Abstract
Spot blotch is an alarming disease for wheat caused by the anamorphic stage (Bipolaris sorokiniana) generally but it’s rare when it caused by telomorphic stage (Cochliobolus sativus). The present study reveals molecular identification and pathogenic variability among the isolates of C. sativus in F2 generation. Each of the C. sativus (F2 generation) isolates was identified and confirmed following ITS rDNA sequence analysis. Internal transcribed spacers (ITS) region sequence reference was KC311473.1and EF452447.1. For determining pathogenic variability a susceptible wheat cultivar “Kanchan” was used. Seven components of disease development like infection frequency, lesion size, lesion cover, necrosis, secondary spore production, disease severity and per cent disease index were studied to understand the pathogenic variability. All components of disease development showed positive co-efficient relation with each other. Non-significant relationships were observed between necrosis and secondary spore production, disease index and per cent disease index. Cumulatively infection frequency and lesion size showed 77.95% variation. According to per cent disease index and secondary spore production isolate CSF2-32 and CSF2-58 were most virulent and aggressive ones among the tested isolates. A cluster analysis indicated that the isolates exhibited distinct differential virulence patterns with five groups supported by a dendrogram figure.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Arabi MIE, Jawhar M (2002) Virulence spectrum to barley (Hordiumvulgari L.) in some isolates of Cochliobolus sativus from Syria. J of Plant Pathol 84(1):35–39
Asad S, Iftikhar S, MunirA AI, Ayub N (2007) Pathogenic diversity in Bipolaris sorokiniana isolates collected from different wheat growing areas of the Punjab and NWFP of Pakistan. Pak J Bot 39(6):2225–2231
BBS (2019) Statistical year book of Bangladesh. Bangladesh Bureau of Statistics, Planning Division, Ministry of Planning, Government of the People’s Republic of Bangladesh.www.bbs.gov.bd
Bouajila A, Zoghlami N, Al Ahmed M, Baum M, Ghorbel A, Nazari K (2012) Pathogenicity spectra and screening for resistance in barley against Tunisian Pyrenophora tere sf. teres. Plant Dis 96:1569–1575
Burdon JJ, Silk J (1997) Sources and patterns of diversity in plant pathogenic fungi. Phytopathol 87:664–669
Chand R, Singh HV, Joshi AK, Duveiller E (2002) Physiological and morphological aspects of Bipolaris sorokiniana conidia surviving on wheat straw. Eur J Plant Pathol 18:328–332
Chand R, Pandey SP, Singh H, Kumar VS, Joshi AK (2003) Variability and its probable cause in natural populations of spot blotch pathogen Bipolaris sorokiniana of wheat (T. Aestivum L.) in India. J Plant Dis Protect 110:27–35
Chang D, Keinan A (2014) Principal component analysis characterizes shared pathogenetics from genome-wide association studies. PloSComputBiol 10(9):e1003820. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003820
Chauhan PK, Singh DP, Karwasram SS (2017) Morphological and pathogenic variability in Bipolaris sorokiniana causing spot blotch in wheat (Triticum aestivum, T. durum, T. dicoccum) in India. Int J CurrMicrobiol App Sci 6:3499–3520
Chowdhury AK, Singh G, Tyagi BV, Ojha A, Dhar T, Bhattacharya PM (2013) India Spot blotch disease of wheat—a new thrust area for sustaining productivity. J Wheat Res 5:1–11
Cumagun CJR, Miedaner T (2003) Aggressiveness of 42 isolates of gibberellazeae (Fusarium graminearum) in wheat under field and greenhouse conditions. J Plant Dis Protect 110:554–559
Duveiller E, Garcia Altamirano I (2000) Pathogenicity of Bipolaris sorokiniana isolates from wheat roots, leaves and grains in Mexico. Plant Pathol 49(2):235–242
Esposito MA, Milanesi LA, Martin EA (2007) Principal component analysis based on morphological characters in Pea (Pisum sativum L.). Int J Plant Breed 1(2):135–137
Gupta PK, Chand R, Vasistha NK, Pandey SP, Kumar U, Mishra VK, Joshi AK (2018) Spot blotch disease of wheat: the current status of research on genetics and breeding. Plant Pathol 67:508–531
Hetzler J, Eyal Z, Metha YR, Campos LA, Fehrmann H, Kushnir U, Zekaria-Oren J, Cohen L (1991) Interaction between spot blotch (Cochliobolus sativus) and wheat cultivars. A proceeding of the International conference. CIMMYT. Mexico pp 146–164
Jaiswal SK, Sweta S, Prasad LC, Sharma S, Kumar S, Prasad R, Pandey SP, Chand R, Joshi AK (2007) Identification of molecular marker and aggressiveness for different groups of Bipolaris sorokiniana isolates causing spot blotch disease in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). CurrMicrobiol 55:135–141
Jeger MJ, Gareth Jones D, Griffiths E (1983) Components of partial resistance of wheat seedlings to Septorianodorum. Euphytica 32:575–584
Karim MR, Awal MA, Akter M (2010) Forecasting of wheat production in Bangladesh. Bangladesh J Agr Res 35:17–28
Kumar P, Rai RC (2019) Spot blotch: a threat to wheat in changing climate-an overview. Int J Pharmacogn 8:326–331
Lahr DJ, Parfrey LW, Mitchell EA, Katz LA, Lara E (2011) The chastity of amoebae: reevaluating evidence for sex in amoeboid organisms. Proc Royal Soc B 278:2081–2090
Mckinney HH (1923) Influence of soil temperature and moisture on infection of wheat seedlings by Helminthosporium sativum. J Agric Res 26:195–217
Raemakers RH (1988) Helminthosporium sativum: disease complex on wheat and sources of resistance in Zambia. In: Klatt AR (ed) Wheat production constraints in tropical environment. Cimmyt, Mexico, pp 175–186
Shewry PR, Hey SJ (2015) The contribution of wheat to human diet and health. Food Energy Secur 4(3):178–202. https://doi.org/10.1002/fes3.64
Siddique AB, Hossain MH, Duveiller E, Sharma RC (2006) Progress in wheat resistance to spot blotch in Bangladesh. J Phytol 154:16–22
Sultana S, Adhikary SK, Islam MM, Rahman SM (2017) Evaluation of pathogenic variability based on leaf blotch disease development components of Bipolaris sorokiniana in Triticum aestivum and Agro climatic origin. Plant Pathol J 34:93–103
Sultana S, Adhikary SK, Rahman SM, Islam MM (2018) Sexuality and compatibility of Bipolaris sorokiniana and segregation pattern in teleomorph (Cochliobolus sativus) geographic origin and segregation ratio. Indian Phytopathol 71:1–14
Tinline RD (1951) Studies on the perfect stage of Helminthosporium sativum. Can J Bot 29:467–478
Tinline RD (1958) Pathogenic and cultural variation in Cochliobolus sativus. Trans Br MycolSoc 43:696–697
Tinline KD, Dickson JG (1958) Cochliobolus sativus. I. Perithecial development and the inheritance of spore color and mating type. Mycologia 50:697–706
Tsui CK, Woodhall J, Chen W, Lévesque CA, Lau A, Schoen CD, Baschien C, Najafzadeh MJ, de Hoog GS (2011) Molecular techniques for pathogen identification and fungus detection in the environment. IMA Fungus 2(2):177–189
Valjavec-Gratian M, Steffenson BJ (1997) Pathotypes of Cochliobolus sativus on barley. Plant Dis 81:1275–1278
White TJ, Bruns TD, Lee S, Taylor J (1990) Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics. In: Innis M, Gelfand D, Shinsky J, White TJ (eds) PCR protocols: a guide to methods and applications. Academic Press, San Diego, pp 315–322. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-372180-8.50042-1
Acknowledgements
The authors are grateful to Ministry of education of Bangladesh for providing fund to conduct the experiment successfully.
Funding
The research was funded by the Ministry of Education of the Government of the People’s Republic of Bangladesh.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
Maliha Momtaz, Sabiha Sultana, Chhoa Mondal, Md. Rejaul Islam and Rakhi Deb Nath declares that they have no conflict of interest.
Consent to participate
Authors are willing to participate.
Consent for publication
Authors are eager to publish.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Momtaz, M., Sultana, S., Mondal, C. et al. Molecular identification and pathogenic variability in F2 generation of Cochliobolus sativus. Indian Phytopathology 74, 911–917 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42360-021-00380-w
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42360-021-00380-w