Waypoints Following Guidance for Surface-to-Surface Missiles
Original Paper
First Online:
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
- 6 Downloads
Abstract
The paper proposes waypoints following guidance law. In this method an optimal trajectory is first generated which is then represented through a set of waypoints that are distributed from the starting point up to the final target point using a polynomial. The guidance system then works by issuing guidance command needed to move from one waypoint to the next one. Here the method is applied for a surface-to-surface missile. The results show that the method is feasible for on-board application.
Keywords
Missile guidance Inverse dynamic guidance Surface-to-surface missile Waypoints following guidanceReferences
- 1.Sworder DD, Wells GR (1977) Guidance laws for aerodynamically controlled re-entry vehicles. J Spacecr 14(2):7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 2.Liu Xj, Yuan Tb (2005) A new efficient method to boundary value problem for ballistic rocket guidance. Appl Math Mech 26(10):1375–1381CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
- 3.Kumar SR, Rao S, Ghose D (2014) Nonsingular terminal sliding mode guidance with impact angle constraints. J Guid Control Dyn 37(4):1114–1130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 4.Medagoda EDB, Gibbens PW (2010) Synthetic-waypoint guidance algorithm for following a desired flight trajectory. J Guid Control Dyn 33(2):601–606CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 5.Kumar P, Bhattacharya A, Padhi R (2013) MPSP guidance of tactical surface-to-surface missiles with way-point as well as terminal impact and body angle constraints. In: Presented at the 2013 IEEE International Conference on Control Applications (CCA) 28–30. August, Hyderabad, IndiaGoogle Scholar
- 6.Ashwin D, Debasish G (2012) Impact angle constraint guidance law using cubic splines for intercepting stationary targets. In: AIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conference, Minneapolis, Minnesota. 13–16 AugustGoogle Scholar
- 7.Knott GD (2000) Interpolating cubic splines. Publ Am Stat Assoc 97(457):366–366zbMATHGoogle Scholar
- 8.Sentoh E, Bryson AE (1992) Inverse and optimal control for desired outputs. J Guid Control Dyn 15(3):687–691CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 9.Enns D, Bugajski DAN, Hendrick R, Stein G (1994) Dynamic inversion: an evolving methodology for flight control design. Int J Control 59(1):71–91CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
- 10.Mario I, Gianluca C, Francesco N (1998) Angle of attack guidance via robust approximate inversion. In: Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conference and Exhibit, Boston, USA, MAGoogle Scholar
- 11.Lu L, Murray-Smith DJ, Thomson D (2008) Issues of numerical accuracy and stability in inverse simulation. Simul Model Pract Theory 16(9):1350–1364CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 12.Zhou H, Rahman T, Chen W (2014) Neural network assisted inverse dynamic guidance for terminally constrained entry flight. Sci World J 686040:2014Google Scholar
- 13.Tawfiqur R, Zhou H, Liang Y, Chen W (2015) Pseudospectral model predictive control for exo-atmospheric guidance. Int J Aeronaut Space Sci 16(1):64–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 14.Burden RL, Faires JD (2011) Numerical analysis. Brooks Cole Publishing CompanyGoogle Scholar
- 15.Palumbo NF, Blauwkamp RA, Lloyd JM (2010) Modern homing missile guidance theory and techniques. Johns Hopkins APL Tech Dig 29(1):42–59Google Scholar
- 16.Oberkampf WL, DeLand SM, Rutherford BM, Diegert KV, Alvin KF (2002) Error and uncertainty in modeling and simulation. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 75(1):333–357CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 17.The Aerodynamic Challenges of the Design and Development of the Space Shuttle Orbiter [A]. In: Space Shuttle Technical Conference [C]. Young JC, Underwood JM, Hillje ER, George W, Deloy O (eds) NASA CP-2342, Lyndon B. Johnson Space Center, Houston, Texas, 1983Google Scholar
Copyright information
© The Korean Society for Aeronautical & Space Sciences and Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2018