Skip to main content
Log in

Mitigation of Vibrations in Rail Tunnels from the Injection of a New Mortar Composed of Recycled Tire Rubber in the Space Formed by Segments and Excavated Land

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Vibration Engineering & Technologies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Excessive vibrations induced by trains and amplified or propagated through the ground can affect sensitive areas such as hospitals, residences, or telecommunication buildings. However, it has been found that the control of these vibrations can be improved by including materials with a high level of damping between the adjacent ground and the tunnel structure.

Review factor

In this study, the behavior of a new type of mortar called C-COM has been characterized through finite element simulations, and its effectiveness on mitigating vibrations in a tunnel is determined.

Conclusions

Five parameters have been proposed to compare the response obtained with the new mortar and the one corresponding to a model with conventional materials. It was found that, using the C-COM mortar, vibration levels can be reduced by 10–20%.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Yang Y-B, Hung HH (2009) Wave propagation for train-induced vibrations: a finite/infinite element approach. World Scientific, Singapore

    Book  Google Scholar 

  2. Yang J et al (2019) Prediction and mitigation of train-induced vibrations of large-scale building constructed on subway tunnel. Sci Total Environ 668:485–499

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Forrest JA, Hunt HEM (2006) A three-dimensional tunnel model for calculation of train-induced ground vibration. J Sound Vib 294(4–5):678–705

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Ma M, Markine V, Liu W, Yuan Y, Zhang F (2011) Metro train-induced vibrations on historic buildings in Chengdu, China. J Zhejiang Univ A 12(10):782–793

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Zou C, Wang Y, Moore JA, Sanayei M (2017) Train-induced field vibration measurements of ground and over-track buildings. Sci Total Environ 575:1339–1351

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Eitzenberger A (2008) Train-induced vibrations in tunnels: a review. Luleåtekniska universitet. https://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:996052/FULLTEXT01.pdf

  7. Rosell EC, Herraiz JR, Llario FR, Canales C, Palomo ML, Bru AS (2020) Development of a flexible grout (C-COM) for precast concrete structural support filling in tunnel boring machine excavations. In: 8th international conference of the Spanish association for structural engineering (ACHE), pp 1–7

  8. Najim KB, Hall MR (2012) Mechanical and dynamic properties of self-compacting crumb rubber modified concrete. Constr Build Mater 27(1):521–530

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Li Z, Li F, Li JSL (1998) Properties of concrete incorporating rubber tyre particles. Mag Concr Res 50(4):297–304

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Güneyisi E, Gesouglu M, Özturan T (2004) Properties of rubberized concretes containing silica fume. Cem Concr Res 34(12):2309–2317

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Turatsinze A, Bonnet S, Granju J-L (2007) Potential of rubber aggregates to modify properties of cement based-mortars: improvement in cracking shrinkage resistance. Constr Build Mater 21(1):176–181

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Eldin NN, Senouci AB (1993) Observations on rubberized concrete behavior. Cem Concr Aggregates 15(1):74–84

    Google Scholar 

  13. Avcular N et al (1997) Analysis of rubberized concrete as a composite material. Cem Concr Res 27(8):1135–1139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Eldin NN, Senouci AB (1993) Rubber-tire particles as concrete aggregate. J Mater Civ Eng 5(4):478–496

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Toutanji HA (1996) The use of rubber tire particles in concrete to replace mineral aggregates. Cem Concr Compos 18(2):135–139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Ghaly AM, Cahill JD IV (2005) Correlation of strength, rubber content, and water to cement ratio in rubberized concrete. Can J Civ Eng 32(6):1075–1081

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Gardien W, Stuit HG (2003) Modelling of soil vibrations from railway tunnels. J Sound Vib 267(3):605–619

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Liu J, Li B (2005) A unified viscous-spring artificial boundary for 3-D static and dynamic applications. Sci China Ser E Eng Mater Sci 48(5):570–584

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. de Fomento M (1999) Recomendaciones para el proyecto de plataformas ferroviarias. In: Servicio de Publicaciones del Ministerio de Fomento. Spanish Ministry of Development Madrid

  20. Labrado-Palomo M, Roca-Barceló F, Ribes-Llario F, Real-Herráiz J (2018) Effect of vehicle speed on the dynamics of track transitions. J Vib Control 24(21):5118–5128

    Google Scholar 

  21. Yang LA, Powrie W, Priest JA (2009) Dynamic stress analysis of a ballasted railway track bed during train passage. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 135(5):680–689

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Jenkins HH, Stephenson JE, Clayton GA, Morland GW, Lyon D (1974) The effect of track and vehicle parameters on wheel/rail vertical dynamic forces. Railw Eng J 3:1

    Google Scholar 

  23. Lei X (2017) High speed railway track dynamics. Springer, Berlin

    Book  Google Scholar 

  24. Melis M (2008) Apuntes de introducción a la dinámica vertical de la vía y a las señales digitales en ferrocarriles. In: Univ. Politécnica Madrid—Cátedra Ferrocarriles, Madrid, p 797

  25. Arias A (1970) A measure of earthquake intensity. In: Seismic design for nuclear power plants, pp 438–483

  26. Bradley BA (2015) Correlation of arias intensity with amplitude, duration and cumulative intensity measures. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 78:89–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Greer R, Manning C (1998) Vibration isolation for railways. Acoust Bull 23:13–17

    Google Scholar 

  28. Heckl M, Hauck G, Wettschureck R (1996) Structure-borne sound and vibration from rail traffic. J Sound Vib 193(1):175–184

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ernesto Alejandro Colomer Rosell.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Colomer Rosell, E.A., Alcañiz Martínez, J.H., Femenía Quiles, R. et al. Mitigation of Vibrations in Rail Tunnels from the Injection of a New Mortar Composed of Recycled Tire Rubber in the Space Formed by Segments and Excavated Land. J. Vib. Eng. Technol. 9, 469–476 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42417-020-00240-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42417-020-00240-3

Keywords

Navigation