Skip to main content
Log in

Determining the applicability limits of different accuracy models when analyzing the loads on the landing gear during landing

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Aerospace Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper, the limits of models different accuracy applicability in the simulation of aircraft rough landing on a runway was analyzed. Three models were considered: a detailed global model, an elastic beam model that takes into account stiffness and mass-inertial characteristics, and an absolutely rigid beam model that takes into account only mass-inertial characteristics. The reduction of the detailed model to the beam ones was carried out according to the beam theory. As a result, the forces acting to the main landing gear were obtained for various combinations of vertical and horizontal speeds, pitch and roll angles. The errors of the beam models relative to the detailed one were obtained and the limits of their applicability were given.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

All data are available.

References

  1. Buryakov VM, Egorov GS, Eremin VA et al (1990) To the pilot about the prevention of rough landings. Transport, Moscow

    Google Scholar 

  2. Stabilized approach and flare are keys to avoiding hard landings. Flight Safety Digest 23(8): 2004

  3. Wang Lei, Changxu Wu, Sun Ruishan, Cui Zhenxin (2014) An analysis of hard landing incidents based on flight QAR data. Conference. https://doi.org/10.1007/9783-3-319-07515-0_40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Wang HG (2019) Risk analysis of flight hard landing based on data statistics. 2019 IEEE 3rd Advanced Information Management Communicates, Electronic and Automation Control Conference. https://doi.org/10.1109/IMCEC46724.2019.8983833

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Wang C, Miao L, Sun H (2016) An analysis based on special hard landing incident. 3rd International Conference on Materials Engineering, Manufacturing Technology and Control

  6. Federal Air Transport Agency. Analysis of rough landings of civil aviation aircraft for the period 2009–2019 and recommendations for their prevention

  7. NASA ASRS report no. 464683. February 2000

  8. Aviation Rules Part 25, “Airworthiness Standards for Transport Category Aircraft”, Interstate Aviation Committee, 2015

  9. Certification Specifications and Acceptable Means of Compliance for Large Aeroplanes CS-25, European Union Aviation Safety Agency, 10 January 2020

  10. Federal Aviation Regulations Part 25: Airworthiness Standards: Transport Category, Federal Aviation Administration

  11. Gong X, Xue C, Jiangbo Xu (2015) Dynamics simulation study on civil aircraft planned pavement emergency landing. J Vibroeng 17(8):4496–4506

    Google Scholar 

  12. Chandresh Zinzuwadia, Gerado Olivares (2016) Crashworthiness by analyses – verifying fem capabilities by accident reconstruction. The Eighth Triennial International Fire & Cabin Safety Research Conference

  13. Rybin AV (2014) Issledovanie dinamiki posadki passazhirskogo samolyota. Elektronnyj zhurnal «Trudy MAI», № 74

  14. Rybin AV (2015) Razrabotka metodiki detektirovaniya i analiza grubyh posadok samolyota na osnove chislennogo mo-delirovaniya proisshestviya. Elektronnyj zhurnal «Trudy MAI», № 81

  15. Kruger W, Besselink I, Cowling D, Doan DB, Kortum W, Krabacher W (1997) Aircraft landing gear dynamics: simulation and control. Vehicle Syst Dynam 28:119

  16. Ted L Lomax (1996) Structural load analysis for commercial transport aircraft: theory and practice. AIAA Education series

  17. Kotik MG (1984) Dinamika vzleta i posadki samoletov (Aircraft takeoff and landing dynamics). Mashinostroenie, Moscow

    Google Scholar 

  18. Bisplinghoff RL, Ashley H, Halfman RL (1955) Aeroelasticity. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA

    Google Scholar 

  19. Snisarenko TV, Chuban VD (2008) Matematicheskoe modelirovanie dinamicheskih nagruzok pri vzlyote i posadke uprugogo samolyota. Uchyonye zapiski CAGI, t. XXXIX, No 3:63–76

    Google Scholar 

  20. Obraztsov IF et al (1986) Structural mechanics of aircraft. Machinostroenie, Moscow

    Google Scholar 

  21. Agladze AG (1935) Konstruirovanie i raschyot maslyanyh amortizatorov shassi samoletov. Tekhnicheskie zametki CAGI / M.: BNII CAGI. ― № 59. ― 47 s

  22. Abaqus (2018) Analysis Users’s Guide // Book Abaqus 2018 Analysis Users’s Guide / EditorSimulia

Download references

Funding

The authors have not disclosed any funding.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kirill Shelkov.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Trifonov, R., Shelkov, K., Perepechaev, S. et al. Determining the applicability limits of different accuracy models when analyzing the loads on the landing gear during landing. AS (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42401-023-00253-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42401-023-00253-2

Keywords

Navigation