mech Based Design Struct Mach. https://doi.org/10.1080/15397734.2023.2265466

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Pinto MC (2023) A novel generalized sandwich-type replacement beam for static analysis of tall buildings: Inclusion of local shear deformation of walls. Thin-Walled Struct 190:110967. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tws.2023.110967

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Pinto MC (2023) Generalized sandwich beam for global stability analysis of tall buildings with shear walls using a modified transfer matrix method. Int J Struct Stab Dyn 24(4):2450036. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219455424500378

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. Williams HE (2008) An asymptotic solution of the governing equation for the natural frequencies of a cantilevered, coupled beam model. J Sound Vib 312(1–2):354–359. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2007.10.048

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Akgöz B, Civalek Ö (2014) A new trigonometric beam model for buckling of strain gradient microbeams. Int J Mech Sci 81:88–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2014.02.013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Armand M, Adali S (2018) Buckling of nonuniform and axially functionally graded nonlocal Timoshenko nanobeams on Winkler-Pasternak foundation. Compos Struct 206:95–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2018.07.046

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Uribe A, Zapata D, Arboleda L, Aristizabal J (2018) Static and dynamic stability of a multi-stepped Timoshenko column including self-weight. Structures 15:28–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2018.05.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Doeva O, Khaneh Masjedi P, Weaver PM (2020) Static deflection of fully coupled composite Timoshenko beams: an exact analytical solution. Eur J Mech - A/Solids 81:103975. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euromechsol.2020.103975

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  22. Hamed MA, Abo-bakr RM, Mohamed SA, Eltaher MA (2020) Influence of axial load function and optimization on static stability of sandwich functionally graded beams with porous core. Eng Comput 36:1929–1946. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00366-020-01023-w

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Hariz M, Le Marrec L, Lerbet J (2022) Buckling of Timoshenko beam under two-parameter elastic foundations. Int J Solids Struct 244–245:111583. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2022.111583

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Ren Y, Huo R, Zhou D (2023) Buckling analysis of non-uniform Timoshenko columns under localised fire. Structures 51:1245–1256. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2023.03.092

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Ruocco E, Reddy JN (2023) Analytical solutions of Reddy, Timoshenko and Bernoulli beam models: a comparative analysis. Eur J Mech 99:104953. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euromechsol.2023.104953

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  26. Cheng MH, Heaton TH (2015) Simulating building motions using ratios of the building’s natural frequencies and a Timoshenko Beam model. Earthq Spectra 31(1):403–420. https://doi.org/10.1193/011613EQS003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Ferretti M, D’Annibale F, Luongo A (2020) Buckling of tower buildings on elastic foundation under compressive tip forces and self-weight. Continuum Mech Thermodyn 35:799–819. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00161-020-00911-2

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  28. Rostami P, Mahsuli M, Ghahari SF, Taciroglu E (2021) Bayesian joint state-parameter-input estimation of flexible-base buildings from sparse measurements using Timoshenko Beam models. J Struct Eng 147(10). https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0003095

  29. Shirzad N, Mahsuli M, Ghahari SF (2018) Bayesian identification of soil-foundation stiffness of building structures. Struct Control Health Monit 25(3):e2090. https://doi.org/10.1002/stc.2090

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Taciroglua E, Ghahari SF, Abazarsa F (2017) Efficient model updating of a multi-story frame and its foundation stiffness from earthquake records using a timoshenko beam model. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 92:25–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2016.09.041

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Terzi VG (2021) Soil-structure-interaction effects on the flexural vibrations of a cantilever beam. Appl Math Model 97:138–181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2021.03.045

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  32. Abramowitz M, Stegun IA (1965) Handbook of mathematical functions. Dover Publications, New York

    Google Scholar 

  33. Cowper GR (1966) The Shear coefficient in Timoshenko’s beam theory. J Appl Mech 33:335–340. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.3625046

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Huergo IF, Hernandez H, Patlán C (2020) A continuous-discrete approach for pre-design of flexible-base tall buildings with fluid viscous dampers. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 131:106042. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2020.106042

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The research described in this document was possible thanks to the support of Jesus Christ. The author dedicates this research to his mother, Lucía Cruz Trujillo, for being an example of overcoming challenges, perseverance, and the pillar of his life (I love you infinitely). The author acknowledges the support from the Multiphysics Modeling and Simulation Group at Instituto Tecgraf PUCRio.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Mao Cristian Pinto-Cruz: Conceptualization, Methodology, Validation, Writing—original draft, Writing—review & editing, Software, Data curation, Validation.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mao Cristian Pinto-Cruz.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The author declares that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pinto-Cruz, M.C. A Numerical and Closed-Form Analytical Solution of the Global Buckling Critical Load of Tall Buildings Including Soil Flexibility: Timoshenko Beam. J. Vib. Eng. Technol. (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42417-024-01316-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42417-024-01316-0

Keywords

Navigation