Skip to main content
Log in

An introduction to electric thruster modeling for stratospheric airship

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Aerospace Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The stratospheric airship uses the electric thrusters composed of motors and large diameter propellers to generate the forward thrust and heading manipulation torque. As the actuators of flight control, electric thrusters have an important impact on the station-keeping and flight-control performance. Due to the high-altitude environment and low-speed flight of big volumetric stratospheric airships, the operating of electric thrusters is significantly different from that of electric aircraft, which makes the analysis and modeling of electric thrusters difficult. In this paper, the characteristics of motors and propellers for stratospheric airship is analyzed at first. Then, the propeller and motor model expressions are summarized respectively, mainly concentrating on the relationship between torque, thrust, advance speed and rotational speed. Benefited from the methods in the field of marine propellers, a quantitative characterization method for the interaction between propeller and airship hull is introduced. Through the mechanical motion equation of the motor, the dynamic matching model between the motor output electromagnetic torque and the propeller load torque is described. An example is used to illustrate the modeling process. Finally, some of the challenging issues in engineering practice are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Zhang Y, Zhu M, Chen T, Zheng Z (2023) Region coverage control for multiple stratospheric airships with combined self-/event-triggered mechanism. Def Technol 24:254–268

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Zhao D, Liu D, Sun K, Tao G, Zhu M, Wu Z (2016) Research status technical difficulties and development trend of stratospheric airship. Acta Aeronaut Astronaut Sin 37:45–56

    Google Scholar 

  3. Yin S, Zhu M, Liang H (2019) Multi-disciplinary design optimization with variable complexity modeling for a stratosphere airship. Chin J Aeronaut 32:1244–1255

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Gao W, Zhang J, Ma T, Lin G, Liu Y, Wang C, Tan H (2022) A novel inflatable rings supported design and buoyancy-weight balance deformation analysis of stratosphere airships. Chin J Aeronaut 35:340–347

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Zhang L, Li J, Wu Y, Lv M (2019) Analysis of attitude planning and energy balance of stratospheric airship. Energy 183:1089–1103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Xu Y, Zhu W, Li J, Zhang L (2020) Improvement of endurance performance for high-altitude solar-powered airships: a review. Acta Astronaut 167:245–259

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. Lv M, Li J, Zhu W, Du H, Meng J, Sun K (2017) A theoretical study of rotatable renewable energy system for stratospheric airship. Energy Convers Manag 140:51–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Zhu W, Li J, Xu Y (2019) Optimum altitude planning of near-space solar powered airship. Aero Sci Technol 84:291–305

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Yang X, Liu D (2017) Renewable power system simulation and endurance analysis for stratospheric airships. Renew Energy 113:1070–1076

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Ni W, Bi Y, Wu D, Ma X (2022) Energy-optimal trajectory planning for solar-powered aircraft using soft actor-critic. Chin J Aeronaut 35:337–353

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. Wang S, Ma D, Yang M, Zhang L, Li G (2019) Flight strategy optimization for high-altitude long-endurance solar-powered aircraft based on Gauss pseudo-spectral method. Chin J Aeronaut 32:2286–2298

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Chen S, Song B, Wang H (2015) Exploring optimum power unit of propulsion system for high altitude airship. Proc Inst Mech Eng G J Aerosp Eng 229:301–311

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Xie F, Ye Z (2009) Drag reduction for an airship with proper arrangement of propeller. Chin J Aeronaut 22:575–582

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Riboldi CED, Rolando A (2022) Layout analysis and optimization of airships with thrust-based stability augmentation. Aerospace 9:393

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Miao J, Zhou J, Nie Y, Yang X (2016) Yaw controller design of stratospheric airship based on phase plane method. Chin J Aeronaut 29:738–745

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Liu S, Sang Y (2018) Underactuated stratospheric airship trajectory control using an adaptive integral backstepping approach. J Aircr 55:2357–2371

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Zhou W, Zhou P, Wang Y, Wang N, Duan D (2019) Station-keeping control of an underactuated stratospheric airship. Int J Fuzzy Syst 21:715–732

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  18. Zheng Z, Xie L (2017) Finite-time path following control for a stratospheric airship with input saturation and error constraint. Int J Control 92:368–393

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  19. Marton AS, Azinheira JR, Fioravanti AR, Paiva ECD, Carvalho JRH, Costa RR (2022) Filtering and estimation of state and wind disturbances aiming airship control and guidance. Aerospace 9:470

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Zheng X, Wang X (2017) Stratospheric airship control considering propeller dynamic model. J Zhejiang Univ (Eng Sci) 51:1428–1436

    Google Scholar 

  21. Song B, Wang H, Yang X (2014) Research progress and challenge of propulsion system for stratospheric platform airship. In: 3th China High Resolution Earth Observation Conference, Beijing, China

  22. Liu X, He W (2017) Performance calculation and design of stratospheric propeller. IEEE Access 4:14358–14368

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Wang H, Yang X, Luo L, Yu T (2021) Design and test technology of propulsion system for stratospheric airship. National Defense Industry Press, China

    Google Scholar 

  24. García-Gutiérrez A, Gonzalo J, Domínguez D, López D, Escapa A (2020) Aerodynamic optimization of propellers for high altitude pseudo satellites. Aerosp Sci Technol 96:105562

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Zheng X, Wang X, Cheng Z, Han D (2017) The efficiency analysis of high-altitude propeller based on vortex lattice lifting line theory. Aeronaut J 121:141–162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Tang ZH, Liu PQ, Chen YX, Guo H (2015) Experimental study of counter-rotating propellers for high-altitude airships. J Propul Power 31:1491–1496

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Tang J, Wang X, Duan D, Xie W (2019) Optimisation and analysis of efficiency for contra-rotating propellers for high-altitude airships. Aeronaut J 123:706–726

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Jiao J, Song B, Li Y, Zhang Y, Xu J (2018) Development of a testing methodology for high-altitude propeller. Aircr Eng Aerosp Tec 90:1486–1494

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Jiao J, Song B, Zhang Y, Li Y (2018) Optimal design and experiment of propellers for high altitude airship. Proc IMechE Part G: J Aerosp Eng 232:1887–1902

    Google Scholar 

  30. Zeraoulia M, Benbouzid MEH, Diallo D (2006) Electric motor drive selection issues for HEV propulsion systems—a comparative study. IEEE T Veh Technol 55:1756–1764

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Mohanraj D, Gopalakrishnan J, Chokkalingam B, Mihet-Popa AL (2022) Critical aspects of electric motor drive controllers and mitigation of torque ripple—review. IEEE Access 10:73635–73674

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Sirimanna S, Thanatheepan B, Lee D, Agrawal S, Yu Y, Wang Y, Anderson A, Banerjee A, Haran K (2021) Comparison of electrified aircraft propulsion drive systems with different electric motor topologies. J Propul Power 37:733–747

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Lee M, Smith S, Androulakakis S (2009) The high altitude lighter than air airship efforts at the US army space and missile defense command/army forces strategic command. In: 18th AIAA Lighter-Than-Air Systems Technology Conference, Washington, USA

  34. Pillay P, Krishnan R (1989) Modeling, simulation, and analysis of permanent-magnet motor drives, part1: the permanent-magnet synchronous motor drive. IEEE T Ind Appl 25:265–273

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Pillay P, Krishnan R (1989) Modeling, simulation, and analysis of permanent-magnet motor drives. Part 2. The brushless DC motor drive. IEEE T Ind Appl 25:274–279

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Lutz T, Funk P, Jakobi A, Wagner S (2001) Calculation of the propulsive efficiency for airships with stern thruster. In: 1sth AIAA Lighter-Than-Air Systems Technical Committee Convention and Exhibition, Ohio

  37. Carlton JS (2019) Marine propellers and propulsion, 4th edn. Elsevier, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  38. Hirner A, Dorn F, Lutz Th, Kramer E (2007) Improvement of propulsive efficiency by dedicated stern thruster design. In: 7th AIAA Aviation Technology, Integration and Operations Conference, Belfast, Northern Ireland

  39. Pivano L, Smogeli O N, Johansen T A, Fossen TI (2006) Marine propeller thrust estimation in four-quadrant operations. In: Proceeding of the 45th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, San Diego, USA

  40. Yu G, Li J, Xu Y, Xiao L, Zou J, Wang M (2018) Improved analytical model of electromagnetic torque for permanent magnet synchronous machines. In: Proceeding of 21st International Conference on Electrical Machines and Systems, Jeju, Korea.

  41. Robinson E, Okolo WA (2022) Estimation of permanent magnet synchronous motor parameters using a linear unknown input interval observer. AIAA SciTech Forum, San Diego

  42. Chen S Q (2015) Parameters optimization of matching and verification study of high efficiency propeller propulsion system of high altitude airship, PhD thesis, Northwestern Polytechnical University, China

  43. Leng Y, Yoo H, Jardin T, Bronz M, Moschetta J M (2019) Aerodynamic modeling of propeller forces and moments at high angle of incidence. AIAA SciTech Forum, San Diego

  44. Lin D, Zhou P, Cendes ZJ (2009) In-depth study of the torque constant for permanent-magnet machines. IEEE T Magn 45:5385–5387

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  45. Montone D (2014) Temperature Effects on Motor Performance. Haydon Kerk Motion Solutions

  46. Ma Z, Qi X (2018) Permanent magnet motor temperature compensated constant torque control. IFAC PapersOnline 51–31:68–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work was supported by the National Science Foundation of China (Grant numbers [62073216] and [51906141].

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation, data collection and analysis were performed by PZ, QL and YJ. The first draft of the manuscript was written by PZ and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pingfang Zhou.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhou, P., Lin, Q. & Jing, Y. An introduction to electric thruster modeling for stratospheric airship. AS (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42401-024-00272-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42401-024-00272-7

Keywords

Navigation