Advertisement

Indian Phytopathology

, Volume 71, Issue 3, pp 393–397 | Cite as

Management of rose powdery mildew (Podosphaera pannosa) through ecofriendly approaches

  • Vijay KumarEmail author
  • Sunita Chandel
Research Article
  • 1 Downloads

Abstract

Powdery mildew is the one of the most severe and devastating disease of roses under protected cultivation. So under this study we have tried different ecofriendly approaches to manage the disease with the use of seven biological control agents (BCAs), nine bio-products and eight plant extracts. Under In vitro studies the highest efficacy was obtained with Bacillus subtilis, neem oil and Allium sativus at their higher concentrations. Among the BCAs the highest disease control was observed in Ampelomyces quisqualis (78.51%), Bacillus subtilis (74.12%), Verticillium lecanii (70.55%) and Trichoderma harzianum (67.33%) under the greenhouse conditions. From the bio-products best disease control was obtained with neem oil (76.18%) at 5% concentration. The best disease control was obtained with plant extract of Allium sativus (71.87%) at 20% concentration.

Keywords

Powdery mildew Biological control agents Bio-products Plant extracts 

References

  1. Apte AR, Kamble SS (2008) Efficacy of carbendazim in combating castor blight in western Maharashtra. Bioinfolet 5:73–74Google Scholar
  2. Channamma SG, Mahesh M, Kushal S (2015) Evaluation of botanical and biocontrol agents against the spore germination of Leveilulla taurica causing powdery mildew of gaur. Int J Trop Agric 33:3521–3523Google Scholar
  3. Chee AA, Wurms KV, George M (2011) Control of powdery mildew (Sphaerotheca pannosa var. rosae) on rose (Rosa L. sp.) using anhydrous milk fat and soybean oil emulsions. New Zealand Plant Protect 64:195–200Google Scholar
  4. Chovatiya AJ (2010) Management of powdery mildew disease of fenugreek (Trigonella foenum graecum L.). M.Sc. Thesis, Agricultural University, Junagadh, Gujrat, India, 57Google Scholar
  5. Elsharkawy K, Nagwa MM, Kamel MSM (2014) Biological control of powdery and downy mildews of cucumber under greenhouse conditions. Egypt J Biol Pest Co 24:407–414Google Scholar
  6. Gastelum FR, Rodriguez GH, Valenzuela CM (2014) First report of powdery mildew (Podosphaera pannosa) of roses in Sinaloa, Mexico. Plant Dis 98:1442CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Janice FE, Haselhan C, Punja ZK (2011) Evaluation of biological control agents for control of botrytis blight of geranium and powdery mildew of rose. Can J Plant Pathol 33:499–505CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Kim YS, Song JG, Lee I, Yeo WH, Yun BS (2013) Bacillus sp. BS061 suppresses powdery mildew and gray mold. Mycobiology 41:108–111CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  9. Kraus W (1995) Biologically active ingredients-azadirachtin and other triterpenoids. In: The Neem Tree Azadirachta indica A. Juss and Other Meliaceous Plants (Schutterer ed). Weinheim, New York, pp 35–88Google Scholar
  10. Mahalakshmi P, Alice D (2013) Management of powdery mildew (Erisiphe polygoni) disease in green gram by plant extract. Int J Appl Biores 18:23–29Google Scholar
  11. McKinney HH (1923) Influence of soil temperature and moisture on infection of wheat seedlings by Helminthosporium sativum. J Agric Res. 26:195–217Google Scholar
  12. Odell DE, Smith J (1982) A simple method for spore germination studies. Bull Br Mycol Soc 16:159–161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Raja SA (2010) Management of powdery mildew, Phyllactinia corylea (Pers.) Karst of Mulberry (Morus sp.) using chosen biocontrol agents. J Biopest 3:483–486Google Scholar
  14. Romero D, Vicentea AD, Zeriouha H, Cazorlaa FM, Ortunob D, Toresb JA, Garcia PA (2007) Evaluation of biological control agents for managing cucurbit powdery mildew on greenhouse grown melon. Plant Pathol 56:976–986CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Sahni ML (1987) Reaction of some rose cultivars to powdery mildew fungus. Indian Phytopathol 40:534–535Google Scholar
  16. Tobamy MRA, Moity AEI, Atia M, Moneim MLA (2002) Evaluation of some plant extracts in control of damping-off and mildew diseases of cucumber. Egypt J Phytopathol 30:71–80Google Scholar
  17. Wojdyla AT (2000) Influence of some compounds on development of Sphaerotheca pannosa var. rosae. J Plant Prot Res 40:106–121Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Indian Phytopathological Society 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Plant PathologyDr. Y.S, Parmar University of Horticulture and ForestrySolanIndia

Personalised recommendations