Abstract
The ultimate need to design and develop high-fidelity dynamical models for future space missions is necessitated by the continuous and enormous interest in spacecraft formation flying, rendezvous and spacecraft proximity operations. In this paper, to obtain high-fidelity dynamics, higher-order relative motion model is developed via nonlinear mapping of orbit element differences and Hill coordinates. First, second-order variation of parameter technique of calculus of variations is applied to the direction cosine matrix (DCM), which maps vector components in inertial frame to vector components in Deputy Hill frame, and deputy spacecraft inertial position and velocity vectors in Deputy Hill frame. Second, after series of transformations and elimination of higher-order terms greater than quadratic terms, new, nonlinearly mapped radial, along-track and cross-track relative motion position and velocity equations are obtained. Using the new equation of motion, nonlinear state space model is developed. The new equations, validated via numerical simulations, are amenable for the analysis of spacecraft relative motion, formation flying, rendezvous and proximity operations in both circular and elliptical orbits.
Similar content being viewed by others
Availability of data and material (data transparency)
All data and materials as well as software application or custom code support our published claims and comply with field standards.
References
Clohessy WH, Wiltshire RS (1960) Terminal guidance system for satellite rendezvous. J Aerosp Sci 27:653–658
Hill G (1878) Researches in lunar theory. Am J Math 21:5–26
Wertz J (2011) Space mission engineering: the new SMAD. Microcosm Press, Cleveland
Tschauner J, Hempel P (1965) Rendezvous zu einem in elliptisher bahn umlaufenden ziel. Astron. Acta 2:104–109
Walsh M. T, Peck M. A(2017)A general approach for calculating farfield orbital rendezvous maneuvers. In: AIAA guidance, navigation, and control conference 1730
Scharf D P, Hadaegh F Y, Ploen S R(2003)A survey of spacecraft formation flying guidance and control (part i): guidance. In: Proceedings of the American control conference, pp 1733–1739
Gim D-W, Terry Alfriend K (2003) State transition matrix of relative motion for the perturbed noncircular reference orbit. J Guid Control Dyn 26:956–971
Vallado DA (2013) Fundamentals of astrodynamics and applications. Microcosm Press, Cleveland
Batin RH (1999) An introduction to the mathematics and methods of astrodynamics, revised edition. AIAA, Reston
Ogundele AD (2021) Harmonic balance analysis and simulations of spacecraft rendezvous and formation flying dynamics. Aerosp Syst (AS). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42401-021-00083-0
De Vries JP (1963) Elliptic elements in terms of small increments of position and velocity components. Am Inst Aeronaut Astronaut J 1(11):2626–2629
Yamanaka K, Ankersen F (2002) New state transition matrix for relative motion on an arbitrary elliptical orbit. J Guid Control Dyn 25(1):60–66
Schaub H, Junkins JL (2014) Analytical mechanics of space systems. AIAA, New York
Alfriend K. T, Schaub H, Gim D Gravitational perturbations, nonlinearity and circular orbit assumption effects on formation flying control strategy. In: AAS guidance and control conference Breckenridge, CO Feb. 2–6, 2000 AAS Publications Office, P.O. Box 28130, San Diego, CA 92198
London HS (1963) Second approximation to the solution of the rendezvous equations. Am Inst Aeronaut Astronaut J 7:1691–1693
Ogundele AD, Agboola OA, Sinha SC (2021) Mathematical modeling and simulation of nonlinear spacecraft rendezvous and formation flying problems via averaging method. Commun Nonlinear Sci Numer Simul 95:105668. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cnsns.2020.105668
Lawden DF (1963) Optimal trajectories for space navigation, 2nd edn. Butterworth, London
Carter TE, Humi M (1987) Fuel-optimal rendezvous near a point in general Keplerian orbit. J Guid Control Dyn 10(6):567–573
Carter TE (1998) State transition matrices for terminal rendezvous studies: brief survey and new examples. J Guid Control Dyn 21(1):148–155
Ogundele A. D, Sinclair A. J, Sinha S. C(2018) Approximate closed form solutions of spacecraft relative motion via Abel and Riccati equations. Adv Astronaut Sci 162:2685–2704 (2018). ISSN: 00653438, Univelt Inc. Paper AAS 17–791 presented at the 2017 AAS/AIAA astrodynamics specialist conference in Columbia River Gorge, Stevenson, August 20–24
Gurfil P, Kasdin NJ (2004) Nonlinear modeling of spacecraft relative motion in the configuration space. J Guid Control Dyn 27:154–157
Palmer P (2006) Optimal relocation of satellites flying in near-circular-orbit formations. J Guid Control Dyn 29(3):519–526
Schaub H, Alfriend KT (2002) Hybrid cartesian and orbit element feedback law for formation flying spacecraft. J Guid Control Dyn 25(2):383–393
Inalhan G, Tillerson M, How J (2002) Relative dynamics and control of spacecraft formations in eccentric orbits. J Guid Control Dyn 25:48–59
Vadali SR (2009) Model for linearized satellite relative motion about a j2-perturbed mean circular orbit. J Guid Control Dyn 32:1687–1691
Ogundele AD (2021) Approximate analytic solution of nonlinear Riccati spacecraft formation flying dynamics in terms of orbit element differences. Aerosp Sci Technol 113:106686. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2021.106686
Ogundele AD, Agboola OA (2021) Nonlinear mapping of orbit element differences for spacecraft formation flying. In: Paper AAS 21–341 presented at 31st space flight mechanics meeting conference, February 1–4, in Charlotte, North Carolina, USA
Ogundele AD, Sinclair AJ, Sinha SC (2021) Closed form parametric solutions of nonlinear Abel-type and Riccati-type spacecraft relative motion. Acta Astronaut 178:733–742. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actaastro.2020.10.009
Ogundele AD, Agboola OA, Sinha SC (2021) Application of Lyapunov Floquet transformation to the nonlinear spacecraft relative motion with periodic-coefficients. Acta Astronaut 187:24–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actaastro.2021.06.024
Liberzon D (2012) Calculus of variations and optimal control theory: a concise introduction. Princeton University Press, Princeton
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
ADO: conceptualization, methodology, writing—original draft, writing—review and editing, literature search, software, formal analysis and validation. OAA: conceptualization, methodology, writing—review and editing, software and formal analysis. OFO: methodology, review and editing, software, formal analysis and validation.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors have no financial or personal relationship with other people or organizations that could inappropriately influence or bias the content of the paper. There is no conflict of interest with other people or organizations that could inappropriately influence or bias the content of the paper.
Compliance with ethical standards
The research meets all applicable standards with regards to the ethics of experimentation and research integrity. The following is being certified/declared true.As an expert scientist, the paper has been submitted with full responsibility following due ethical procedure and there is no duplicate publication, fraud, plagiarism, or concerns about animal or human experimentation.
Additional information
This is the revised version of the paper AAS 21-341 presented at 31st AAS/AIAA Space Flight Mechanics Meeting. The Sheraton Charlotte Hotel in Charlotte, North Carolina. February 1–4, 2021.
Appendix A: Normalized nonlinear terms of the nonlinear mapped relative motion orbit element differences
Appendix A: Normalized nonlinear terms of the nonlinear mapped relative motion orbit element differences
and
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ogundele, A.D., Agboola, O.A. & Oseni, O.F. Nonlinear high-fidelity modeling of spacecraft relative motion via orbit element differences. AS 5, 591–605 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42401-022-00155-9
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42401-022-00155-9