Skip to main content
Log in

Rural Foundation Collaboration: “Houston we have a problem”

  • Original Research Article
  • Published:
International Journal of Community Well-Being Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Rural communities throughout the United States are alarmingly challenged by deteriorating landscapes, ravished economies, declining populations, and gentrifying populations in the face of unfair and disproportionately lower support from government and philanthropy compared to urban areas. Rural communities have many big city problems but small-town resources for addressing them. Institutional philanthropy may represent a significant new option for meaningfully addressing rural challenges. Though it appears foundations are largely absent from rural America and, when present, often struggle in developing strategies appropriate for rural contexts. Further, rural needs often require resources of multiple foundations, but many foundations are ineffective in collaborating with other funders. This study of rural practices involving grant making and collaboration between funders examined experiences and approaches employed by representatives of 54 foundations (national, regional, and local place-based). Participants from 31 states and the District of Columbia contributed valuable insights. Findings from this research offer important insights that, if properly addressed, could significantly improve efforts at rural philanthropy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Austin, J., & Seitanidi, M. (2012). Collaborative value creation: A review of partnering between nonprofits and businesses: Part 1. Value creation spectrum and collaboration stages. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 41, 726–758.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bailey, C., Jensen, L., & Ransom, E. (2014). Rural America in a globalizing world: Problems and prospects for the 2010s. Morgantown: West Virginia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Belanger, K., & Stone, W. (2008). The social service divide: Service availability and accessibility in rural versus urban counties and impact on child welfare outcomes. Child Welfare, 87(4), 101–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bresnen, M. (2007). Deconstructing partnering in project-based organization: Seven pillars, seven paradoxes and seven deadly sins. International Journal of Project Management, 25, 365–374.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bresnen, M., & Marshall, N. (2001). The engineering or evolution of co-operation? A tale of two partnering projects. International Journal of Project Management, 20, 497–505.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burton, L., Lichter, D., Baker, R., & Eason, J. (2013). Inequality, family processes, and rural health in the “new” rural America. American Behavioral Sciences, 57(2013), 1128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cavaye, J. (2001). Rural community development: New challenges and enduring dilemmas. The Journal of Regional Policy Analysis, 31(2), 109–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chan, J. (2008). An integrated architecture for enterprise relationship management. Communications of the IIMA, 8(2), 55–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Creswell, J., & Miller, D. (2010). Determining validity in qualitative inquiry. Theory into Practice, 39(3), 124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Darling, M., Sparkes, H., Smith, J., & Stiles, J. (2016). Emergent learning: A framework for whole-system strategy, learning, and adaptation. Foundation Review, 8(1), 8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Beer, F., & Marais, M. (2005). Rural communities, the natural environment and development: Some challenges, some successes. Community Development Journal, 40, 50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drees, J. (2013). Synthesizing and extending resource dependency theory: A meta-analysis. Journal of Management, 39(6), 1666–1698.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dyer, J., & Hatch, N. (2006). Relation-specific capabilities and barriers to knowledge transfers: Creating advantage through network relationships. Strategic Management Journal, 27, 701–719.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dyer, J. D., & Singh, H. (1998). The relational view: Cooperative strategy and sources of interorganizational competitive advantage. Academy of Management Review, 23(4), 660–679.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Easterling, D., & McDuffee, L. (2019). How can foundations promote impactful collaboration? The Foundation Review, 11(3), 23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fluharty, C. (2004). Assessing the state of rural governance in the United States. Proceedings – rural conferences, 29–47. https://www.kansascityfed.org/PUBLICAT/NewGovernance04/Fluharty04.pdf

  • Gil-Saura, I., Frasquet-Deltoro, M., & Cervera-Taulet, A. (2009). The value of B2B relationships. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 109(5), 593–609.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gioia, D., Corley, K., & Hamilton, A. (2012). Seeking qualitative rigor in inductive research: Notes on the Gioia methodology. Organizational Research Methods, 16(1), 15–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gosnell, H., & Abrams, J. (2009). Amenity migration: Diverse conceptualizations of drivers, socioeconomic dimensions, and emerging challenges. GeoJournal, 76, 303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, L., Hamilton, L., Duncan, C., & Colocousis, C. (2008). Place matters: Challenges and opportunities in four rural Americas. Reports on Rural America, 1(4). Durham: Carsey Institute.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hay, I., & Muller, S. (2013). Questioning generosity in the golden age of philanthropy: Towards critical geographies of super-philanthropy. Progress in Human Geography, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132513500893

  • Herrera, M., & Hoelting, J. (2010). To establish an effective community spirit: A land grant extension and deliberative dialogue. New Directions for Higher Education, 2010(152), 43–50. https://doi.org/10.1002/he.411.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kale, P., & Singh, H. (2009). Managing strategic alliances: What do we know now, and where do we go from here? Academy of Management, 23(3), 45–62. https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2009.43479263

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kale, P., Dyer, J., & Singh, H. (2001). Value creation and success in strategic alliance: Alliancing skills and the role of alliance structure and systems. European Management Journal, 19(5), 463–471.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kallman, M., Clark, T., Wu, C., & Lin, J. (2016). In the third sector: Community organizations, NGOs, and nonprofits (pp. 1–VI). Urbana: University of Illinois Press Retrieved August 3, 2020, from www.jstor.org/stable/10.5406/j.ctt1hd18tn.1.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kania, J., Kramer, M., & Russell, P. (2014). Strategic philanthropy for a complex world. Stanford Social Innovation Review, 12, 26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koranyi, F., & Kolleck, N. (2018). Roles of local foundations in German community-based initiatives: Devolving criticism of philanthropy to the local? EPAA, 26, 139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kwon, S. W., & Feiock, R. (2012). The roles of regional organizations for interlocal resource exchange: Complement or substitute. The American Review of Public Administration, 44(3), 339–357. https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074012465488.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lamkin, M. (2006). Challenges and changes faced by rural superintendents. The Rural Educator, 28(1), 17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lobao, L., & Kraybill, D. (2005). The emerging roles of county governments in metropolitan and nonmetropolitan areas: Findings from a national survey. Economic Development Quarterly, 19(3), 245–259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCoy, D., Kembhavi, G., Patel, J., & Luintel, A. (2009). The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation’s grant-making programme for global health. Lancet, 373(9675), 1645–1653.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McDonald, F., & Simpson, C. (2013). Challenges for rural communities in recruiting and retaining physicians. Canadian Family Physician, 59, 915–917.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKenzie, F. (2010). Fly-in fly-out: The challenges of transient populations in rural landscapes. In: Demographic change in Australia’s rural landscapes. 12. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-9654-8_15

  • Meier, D., & Beresford, L. (2008). Outpatient clinics are a new frontier for palliative care. Journal of Palliative Medicine, 11(6), 823–828. https://doi.org/10.1089/jpm.2008.9886.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Millensen, J. (2015). Understanding collective impact in a rural funding collaborative: Collective grantmaking in Appalachian Ohio. The Foundation Review, 7(4).

  • Monk, D. (2007). Recruiting and retaining high quality teachers in rural areas. Excelling in the Classroom, 17(1), 155–174.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murdoch, J., Garrigan, B., Lavin-Loucks, D. Murdoch III, J., Hess, L., & Thilbos, M. (2007). The place-based strategic philanthropic model. Published by the Center for Urban Economics. https://www.socalgrantmakers.org/sites/default/files/resources/Place-based.Philanthropy.Brief_.pdf

  • Neighborhood Funders Group Special Report (2010). A sense of place. https://www.mayorsinnovation.org/images/uploads/pdf/3ASenseofPlace.pdf.

  • Norris-Tirrell, D., Blassett, B., & Connolly Knox, C. (2014). Peeking behind the curtain: The operations and funding priorities of rural private foundations. The Foundation Review, 6(4), 8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Hare, W., Manning, W., Porter, M., & Lyon, H. (2009). Rural children are more likely to live in cohabitating-couple households. The Carsey School of Public Policy at the Scholars’ Repository, 75.

  • O’Hare, W., Manning, W., Porter, M., & Lyon, H. (2009). Rural children are more likely to live in cohabitating-couple households. The Carsey School of Public Policy at the Scholars’ Repository, 75. https://scholars.unh.edu/carsey/75

  • Pender, J. (2015). Foundation grants to rural areas from 2005 to 2010: Trends and patterns. Economic Research Service. USDA, Economic Information Bulletin, (141).

  • Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G. (1978). The external control of organizations. A resource dependence perspective. The Economic Journal, 89(356), 969–970.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ploetner, O., & Ehert, M. (2005). From relationships to partnerships: New forms of cooperation between buyer and seller. Industrial Marketing Management, 35, 4–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pogoy, A., & Montalbo, I. (2012). An empirical evidence of the impact of education on poverty. CNU Journal of Higher Education, ‘Special Edition of Poverty Alleviation, 1–10. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/325118785_An_Empirical_Evidence_of_the_Impact_of_Education_on_Poverty

  • Preston, J., Jakubiec, B., & Kooymans, R. (2013). Common challenges faced by rural principals: A review of the literature. The Rural Educator, 35(1), 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quin, R., Tompkins-Stange, M., & Meyerson, D. (2014). Beyond grantmaking: Philanthropic foundations as agents of change and institutional entrepreneurs. Nonprofit and Voluntary Quarterly, 43(6), 950.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reid, R. (2015). The opacity of private philanthropy (unpublished doctoral dissertation). Stillwater, Oklahoma State University.

  • Reid, R. (2018). Foundation transparency: Opacity- it’s complicated. The Foundation Review, 10(1), 77–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reid, R., Rising, E., Kaufman, A., Bassett, A., Cole McGrew, M., Silverblatt, H., & Haederle, M. (2018). The influence of a place-based foundation and a public university in growing a rural health workforce. Journal of Community Health, 44(2), 292–296. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10900-018-0585-y.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, J., & London, J. (2007). Strategies and lessons for reducing persistent rural poverty: A social-justice approach to funding rural community transformation. Journal of Community Development Society, 38(1), 92–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schorr, L. (2016). Reconsidering evidence: What it means and how we use it. Stanford Social Innovation Review, January.

  • Shenton, A. K. (2004). Strategies for ensuring trustworthiness in qualitative research projects. Education for Information, 22, 63–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sinkovics, R., & Alfoldi, E. (2012). Progressive focusing and trustworthiness in qualitative research: The enabling role of computer-assisted qualitative analysis software. Management Information Review, 52(6), 817–845.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snavely, K., & Tracy, M. (2000). Collaboration among rural nonprofit organizations. Nonprofit Management & Leadership, 11(2), 145–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sojourner, A., Brown, P., Chaskin, R., Hamilton, R., Fiester, L., & Richman, H. (2004). Moving forward while staying in place: Embedded funders and community change. Chicago: Chapin Hall Center for Children at the University of Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spoth, R. (2007). Opportunities to meet challenges in rural prevention research: Findings from an evolving community-university partnership model. Journal of Rural Health, 23, 42–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stebbins. (2001). Exploratory research in the social sciences: What is exploration (Vol. 48). Newbury Park: Sage Publications, Inc.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Strasser, R. (2003). Rural health around the world: Challenges and solutions. Family Practice, 20(4), 457–463.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. New Delhi: Sage Publications, Inc..

    Google Scholar 

  • Suvanto, H. (2011). Constructing a typology of trust in asymmetrical food business relationships. British Food Journal, 114(7), 926–943.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tandoh-Offin, P. (2010). The evolving rural and urban interdependence: Opportunities and challenges for community economic development. Journal of Geography and Regional Planning, 3(12), 339–345.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tinoco, J. (2010). Organizational power and dependence: Contradictions and implications for industry control. International Journal of Management and Innovation, 2(2), 54–67.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Robert J. Reid.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Reid, R.J., Palmer, E.A., Reid, M.R. et al. Rural Foundation Collaboration: “Houston we have a problem”. Int. Journal of Com. WB 5, 273–304 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42413-020-00089-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42413-020-00089-0

Keywords

Navigation