Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Comparative Study for Inspection Planning of Aircraft Structural Components

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Journal of Aeronautical and Space Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In the aircraft operation, the metallic airframes are usually exposed to the extreme loading conditions during the flights due to which the risk of failure should be assessed and held to an allowed level to prevent the associated loss. If the components are inspectable, the components should be inspected routinely so that the fatigue damage can be detected before failure, which usually requires non-destructive inspection (NDI) techniques to evaluate the damage growth during the maintenance action. There have been several methods to determine the inspection plan in the aircraft industry for this purpose. In this study, four methods: Aircraft Structural Integrity Program (ASIP), Reliability Centered Maintenance Analysis (RCMA), Modified RCMA and Stochastic Life APproach (SLAP), are selected to evaluate the performance in comparative manner for a couple of crack growth problems with the aim to help the maintenance planning engineers select their own inspection plan properly based on the performance of each method. The methods are briefly reviewed, implemented, and examined in comparison for the fatigue test data of the fastener hole specimen under an aircraft load spectrum.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14

Similar content being viewed by others

Availability of data and material

The raw data used for the comparison study is from the reference, “Gordon DE, Kirschner SB, Brubaker LE, Koepsel K, Manning SD (1986) Advanced Durability Analysis. Volume III. Fractographic Test Data. Air Force Wright Aeronautical Laboratories. TR-86–3017”.

Code availability

Not applicable.

References

  1. Iyyer N, Sarkar S, Merrill R, Phan N (2007) Aircraft life management using crack initiation and crack growth models–P-3C Aircraft experience. Int J Fatigue 29:1584–1607. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2007.03.017

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. US Department of Defense (2016) Department of Defense Standard Practice Aircraft Structural Integrity Program (ASIP). MIL-STD-1530D.

  3. Manning SD, Yang JN, Pretzer FL, Marler JE (1992) Reliability centered maintenance for metallic airframes based on a stochastic crack growth approach. In: Advances in fatigue lifetime predictive techniques. ASTM International. https://doi.org/10.1520/STP24172S

  4. Valdebenito MA, Schuëller GI (2010) Design of maintenance schedules for fatigue-prone metallic components using reliability-based optimization. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 199:2305–2318. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2010.03.028

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Pattabhiraman S, Gogu C, Kim NH, Haftka RT, Bes C (2012) Skipping unnecessary structural airframe maintenance using an on-board structural health monitoring system. Proc Inst Mech Eng O J Risk Reliab 226:549–560. https://doi.org/10.1177/1748006X12459157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Grooteman F (2008) A stochastic approach to determine lifetimes and inspection schemes for aircraft components. Int J Fatigue 30:138–149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2007.02.021

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Kim SJ, Kim HS, Choi JH (2020) Modified reliability centered maintenance analysis considering probability of detection. J Aerosp Inf Syst 17:240–247. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.I010800

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Gordon DE, Kirschner SB, Brubaker LE, Koepsel K, Manning SD (1986) Advanced durability analysis. Volume III. Fractographic test data. air force wright aeronautical laboratories. TR-86–3017.

  9. Yang JN, Manning SD (1994) Aircraft fleet maintenance based on structural reliability analysis. J Aircr 31:419–425. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.46502

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Federal Aviation Administration Advisory Circular (2011) Damage tolerance and fatigue evaluation of structure. 25.571–1D.

  11. Heida JH, Grooteman FP (1998) Airframe inspection reliability using field inspection data. Netherlands Aerospace Centre.

  12. Yang JN, Chen S (1985) Fatigue reliability of structural components under scheduled inspection and repair maintenance. In: Probabilistic methods in the mechanics of solids and structures, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp 559–568. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-82419-7_51

  13. Yang JN, Chen S (1985) Fatigue reliability of gas turbine engine components under scheduled inspection maintenance. J Aircr 22:415–422. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.45140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Manning SD, Yang JN (1986) Advanced durability analysis. Volume I. Analytical Methods. Air Force Wright Aeronautical Laboratories. TR-86–3017.

  15. Manning SD, Yang JN (1989) Advanced durability analysis. Volume II. Analytical predictions, test results and analytical correlations. Air Force Wright Aeronautical Laboratories. TR-86–3017.

Download references

Funding

Not applicable

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Aerospace and Mechanical Engineering, Korea Aerospace University, Goyang-si, 10540, Republic of Korea

    Sung Jin Kim

  2. School of Aerospace and Mechanical Engineering, Korea Aerospace University, Goyang-si, 10540, Republic of Korea

    Joo-Ho Choi

Authors
  1. Sung Jin Kim
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Joo-Ho Choi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Joo-Ho Choi.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

Not applicable.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kim, S.J., Choi, JH. Comparative Study for Inspection Planning of Aircraft Structural Components. Int. J. Aeronaut. Space Sci. 22, 328–337 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42405-020-00319-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42405-020-00319-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation