Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Assessing Gas Leakage Detection Performance Using Machine Learning with Different Modalities

  • Regular Paper
  • Published:
Transactions on Electrical and Electronic Materials Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Artificial intelligence technologies are reviving the entire proactive repair system for leakage issues in industries with a real-time strategy for the current era of industry 4.0. In the present work, Gas sensor and an infrared thermography is used in this work to analyze the effectiveness of finding gas leaks. The effectiveness of the proposed work is to extract the statistical features from gas sensor and infrared thermography to identify gas leaks. Moreover, different machine learning methods are renowned for performing exceptionally well in classification tasks, to obtain accurate categorization. To properly identify and classify gas leakages, four separate categories have been established on the most popular online dataset. On a different gas leakage dataset, different tests have been conducted to verify the methodology and evaluated our strategy against other machine learning techniques that are frequently employed in gas leakage detection. The results show how well the proposed method works for precisely identifying and categorizing gas leaks. The comparison analysis demonstrates the different machine learning methods and their superiority in terms of efficiency and classification precision.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Yu. Zhang, Xu. Jiaqiang Wang, X.H. Bian, L. Qi, A continuous gas leakage localization method based on an improved beamforming algorithm. Measurement 106, 143–151 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. D. Goyal, A. Choudhary, B.S. Pabla, S.S. Dhami, Support vector machines based non-contact fault diagnosis system for bearings. J. Intell. Manuf. 31, 1275–1289 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Xu. Zhang, W. Jin, J. Li, X. Wang, S. Li, Minimum detectable gas concentration performance evaluation method for gas leak infrared imaging detection systems. Appl. Opt. 56(10), 2952–2959 (2017)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. J. Liniger, N. Sepehri, M. Soltani, H.C. Pedersen, Signal-based gas leakage detection for fluid power accumulators in wind turbines. Energies 10(3), 331 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Q. Xiao, J. Li, J. Sun, H. Feng, S. Jin, Natural-gas pipeline leak location using variational mode decomposition analysis and cross-time–frequency spectrum. Measurement 124, 163–172 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. P. Narkhede, R. Walambe, P. Chandel, S. Mandaokar, K. Kotecha, MultimodalGasData: multimodal dataset for gas detection and classification. Data 7(8), 112 (2022)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. W.H. Png, H.S. Lin, C.H. Pua, F.A. Rahman, Pipeline monitoring and leak detection using loop integrated Mach Zehnder Interferometer optical fiber sensor. Opt. Fiber Technol. 46, 221–225 (2018)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. P. Stajanca, S. Chruscicki, T. Homann, S. Seifert, D. Schmidt, A. Habib, Detection of leak-induced pipeline vibrations using fiber: optic distributed acoustic sensing. Sensors 18(9), 2841 (2018)

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. J.Li, Y. Liu, Y. Chai, H. He, M. Gao, A small leakage detection approach for gas pipelines based on CNN. In 2019 CAA Symposium on fault detection, supervision and safety for technical processes (SAFEPROCESS), pp. 390–394. IEEE (2019)

  10. M. Zhou, Q. Zhang, Y. Liu, X. Sun, Y. Cai, H. Pan, An integration method using kernel principal component analysis and cascade support vector data description for pipeline leak detection with multiple operating modes. Processes 7(10), 648 (2019)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. R. Xiao, Hu. Qunfang, J. Li, Leak detection of gas pipelines using acoustic signals based on wavelet transform and support vector machine. Measurement 146, 479–489 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. M.A. Adegboye, W.K. Fung, A. Karnik, Recent advances in pipeline monitoring and oil leakage detection technologies: principles and approaches. Sensors 19(11), 2548 (2019)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. R. Doshmanziari, H. Khaloozadeh, A. Nikoofard, Gas pipeline leakage detection based on sensor fusion under model-based fault detection framework. J. Petrol. Sci. Eng. 184, 106581 (2020)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. C. Wang, F. Han, Y. Zhang, Lu. Jingyi, An SAE-based resampling SVM ensemble learning paradigm for pipeline leakage detection. Neurocomputing 403, 237–246 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. M. Meribout, L. Khezzar, A. Azzi, N. Ghendour, Leak detection systems in oil and gas fields: present trends and future prospects. Flow Meas. Instrum. 75, 101772 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. I. Amini, Y. Jing, T. Chen, A. Colin, G. Meyer, A two-stage deep-learning based detection method for pipeline leakage and transient conditions. In: 2020 IEEE Electric power and energy conference (EPEC), pp. 1–5. IEEE (2020)

  17. F. Ning, Z. Cheng, Di. Meng, S. Duan, J. Wei, Enhanced spectrum convolutional neural architecture: an intelligent leak detection method for gas pipeline. Process. Saf. Environ. Prot. 146, 726–735 (2021)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. D. Song, K. Lee, C. Phark, S. Jung, Spatiotemporal and layout-adaptive prediction of leak gas dispersion by encoding-prediction neural network. Process. Saf. Environ. Prot. 151, 365–372 (2021)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. S.C. Christos, G. Fotis, G. Nektarios, R. Dimitris, P. Areti, S.Dimitrios, Autonomous low-cost wireless sensor platform for leakage detection in oil and gas pipes. in 2021 10th International Conference on Modern Circuits and Systems Technologies (MOCAST), pp. 1–4. IEEE (2021)

  20. Q. Tan, Mu. Xiaowei, Fu. Ming, H. Yuan, J. Sun, G. Liang, Lu. Sun, A new sensor fault diagnosis method for gas leakage monitoring based on the naive Bayes and probabilistic neural network classifier. Measurement 194, 111037 (2022)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. D. Yang, N. Hou, Lu. Jingyi, D. Ji, Novel leakage detection by ensemble 1DCNN-VAPSO-SVM in oil and gas pipeline systems. Appl. Soft Comput. 115, 108212 (2022)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. J. Lu, F. Yunqiu, J. Yue, L. Zhu, D. Wang, H. Zhongrui, Natural gas pipeline leak diagnosis based on improved variational modal decomposition and locally linear embedding feature extraction method. Process. Saf. Environ. Prot. (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2022.05.043

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. H. Chen, X. Fan, W. Fang, B. Zhang, S. Cao, Q. Sun, D. Wang et al., High-Q Fano resonances in all-dielectric metastructures for enhanced optical biosensing applications. Biomed. Opt. Exp. 15(1), 294–305 (2024)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. X. Liu, S. Soares, L. Silva, A.J. Fernandes, R. Singh, B. Zhang, S. Kumar, C. Marques, SFFO Cortisol Biosensor: Highly sensitive S-flex fiber optic plasmonic biosensor for label-free cortisol detection. IEEE Sensors J. (2023). https://doi.org/10.1109/JSEN.2023.3336414

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. J. Wang, J. Ji, A.P. Ravikumar, S. Savarese, A.R. Brandt, VideoGasNet: deep learning for natural gas methane leak classification using an infrared camera. Energy 238, 121516 (2022)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. C. Spandonidis, P. Theodoropoulos, F. Giannopoulos, N. Galiatsatos, A. Petsa, Evaluation of deep learning approaches for oil & gas pipeline leak detection using wireless sensor networks. Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell. 113, 104890 (2022)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. A. Kopbayev, F. Khan, M. Yang, S.Z. Halim, Gas leakage detection using spatial and temporal neural network model. Process Saf. Environ. Protect. 160, 968–975 (2022)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Sensor and Optoelectronics Research Group, Department of Electrical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Patna, Bihta, Bihar, 801103, India

    Gaurav Kumar, Vivek Pratap Singh & Saurabh Kumar Pandey

Authors
  1. Gaurav Kumar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Vivek Pratap Singh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Saurabh Kumar Pandey
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Saurabh Kumar Pandey.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kumar, G., Singh, V.P. & Pandey, S.K. Assessing Gas Leakage Detection Performance Using Machine Learning with Different Modalities. Trans. Electr. Electron. Mater. (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42341-024-00545-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42341-024-00545-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation