Skip to main content
Log in

Design Optimization and Investigation of Aerodynamic Characteristics of Low Reynolds Number Airfoils

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Journal of Aeronautical and Space Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study aims to develop a simple and efficient design optimization methodology for the low Reynolds number airfoils. XFOIL is used as an aerodynamic solver while modeFRONTIER workflow is employed for the design optimization purpose. The airfoil SG6043 is used as the reference airfoil for optimization due to its common applications when long-endurance characteristics are desired. A simple design optimization methodology with the integration of XFOIL in the modeFRONTIER workflow environment is proposed in this study. The proposed “software integration methodology” demonstrated up to 10% improvement in the optimization parameter which makes it more efficient by reducing the optimization time and steps without unnecessary user intervention which are the limitations conventionally associated with the optimization process. The optimization results are further compared with the results of the numerical simulations. The use of the transition-sensitive turbulence model allowed the evaluation of the behavior of the laminar separation bubble for different angles of attack, observing that it shifts towards the leading edge and has its length reduced as the angle of attack increases. The newly generated airfoil exhibits improved aerodynamic characteristics as compared to the base airfoil. The optimized airfoil can be used in the applications of UAVs as well as in general aviation. Further validation of the airfoil using wind tunnel testing is recommended and planned.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Mueller TJ (1985) Low Reynolds number vehicles, AGARD-AG-288

  2. Gross A, Fasel H (2010) Numerical investigation of separation for airfoils at low Reynolds number. In: 40th fluid dynamics conference and exhibit, Chicago

  3. Kessler DA, Johnson R, Corrigan AT, Qidwai S, Merril S, Thomas J (2016) Modeling low-Reynolds-number flow over rough airfoils. In: 54th AIAA aerospace sciences meeting, San Diego

  4. Drela M (1989) XFOIL: an analysis and design system for low Reynolds number airfoils. Springer, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  5. Katz J (2019) Classical and potential flow based aerodynamics - do we need them? In: AIAA Scitech 2019 Forum, San Diego

  6. Buckley HP, Zhou BY, Zingg DW (2010) Airfoil optimization using practical aerodynamic design requirements. J Aircr 47(5):1707–1719

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Tirado EM, Quagliarella D, Tognaccini R (2019) Airfoil optimization using far-field analysis of the drag force. In: AIAA Scitech 2019 forum, San Diego

  8. Ferreira CS, Barone MF, Zanon A, Kemp R, Giannattasio P (2015) Airfoil optimization for stall regulated vertical axis wind turbines. In: 33rd wind energy symposium, Kissimmee

  9. Hájek J (2009) Aerodynamic optimization of airfoils and wings using fast solver. Prague: Ph.D. Dissertation

  10. Menter FR, Langtry R, Völker S (2006) Transition modelling for general purpose CFD codes. Flow Turbul Combust 77(1–4):277–303

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Hübbe GBB (2017) Numerical and experimental analysis of a high lifting airfoil at low Reynolds number flows, Florianópolis. Master Thesis

  12. Mushynski AT, Johnson T (2017) Analysis and design of a low reynolds propeller for optimal unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) flight. In: ASME 2017 international mechanical engineering congress and exposition, Tampa

  13. Holst D, Church B, Pechlivanoglou G, Tüzüner E, Saverin J, Nayeri CN, Paschereit CO (2018) Experimental analysis of a NACA 0021 airfoil section through 180-degree angle of attack at low Reynolds numbers for use in wind turbine analysis. J Eng Gas Turbines Power 9

  14. Brandt JB, Selig MS (2011) Propeller performance data at low Reynolds numbers. In: 49th AIAA aerospace sciences meeting, Orlando

  15. Dähnert J, Lyko C, Peitsch D (2013) Transition mechanisms in laminar separated flow under simulated low pressure turbine aerofoil conditions. J Turbomach 135(1)

  16. Désert T, Moschetta J, Bézard H (2018) Numerical and experimental investigation of an airfoil design for a Martian micro rotorcraft. Int J Micro Air Veh 10(3):262–272

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Federal Aviation Administration (2019) Aerospace forecast 2019–2039

  18. Chen X, Agarwal RK (2014) Shape optimization of airfoils in transonic flow using a multi-objective genetic algorithm. J Aerosp Eng

  19. Liu Z, Dong L, Moschetta J-M, Zhao J, Yan G (2014) Optimization of nano-rotor blade airfoil using controlled elitist NSGA-II. Int J Micro Air Veh 6

  20. Maughmer MD, Somers DM (1987) The design of an airfoil for a high-altitude, long-endurance remotely piloted vehicle. In: 5th applied aerodynamics conference, Monterey

  21. Arshad A, Samarasinghe S, Ameer MAF, Urbahs A (2020) A simplified design approach for high-speed wind tunnels. Part I: table of inclination. J Mech Sci Technol 34(6):2455–2468

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Arshad A, Samarasinghe S, Kovalcuks V (2020) A simplified design approach 28 for high-speed wind tunnels. Part-I.I: optimized design of settling chamber and inlet nozzle. In: IEEE 11th international conference on mechanical and aerospace engineering (ICMAE), pp 150–154

  23. Arshad A, Andrew N, Blumbergs I (2020) Computational study of noise reduction in CFM56–5B using core nozzle chevrons. In: IEEE 11th international conference on mechanical and aerospace engineering (ICMAE), pp 162–167

  24. Selig MS, Guglielmo JJ, Broeren AP, Giguère P (1995) Summary of low-speed airfoil data, vol 1. Soartech Publications, Virginia Beach

    Google Scholar 

  25. Selig MS, Guglielmo JJ, Giguère P, Lyon CA, Ninham CP (1996) Summary of low-speed airfoil data, vol 2. Soartech Publications, Virginia Beach

    Google Scholar 

  26. Selig MS, Lyon CA, Broeren AP, Giguère P, Gopalarathnam A (1997) Summary of low-speed airfoil data, vol 3. Soartech Publications, Virginia Beach

    Google Scholar 

  27. Selig MS, Williamson GA, McGranahan BD, Broughton BA, Deters RW, Brandt JB (2012) Summary of low-speed airfoil data, vol 5

  28. ANSYS, Inc. Fluent Theory Guide, Release 19.2

  29. Aftab SMA, Rafie ASM, Razak NA, Ahmad KA (2016) Turbulence model selection for low Reynolds number flows. PLoS ONE 11(4):e0153755

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work has been supported by the European Regional Development Fund within the Activity 1.1.1.2 “Post-doctoral Research Aid” of the Specific Aid Objective 1.1.1 “To increase the research and innovative capacity of scientific institutions of Latvia and the ability to attract external financing, investing in human resources and infrastructure” of the Operational Program “Growth and Employment” (No. 1.1.1.2/VIAA/2/18/321).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ali Arshad.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Arshad, A., Rodrigues, L.B. & López, I.M. Design Optimization and Investigation of Aerodynamic Characteristics of Low Reynolds Number Airfoils. Int. J. Aeronaut. Space Sci. 22, 751–764 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42405-021-00362-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42405-021-00362-2

Keywords

Navigation