Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Condition Monitoring and Fault Diagnosis of Induction Motor

  • Review
  • Published:
Journal of Vibration Engineering & Technologies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

An induction motor is at the heart of every rotating machine and hence it is a very vital component. Almost in every industry, around 90% of the machines apply an induction motor as a prime mover. It is a very important driving unit of the machine. Hence, it is necessary to monitor its condition to avoid any catastrophic failure and stoppage of production. The breakdown of the induction motor would not be affordable due to remarkable financial loss, unpredicted shutdown, and the associated repair cost.

Purpose

Vibration is a manifestation of induction motor due to the issues in alignment, balancing, and clearances. Bearing, the most vulnerable to failure due to continuous working under fatigue loading leads to defects. These defects cause changes in the vibration signature over time. The vibration monitoring techniques helps to effectively diagnose mechanical faults such as bearing defect and stator rotor rub. The purpose of this review paper is to summarize the major faults in induction motor, recent diagnostics methods augmented with advanced signal processing techniques, and real-life applications in electric vehicles. It also discusses possible research gaps and opportunities to contribute based on the review findings in the field of condition monitoring.

Methods

This article presents a detailed review of recent trends in the research of condition monitoring and fault diagnosis of the induction motor. The emphasis is given on the major faults in the induction motor covering time-domain, frequency-domain, and time–frequency domain methods along with an application of artificial intelligence techniques for fault detection.

Review Factor

This article presents a comprehensive review of literature which highlights the development and new propositions by researchers in the field of diagnostic techniques for the different faults of induction motor in the last decade. Researchers documented applications of the different conventional methods, advanced signal processing techniques, and soft computing techniques for fault identification of induction motor. This review is carried out for fault identification of induction motor used in machines in general and in particular for identifying the faults in an induction motor of an electric vehicle. A dedicated discussion on the review findings, research gaps, future trends in the field of condition monitoring of induction motor is presented. Condition monitoring of the induction motor in an electric vehicle is also discussed in this paper.

Conclusions

It is observed that the vibration-based techniques are reported to be effective for the identification of mechanical faults while motor current signature analysis is effective for electrical fault in an induction motor. The review presented to analyze the suitability of various condition monitoring techniques for the induction motor fault identification in general and particularly its application in an electric vehicle. It is observed that the diagnosis of faults at the incipient level without using the signal processing technique is challenging. Fault diagnosis of induction motor has witnessed the changes from traditional diagnosis techniques to advanced techniques with a hybrid application of signal processing and artificial intelligence techniques. Still, there is a potential of improvement in reliability, efficiency, robustness, computational time, and real-time diagnostics of faults in IM.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Availability of Data and Material

Not applicable.

Code Availability

Not applicable.

References

  1. IEA (2019) Global EV outlook 2019. IEA, Paris. https://www.iea.org/reports/global-ev-outlook-2019

  2. Nandi S, Toliyat HA, Li X (2005) Condition monitoring and fault diagnosis of electrical motors—a review. IEEE Trans Energy Convers 20:719–729

    Google Scholar 

  3. Guo X, Chen L, Shen C (2016) Hierarchical adaptive deep convolution neural network and its application to bearing fault diagnosis. Measurement 93:490–502. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2016.07.054

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Li Y, Yang Y, Wang X, Liu B, Liang X (2018) Early fault diagnosis of rolling bearings based on hierarchical symbol dynamic entropy and binary tree support vector machine. J Sound Vib 428:72–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2018.04.036

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Unal M, Onat M, Demetgul M, Kucuk H (2014) Fault diagnosis of rolling bearings using a genetic algorithm optimized neural network. Measurement 58:187–196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2014.08.041

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Germen E, Başaran M, Fidan M (2014) Sound based induction motor fault diagnosis using Kohonen self-organizing map. Mech Syst Signal Proces 46:45–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2013.12.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Kang M, Kim J, Kim J-M (2015) Reliable fault diagnosis for incipient low-speed bearings using fault feature analysis based on a binary bat algorithm. Inf Sci 294:423–438. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2014.10.014

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Glowacz A, Glowacz W, Glowacz Z, Kozik J (2018) Early fault diagnosis of bearing and stator faults of the single-phase induction motor using acoustic signals. Measurement 113:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2017.08.036

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Pereira LA, da Silva Gazzana D, Pereira LF (2005) Motor current signature analysis and fuzzy logic applied to the diagnosis of short-circuit faults in induction motors. In: 31st annual conference of IEEE industrial electronics society, 2005. IECON 2005. IEEE, p 6

  10. Pires VF, Foito D, Martins J, Pires A (2015) Detection of stator winding fault in induction motors using a motor square current signature analysis (MSCSA). In: 2015 IEEE 5th international conference on power engineering, energy and electrical drives (POWERENG), 2015. IEEE, pp 507–512

  11. Seera M, Lim CP, Ishak D, Singh H (2011) Fault detection and diagnosis of induction motors using motor current signature analysis and a hybrid FMM–CART model. IEEE Trans Neural Netw Learn Syst 23:97–108

    Google Scholar 

  12. Gentile G, Meo S, Ometto A (2003) Induction motor current signature analysis to diagnostics, of stator short circuits. In: 4th IEEE international symposium on diagnostics for electric machines, power electronics and drives, 2003. SDEMPED 2003. IEEE, pp 47–51

  13. Ishkova I, Vítek O (2015) Diagnosis of eccentricity and broken rotor bar related faults of induction motor by means of motor current signature analysis. In: 2015 16th international scientific conference on electric power engineering (EPE), 2015. IEEE, pp 682–686

  14. Guedidi S, Zouzou S, Laala W, Sahraoui M, Yahia K (2011) Broken bar fault diagnosis of induction motors using MCSA and neural network. In: 8th IEEE symposium on diagnostics for electrical machines, power electronics and drives, 2011. IEEE, pp 632–637

  15. Lau EC, Ngan H (2010) Detection of motor bearing outer raceway defect by wavelet packet transformed motor current signature analysis. IEEE Trans Instrum Meas 59:2683–2690

    Google Scholar 

  16. Vitek O, Janda M, Hajek V, Bauer P (2011) Detection of eccentricity and bearings fault using stray flux monitoring. In: 8th IEEE symposium on diagnostics for electrical machines, power electronics and drives, Bologna, 2011, pp 456-461

  17. Zhen L, Zhengjia H, Yanyang Z, Xuefeng C (2008) Bearing condition monitoring based on shock pulse method and improved redundant lifting scheme. Math Comput Simul 79:318–338

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Drif Mh, Cardoso AJM (2014) Stator fault diagnostics in squirrel cage three-phase induction motor drives using the instantaneous active and reactive power signature analyses. IEEE Trans Ind Inf 10:1348–1360

    Google Scholar 

  19. Liu Z, Yin X, Zhang Z, Chen D, Chen W (2004) Online rotor mixed fault diagnosis way based on spectrum analysis of instantaneous power in squirrel cage induction motors. IEEE Trans Energy Convers 19:485–490

    Google Scholar 

  20. Janssens O, Schulz R, Slavkovikj V, Stockman K, Loccufier M, Van de Walle R, Van Hoecke S (2015) Thermal image based fault diagnosis for rotating machinery. Infrared Phys Technol 73:78–87

    Google Scholar 

  21. Glowacz A, Glowacz Z (2017) Diagnosis of the three-phase induction motor using thermal imaging. Infrared Phys Technol 81:7–16

    Google Scholar 

  22. Kim D-Y, Yun H-B, Yang S-M, Kim W-T, Hong D-P (2010) Fault diagnosis of ball bearings within rotational machines using the infrared thermography method. J Korean Soc Nondestr Test 30:558–563

    Google Scholar 

  23. Liu Y, Bazzi AM (2017) A review and comparison of fault detection and diagnosis methods for squirrel-cage induction motors: state of the art. ISA Trans 70:400–409. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isatra.2017.06.001i

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Zhang P, Du Y, Habetler TG, Lu B (2011) A survey of condition monitoring and protection methods for medium-voltage induction motors. IEEE Trans Ind Appl 47(1):34–46. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIA.2010.2090839

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Riera-Guasp M, Antonino-Daviu JA, Capolino G-A (2015) Advances in electrical machine, power electronic, and drive condition monitoring and fault detection: state of the art. IEEE Trans Industr Electron 62:1746–1759. https://doi.org/10.1109/tie.2014.2375853

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Gangsar P, Tiwari R (2020) Signal based condition monitoring techniques for fault detection and diagnosis of induction motors: a state-of-the-art review. Mech Syst Signal Process 144:106908

    Google Scholar 

  27. Choudhary A, Goyal D, Shimi SL, Akula A (2019) Condition monitoring and fault diagnosis of induction motors: a review. Arch Comput Methods Eng 26:1221–1238

    Google Scholar 

  28. Siddiqui KM, Sahay K, Giri V (2014) Health monitoring and fault diagnosis in induction motor-a review. Int J Adv Res Electr Electron Instrum Eng 3:6549–6565

    Google Scholar 

  29. Eftekhari M, Moallem M, Sadri S, Shojaei A (2013) Review of induction motor testing and monitoring methods for inter-turn stator winding faults. In: Proceedings of the 2013 21st Iranian conference on electrical engineering (ICEE), Mashhad, 2013, pp 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1109/IranianCEE.2013.6599713

  30. Mehrjou MR, Mariun N, Hamiruce Marhaban M, Misron N (2011) Rotor fault condition monitoring techniques for squirrel-cage induction machine—sss review. Mech Syst Signal Proces 25:2827–2848. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2011.05.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Immovilli F, Bellini A, Rubini R, Tassoni C (2010) diagnosis of bearing faults in induction machines by vibration or current signals: a critical comparison. IEEE Trans Ind Appl 46(4):1350–1359. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIA.2010.2049623

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Duan Z, Wu T, Guo S, Shao T, Malekian R, Li Z (2018) Development and trend of condition monitoring and fault diagnosis of multi-sensors information fusion for rolling bearings: a review. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 96:803–819. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-017-1474-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Rai A, Upadhyay SH (2016) A review on signal processing techniques utilized in the fault diagnosis of rolling element bearings. Tribol Int 96:289–306. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.triboint.2015.12.037

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Li C, de Oliveira JV, Cerrada M, Cabrera D, Sanchez RV, Zurita G (2019) A systematic review of fuzzy formalisms for bearing fault diagnosis. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 27:1362–1382. https://doi.org/10.1109/tfuzz.2018.2878200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Malla C, Panigrahi I (2019) Review of condition monitoring of rolling element bearing using vibration analysis and other techniques. J Vib Eng Technol 7:407–414

    Google Scholar 

  36. Faiz J, Moosavi SMM (2016) Eccentricity fault detection—from induction machines to DFIG—a review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 55:169–179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.10.113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Devillers E, Le Besnerais J, Souron Q, Hecquet M (2016) Characterization of acoustic noise and vibrations due to magnetic forces in induction machines for transport applications using MANATEE software. In: Proceedings of ISMA, 2016

  38. Randall RB, Antoni J (2011) Rolling element bearing diagnostics—a tutorial. Mech Syst Signal Process 25:485–520

    Google Scholar 

  39. Fabio Immovilli AB, Riccardo Rubini CT (2010) Diagnosis of bearing faults in induction machines by vibration or current signals: a critical comparison. IEEE Trans Ind Appl 46:1350

    Google Scholar 

  40. Long Zhang GX, Liu H, Zou H, Guo W (2010) Bearing fault diagnosis using multi-scale entropy and adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference. Expert Syst Appl 37:6077–6085. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2010.02.118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Saidi L, Capolino G, Henao H (2012) Stator current bi-spectrum patterns for induction machines multiple-faults detection. In: IECON 2012—38th annual conference on IEEE industrial electronics society, Montreal, QC, 2012, pp 5132–5137

  42. Omoregbee HO, Heyns PS (2019) Fault classification of low-speed bearings based on support vector machine for regression and genetic algorithms using acoustic emission. J Vib Eng Technol 7:455–464

    Google Scholar 

  43. Agrawal P, Jayaswal P (2019) Diagnosis and classifications of bearing faults using artificial neural network and support vector machine. J Inst Eng (India) Ser C 101:61–72. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40032-019-00519-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Immovilli F, Rubini R, Tassoni C (2010) Diagnosis of bearing faults in induction machines by vibration or current signals: a critical comparison. IEEE Trans Ind Appl 46:1350–1359

    Google Scholar 

  45. Zhang L, Xiong G, Liu H, Zou H, Guo W (2010) Bearing fault diagnosis using multi-scale entropy and adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference. Expert Syst Appl 37:6077–6085. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2010.02.118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Başaran M (2011) Condition monitoring of speed controlled induction motors using wavelet packets and discriminant analysis. Expert Syst Appl 38:8079–8086

    Google Scholar 

  47. Mehala N, Dahiya R (2010) Detection of bearing faults of induction motor using Park’s vector approach. Int J Eng Technol 2(4):263–266

    Google Scholar 

  48. Da Costa C, Mathias MH, Ramos P, Girao PS (2010) A new approach for real time fault diagnosis in induction motors based on vibration measurement. In: IEEE instrumentation and measurement technology conference proceedings, Austin, TX, 2010, pp 1164–1168

  49. Konar P, Chattopadhyay P (2011) Bearing fault detection of induction motor using wavelet and support vector machines (SVMs). Appl Soft Comput 11:4203–4211

    Google Scholar 

  50. Yang R, Kang J, Zhao J, Li J, Li H (2014) A case study of bearing condition monitoring using SPM. In: 2014 prognostics and system health management conference (PHM-2014 Hunan), 2014. IEEE, pp 695–698

  51. Wu C, Chen T, Jiang R, Ning L, Jiang Z (2015) ANN based multi-classification using various signal processing techniques for bearing fault diagnosis. Int J Control Autom 8:113–124

    Google Scholar 

  52. Vishwakarma HO, Sajan K, Maheshwari B, Dhiman YD (2015) Intelligent bearing fault monitoring system using support vector machine and wavelet packet decomposition for induction motors. In: 2015 international conference on power and advanced control engineering (ICPACE), 2015. IEEE, pp 339–343

  53. Ghods A, Lee H-H (2016) Probabilistic frequency-domain discrete wavelet transform for better detection of bearing faults in induction motors. Neurocomputing 188:206–216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neucom.2015.06.100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Han Zhang XC, Zhaohui Du, Yan R (2016) Kurtosis based weighted sparse model with convex optimization technique for bearing fault diagnosis. Mech Syst Signal Process 80:349–376. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2016.04.033i

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Patel RK, Giri V (2016) Feature selection and classification of mechanical fault of an induction motor using random forest classifier. Perspect Sci 8:334–337

    Google Scholar 

  56. He W, Ding Y, Zi Y, Selesnick IW (2017) Repetitive transients extraction algorithm for detecting bearing faults. Mech Syst Signal Process 84:227–244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2016.06.035

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Deng W, Zhang S, Zhao H, Yang X (2018) A novel fault diagnosis method based on integrating empirical wavelet transform and fuzzy entropy for motor bearing. IEEE Access 6:35042–35056. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2018.2834540

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Gangsar P, Tiwari R (2018) Multifault diagnosis of induction motor at intermediate operating conditions using wavelet packet transform and support vector machine. J Dyn Syst Meas Control. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4039204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Eren L, Ince T, Kiranyaz S (2018) A generic intelligent bearing fault diagnosis system using compact adaptive 1D CNN classifier. J Signal Process Syst 91:179–189. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11265-018-1378-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Zhang J, Yi S, Liang G, Hongli G, Xin H, Hongliang S (2020) A new bearing fault diagnosis method based on modified convolutional neural networks. Chin J Aeronaut 33:439–447

    Google Scholar 

  61. Trajin B, Régnier J, Faucher J (2010) Comparison between vibration and stator current analysis for the detection of bearing faults in asynchronous drives. IET Electr Power Appl 4:90–100

    Google Scholar 

  62. Jena D, Panigrahi S (2015) Automatic gear and bearing fault localization using vibration and acoustic signals. Appl Acoust 98:20–33

    Google Scholar 

  63. Sawalhi N, Randall R (2008) Simulating gear and bearing interactions in the presence of faults: Part I. the combined gear bearing dynamic model and the simulation of localised bearing faults. Mech Syst Signal Process 22:1924–1951

    Google Scholar 

  64. Sawalhi N, Randall R (2008) Simulating gear and bearing interactions in the presence of faults: Part II: simulation of the vibrations produced by extended bearing faults. Mech Syst Signal Process 22:1952–1966

    Google Scholar 

  65. Cao M, Xiao J (2008) A comprehensive dynamic model of double-row spherical roller bearing—model development and case studies on surface defects, preloads, and radial clearance. Mech Syst Signal Process 22:467–489

    Google Scholar 

  66. Tadina M, Boltežar M (2011) Improved model of a ball bearing for the simulation of vibration signals due to faults during run-up. J Sound Vib 330:4287–4301

    Google Scholar 

  67. Petersen D, Howard C, Sawalhi N, Ahmadi AM, Singh S (2015) Analysis of bearing stiffness variations, contact forces and vibrations in radially loaded double row rolling element bearings with raceway defects. Mech Syst Signal Process 50:139–160

    Google Scholar 

  68. Ahmadi AM, Petersen D, Howard C (2015) A nonlinear dynamic vibration model of defective bearings—the importance of modelling the finite size of rolling elements. Mech Syst Signal Process 52:309–326

    Google Scholar 

  69. Ahmadi AM, Howard CQ, Petersen D (2016) The path of rolling elements in defective bearings: observations, analysis and methods to estimate spall size. J Sound Vib 366:277–292

    Google Scholar 

  70. Singh S, Köpke UG, Howard CQ, Petersen D (2014) Analyses of contact forces and vibration response for a defective rolling element bearing using an explicit dynamics finite element model. J Sound Vib 333:5356–5377

    Google Scholar 

  71. Sawalhi N, Randall R (2011) Vibration response of spalled rolling element bearings: observations, simulations and signal processing techniques to track the spall size. Mech Syst Signal Process 25:846–870

    Google Scholar 

  72. Zhao S, Liang L, Xu G, Wang J, Zhang W (2013) Quantitative diagnosis of a spall-like fault of a rolling element bearing by empirical mode decomposition and the approximate entropy method. Mech Syst Signal Process 40:154–177

    Google Scholar 

  73. Harsha S, Sandeep K, Prakash R (2004) Non-linear dynamic behaviors of rolling element bearings due to surface waviness. J Sound Vib 272:557–580

    Google Scholar 

  74. Harsha S, Sandeep K, Prakash R (2003) The effect of speed of balanced rotor on nonlinear vibrations associated with ball bearings. Int J Mech Sci 45:725–740

    Google Scholar 

  75. Chen A, Kurfess TR (2018) A new model for rolling element bearing defect size estimation. Measurement 114:144–149

    Google Scholar 

  76. Ali JB, Chebel-Morello B, Saidi L, Malinowski S, Fnaiech F (2015) Accurate bearing remaining useful life prediction based on Weibull distribution and artificial neural network. Mech Syst Signal Process 56:150–172

    Google Scholar 

  77. Tian Z (2012) An artificial neural network method for remaining useful life prediction of equipment subject to condition monitoring. J Intell Manuf 23:227–237

    Google Scholar 

  78. Mahamad AK, Saon S, Hiyama T (2010) Predicting remaining useful life of rotating machinery based artificial neural network. Comput Math Appl 60:1078–1087

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  79. Pan Z, Meng Z, Chen Z, Gao W, Shi Y (2020) A two-stage method based on extreme learning machine for predicting the remaining useful life of rolling-element bearings. Mech Syst Signal Process 144:106899

    Google Scholar 

  80. Zolfaghari S, Noor SBM, Rezazadeh Mehrjou M, Marhaban MH, Mariun N (2018) Broken rotor bar fault detection and classification using wavelet packet signature analysis based on fourier transform and multi-layer perceptron neural network. Appl Sci 8:25

    Google Scholar 

  81. Armaki MG, Roshanfekr R (2010) A new approach for fault detection of broken rotor bars in induction motor based on support vector machine. In: 18th Iranian conference on electrical engineering, Isfahan, 2010, pp 732–738

  82. Ebrahimi BM, Faiz J, Lotfi-fard S, Pillay P (2012) Novel indices for broken rotor bars fault diagnosis in induction motors using wavelet transform. Mech Syst Signal Process 30:131–145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2012.01.026

    Article  Google Scholar 

  83. Liang B, Iwnicki SD, Zhao Y (2013) Application of power spectrum, cepstrum, higher order spectrum and neural network analyses for induction motor fault diagnosis. Mech Syst Signal Process 39:342–360. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2013.02.016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  84. Gu F, Wang T, Alwodai A, Tian X, Shao Y, Ball AD (2015) A new method of accurate broken rotor bar diagnosis based on modulation signal bispectrum analysis of motor current signals. Mech Syst Signal Process 50–51:400–413. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2014.05.017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  85. El Bouchikhi EH, Choqueuse V, Benbouzid M (2014) Induction machine faults detection using stator current parametric spectral estimation. Mech Syst Signal Process 52–53:447–464. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2014.06.015i

    Article  Google Scholar 

  86. Romero-Troncoso RJ, Garcia-Perez A, Morinigo-Sotelo D, Duque-Perez O, Osornio-Rios RA, Ibarra-Manzano MA (2016) Rotor unbalance and broken rotor bar detection in inverter-fed induction motors at start-up and steady-state regimes by high-resolution spectral analysis. Electr Power Syst Res 133:142–148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsr.2015.12.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  87. Iglesias-Martínez M, Antonino-Daviu J, Fernández de Córdoba P, Conejero J (2019) Rotor fault detection in induction motors based on time-frequency analysis using the bispectrum and the autocovariance of stray flux signals. Energies 12:597. https://doi.org/10.3390/en12040597

    Article  Google Scholar 

  88. Braut S, Žigulić R, Skoblar A, Rončević GŠ (2020) Partial rub detection based on instantaneous angular speed measurement and variational mode decomposition. J Vib Eng Technol 8:351–364

    Google Scholar 

  89. Kurek J, Osowski S (2010) Support vector machine for fault diagnosis of the broken rotor bars of squirrel-cage induction motor. Neural Comput Appl 19:557–564

    Google Scholar 

  90. Garcia-Perez A, de Jesus R-T, Cabal-Yepez E, Osornio-Rios RA (2011) The application of high-resolution spectral analysis for identifying multiple combined faults in induction motors. IEEE Trans Industr Electron 58:2002–2010

    Google Scholar 

  91. Keskes H, Braham A, Lachiri Z (2013) Broken rotor bar diagnosis in induction machines through stationary wavelet packet transform and multiclass wavelet SVM. Electr Power Syst Res 97:151–157

    Google Scholar 

  92. Saidi L, Fnaiech F, Henao H, Capolino GA, Cirrincione G (2013) Diagnosis of broken-bars fault in induction machines using higher order spectral analysis. ISA Trans 52:140–148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isatra.2012.08.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  93. Palácios RHC, da Silva IN, Goedtel A, Godoy WF (2015) A comprehensive evaluation of intelligent classifiers for fault identification in three-phase induction motors. Electr Power Syst Res 127:249–258

    Google Scholar 

  94. Sun W, Shao S, Zhao R, Yan R, Zhang X, Chen X (2016) A sparse auto-encoder-based deep neural network approach for induction motor faults classification. Measurement 89:171–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2016.04.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  95. Camarena-Martinez D, Perez-Ramirez CA, Valtierra-Rodriguez M, Amezquita-Sanchez JP, Romero-Troncoso RdJ (2016) Synchrosqueezing transform-based methodology for broken rotor bars detection in induction motors. Measurement 90:519–525. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2016.05.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  96. Bessam B, Menacer A, Boumehraz M, Cherif H (2016) Detection of broken rotor bar faults in induction motor at low load using neural network. ISA Trans 64:241–246

    Google Scholar 

  97. Delgado-Arredondo PA, Morinigo-Sotelo D, Osornio-Rios RA, Avina-Cervantes JG, Rostro-Gonzalez H, de Jesus R-T (2017) Methodology for fault detection in induction motors via sound and vibration signals. Mech Syst Signal Process 83:568–589

    Google Scholar 

  98. Abd-el-Malek M, Abdelsalam AK, Hassan OE (2017) Induction motor broken rotor bar fault location detection through envelope analysis of start-up current using Hilbert transform. Mech Syst Signal Process 93:332–350. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2017.02.014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  99. Singh G, Naikan V (2018) Detection of half broken rotor bar fault in VFD driven induction motor drive using motor square current MUSIC analysis. Mech Syst Signal Process 110:333–348

    Google Scholar 

  100. Zgarni S, Keskes H, Braham A (2018) Nested SVDD in DAG SVM for induction motor condition monitoring. Eng Appl Artif Intell 71:210–215

    Google Scholar 

  101. Patel VU (2019) Condition monitoring of induction motor for broken rotor bar using discrete wavelet transform and K-nearest neighbor. In: 3rd international conference on computing methodologies and communication (ICCMC), Erode, India, 2019, pp 520–524

  102. Khelfi H, Hamdani S (2020) Induction motor rotor fault diagnosis using three-phase current intersection signal. Electr Eng 102:539–548

    Google Scholar 

  103. da Silva AM, Povinelli RJ, Demerdash NA (2013) Rotor bar fault monitoring method based on analysis of air-gap torques of induction motors. IEEE Trans Ind Inf 9:2274–2283

    Google Scholar 

  104. Supangat R, Grieger J, Ertugrul N, Soong WL, Gray DA, Hansen C (2007) Detection of broken rotor bar faults and effects of loading in induction motors during rundown. In: 2007 IEEE international electric machines and drives conference, 2007. IEEE, pp 196–201

  105. Drif MH, Cardoso AM (2009) The use of the instantaneous-reactive-power signature analysis for rotor-cage-fault diagnostics in three-phase induction motors. IEEE Trans Ind Electron 56:4606–4614

    Google Scholar 

  106. Rajalakshmi Samaga BL, Vittal KP (2012) Comprehensive study of mixed eccentricity fault diagnosis in induction motors using signature analysis. Int J Electr Power Energy Syst 35:180–185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijepes.2011.10.011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  107. Samaga BR, Vittal K (2012) Comprehensive study of mixed eccentricity fault diagnosis in induction motors using signature analysis. Int J Electr Power Energy Syst 35:180–185

    Google Scholar 

  108. Akar M (2013) Detection of a static eccentricity fault in a closed loop driven induction motor by using the angular domain order tracking analysis method. Mech Syst Signal Process 34:173–182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2012.04.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  109. Yahia K, Cardoso AJM, Ghoggal A, Zouzou SE (2013) Induction motors airgap-eccentricity detection through the discrete wavelet transform of the apparent power signal under non-stationary operating conditions. ISA Trans. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isatra.2013.12.002i

    Article  Google Scholar 

  110. Siddiqui KM, Sahay K, Giri VK, Gothwal N (2016) Diagnosis of airgap eccentricity fault in the inverter driven induction motor drives by transformative techniques. Perspect Sci 8:127–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pisc.2016.04.014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  111. Hegde V, Maruthi GS (2012) Experimental investigation on detection of air gap eccentricity in induction motors by current and vibration signature analysis using non-invasive sensors. Energy Procedia 14(2012):1047–1052. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2011.12.1053, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2011.12.887

  112. Salem SB, Bacha K, Chaari A (2012) Support vector machine based decision for mechanical fault condition monitoring in induction motor using an advanced Hilbert–Park transform. ISA Trans 51:566–572

    Google Scholar 

  113. Tran VT, AlThobiani F, Ball A, Choi B-K (2013) An application to transient current signal based induction motor fault diagnosis of Fourier-Bessel expansion and simplified fuzzy ARTMAP. Expert Syst Appl 40:5372–5384. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2013.03.040

    Article  Google Scholar 

  114. Esfahani ET, Wang S, Sundararajan V (2013) Multisensor wireless system for eccentricity and bearing fault detection in induction motors. IEEE ASME Trans Mechatron 19:818–826

    Google Scholar 

  115. Pons-Llinares J, Antonino-Daviu J, Roger-Folch J, Moríñigo-Sotelo D, Duque-Pérez O (2014) Mixed eccentricity diagnosis in inverter-fed induction motors via the adaptive slope transform of transient stator currents. Mech Syst Signal Process 48:423–435. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2014.02.012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  116. Zhou Z, Zhao J, Cao F (2014) A novel approach for fault diagnosis of induction motor with invariant character vectors. Inf Sci 281:496–506

    Google Scholar 

  117. Oumaamar MEK, Maouche Y, Boucherma M, Khezzar A (2017) Static air-gap eccentricity fault diagnosis using rotor slot harmonics in line neutral voltage of three-phase squirrel cage induction motor. Mech Syst Signal Process 84:584–597. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2016.07.016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  118. Mirzaeva G, Saad KI (2018) Advanced diagnosis of stator turn-to-turn faults and static eccentricity in induction motors based on internal flux measurement. IEEE Trans Ind Appl 54:3961–3970

    Google Scholar 

  119. Bouchareb I, Lebaroud A, Cardoso A, Lee SB (2019) Towards advanced diagnosis recognition for eccentricities faults: application on induction motor. In: 2019 IEEE 12th international symposium on diagnostics for electrical machines, power electronics and drives (SDEMPED), 2019. IEEE, pp 271–282

  120. Bagheri A, Ojaghi M, Bagheri A (2020) Air-gap eccentricity fault diagnosis and estimation in induction motors using unscented Kalman filter. Int Trans Electr Energ Syst 30:e12450. https://doi.org/10.1002/2050-7038.12450

    Article  Google Scholar 

  121. Halem N, Zouzou S, Srairi K, Guedidi S, Abbood F (2013) Static eccentricity fault diagnosis using the signatures analysis of stator current and air gap magnetic flux by finite element method in saturated induction motors. Int J Syst Assur Eng Manag 4:118–128

    Google Scholar 

  122. Devarajan G, Chinnusamy M, Kaliappan L (2020) Detection and classification of mechanical faults of three phase induction motor via pixels analysis of thermal image and adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system. J Ambient Intell Humaniz Comput. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12652-020-01857-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  123. Ghate VN, Dudul SV (2010) Optimal MLP neural network classifier for fault detection of three phase induction motor. Expert Syst Appl 37:3468–3481. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2009.10.041

    Article  Google Scholar 

  124. D’Angelo MFSV, Palhares RM, Takahashi RHC, Loschi RH, Baccarini LMR, Caminhas WM (2011) Incipient fault detection in induction machine stator-winding using a fuzzy-Bayesian change point detection approach. Appl Soft Comput 11:179–192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2009.11.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  125. Ukil A, Chen S, Andenna A (2011) Detection of stator short circuit faults in three-phase induction motors using motor current zero crossing instants. Electr Power Syst Res 81:1036–1044. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsr.2010.12.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  126. Lashkari N, JPn, Hamid Fekri Azgomi, (2015) Simulative and experimental investigation on stator winding turn and unbalanced supply voltage fault diagnosis in induction motors using artificial neural networks. ISA Trans 59:334–342. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isatra.2015.08.001i

    Article  Google Scholar 

  127. Godoy WF, da Silva IN, Goedtel A, Cunha Palácios RH (2015) Evaluation of stator winding faults severity in inverter-fed induction motors. Appl Soft Comput 32:420–431. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2015.03.053

    Article  Google Scholar 

  128. Glowacz A, Glowacz Z (2017) Diagnosis of stator faults of the single-phase induction motor using acoustic signals. Appl Acoust 117:20–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apacoust.2016.10.012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  129. Zaparoli IO, Rabelo Baccarini LM, Lamim Filho PCM, Batista FB (2020) Transient envelope current analysis for inter-turn short-circuit detection in induction motor stator. J Braz Soc Mech Sci Eng. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40430-020-2188-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  130. Bossio GR, De Angelo CH, de la Barrera PM, Solsona JA, García GO, Valla MI (2011) Stator winding fault detection in induction motor drives using signal injection. In: 8th IEEE symposium on diagnostics for electrical machines, power electronics & drives, Bologna, 2011, pp 92–97. https://doi.org/10.1109/DEMPED.2011.6063607

  131. Martins JF, Pires VF, Amaral T (2011) Induction motor fault detection and diagnosis using a current state space pattern recognition. Pattern Recognit Lett 32:321–328. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patrec.2010.09.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  132. Ergin S, Uzuntas A, Gulmezoglu MB (2012) Detection of stator, bearing and rotor faults in induction motors. Procedia Eng 30:1103–1109

    Google Scholar 

  133. Seera M, Lim CP (2013) Online motor fault detection and diagnosis using a hybrid FMM-CART model. IEEE Trans Neural Netw Learn Syst 25:806–812

    Google Scholar 

  134. Wolkiewicz M, Kowalski CT (2013) On-line neural network-based stator fault diagnosis system of the converter-fed induction motor drive. In: IECON 2013—39th annual conference of the ieee industrial electronics society, Vienna, 2013, pp 5561–5566. https://doi.org/10.1109/IECON.2013.6700044

  135. Konar P, Chattopadhyay P (2015) Multi-class fault diagnosis of induction motor using Hilbert and Wavelet transform. Appl Soft Comput 30:341–352

    Google Scholar 

  136. Glowacz A, Glowacz Z (2016) Diagnostics of stator faults of the single-phase induction motor using thermal images, MoASoS and selected classifiers. Measurement 93:86–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2016.07.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  137. Bazan GH, Scalassara PR, Endo W, Goedtel A, Godoy WF, Palácios RHC (2017) Stator fault analysis of three-phase induction motors using information measures and artificial neural networks. Electr Power Syst Res 143:347–356. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsr.2016.09.031

    Article  Google Scholar 

  138. Maraaba L, Al-Hamouz Z, Abido M (2018) An efficient stator inter-turn fault diagnosis tool for induction motors. Energies 11:653. https://doi.org/10.3390/en11030653

    Article  Google Scholar 

  139. Rajeswaran N, Swarupa ML, Rao TS, Chetaswi K (2018) Hybrid artificial intelligence based fault diagnosis of svpwm voltage source inverters for induction motor. Mater Today Proc 5:565–571

    Google Scholar 

  140. Akhil Vinayak B, Anjali Anand K, Jagadanand G (2020) Wavelet-based real-time stator fault detection of inverter-fed induction motor. IET Electr Power Appl 14:82–90. https://doi.org/10.1049/iet-epa.2019.0273

    Article  Google Scholar 

  141. Gangsar P, Tiwari R (2019) Diagnostics of mechanical and electrical faults in induction motors using wavelet-based features of vibration and current through support vector machine algorithms for various operating conditions. J Braz Soc Mech Sci Eng 41:71

    Google Scholar 

  142. Skowron M, Orlowska-Kowalska T, Wolkiewicz M, Kowalski CT (2020) Convolutional neural network-based stator current data-driven incipient stator fault diagnosis of inverter-fed induction motor. Energies 13:1475. https://doi.org/10.3390/en13061475

    Article  Google Scholar 

  143. Lamim Filho P, Pederiva R, Brito J (2014) Detection of stator winding faults in induction machines using flux and vibration analysis. Mech Syst Signal Process 42:377–387

    Google Scholar 

  144. Frosini L, Borin A, Girometta L, Venchi G (2012) A novel approach to detect short circuits in low voltage induction motor by stray flux measurement. In: 2012 XXth international conference on electrical machines, 2012. IEEE, pp 1538–1544

  145. Krishna MSR, Ravi KS (2013) Fault diagnosis of induction motor using motor current signature analysis. In: 2013 international conference on circuits, power and computing technologies (ICCPCT), 2013. IEEE, pp 180–186

  146. Messaoudi M, Sbita L (2010) Multiple faults diagnosis in induction motor using the MCSA method. Int J Signal Image Process 1:190–195

    Google Scholar 

  147. Gaeid KS, Ping HW, Khalid M, Salih AL (2011) Fault diagnosis of induction motor using MCSA and FFT. Electr Electron Eng 1:85–92

    Google Scholar 

  148. Kathiravan M, Prakasam K (2014) Motor current signature analysis based fault diagnosis of induction motor. Int J Power Control Comput (IJPCSC) 6:56–62

    Google Scholar 

  149. Braut S, Zigulic R, Stimac G, Skoblar A (2015) Light rotor–stator partial rub characterization using instantaneous angular speed measurement. Vibration engineering and technology of machinery. Springer, Berlin, pp 673–682

    Google Scholar 

  150. Spagnol M, Bregant L, Boscarol A (2014) Electrical induction motor higher harmonics analysis based on instantaneous angular speed measurement. In: International conference on condition monitoring of machinery in non-stationary operation, 2014. Springer, pp 27–41

  151. Eftekhari M, Moallem M, Sadri S, Hsieh M-F (2013) A novel indicator of stator winding inter-turn fault in induction motor using infrared thermal imaging. Infrared Phys Technol 61:330–336

    Google Scholar 

  152. Salem SB, Bacha K, Chaari A (2012) Support vector machine-based decision for induction motor fault diagnosis using air-gap torque frequency response. Int J Comput Appl 38

  153. Cabal-Yepez E, Valtierra-Rodriguez M, Romero-Troncoso RJ, Garcia-Perez A, Osornio-Rios RA, Miranda-Vidales H, Alvarez-Salas R (2012) FPGA-based entropy neural processor for online detection of multiple combined faults on induction motors. Mech Syst Signal Process 30:123–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2012.01.021

    Article  Google Scholar 

  154. Kumar HS, Pai PS, Sriram NS, Vijay GS (2013) ANN based evaluation of performance of wavelet transform for condition monitoring of rolling element bearing. Procedia Eng 64:805–814. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2013.09.156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  155. Jawadekar A, Paraskar S, Jadhav S, Dhole G (2014) Artificial neural network-based induction motor fault classifier using continuous wavelet transform. Syst Sci Control Eng 2:684–690. https://doi.org/10.1080/21642583.2014.956266

    Article  Google Scholar 

  156. Kateris D, Moshou D, Pantazi X-E, Gravalos I, Sawalhi N, Loutridis S (2014) A machine learning approach for the condition monitoring of rotating machinery. J Mech Sci Technol 28:61–71. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12206-013-1102-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  157. Bhowmik P, Pradhan S, Prakash M, Roy S (2013) Investigation of wavelets and radial basis function neural network for incipient fault diagnosis in induction motors. In: 2013 International conference on circuits, controls and communications (CCUBE), 2013. IEEE, pp 1–5

  158. Önel IY, Dalci KB, Senol I (2006) Detection of bearing defects in three-phase induction motors using Park’s transform and radial basis function neural networks. Sadhana 31:235–244

    Google Scholar 

  159. Zhang K, Li Y, Scarf P, Ball A (2011) Feature selection for high-dimensional machinery fault diagnosis data using multiple models and radial basis function networks. Neurocomputing 74:2941–2952

    Google Scholar 

  160. Liu H, Zhou J, Zheng Y, Jiang W, Zhang Y (2018) Fault diagnosis of rolling bearings with recurrent neural network-based autoencoders. ISA Trans 77:167–178

    Google Scholar 

  161. Bayir R (2008) Condition monitoring and fault diagnosis of serial wound starter motor with learning vector quantization network. J Appl Sci 8:3148–3156

    Google Scholar 

  162. Kumar G, Sharma S, Malik H (2016) Learning vector quantization neural network based external fault diagnosis model for three phase induction motor using current signature analysis. Procedia Comput Sci 93:1010–1016

    Google Scholar 

  163. Marzi H (2004) Real-time fault detection and isolation in industrial machines using learning vector quantization. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part B J Eng Manuf 218:949–959

    Google Scholar 

  164. Bossio JM, De Angelo CH, Bossio GR, García GO (2010) Fault diagnosis on induction motors using Self-Organizing Maps. In: 2010 9th IEEE/IAS international conference on industry applications-INDUSCON 2010, 2010. IEEE, pp 1–6

  165. Saucedo-Dorantes JJ, Delgado-Prieto M, Romero-Troncoso RDJ, Osornio-Rios RA (2019) Multiple-fault detection and identification scheme based on hierarchical self-organizing maps applied to an electric machine. Appl Soft Comput 81:105497

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  166. Cho HC, Knowles J, Fadali MS, Lee KS (2009) Fault detection and isolation of induction motors using recurrent neural networks and dynamic Bayesian modeling. IEEE Trans Control Syst Technol 18:430–437

    Google Scholar 

  167. Xuhong W, Yigang H (2005) Diagonal recurrent neural network based on-line stator winding turn fault detection for induction motors. In: 2005 international conference on electrical machines and systems, 2005. IEEE, pp 2266–2269

  168. Eren L, Ince T, Kiranyaz S (2019) A generic intelligent bearing fault diagnosis system using compact adaptive 1D CNN classifier. J Signal Process Syst 91:179–189

    Google Scholar 

  169. Hoang D-T, Kang H-J (2019) Rolling element bearing fault diagnosis using convolutional neural network and vibration image. Cognit Syst Res 53:42–50

    Google Scholar 

  170. Pan H, He X, Tang S, Meng F (2018) An improved bearing fault diagnosis method using one-dimensional CNN and LSTM. J Mech Eng 64:443–452

    Google Scholar 

  171. Eren L (2017) Bearing fault detection by one-dimensional convolutional neural networks. Math Probl Eng 2017:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/8617315

    Article  Google Scholar 

  172. Tra V, Kim J, Khan SA, Kim JM (2017) Bearing fault diagnosis under variable speed using convolutional neural networks and the stochastic diagonal Levenberg–Marquardt algorithm. Sensors. https://doi.org/10.3390/s17122834

    Article  Google Scholar 

  173. Xia M, Li T, Xu L, Liu L, De Silva CW (2017) Fault diagnosis for rotating machinery using multiple sensors and convolutional neural networks. IEEE/ASME Trans Mechatron 23:101–110

    Google Scholar 

  174. Vapnik V (1995) The nature of statistical learning theory. Springer, New York, p 189

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  175. Bafitlhile TM, Li Z (2019) Applicability of ε-support vector machine and artificial neural network for flood forecasting in humid, semi-humid and semi-arid basins in China. Water 11:85

    Google Scholar 

  176. Zhiwei L, Minfen S (2007) Classification of mental task EEG signals using wavelet packet entropy and SVM. In: 2007 8th international conference on electronic measurement and instruments, 2007. IEEE, pp 3-906-903-909

  177. Gopi AP, Jyothi RNS, Narayana VL, Sandeep KS (2020) Classification of tweets data based on polarity using improved RBF kernel of SVM. Int J Inf Technol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41870-019-00409-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  178. Pratyay Konar PC (2015) Multi-class fault diagnosis of induction motor using Hilbert and wavelet transform. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2014.11.062

  179. Sugumaran V, Ramachandran K (2011) Effect of number of features on classification of roller bearing faults using SVM and PSVM. Expert Syst Appl 38:4088–4096

    Google Scholar 

  180. Banerjee TP, Das S (2012) Multi-sensor data fusion using support vector machine for motor fault detection. Inf Sci 217:96–107

    Google Scholar 

  181. Keskes H, Braham A, Lachiri Z (2013) Broken rotor bar diagnosis in induction machines through stationary wavelet packet transform and multiclass wavelet SVM. Electr Power Syst Res. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsr.2012.12.013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  182. Lim G-M, Bae D-M, Kim J-H (2014) Fault diagnosis of rotating machine by thermography method on support vector machine. J Mech Sci Technol 28:2947–2952

    Google Scholar 

  183. Gangsar P, Tiwari R (2019) Diagnostics of mechanical and electrical faults in induction motors using wavelet-based features of vibration and current through support vector machine algorithms for various operating conditions. J Braz Soc Mech Sci Eng. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40430-019-1574-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  184. Ziani R, Felkaoui A, Zegadi R (2014) Bearing fault diagnosis using multiclass support vector machines with binary particle swarm optimization and regularized Fisher’s criterion. J Intell Manuf. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-014-0987-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  185. Singh M, Shaik AG (2019) Faulty bearing detection, classification and location in a three phase induction motor based on stockwell transform and support vector machine. Measurement 131:524–533. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2018.09.013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  186. Garcés MA, Orosco LL (2008) EEG signal processing in brain–computer interface. Smart wheelchairs and brain-computer interfaces. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 95–110

    Google Scholar 

  187. Aydin I, Karakose M, Akin E (2014) An approach for automated fault diagnosis based on a fuzzy decision tree and boundary analysis of a reconstructed phase space. ISA Trans 53:220–229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isatra.2013.11.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  188. Berredjem T, Benidir M (2018) Bearing faults diagnosis using fuzzy expert system relying on an Improved Range Overlaps and Similarity method. Expert Syst Appl 108:134–142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2018.04.025

    Article  Google Scholar 

  189. Mayadevi N, Mini VP, Hari Kumar R, Prins S (2019) Fuzzy-based intelligent algorithm for diagnosis of drive faults in induction motor drive system. Arab J Sci Eng 45:1385–1395. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-019-03935-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  190. Romero-Troncoso RJ (2011) FPGA-based online detection of multiple combined faults in induction motors through information entropy and fuzzy inference. IEEE Trans Ind Electron 58:5263–5270

    Google Scholar 

  191. Xu B, Sun L, Xu L, Xu G (2013) Improvement of the Hilbert method via ESPRIT for detecting rotor fault in induction motors at low slip. IEEE Trans Energy Convers 28:225–233

    Google Scholar 

  192. Jiang X, Yi Z, Lv JC (2006) Fuzzy SVM with a new fuzzy membership function. Neural Comput Appl 15:268–276

    Google Scholar 

  193. Bayram D, Şeker S (2014) Anfis model for vibration signals based on aging process in electric motors. Soft Comput 19:1107–1114. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-014-1326-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  194. Ertunc HM, Ocak H, Aliustaoglu C (2013) ANN-and ANFIS-based multi-staged decision algorithm for the detection and diagnosis of bearing faults. Neural Comput Appl 22:435–446

    Google Scholar 

  195. Salahshoor K, Kordestani M, Khoshro MS (2010) Fault detection and diagnosis of an industrial steam turbine using fusion of SVM (support vector machine) and ANFIS (adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system) classifiers. Energy 35:5472–5482. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2010.06.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  196. Ballal MS, Khan ZJ, Suryawanshi HM, Sonolikar RL (2007) Adaptive neural fuzzy inference system for the detection of inter-turn insulation and bearing wear faults in induction motor. IEEE Trans Industr Electron 54:250–258

    Google Scholar 

  197. Lee H-H, Nguyen N-T, Kwon J-M (2007) Bearing fault diagnosis using fuzzy inference optimized by neural network and genetic algorithm. J Electr Eng Technol 2:353–357

    Google Scholar 

  198. Gnanaprakasam C, Chitra K (2015) S-transform and ANFIS for detecting and classifying the vibration signals of induction motor. J Intell Fuzzy Syst 29:2073–2085

    Google Scholar 

  199. Jirdehi MA, Rezaei A (2016) Parameters estimation of squirrel-cage induction motors using ANN and ANFIS. Alexandria Eng J 55:357–368

    Google Scholar 

  200. Vatankhah M, Asadpour V, Fazel-Rezai R (2013) Perceptual pain classification using ANFIS adapted RBF kernel support vector machine for therapeutic usage. Appl Soft Comput 13:2537–2546

    Google Scholar 

  201. (2004)Bearing fault detection using artificial neural networks and genetic algorithm. EURASIP J Appl Signal Process 3:366–377

  202. Toma RN, Prosvirin AE, Kim J-M (2020) Bearing fault diagnosis of induction motors using a genetic algorithm and machine learning classifiers. Sensors 20:1884

    Google Scholar 

  203. Lu L, Yan J, de Silva CW (2015) Dominant feature selection for the fault diagnosis of rotary machines using modified genetic algorithm and empirical mode decomposition. J Sound Vib 344:464–483. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2015.01.037

    Article  Google Scholar 

  204. Du J, Alhajj R, Barker K (2006) Genetic algorithms based approach to database vertical partition. J Intell Inf Syst 26:167–183

    Google Scholar 

  205. Bhattacharjya RK (2012) Introduction to genetic algorithms. Guwahati, IIT Guwahati, p 12

    Google Scholar 

  206. Ettefagh MM, Ghaemi M, Asr MY (2014) Bearing fault diagnosis using hybrid genetic algorithm K-means clustering. In: 2014 IEEE international symposium on innovations in intelligent systems and applications (INISTA) proceedings, 2014. IEEE, pp 84–89

  207. Zhu X, Xiong J, Liang Q (2018) Fault diagnosis of rotation machinery based on support vector machine optimized by quantum genetic algorithm. IEEE Access 6:33583–33588

    Google Scholar 

  208. Al Tobi MAS, Bevan G, Wallace P, Harrison D, Ramachandran K (2016) A review on applications of genetic algorithm for artificial neural network. Int J Adv Comput Eng Netw 4:50–54

    Google Scholar 

  209. Yang X-S (2014) Chapter 2-analysis of algorithms. Nature-inspired optimization algorithms. Elsevier, Oxford, pp 23–44

    Google Scholar 

  210. Yang X-S (2014) Nature-inspired optimization algorithms. Elsevier, Amsterdam

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  211. Akin B (2017) Electric implementation of fault diagnosis in hybrid vehicles based on reference frame theory. Electric machines: modeling, condition monitoring, and fault diagnosis p 221

  212. Kunthong J, Sapaklom T, Konghirun M, Prapanavarat C, Ayudhya PNN, Mujjalinvimut E, Boonjeed S (2017) IoT-based traction motor drive condition monitoring in electric vehicles: part 1. In: 2017 IEEE 12th international conference on power electronics and drive systems (PEDS), 2017. IEEE, pp 1184–181188

  213. Watkins K, Wong C (2012) Use of conductive composite sensors for improved condition monitoring of electric vehicle motor insulation systems. In: 2012 IEEE international electric vehicle conference, 2012. IEEE, pp 1–4

  214. Lashkari N, Poshtan J (2015) Detection and discrimination of stator interturn fault and unbalanced supply voltage fault in induction motor using neural network. In: The 6th power electronics, drive systems & technologies conference (PEDSTC2015). IEEE, Tehran, Iran. https://doi.org/10.1109/PEDSTC.2015.7093287

Download references

Acknowledgements

The author would like to thank the Department of Mechanical Engineering, Visvesvaraya National Institute of Technology, Nagpur for extending the facilities for this review.

Funding

This research did not receive any specific Grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Mechanical Engineering, Visvesvaraya National Institute of Technology, Nagpur, 440010, Maharashtra, India

    Swapnil K. Gundewar & Prasad V. Kane

Authors
  1. Swapnil K. Gundewar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Prasad V. Kane
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Swapnil K. Gundewar.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The author declares that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gundewar, S.K., Kane, P.V. Condition Monitoring and Fault Diagnosis of Induction Motor. J. Vib. Eng. Technol. 9, 643–674 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42417-020-00253-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42417-020-00253-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation