Advertisement

Indian Phytopathology

, Volume 71, Issue 3, pp 385–391 | Cite as

Studies on biology and environmental factors affecting the development of tomato powdery mildew under protected cultivation

  • Arushi Rana
  • A. B. Malannavar
  • D. K. BanyalEmail author
Research Article
  • 6 Downloads

Abstract

The morphological and molecular characterization using primers EryF and EryR confirmed the associated pathogen with collected samples of tomato powdery mildew as Oidium neolycopersici. Incubation and latent period of the pathogen under in vitro was 4 and 5 days, respectively, however it was 5 days for both under in vivo. Effect of weather variables on the disease development in March 30th and August 30th transplanted crop showed that low temperature and high relative humidity were most favourable factors for disease development. The studies on colonization behavior of the pathogen showed that tissue colonization was directly proportional to the disease severity.

Keywords

Tomato Powdery mildew Oidium neolycopersici Biology Colonization behavior Incubation and latent period 

References

  1. Anonymous (2015) Indian Horticulture Database. 2015. National Horticulture Board. Ministry of Agriculture and Farmers Welfare, Government of India. http://nhb.gov.in. Accessed June 2016
  2. Attanayake RN, Glawe DA, Dugan FM, Chen W (2009) Erysiphe trifolii causing powdery mildew of lentil (Lens culinaris). Plant Dis 93:797–803.  https://doi.org/10.1094/PDIS-93-8-0797 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baiswar P, Braun U, Chandra S, Ngachan SV (2009) First report of an Oidium sp. [neolycopersici] on Solanum betaceum in India. Australas Plant Dis Notes 4:32–33Google Scholar
  4. Banyal DK, Chaudhary J, Singh A (2015) Evaluation of pea (Pisum sativum) germplasm for inheritance of resistance to powdery mildew (Erysiphe pisi). Indian Phytopathol 68(2):166–171Google Scholar
  5. Boiteux LS (1994) Powdery mildew of potato caused by Erysiphe cichoracearum in Brazil. Plant Dis 78:830.  https://doi.org/10.1094/PD-78-0830B CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Burgerjon A, Nicot PC, Bertrand F, Blancard D (1990) Early powdery mildew of greenhouse-grown tomatoes in France. (Abstr.). J Phytopathol 80:1063Google Scholar
  7. Campbell RN, Scheuerman RW (1979) Oidiopsis taurica on processing tomatoes in the central valley of California. Plant Dis Rep 63:1087Google Scholar
  8. Cerkauskas R (2005) The world vegetable fact sheet; Tomato Diseases Powdery Mildew. The World Vegetable Center, ShanhuaGoogle Scholar
  9. Cerkauskas RF, Ferguson G, Banik M (2011) Powdery mildew (Leveillula taurica) on greenhouse and field peppers in Ontario-host range, cultivar response and disease management strategies. Can J Plant Pathol 33:485–498CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Correll JC, Gordon TR, Elliot VJ (1987) Host range, specificity and biometrical measurements of Leveillula taurica in California. Plant Dis 71:248–251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Correll JC, Villarroel MI, McLeod PJ, Cazon MI, Rivadeneria C (2005) First report of powdery mildew caused by Leveillula taurica on tomato and pepper in Bolivia. Plant Dis 89:776CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gupta SK, Gupta A, Shyam KR, Bhardwaj R (2001) Morphological characterization and effect of meteorological factors on development of cucumber powdery mildew. Indian Phytopathol 54(3):311–315Google Scholar
  13. Ivic D, Milicevic T, Cvjetkovic B (2008) First Croatian report of powdery mildew on tomato caused by Oidium neolycopersici. New Dis Rep 18:35Google Scholar
  14. Jacob D, David DR, Elad Y (2007) Biology and biological control of tomato powdery mildew (Oidium neolycopersici). Bull OILB/SROP 30:329–332Google Scholar
  15. Jones H, Whipps JM, Gurr SJ (2001) Tomato powdery mildew fungus Oidium neolycopersici. Mol Plant Pathol 2:303–309CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Kiss L, Cook RTA, Saenz GS, Cunnington JH, Takamatsu S, Pascoe I, Bardin M, Nicot PC, Sato Y, Rossman AY (2001) Identification of two powdery mildew, Oidium neolycopersici and Oidium lycopersici, infecting tomato in different parts of the world. Mycol Res 105:684–697CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kiss L, Takamatsu S, Cunnington JH (2005) Molecular identification of Oidium neolycopersici as the causal agent of the recent tomato powdery mildew epidemics in North America. Plant Dis 89:491–496.  https://doi.org/10.1094/PD-89-0491 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Koike ST, Saenz GS (1999) Powdery mildew of spearmint caused by Erysiphe orontii in California. Plant Dis 8:399CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kontaxis DG, Van MA (1978) Powdery mildew of tomato—a new disease in the United States. Plant Dis Rep 62:892–893Google Scholar
  20. Li CW, Pei DL, Wang WJ, Ma YS, Wang L, Wang F, Liu JL, Zhu WM (2008) First report of powdery mildew caused by Oidium neolycopersici on tomato in China. Plant Dis 92:1370.  https://doi.org/10.1094/PDIS-92-9-1370C CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Marois JJ, Momol MT, Kimbrough JW, Hochmuth RC, Dankers W (2001) First report of powdery mildew on greenhouse tomatoes caused by Oidium neolycopersici in Florida. Plant Dis 85:1292CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Mieslerova B, Lebeda A (2010) Influence of temperature and light conditions on germination, growth and conidiation of Oidium neolycopersici. J Phytopathol 158:616–627.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0434.2009.01663 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Montilla JO, Gonzalez MS, Renaud D (2007) First report of powdery mildew on tomato caused by Oidium neolycopersici in Venezuela. Plant Dis 91:910CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Murray HG, Thompson WF (1980) Rapid isolation of high molecular weight plant DNA. Nucleic Acids Res 8:4321–4325CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  25. Neupane AC, Subedi RC (2010) Tomato powdery mildew (Pseudoidium neolycopersici). http://www.plantwise.org. Accessed June 2016
  26. Serawit Y, Fanos T (2016) Review on distribution, biology and management of tomato powdery mildew (O. neolycopersici). J Biol Agric Healthc 6(3):109–116Google Scholar
  27. Shankar R, Harsha S, Bhandary R (2014) A practical guide to identification and control of tomato diseases. P 24 TROPICA SEEDS PVT LTD|No 54, South End Road, 1st Floor, Nama Aurore Building, Basavangudi, Bangalore 560004, IndiaGoogle Scholar
  28. Sheng Z, Yu CU, Hua Y, Jun SX, Wei H, Feng JJ, Rong SC, Wei C (2011) Occurrence of powdery mildew of autumn delayed tomato cultivated in facilities soilless matrix and test of its pesticide control. Xinjiang Agric Sci 48:369–373Google Scholar
  29. Stevanovic M, Stankovic I, Vucurovic A, Dolovac N, Pfaf-Dolovac E, Krstic B, Bulajic A (2012) First report of Oidium neolycopersici on greenhouse tomatoes in Serbia. Plant Dis 96:912CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Tamura K, Stecher G, Peterson D, Filipski A, Kumar S (2013) MEGA6: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 6.0. Mol Biol Evol 30:2725–2729.  https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/mst197 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  31. Yolageldi L, Sin B, Onogur E (2008) First report of Oidium neolycopersici on tomatoes in Turkey. Plant Pathol 57:373CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Indian Phytopathological Society 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Plant PathologyCSK HPKVPalampurIndia

Personalised recommendations