Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Comprehensive Comparison of Dysphagia Predominant Eosinophilic Esophagitis: With and Without Food Impaction

  • Medicine
  • Published:
SN Comprehensive Clinical Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We describe 101 EoE patients with dysphagia, with food impaction (EoE-FI) and without food impaction (EoE-NoFI). Compare clinical features, endoscopy, histology and 10 additional histological features (AHF), and outcomes. Clinical features, dysphagia score, and endoscopic findings were captured. Eosinophils and 10 AHF at diagnosis and follow-up were done. Two hundred seven patients were seen with EoE, 101 patients with dysphagia enrolled; Follow period was; EoE-FI, and 71 EoE-NoFI and mean ages of 10.9 and 10.4 years, respectively (p = 0.27). Clinical features, EGD, and biopsies were almost similar in both groups. EoE-FI, 1.7 years (mean), range 1/12–8 years, and EoE-NoFI, 1.1 years (1/12–7 years). Dysphagia score improved from 3 to 1.25 in EoE-FI and 1.21 to 0.71 in EoE-NoFI (p < 0.001). Composite score improved from 3.3 to 1.45 and 2.49 to 1.48 (p < 0.001) in EoE-FI and EoE-NoFI; 15/30 (EoE-FI) and 45/71(EoE-NoFI) patients had repeat EGD. Peak eosinophils in EoE-FI improved from 60 to 27 (p = 0.03), and in EoE-NoFI from 47.6 to 33 (p = 0.001). Mean eosinophils in EoE-FI improved from 42 to 27.5 (p = 0.03), and EoE-NoFI from 39.3 to 22.1(p < 0.001). Comparison of the 10 AHF at diagnosis and follow-up showed minimal numerical (%) differences, and none were significant. During follow-up, none had recurrence or occurrence of FI in both groups. There were no significant differences in the clinical features and outcomes of dysphagia in EoE-FI and EoE-NoFI groups. Endoscopy including strictures and histologic findings of eosinophils and the 10 AHF were similar in both groups at diagnosis and follow-up.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Dellon E, Liacouras C, Molina-Infante J, et al. Updated international consensus diagnostic criteria for eosinophilic esophagitis: proceedings of the AGREE Conference. Gastroenterology. 2018;155:1022–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Liacouras C, Furuta GA, Hirano I, et al. Eosinophilic esophagitis: updated consensus recommendations for children and adults. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2011;128:1–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Furuta GT, Liacouras CA, Collins MH, et al. Eosinophilic esophagitis in children and adults: a systematic review and consensus recommendations for diagnosis and treatment. Gastroenterology. 2007;133:1342–63.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Gunasekaran T, Prabhakar G, Schwartz A, et al.. Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) in children and adolescents with abdominal pain. Comparison with EoE-Dysphagia and Functional Abdominal Pain. Can J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2016 https://www.hindawi.com/journals/cjgh/2016/4123692/cta/.

  5. Gunasekaran T, Chu C, Chennuri R, et al. Detailed histologic evaluation of eosinophilic esophagitis in pediatric patients presenting with dysphagia or abdominal pain and comparison of the histology between the two groups. Can J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017:3709254. https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/3709254.

  6. Al-Hussaini A. Savary dilation is safe and effective treatment for esophageal narrowing related to pediatric eosinophilic esophagitis. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2016;63:474–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Dohil R, Newbury R, Fox, et al. Oral viscous budesonide is effective in children with eosinophilic esophagitis in a randomized, placebo-controlled trial. Gastroenterology. 2010;139:418–29.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Eskian M, Khorasanizadeh M. Assa’ad AH et al Monoclonal antibodies for treatment of eosinophilic esophagitis. Clin Rev Allergy Immunol. 2018;55:88–98.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Longstreth GF, Longstreth KJ, Yao JF. Esophageal food impaction: epidemiology and therapy. A retrospective, observational study. Gastrointest Endosc. 2001;53:193–208.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Ko HH, Enns R. Review of food bolus management. Can J Gastroenterol. 2008;22:805–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Hiremath GS, Hameed F, Pacheco A, et al. Esophageal food impaction and eosinophilic esophagitis: a retrospective study, systematic review, and meta-analysis. Dig Dis Sci. 2015;60:3181–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Diniz LO, Towbin AJ. Causes of esophageal food bolus impaction in pediatric population. Dig Dis Sci. 2012;57:690–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Desai TK, Stecevic V, Chang CH, et al. Association of eosinophilic inflammation with esophageal food impaction in adults. Gastrointest Endosc. 2005;61:795–801.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. El-Matary W, El-Hakim H, Popel J. Eosinophilic esophagitis in children needing emergency endoscopy for foreign body and food bolus impaction. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2012;28:611–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Straumann A, Bussmann C, Zuber M, et al. Eosinophilic esophagitis: analysis of food impaction and perforation in 251 adolescent and adult patients. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2008;6:598–600.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Dellon ES, Jensen ET, Martin CF, Shaheen NJ, Kappelman MD. Prevalence of eosinophilic esophagitis in the United States. Clin Gastro Hepatology. 2014;12:589–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Gawron AJ, Hirano I. Eosinophilic esophagitis—emerging epidemic or misdiagnosed malady? Clin Gastro Hepatology. 2014;12:597–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Mittal RK. Esophageal function testing: beyond manometry and impedance. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am. 2014;24:667–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Mittal RK. Longitudinal muscle of the esophagus; its role in the esophageal health and disease. Curr Opin Gastroenterol. 2013 Jul;29(4):421–30. https://doi.org/10.1097/MOG.0b013e3283622b57.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Korsapati H, Babaei A, Bhargava V, et al. Dysfunction of the longitudinal muscles of the esophagus in eosinophilic esophagitis. Gut. 2009;58:1056–62.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Kwiatek MA, Hirano I, Kahrillas PJ, et al. Mechanical properties of the esophagus in eosinophilic esophagitis. Gastroenterology. 2011;140:82–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Maheen H, Aceves S, Dohil R, et al. Esophageal compliance quantifies epithelial remodeling in pediatric patients with eosinophilic esophagitis. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2019;68:559–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Menard-Katcher C, Benitez AJ, Pan Z, et al. Influence of age and eosinophilic esophagitis on esophageal distensibility in a pediatric cohort. Am J Gastroenterol. 2017;112:1466–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Menard-Katcher C, Benitez AJ, Ahmed F, et al. Esophageal distensibility provides measure of remodeling in pediatric eosinophilic esophagitis. Gastroenterology. 2016;150:S17–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Murch S, Allen KJ, Chong SKF, et al. Potential for improving therapy and defining new research targets in eosinophilic esophagitis based on understanding of immunopathogenesis. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2013;57:529–34.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. de Boer RE, Brouwer F, Zaagsma J. The beta-adrenoceptors mediating relaxation of rat esophageal muscularis mucosae are predominantly of the beta 3-, but also of the beta 2-subtype. Br J Pharmacol. 1993;110:442–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Crowell MD, Zayat EN, Lacy BE, et al. The effects of an inhaled beta-2 adrenergic agonist on lower esophageal function: a dose-response study. Chest. 2001;120:1184–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Okamura S, Oshimoto H, Sakamoto T, et al. Beta-adrenoreceptor agonists for diffuse esophageal spasm. J Gastroenterol. 2002;37:229–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Dias JA, Fernandes S, Corujeira S, et al. Salbutamol therapy for food impaction in eosinophilic esophagitis. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2017;65:e97. https://doi.org/10.1097/MPG.0000000000001661.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Schoepfer AM, Safroneeva E, Bussmann C, et al. Delay in diagnosis of eosinophilic esophagitis increases risk for stricture formation in a time–dependent manner. Gastroenterology. 2013;145:1230–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Collins MH, Martin LJ, Alexander ES, et al.. Newly developed and validated eosinophilic esophagitis histology scoring system and evidence that it outperforms peak eosinophil count for disease diagnosing and monitoring. Dis Esophagus 2016; Feb 9. doi:10.1111/dote.12470.

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Henry Mangurten, MD, for the editorial revision of the manuscript.

Availability of Data and Materials

N/A

Code Availability

N/A

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Thirumazhisai S. Gunasekaran, MD — study concept and design, drafting of the manuscript, final approval, and study supervision and administrative. Vijayalakshmi Kory, MBBS — data collection, analysis, and administrative. Snehal S. Sonawane, MBBS, MD — study design and interpretation of the histology. Mohamed Rizwan Haroon Al Rasheed, MBBS, MD — study design and interpretation of the histology. Brian Adley, MD — study design and supervision/interpretation of the histology. Alan Schwartz, PhD — statistical analysis and interpretation of data. James Berman, MD — critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Thirumazhisai S. Gunasekaran.

Ethics declarations

Ethics Approval

Institutional Review Board approval for this study was obtained through Advocate Health Care, Oak Brook, IL, USA.

Consent to Participate

This is a retrospective study, and as per the above IRB, no consent was needed.

Consent for Publication

The authors give consent for publication of the manuscript if approved for publication.

Competing Interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

This article is part of the Topical Collection on Medicine

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gunasekaran, T.S., Kory, V., Sonawane, S.S. et al. Comprehensive Comparison of Dysphagia Predominant Eosinophilic Esophagitis: With and Without Food Impaction. SN Compr. Clin. Med. 3, 2134–2140 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42399-021-00889-1

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42399-021-00889-1

Keywords

Navigation