Abstract
The objective of this paper is to enhance the aerodynamic performance of trainer aircraft wing using active flow control method of co flow jet (CFJ). In this numerical study, free stream velocity of 20 m/s and k epsilon turbulence model is used to compare baseline and CFJ aerofoils with different angles of attack (AOA). This work introduced CFJ method into the trainer aircraft wing to improve the aerodynamic performance by controlling the boundary layer over it at different AOA and at the same time to reduce the take-off landing distance. The obtained results show that the stalling AOA improved by 40% and lift coefficient increased by 52%. The same method could be used to all trainer aircrafts.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Karuppiah B, Wessley GJJ (2021) Study on the influence of mass flow rate over a National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics 6321 airfoil using improved blowing and suction system for effective boundary layer control. SAE Int J Aerosp 14(2):219–233. https://doi.org/10.4271/01-14-02-001
Balaji K, Wessley GJJ (2021) Enhancement of aerodynamic efficiency of aerofoil using improved blowing and suction system. Advances in science and technology. Res J 15(2):116–126. https://doi.org/10.12913/22998624/134642
Balaji K, Wessley GJJ (2020) Experimental investigations on the performance of a modified co-flow jet aerofoil. Indian J Sci Technol 13:1873–1881. https://doi.org/10.12913/22998624/134642
Katkar AM, Balaji K, Khandal SV (2022) Numerical studies on fixed wing aircraft aerodynamic performance using injection Suction method. Int J Veh Struct. https://doi.org/10.4273/ijvss.14.5.15
Balaji K, Wessley GJJ (2022) Studies on the enhancement of aerodynamic performance in aerofoils using co-flow jet: a comprehensive review. Aerosp Syst. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42401-022-00183-5
Rajan EZ, Gowthaman TS, Ganesan C, Balaji K, Kiran Babu K M (2015) Wind tunnel testing of NACA 0021 aerofoil with co- flow jet. In: International Conference on Systems, Science, Control, Communication, Engineering and Technology, pp 17–21
Yang Y, Zha G (2017) Super-lift coefficient of active flow control airfoil: what is the limit? AIAA. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2017-1693
Wang Y, Zha G (2019) Study of mach number effect for 2D Co-flow jet aerofoil at cruise conditions. AIAA Aviat Forum. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2019-3169
Xu K, Mcbreen B, Ren Y, Zha G (2020) Analysis of micro-compressor performance with integrated co-flow jet airfoil ducting system. AIAA Scitech Forum. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2020-0047
Ren Y, Wang Y, Zha G (2020) High efficiency tandem propeller-coflow jet airfoil system in cruise. AIAA Aviat Forum. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2020-2779
Lefebvre A, Zha GC (2016) Trade study of 3D co-flow jet wing for cruise and takeoff/landing performance. In: 54th AIAA Aerosp. Sci. Meet, pp 1–29. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2016-0570
Zha G, Gao W, Gables C (2006) Analysis of jet effects on co-flow jet airfoil performance with integrated propulsion system. AIAA. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2006-102
Zha GC, Gao W, Paxton CD, Palewicz A (2006) Numerical investigations of co-flow jet airfoil with and without injection. In: Collect. Tech. Pap.—44th AIAA Aerosp. Sci. Meet. 17, 12743–12756. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2006-1061
Zha GC, Gao W, Paxton CD (2007) Jet effects on coflow jet airfoil performance. AIAA J 45:1222–1231. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.23995
Wang B, Haddoukessouni B, Levy J, Zha GC (2008) Numerical investigations of injection-slot-size effect on the performance of coflow jet airfoils. J Aircr 45:2084–2091. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.37441
Liang CB et al. (2020) Numerical simulation of aerofoil with flow injection at the upper surface. 1:98–110
Boling J, Dhakal S (2017) Numerical investigation of low speed performance of transonic coflow jet supercritical airfoil. AIAA. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2017-3249
Lefebvre A, Dano B, Difronzo M, Bartow W, Zha G (2013) Performance of a co-flow jet airfoil with variation of Mach number. In: 51st AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting including the New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition 2013. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2013-490
He-Yong Xu Z-YY, Xing S-L (2015) Numerical study of the S809 airfoil aerodynamic performance using a co-flow jet active control concept. J Renew Sustain Energy 1–21:023131. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4919013
Zha GC, Paxton CD, Conley CA (2006) Effect of injection slot size on the performance of coflow jet airfoil. J Aircr 10(2514/1):16999
Zha G, Gables C, Carroll BF, Gables C, Wells A (2005) High performance airfoil using co-flow jet flow control. AIAA, pp 1–27
Funding
The authors have not disclosed any funding.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Anish, J., Joselin Herbert, G.M. & Balaji, K. Improvement in aerodynamic efficiency of trainer aircraft wing using co flow jet method. AS (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42401-023-00256-z
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42401-023-00256-z