Skip to main content
Log in

Maize rhizosphere soil stimulates greater soil microbial biomass and enzyme activity leading to subsequent enhancement of cowpea growth

  • Short Communication
  • Published:
Environmental Sustainability Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Rhizosphere from different plant species can influence differently the soil microbial biomass and activity. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of rhizosphere of maize and cowpea on soil microbial biomass and enzymes. Soil samples adhered to the roots of maize were collected at 45 (flowering) and 75 (senescence) days; while for cowpea, soil samples were collected at 35 (flowering) and 60 (senescence) days. Soil microbial biomass C was highest in soils from the rhizosphere of maize. The activity of dehydrogenase and β-glycosidase were highest in soils from the rhizosphere of maize, while phosphatase was higher in soils from the rhizosphere of cowpea. This study concluded that soils from rhizosphere of maize presented higher soil microbial biomass and enzyme activity in comparison to soils from rhizosphere of cowpea.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

References

  • Alef K, Nannipieri P (1995) Methods in soil microbiology and biochemistry. Academic press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Araujo ASF, Cesarz S, Leite LFC, Borges CD, Tsai SM, Eisenhauer N (2013) Soil microbial properties and temporal stability in degraded and restored lands of Northeast Brazil. Soil Biol Biochem 66:175–181

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bolton H, Frederickson JK, Elliot LF (1992) Microbial ecology of the rhizosphere. In: Metting FB (ed) Soil microbial ecology. Marcel Dekker, New York, pp 27–36

    Google Scholar 

  • Cabugao KG, Timm CM, Carrell AA, Childs J, Lu TS, Pelletier DA, Weston DJ, Norby RJ (2017) Root and rhizosphere bacterial phosphatase activity varies with tree species and soil phosphorus availability in Puerto Rico tropical forest. Front Plant Sci 8:1834

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Casida LE, Klein DA, Santoro T (1965) Soil dehydrogenase activity. Soil Sci 98:371–376

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chaudhary DR, Saxena J, Lorenz N, Dick LK, Dick RP (2012) Microbial Profiles of Rhizosphere and Bulk Soil Microbial Communities of Biofuel Crops Switchgrass (Panicum virgatum L.) and Jatropha (Jatropha curcas L.). Appl Environ Soil Sci. doi:10.1155/2012/906864

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Core Team R (2016) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna

    Google Scholar 

  • Dakora FD, Spriggs A, Nyemba RC, Chimphango MB (2000) Host-plant factors in the adaptation of indigenous African legumes to low pH soils. In: Pedrosa FO, Hungria M, Yates MG, Newton WE (eds) nitrogen fixation from molecules to crop productivity. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, pp 579–580

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • EMBRAPA—Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropequária (1997) Manual de métodos de análise de solo. Rio de Janeiro

  • Eivazi F, Tabatabai MA (1988) Glucosidases and galactosidases in soils. Soil Biol Biochem 20:601–606

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fageria NK, Moreira A (2011) The role of mineral nutrition on root growth of crop plants. In: Sparks DL (ed) Advances in agronomy, vol 110. Academic Press, Burlington, pp 251–331

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner T, Acosta-Martinez V, Senwo Z, Dowd SE (2011) Soil rhizosphere microbial communities and enzyme activities under organic farming in Alabama. Diversity 3:308–328

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gong L, He G, Liu W (2016) Long-term cropping effects on agricultural sustainability in Alar Oasis of Xinjiang China. Sustainability 8:61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guo HC, Wang WB, Luo XH, Wu XP (2015) Characteristics of rhizosphere and bulk soil microbial communities in rubber plantations in Hainan Island, China. J Trop Forest Sci 27:202–212

    Google Scholar 

  • Islam KR, Weil RR (1998) Microwave irradiation of soil for routine measurement of microbial biomass carbon. Biol Fertil Soil 27:408–416

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jacoby R, Peukert M, Succurro A, Koprivova A, Kopriva S (2017) The role of soil microorganisms in plant mineral nutrition—current knowledge and future directions. Front Plant Sci 8:1617

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones DL (1998) Organic acids in the rhizosphere—a critical review. PlANT Soil 205:25–44

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kaschuk G, Alberton O, Hungria M (2010) Three decades of soil microbial biomass studies in Brazilian ecosystems: Lessons learned about soil quality and indications for improving sustainability. Soil Biol Biochem 42:1–13

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Li SM, Li L, Zhang FS, Tang C (2004) Acid Phosphatase Role in Chickpea/Maize Intercropping. Ann Botany 94:297–303

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Li L, Xu M, Ali E, Zhang W, Duan Y, Li D (2018) Factors affecting soil microbial biomass and functional diversity with the application of organic amendments in three contrasting cropland soils during a field experiment. PLoS ONE 13:e0203812

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lopes AAC, Sousa DMG, Chaer GM, Junior FBR, Goedert WJ, Mendes IC (2013) Interpretation of microbial soil indicators as a function of crop yield and organic carbon. Soil Sci Soc Am J 77:461–472

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lyu Y, Tang H, Li H, Zhang F, Rengel Z, Whalley WR, Shen J (2016) Major crop species show differential balance between root morphological and physiological responses to variable phosphorus supply. Front Plant Sci 7:1939

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Makoi JHJR, Chimphango SBM, Dakora FD (2010) Elevated levels of acid and alkaline phosphatase activity in roots and rhizosphere of cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L. Walp.) genotypes grown in mixed culture and at different densities with sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L.). Crop Past Sci 61:279–286

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mukherjee D, Kumar R (2007) Kinetin regulates plant growth and biochemical changes during maturation and senescence of leaves, flowers, and pods of Cajanus cajan L. Biol Plant 51:80–85

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Neogi S, Bhattacharyy P, Roy KS, Panda BB, Nayak AK, Rao KS, Manna MC (2014) Soil respiration, labile carbon pools, and enzyme activities as affected by tillage practices in a tropical rice–maize–cowpea cropping system. Environ Monit Assess 186:4223-4236

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Png GK, Turner BL, Albornoz FE, Hayes PE, Lambers H, Laliberté E (2017) Greater root phosphatase activity in nitrogen-fixing rhizobial but not actinorhizal plants with declining phosphorus availability. J Ecol 105:1246–1255

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Qiao Q, Wang F, Zhang J (2017) The variation in the rhizosphere microbiome of cotton with soil type, genotype and developmental stage. Sci Rep 7:3940

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rao AV, Bala K, Taradfar C (1990) Dehydrogenase and phosphatase activities in soil as influenced by the growth of arid-land crops. J Agric Sci 115:221–225

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rao TP, Yano K, Lijima M, Yamauchi A, Tatsumi L (2002) Regulation of rhizosphere by photosynthetic activity in cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L. Walp) seedlings. Ann Botany 89:213–220

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ren Q, Song H, Yuan Z, Ni X, Li C (2018) Changes in soil enzyme activities and microbial biomass after revegetation in the Three Gorges Reservoir. China. Forests 9:249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steinauer K, Chatzinotas C, Eisenhauer N (2016) Root exudate cocktails: the link between plant diversity and soil microorganisms? Ecol Evol 6:7387–7396

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tabatabai MA, Bremner JM (1969) Use of p-nitrophenyl phosphate for assay of soil phosphatase activity. Soil Biol Biochem 1:301–307

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Vílchez S, Manzanera M, Ramos JL (2000) Control of expression of divergent Pseudomonas putida put promoters for proline catabolism. Appl Environ Microbiol 66:5221–5225

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang X-Y, Ge Y, Wang J (2017) Positive effects of plant diversity on soil microbial biomass and activity are associated with more root biomass production. J Pl Interact 12:533–541

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Wyk DAB, Adeleke R, Rhode OHJ, Bezuidenhout CC, Mienie C (2017) Ecological guild and enzyme activities of rhizosphere soil microbial communities associated with Bt-maize cultivation under field conditions in North West Province of South Africa. J Basic Microbiol 57:781–792

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xavier TF, Araújo ASF, Santos VB, Campos FL (2008) Inoculação e adubação nitrogenada sobre a nodulação e a produtividade de grãos de feijão-caupi. Ci Rural 38:2037–2041

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yeomans JC, Bremner JM (1988) A rapid and precise method for routine determination of organic carbon in soil. Comm Soil Sci Pl Anal 19:1467–1476

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zang H, Yang X, Feng X, Qian X, Hu Y, Ren C, Zeng Z (2015). Rhizodeposition of nitrogen and carbon by mungbean (Vigna radiata L.) and its contribution to intercropped oats (Avena nuda L.). PLoS One 10:e0121132

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Ademir S. F. Araujo thanks to Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico – CNPq/Brazil (grant 305102/2014–1) for its fellowship of productivity.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ademir Sérgio Ferreira de Araujo.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

de Sousa, R.S., Nunes, L.A.P.L., Antunes, J.E.L. et al. Maize rhizosphere soil stimulates greater soil microbial biomass and enzyme activity leading to subsequent enhancement of cowpea growth. Environmental Sustainability 2, 89–94 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42398-019-00047-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42398-019-00047-3

Keywords

Navigation